User talk:Mikeanand
Darbhanga
Why is it that despite Indian census report provided some miscreants has projected Darbhanga as the 5th largest city of Bihar whereas fact provided in the census clearly show Purnea being the 5th largest city in terms of population and area. Kindly check the facts and request darbhanga editors to stop misleading people through Wikipedia. Even in Bihar Wikipedia page you can see darbhanga is behind Purnea in terms of area and population. Let the world trust Wikipedia. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajit.usp (talk • contribs) 07:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ajit.usp: I tried to fix some of those errors. I will try to fix those errors again in a few hours. There seems to be some confusion due to different census figures for Urban Agglomerations (UA) and Municipal corporations. Thanks.—Jakichandan (talk) 07:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
On which criteria you are ranking the cities,population is not the only way of comparing two cities.population density in city of purnia is 3058 while of darbhanga is 16,058 which is way more than of purnia,cities can only be compared or ranked on the basis of development of medical, commercial and education and transportation facility.in which darbhanga is way ahead. Uday1990 (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
@Uday1990: We are not comparing the development but only giving population wise rank in the lead and the info box. You can also add density figures if you wish. Thanks. —Jakichandan (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pratyush (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Indian defence services
You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Jakichandan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)
Greetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Why removed my edits on Tirhuta page ?
I fully cited the claims that I made on Tirhuta page. Why did you remove it? Ancient stone carvings identified as Tirhuta script has been found in Simroungarh of Nepal by the Department of Archaeology in Nepal. This information is not misleading by any means. It's fully substantiated. The journal published by the Department of Archaeology that I cited even contains an image of the writings found at the excavated cite. Scyfie (talk) 19:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@Scyfie: You changed the date of use of tirhuta script without proper explanation. Please use the edit summary to properly describe and explain your changes, although it is not compulsory, it helps other users to understand what you did. Thanks. Jakichandan (talk) 02:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution
In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
- (a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
- (b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
- Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
- Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maithili language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bokaro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Project Tiger Writing Contest
In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:
- Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
- List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
- Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
- For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest
Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).
Don't delete talk page posts
Please stop deleting talk page posts, either use the archiver bot or manually archive but don't delete/blank just because posts are old. —SpacemanSpiff 09:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @SpacemanSpiff: Got it. Thanks. Jakichandan (talk) 10:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @SpacemanSpiff: Is it OK to delete some completely far from fact and unsourced claims made by some IPs on the talk pages. Jakichandan (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- See WP:TPG, content on talk pages don't have to be sourced, they just have to be related to the article; while personal attacks and straight up vandalism can be removed, it is not good practice to remove something from the talk page just because it's unsourced. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 13:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Raj Darbhanga
I have had to revert you at Raj Darbhanga. Your recent edits to the History section took our statements well away from what the source says. You can't do that. - Sitush (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
@Sitush: Thank you for correcting the errors. Actually this probably happened as I could only partially revert the edits by IPs. I will take care from next time onwards. Thanks again. — Jakichandan (talk) 00:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
This edit by an IP should have been reverted completely not just partially but I somehow missed it. Thanks. — Jakichandan (talk) 00:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Sitamarhi
Jakichandan ji, it was wrongly written so I just chaged with the same reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pm.madhav (talk • contribs) 14:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Pm.madhav: What you are claiming should be supported by reliable sources. Is your claim supported by the already present reference? If not, you need to cite other reliable sources. Moreover, your edits also had some grammatical errors, they also need to be fixed. Thanks.—Jakichandan (talk) 14:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Administrators noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding accusations. The thread is Unsubstantiated accusations of being part of a "sockfarm. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Good Puppy Heaven (talk) 12:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
unsupported Maithili edit
Since someone's turned it into an edit war, I thought I should comment on your edit at Languages of India. You counted Maithili as Hindi while claiming you were not, and in addition duplicated it in the table, which means you counted it twice. In addition, the census figure you used is demonstrably incorrect. (There are about 40M speakers of Maithili, not 13M. Most speakers reported their language as 'Hindi' or 'Bihari' in the 2011 census, which is officially what it was when they went to school.) Maithili also does not fit in the table, as the source does not mention it. Whether it's official is irrelevant -- there's no purpose to adding languages to the table when our source does not have the numbers of L2 and L3 speakers for them. — kwami (talk) 00:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami: I didn't revert your edit after you clarified in your edit summary. Someone else reverted your edits, Maybe, you should discuss with them to know why they reverted your edits. Thanks. —Jakichandan (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Sorry for pestering you with unnecessary comments. I did comment on their talk page, but figured I should say something to you too, so everyone's on the same page. — kwami (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami: My edit was a good faith edit, and I thought Maithili wouldn't have been included in Hindi as it is recognised as a distinct language. The census mentions about 13M figure, so I mentioned it. I was in no way intending to "falsify" sources. By the way, are those 13m or so who actually reported their mother tongue as Maithili, also included in Hindi belt figures, in our article? Thanks. —Jakichandan (talk) 01:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for being irritable. (The last edit-war I was in was with someone threatening a block for me saying that England is a country like Greenland is, despite consensus for just that on the talk page. Idiots like that make me short-tempered with everyone, which I usually end up regretting.)
Yes, the figure for Hindi includes Maithili. There's a comment in the coding for what was included.
The figures are a bit ambiguous. For instance, suppose someone speaks Awadhi as L1 and "Hindi" as L2. Are they counted as native Hindi speakers (from one source), L2-speakers (from another source), or both? I have no idea if even the one-to-two significant figures I left in the table are justified, but the article on L2-speakers didn't separate out Maithili. And we should probably check their sources. If they just took them from the 2001 census, then we should update those figures in the table too. — kwami (talk) 05:56, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chhath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bihari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Jakichandan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Udit Narayan
Hello ! Jakichandan page of Udit Narayan doesn’t seem legit. Please edit the label of Indian playback singer . His place of birth is a controversial as he has told he was born in Saptari,Nepal to Nepal and told Bihar to India . Review page and edit his origin as Nepal. He might be living in India and taken Indian citizenship but also has a Nepali citizenship as his both parents were Nepalese and his natives still live in Bhardah,Saptari,Nepal. So basically according to him he was born in Bihar in his maternal house but still is a Nepalese origin. So request you to edit the page as he is not particularly an Indian . Go through the articles Please! Edit needed . [1] [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.34.22.68 (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Areas of Mithila
In Mithila Mahatmya the northern border of Mithila has been defined as "हिमालय वन" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scyfie (talk • contribs) 05:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Jakichandan, the Mithila_(region) page has citations that are based on ancient texts. And based on ancient texts, Mithila has double meanings. The claim was properly substantiated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scyfie (talk • contribs) 13:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Kingdom of Videhas
If you consider Mithila synonymous to Videha, then what was the capital of Videha called ? Manusmriti, Vishnupurana are more reliable sources than Gazettes like : http://lrc.bih.nic.in/Gazetteer/Saharsa/chapter-II.pdfScyfie (talk) 17:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Scyfie: What I believe or don't believe doesn't matter. Reliable sources do matter. And http://lrc.bih.nic.in/Gazetteer/Saharsa/chapter-II.pdf is a reliable source. We don't do WP:OR. Mythology and history are two different things. There has been Kingdoms and states whose name and capital's name has been the same. Moreover, the capital's name has been used as a synonym for the entire Kingdom or state in various cases. I think @Ponyo: might like to help. Thanks.—Jakichandan (talk) 17:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jakichandan: What if I show an equally reliable source that says Mithila was capital of Videha ? Would you still consider Mithila as synonym to Videha and revert my edits ?Scyfie (talk) 17:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Scyfie: There is no dispute over the fact that the term Mithila has been used to refer to the capital of the Kingdom of the Videhas. I am just saying that the same term i.e. Mithila has also been used as a synonym for the Kingdom of the Videhas. Thanks. —Jakichandan (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jakichandan: So When I put Mithila as capital in the infobox of Videha page, why did you still revert it ?Scyfie (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Scyfie: Because in the same edit you made some other modifications also and removed things like "also known as Mithila". Thanks. —Jakichandan (talk) 17:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Mithila (ancient city) page
You have removed Farsi name of Mithila, calling it "not a native language". Farsi was used in the areas identified as Mithila in the article during the Islamic rule. Hence Farsi name can also be included as its native name. The Brahmipublication reference has this thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scyfie (talk • contribs) 06:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Scyfie: There is a difference between native language and official language. Thanks.—Jakichandan (talk) 07:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Request
Namaskar. You are doing good work for history of Bihar and Mithila. I don't have an account so could you please create "Category:Kingdoms of Bihar" so that all of our kings like Oiniwar Dynasty, Raj Darbhanga and Kharagpur Raj can be collected into once place? Thank you.103.12.211.44 (talk) 17:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Please note that the Vikram Samvat widely used in India from ancient times, and still used is not the same as the Nepali Bikram samvat. Nepali Bikram samvat is a relatively modern invention (1901 AD [3]). It is unfortunate that the article conflates the two and creates confusion.
Jakichandan: can you explain whey you removed the following?
- The classical Vikram Samvat in India, the months are lunar. The classical Vikram Samvat is either Chaitradi (North India, starting from Chaitra) or Kartikadi (Gujarat, Maharashtra, starting from Kartika).
Malaiya (talk) 17:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Malaiya: The article is confusing and I just removed some content due to lack of the citation of reliable sources. Please feel free to add information with reliable sources. Also just wanted to ask isn't classical Vikram Samvat used also in Eastern India?—Jakichandan (talk) 17:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Jakichandan: The dividing line between Chaitradi Vikram Samvat and the Kartikadi Vikram Samvat occurrs along the Rajasthan/Gujarat and MP/Maharashtra borders. The Bangali calendar, and the Maithili calendar are fasli (i.e. tropical solar) calendars. So the the new Nepali Bikram samvat. Pahela Baishakh marks the beginning of these calendars which is widely celebrated in Eastern India. Because these calendars are tropical, they synchronize closely with the Gregorian calendar. Traditional Vikram Samvat is strictly sidereal, i.e. is based on the movement of the sun across the nakshatras. Malaiya (talk) 00:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Indian people is for individual biographies, not articles about groups of people.Rathfelder (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Rathfelder: Got it. Thanks. –Jakichandan (talk) 10:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Kapilavastu (ancient city)
I humbly apologize for my error, which I realized immediately after I reverted your edit. I understand your point, and you are 100% correct. Tilaurakot is a Buddhist pilgrimage site in Nepal, while Piprahwa is a Buddhist pilgrimage site in India. Both of these places are purported to be the site of the ancient city of Kapilavastu. Have a nice day! DiverDave (talk)
WikiProject India
Namaste, Jakichandan. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Anti-Bihari sentiment
There's a deletion discussion on Anti-Bihari sentiment that you may be interested in.Thekua (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Purnea
Why you are adding wrong information on Wikipedia page. Satyabrat Shanu (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Satyabrat Shanu: I have reverted your edits on Purnia district because they failed WP:V and WP :RS. Please note that we don't use Wikipedia itself as a reliable source. Also note that Purnia district, the city of Purnia and Purnia lok sabha constituency are different from each other. Parts of Purnia district also lies in lok sabha constituencies other than Purnia lok sabha constituency, so they are also mentioned on Purnia district page. You are free to change if you have reliable sources to back your claims. Thanks. —Jakichandan (talk) 16:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Adding any private commercial thing on Wikipedia page.
Why are you adding this on Wikipedia page "A commercial complex called D. N. Roy Market (Aabha Complex) is setting up at Line Bazar." This has nothing to do with purnea page. Don't use wikipedia page for any commercial thing. Satyabrat Shanu (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- I am not adding it. It was there before your edit. I simply reverted your edit so it got added back. Thanks. —Jakichandan (talk) 17:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Ok fine. Satyabrat Shanu (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Maithili Academy, Bihar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article makes no statement of notability so it may be an attempted promotion. Can find nothing about this organization online, in any language, outside of their own promotions and social media.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
~Swarm~ {sting} 04:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maithili language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhubani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Recent unsourced edits by a user
Hi, regarding this unsourced edit. I typically try to add source after that user's unsourced edits (addition of content in infobox), in this particular case, I wasn't able to find anything in Ethnologue. Since you reverted their edit, I thought it is better to consult with you. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @Fylindfotberserk: I am tempted to think if this is a case of POV pushing.— Jakichandan (talk) 16:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Seems like it. After all their edits are mostly unsourced additions of Bhojpuri or anything related in articles, not to mention their name suggest that
. I've reverted them in the past where they were blatantly wrong, can't remember, perhaps trying to add Bhojpuri as regional language in a Magahi, Maithili or some other language dominated region. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Seems like it. After all their edits are mostly unsourced additions of Bhojpuri or anything related in articles, not to mention their name suggest that
- Exactly my thoughts.— Jakichandan (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Happy New Year, Jakichandan!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/93/Fuochi_d%27artificio.gif/212px-Fuochi_d%27artificio.gif)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Happy_new_year_01.svg/177px-Happy_new_year_01.svg.png)
Jakichandan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
@Fylindfotberserk: Wish you the same. Thank you so much. ‐ Jakichandan (talk) 09:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks and welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for this. Yesterday, I was probably not paying attention when I came across those changes. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
please tell me
I am not expert like you. But I am good and serious writer. Why did you undo my addition to karan kayastha? I write from standard source. Please tell me the reason. Waked Bold Ambushed (talk) 17:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Please explain. I am ready to listen and learn.
Hi Jakichandan,
Can you explain, in more detail, your reasons for removing the references in Anga area at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anga area? I've temporarily restored the content you removed so that a larger group of editors can examine the article's notability. Firsfron of Ronchester 18:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
@Firsfron of Ronchester: The content I removed was previously added by me while creating the page months ago. After properly reading WP:OR, I understand that it fails WP:OR and wp:v. Thanks.– Jakichandan (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Angika never used tirhiuta script in intire history
Don't fool us by using some fake contribution, Angika language never used Tirhuta Script in past history. you are not native angika speaker but I am. I know in which script angika used to written and that was kaithi only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Propriyam! (talk • contribs) 10:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Propriyam!: Please read wikipedia policies of wp:v. Also, take a look at WP:COI, since you have yourself said that you are a native Angika speaker. I have only reverted your edit to a previous version since you have not adequately explained why you removed sourced content. Regards. — Jakichandan (talk) 13:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Anon changing languages in Bihar-related articles
I see you have edited a few pages that I am concerned about, so I am asking you for advice and such. I reverted all of the anon's edits and others as well. I have no Indian background, so I hope I'm doing the correct thing!
2409:4050:eb2:bfe4:5d32:c2a5:bb9e:3a05 (talk · contribs) has changed the list of spoken languages in a number of Bihar-related articles. The number of this sort of edit seem to have increased as of late. An example a change is this addition: | demographics1_info4 = [[Bang]]-[[Maithili]],[[Surjapuri]]-[[Maithili]] Amusingly, Bang is a DAB page. On the Maithili language page, this edit, has an ES of Bang-Maithili is also the dialect of Maithili and we are also the part of Mithilanchal. So we request to all editor Don't remove our Identity by making Changes in this article. Being Maithili. was added. The change did not cite a source.
Any suggestions? I'm getting tired of this! Please ping? Watchlist overfloweth. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Adakiko: "No source was cited", I think you have your answer. Cheers. Regards – Jakichandan (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Fortunately, the editor quit making those changes. Any idea what the language "Bang-Maithili" is? The editor(s) kept linking to that dab page. Googling "Bang-Maithili" didn't return anything other than the Wiki pages. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
@Adakiko: No idea. Regards— Jakichandan (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Is Maithili is the Official language of All Maithil Districts
Someone Changing the Official language of all Maithil District which are Begushorai,Darbhanga etc. Is Maithili is the Official language of all Maithil District which are comes in Mithila. They(Editor) said Mithila is a fake concept and all Begusarai and Darbhanga comes in Bihar and Hindi and Urdu is the Official language of Bihar. But we Maithils don't have any connection with Urdu and Hindi. Please 🙏 make some changes with proff and reference because Mithila is the proposed State of India and Maithili is the Official language of Mithila used in Office and all Official work. Vikas Sharma223 (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Please Add Dakhinaha Maithili (Angika)
I hope you everything is going well for you! Could you Please Add Dakhinaha Maithili (Angika) in Maithili language's Classification dialect section? Because Dakhinaha Maithili (Angika) is also the Dialect of Maithili language. 2409:4050:2D43:8C36:498E:9591:E508:1512 (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)