Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Log

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uanfala (talk | contribs) at 14:32, 28 April 2023 (→‎Template:Prose timeline: k). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

April 13

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 13, 2023.

Hello, How Do You Do?

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete huh? What? Dronebogus (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing. According to my Google Books search, this sentence seems to be used for training kids in manners or for people who are learning basic English language. --Lenticel (talk) 00:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dead Leaves (upcoming film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make sense to redirect this title to the redirect's subject's potential director when the subject of the redirect may be attached to other notable subjects with articles. Also, WP:REDLINK applies. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the worst possible case of crystal Dronebogus (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pros and Cons of the Euro

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 08:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

​I'm not nominating this redirect on the basis of the unusual title, but because the target is too broad for it to be useful. I could understand if, for example, it pointed to a section named "Support and criticism", or even just "Response" or "Reception". The article on the euro doesn't have any of these sections (Criticism of the European Union is a redirect to Euroscepticism). The redirect also doesn't have page history or mainspace backlinks worth preserving. For all these reasons, it should be deleted as a costly title. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete deceptive POV redirect Dronebogus (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think it gets used much; the page view statistics show 577 views since its creation in 2007. There were reasons I thought it was appropriate in 2007; but I don't think those reasons are applicable today. I think most people looking for information on the Euro will just search for Euro. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 19:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Monster (upcoming film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make sense to redirect this title to the redirect's subject's potential director when the subject of the redirect may be attached to other notable subjects with articles. Also, WP:REDLINK applies. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

"Upcoming" no longer upcoming

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer upcoming, see WP:UFILM. Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Execution of Tymofii Shadura

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 21#Execution of Tymofii Shadura

Account of My Life

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Way too vague, no mention at the target. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I assume this is an alternate title? Dronebogus (talk) 19:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

His Autobiography

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Way too vague, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly the least clear redirect ever Dronebogus (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2038 Asian Games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FUTURE and WP:TOOSOON, same reason we don't have 2044 Summer Olympics as a redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rules of the Senate

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 22#Rules of the Senate

Mount Everett (Canmore)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how this relates to the target. Not mentioned there anyplace. Onel5969 TT me 16:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly a hoax Dronebogus (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gary Metropolitan Area

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear why the former (not used since 1896) name of Hodgkins, Illinois (a village with 1500 population) would be a plausible redirect for the Chicago metropolitan area. Miscapitalised, and only has 58 pageviews since its creation in 2017. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 15:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Shah Pahlavi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. However, because there was a consensus against keeping the redirect as-is and a disambiguation page would consist of the first two entries at Pahlavi dynasty#Heads of House of Pahlavi, I have retargeted it there. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose we disambiguate this redirect because in addition to Reza Shah Pahlavi, these words can also refer to his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. NotReallySoroka (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support disambiguation - It could even be reasonable to redirect to the younger shah, considering he is often simply known as "the Shah" and by far a primary topic. Estar8806 (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation allows for a more succinct page conducive to finding the Pahlavis themselves. Not·Really·Soroka 05:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:BOLDMOVE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Requested moves#Undiscussed moves. ✗plicit 23:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by a now blocked user in an appear effort to help justify their controversy moves. Has no incoming links and I've only seen it mentioned in edit summaries by the creating user and a user that has now been blocked as a sock (ex: Special:Diff/1139343657). The word "bold" also doesn't appear at target so delete. Skynxnex (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per HouseBlaster. I also thought that the redirect would most naturally point to our guidance on undiscussed moves. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The School Up North

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 21#The School Up North

Template:Prose timeline

and related Template:Proseline and possibly others.

I don't know why this was merged instead of deleted after the 3rd nom in 2009[permalink], but its existence is still causing problems. Money quote from that Tfd is in the nom:

Template masquerades as a policy/guideline-based cleanup tag, but is not. It is simply one editor's neologistic opinion about "proseline". — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] 22:49, 28 August 2009

That's still true, and now we have a minor kerfuffle at Tucker Carlson because of it, after my removal of Template:Proseline from Tucker Carlson#Media career in this edit, followed by active discussion at Talk:Tucker Carlson. Inviting User:Thebiguglyalien from that discussion. (Pinging User:SMcCandlish, as I'm uncertain if use inside a {{talk quote}} will mask the notif or not.)

There are 11 redirects to Template:Prose, of which five have the problematic proseline term in the name. There are 21 transclusions of 'Template:Proseline', so maybe we can just hard-delete it and fix up the existing uses; or maybe convert it to a soft redirect instead, with an added "Notes" section with additional comment right on the redirect page, explaining why maybe you don't want to follow it? Or, do we just carry on as is, and put up with the occasional confusion?

Possibly related (or maybe just confusing detail?): an earlier life of 'Template:Proseline' was moved to Template:ProseTimeline per Tfd in 2007. How do we get out of this mess? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck off the "related Template:Proseline" above as redundant, as I have bundled it with this Rfd. Jay 💬 07:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Or maybe an additional, "When to use" section at Template:Prose/doc might help, or in particular, "When not to use", which exist on some templates, and which I find very helpful, sometimes. Mathglot (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see; you mean the one inside the talk quote, which you SMcC already hid; thanks for that. Restored it, entity-encoded; hopefully will work. Mathglot (talk) 03:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looks all good to me now. Thanks! TartarTorte 12:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled Template:Proseline as this discussion is more about it and its 21 transclusions. Did not bundle the other three (Template:Prosetimeline, Template:ProseTimeline and Template:Prose-timeline) as they do not have transclusions, and to keep this RfD simple.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Norph

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 21#Norph

Raat Ka Khel Saara

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ratris Khel Chale. (non-admin closure) Carpimaps (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how this relates to the target article, not mentioned there (or on their list of programs). Onel5969 TT me 13:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Missing Zee Kannada programmes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada. (non-admin closure) Carpimaps (talk) 05:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, List of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada or anywhere else on Wikipedia. Delete unless a duly-sourced mention can be added somewhere. signed, Rosguill talk 21:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Porta Fidei

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target. It refers to a specific document that is not mentioned anywhere else on WP. Therefore, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 00:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking now and I'm seeing several academic pieces that talk about this exact motu propio as well as the Year of Faith that it created. That being said, I support deletion per WP:REDYES, as this warrants its own page rather than a redirect to an article that does not mention it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bxvi

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 20#Bxvi

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_13&oldid=1152149731"