Jump to content

Talk:List of presidents of the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZX95 (talk | contribs) at 00:47, 8 January 2024 (Biden & Trump portrait crops: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured listList of presidents of the United States is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 15, 2005Featured list candidatePromoted
October 30, 2008Featured list removal candidateDemoted
June 26, 2009Featured list candidateNot promoted
March 3, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
September 9, 2022Featured list candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Portraits

Pardon if this veers out of pure "discuss the article" territory, but ...

Why do y'all care so much about what portrait is used? I think at least 80% of the edit wars on this article are all about which picture to use for a dead famous guy. --Golbez (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best course, is for any editor to propose an image on the talkpage. Rather then boldly adopt the new image. GoodDay (talk) 21:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, but why do people care so much? Why are so many of the edits just drive-by changing of a pic? --Golbez (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What do you expect to achieve with this thread? It seems somewhat contradictory, either people casually change an image with a fly-by edit, which doesn't suggest they "care so much" (and are unlikely to respond), or you could try pinging specific editors who have made actual, concerted efforts to change an image (or images), with multiple attempts to make the same edit, as well as perhaps some fully engaged talk page debating to support their changes. Pinging said users is more likely to not only get a response, but one with actual answers, as opposed to some mind-reading type replies solicited by this kind of tossing a general question into the air approach. (jmho) - wolf 00:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not asking for mindreading but I wondered if any of yu had in the last many years done the same and enquired but I see y'all are just as incurious as I was. --Golbez (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of portraits - why are they so big? Is there a particular reason for 160px? --Golbez (talk) 15:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What size are they on the veep list page? Would be best if they're consistent. GoodDay (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't answer my question, because it then goes to "why are they so big over there," and I strongly suspect the response to be "because they're that big over here." Consistency needs a reason. --Golbez (talk) 15:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm content with whatever size is agreed upon, if it's applied to both pages. GoodDay (talk) 15:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Veep page pictures are 150px. I see no good reason for those on this page to be larger. Drdpw (talk) 15:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's a lot of formatting that's not applied to both pages. --Golbez (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
By all means, reduce the prez photos to 150px. GoodDay (talk) 15:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why not 75? --Golbez (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A microscope would be required to see portraits/photos at 75px size. GoodDay (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. On my phone, at the current size, three rows and two columns are visible. At 75px that changes to 6 rows and 3 columns. And the best part, if I want to see a picture better, I can tap it! And that works on PC as well! Instead of forcing a particular large size, how about let people see the larger size if they so wish? This is a list, not a photo gallery. --Golbez (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Might be best to open an RFC on the size of portraits/photos for all the list pages of US officer holders, both federal & state/territory level. GoodDay (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, I'm not opening that can of worms, lest the poor decisions from this article infect my work. I was merely curious why that's the size here, a question which remains unanswered, so it's starting to appear that was just done one day by someone. Which is fine. --Golbez (talk) 16:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just use the "thumb" parameter and leave fixed sizes out of it altogether? - wolf 22:53, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Washington’s Presidency Start Date

Washington’s Presidency started on March 4th yes he was sworn in on April 30th but alot of presidents have been sworn in on march 3rd/5th or january 19th/21st because of the sunday but they all still say that their Presidency started on March 4th or January 20th yet for Washington it’s different? Why is this? I would like to propose we change it to March 4th as that’s when the office of president started and the office/title of president has never been vacant unlike the office of vice president Lil Zadeh (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing historical sources use April 30, 1789 (swearing in date, instead of term starting date) for the first president, as it was during the formation of the federal government, under the US Constitution. Same reason why April 21, 1789 is used for the first vice president. GoodDay (talk) 15:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay thank you Lil Zadeh (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image changes, without consensus

We've got to do something about editors showing up (IP, mobile, etc) & changing images here & at List of vice presidents of the United States without a consensus & borderline edit-warring to keep those changes. GoodDay (talk) 02:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote

@Drdpw: How is this a "DAB of little usefulness"? "Presidents of the United States" could refer to several other things, all documented at President of the United States (disambiguation), most notably to President of the United States itself, but also to 5 other "United States"es and The Presidents of the United States of America (band). (Presidents of the United States of America redirects here too, but I left it out of the "redirects here" clause to save space.) WP:HATNOTERULES is clear, if a notable topic X is commonly referred to as "Foo", but the article "Foo" is not about X, there must be a hatnote linking to the article on X or linking to a disambiguation page that contains a link to the article on X. This is widely followed in cases where the singular and plural form of a term diverge. To take three canonical examples from WP:PLURAL:

That said, I don't have a strong preference as to whether the hatnote target should be President of the United States (disambiguation) or President of the United States. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 21:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As long as Presidents of the United States of America and The Presidents of the USA redirect here (they shouldn't, and they didn't until recently), there must be a hatnote because of the band, if nothing else. Presidents of the United States is slightly less of an issue because president of the United States is linked in the first sentence. Station1 (talk) 07:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those articles should not redirect to this list article. Drdpw (talk) 01:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then take them back to RfD. It's been 2 months since Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § The Presidents of the United States of America, and since that closed as no consensus it's been long enough to renominate. Until then, though, a hatnote is required by WP:HATNOTERULES. Please self-revert and then, if you wish, start a new RfD. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 01:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biden & Trump portrait crops

Why do the Biden and Trump entries use extremely close crops of their portraits, when all other recent presidents are represented by their uncropped official portraits? We should probably stick to the uncropped official portraits for Biden and Trump, or switch to super narrow crops for all the other recent presidents, rather than the current arbitrary switch. Unless there's some good reason for this inconsistency? ∴ ZX95 [discuss] 00:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]