User talk:WackyWikiWoo

Welcome!

Hello, WackyWikiWoo, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 04:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

WackyWikiWoo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WackyWikiWoo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ultimate Custom Night.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ultimate Custom Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Storm Area 51

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Storm Area 51 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Storm Area 51

The article Storm Area 51 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Storm Area 51 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Place (Reddit)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Place (Reddit) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Place (Reddit)

The article Place (Reddit) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Place (Reddit) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Storm Area 51

On 29 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Storm Area 51, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Storm Area 51" was a comedic Facebook event intended as a raid on Area 51 in search of aliens? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Storm Area 51. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Storm Area 51), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

WackyWikiWoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn’t aware making accounts for quick edits here and there was not allowed. I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its “purpose”. I have not used any of these accounts to make disruptive edits. I understand the rule now and will not do this again. WackyWikiWoo (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I wasn’t aware making accounts for quick edits here and there was not allowed. I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its “purpose”. I have not used any of these accounts to make disruptive edits. I understand the rule now and will not do this again. [[User:WackyWikiWoo|WackyWikiWoo]] ([[User talk:WackyWikiWoo#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I wasn’t aware making accounts for quick edits here and there was not allowed. I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its “purpose”. I have not used any of these accounts to make disruptive edits. I understand the rule now and will not do this again. [[User:WackyWikiWoo|WackyWikiWoo]] ([[User talk:WackyWikiWoo#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I wasn’t aware making accounts for quick edits here and there was not allowed. I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its “purpose”. I have not used any of these accounts to make disruptive edits. I understand the rule now and will not do this again. [[User:WackyWikiWoo|WackyWikiWoo]] ([[User talk:WackyWikiWoo#top|talk]]) 15:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Unblock discussion

• What other accounts have you used for editing?
• Please read and affirm understanding of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Alternative account notification. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra: The main account I have used is this one, the others were “throwaway” accounts I created, not knowing about the policy you’ve linked. I have read and understood it now.WackyWikiWoo (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Please disclose the complete list of other accounts you have used. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: They’re on the investigation page, but I’ll reproduce them here:

• Hyo14225 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Heaveho672 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Gagao091 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Habada245 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Heyo2346 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Gnaome162 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Wedstox346 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Sunman120 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Cartrisge273 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Covid12 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Shahahaha (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

WackyWikiWoo (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Nothing you've said is truthful. Take a look at Category:Requests for unblock and see that your request has been seen by the project's admins for a week and no one is accepting of your story. Now, you can double down and try to insist that you have been truthful with us or you can revise your unblock request and be honest with us this time.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: I’m not sure why what I’ve said is so surely untruthful. Given that none of the edits were disruptive, I don’t know what you believe the purpose of these accounts to be other than what I’ve said. I did not know of the rule, and have stated I understand the rule now and I won’t do it again. Even if you think I am lying, can’t I be unblocked on the basis that I understand the rule and won’t make the same mistake again? WackyWikiWoo (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)