User talk:Graearms

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mental Illness in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Mental Illness in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 05:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Substance Abuse in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Substance Abuse in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the new articles

I enjoyed reading your first two articles. Good work! 😁👍 Tewdar 21:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surgery in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Surgery in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 10:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gynecology in Ancient Rome has been accepted

Gynecology in Ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nav template or Infobox

Now that there are a number of medicine related pages for Ancient Rome I was wondering if it might be time for a nav template or Infobox to start to link them all together? Apart from anything else it would help tie them together and provide a nice context. Gusfriend (talk) 07:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will consider created or using a new template. Thank you for making me aware of this.

There is a good page at Wikipedia:Navigation template which has a bit of a discussion of the different options.Gusfriend (talk) 11:56, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me about this.

@Gusfriend: I have created a new navigation template here. What should I do now?

DYK nomination of Gynecology in ancient Rome

Hello! Your submission of Gynecology in ancient Rome at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 22:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Surgery in ancient Rome

On 19 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Surgery in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ancient Roman surgeons used materials such as bran and ashes to heal burns? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Surgery in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Surgery in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gynecology in ancient Rome

On 20 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gynecology in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ancient Roman gynecologists believed that menstrual blood could be used to drive dogs insane? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gynecology in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gynecology in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dentistry in ancient Rome has been accepted

Dentistry in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renato D. Alarcón has been accepted

Renato D. Alarcón, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Oldham (psychiatrist) (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Should be notable per WP:PROF; however, this draft needs some improving. The text condenses so much information into the lead section that it becomes very difficult to read. Please summarise the key aspects of Oldham and describe everything else in dedicated sections. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Oldham (psychiatrist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Oldham (psychiatrist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dentistry in ancient Rome

On 4 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dentistry in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ancient Romans made toothpaste with human urine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dentistry in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dentistry in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew E. Skodol has been accepted

Andrew E. Skodol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Slywriter (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mining in ancient Rome has been accepted

Mining in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leslie Morey has been accepted

Leslie Morey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 01:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mining in ancient Rome

On 1 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mining in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Roman slave miners would rather die than work in the horrible working conditions of the mines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mining in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mining in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxation in ancient Rome has been accepted

Taxation in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Banking in ancient Rome has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Banking in ancient Rome. Thanks! Artem.G (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puticuli has been accepted

Puticuli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to link to it from pages such as Potter's field and possibly a section at Mass grave. Gusfriend (talk) 07:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poverty in ancient Rome has been accepted

Poverty in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I approved the article because believe that there is (more than) sufficient sourcing information via the books in the bibliography even if not every statement of text is directly supported by an inline citation (which is perfectly acceptable see WP:REF). Having said that, some readers, and possibly some editors, will think that text without an associated in line citation is unsupported. If you get a chance you may want to add a few more in line citations to help ease their concerns. Gusfriend (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you so much for your efforts on expanding information on ancient Roman history on Wikipedia!★Trekker (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Taxation in ancient Rome

On 14 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Taxation in ancient Rome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that taxation may have played a part in the fall of the Roman Empire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Taxation in ancient Rome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Taxation in ancient Rome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 11,001 views (458.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vacation in ancient Rome has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vacation in ancient Rome. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vacation in ancient Rome (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

vacation is an americanism, tourism or simply travel would be better.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vacation in ancient Rome and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graearms! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 06:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art collection in ancient Rome has been accepted

Art collection in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 06:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of ancient Roman speeches has been accepted

List of ancient Roman speeches, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article could do with an introductory paragraph especially if you could come up with some text on the role of oratory in Roman public discourse. It would also be great if the table was sortable so that you can order by orators (see WP:SORT). Gusfriend (talk) 09:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you

		The Epic Barnstar
		Thank you for your excellent work on new Roman articles. Gusfriend (talk) 10:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Banking in ancient Rome has been accepted

Banking in ancient Rome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tributum soli has been accepted

Tributum soli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:47, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vicesima libertatis has been accepted

Vicesima libertatis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spudlace (talk) 19:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]