Jump to content

User talk:AnuYog: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnuYog (talk | contribs)
AnuYog (talk | contribs)
Line 238: Line 238:


Be warned, if you continue to make pointless unblock requests like the one above, you will lose access to this talk page. Please consider removing the above request before it is declined. Then write an unblock request that addresses the concerns which lead to your block. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 20:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Be warned, if you continue to make pointless unblock requests like the one above, you will lose access to this talk page. Please consider removing the above request before it is declined. Then write an unblock request that addresses the concerns which lead to your block. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 20:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|My account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. I read about that on its page, but I didn't understand that much. Can I request for a clearer explanation?}}

Revision as of 20:42, 27 December 2019

Welcome

Hello, Yogeshvidyasagar, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Wham2001 (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hampi (Marathi Movie) (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AnuYog! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hampi (film) (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:48, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hampi (film) (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghanada (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Etothepi were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
eπ/💬 21:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hampi (film) has been accepted

Hampi (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nizil (talk) 07:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghanada (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 05:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghanada (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. eπ/💬 16:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghanada (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 19:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swiftships, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghanada (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnuYog (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm totally new here & learning a lot of things. May I know what is my mistake? I'm ready to learn & correct my mistake. I'm not aware about my mistake. If I did mistake, it was not intentional. Kindly help.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Be warned, if you continue to make pointless unblock requests like the one above, you will lose access to this talk page. Please consider removing the above request before it is declined. Then write an unblock request that addresses the concerns which lead to your block. --Yamla (talk) 20:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

AnuYog (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. I read about that on its page, but I didn't understand that much. Can I request for a clearer explanation?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. I read about that on its page, but I didn't understand that much. Can I request for a clearer explanation? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. I read about that on its page, but I didn't understand that much. Can I request for a clearer explanation? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. I read about that on its page, but I didn't understand that much. Can I request for a clearer explanation? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}