This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 17:59, 20 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 8 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 7 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Chicago}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}, {{WikiProject African diaspora}}, {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Women artists}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: cat.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 17:59, 20 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 8 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 7 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Chicago}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}, {{WikiProject African diaspora}}, {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Women artists}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: cat.)
This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This article was created or improved during the Black women edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in February 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
A fact from Nyeema Morgan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Hi Possibly. Thank you for helping with the article. I was disappointed to see it nominated for deletion and would appreciate your feedback on how to improve it. The interview portion of that reference from BOMB is indeed primary, but it is only being used to verify the titles of Morgan's works and a brief description of her installation. Should I be trying to include a larger number of reliable sources at this point? gobonobo+c05:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gobonobo: I think the main issue is that she is on the cusp of her career, so coverage is a little sparse. I'm not sure how many artist bios you have worked on,but we usually don't include a list of works, unless they are a heavy hitter artist or there is very good coverage. It is much better, I think, to mention the specific piece inline in a "work" or "career" section. Also, the dealer reference not going to be contributory to notability. If you can find more RS that is of course a good idea. Hope that helps. Possibly (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Possibly: I took out the list of works and eliminated the dealer reference. I'm at the point where most of the good reliable sources that can be found online are included. There's plenty of offline sources as well, but I'm not sure they'll help. Like, exhibition catalogues might meet WP:RS, but I suspect they wouldn't win any points at AfD. gobonobo+c03:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gobonobo: Thanks. Like I said I think the notability is right on the edge. In 5 years it will probably not be a problem. There are a bunch of us who frequent the artist AfD's (Netherzone, Theredproject, Vexations), so you will not doubt get more opinions shortly. I'm going to go and look at the collections she is in. Possibly (talk) 03:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
New enough, created 6 Feb, nom 13 Feb; long enough, 6736 char, neutral, no apparent copyvios, cited, QPQ done, no photo in nom. (Comment that has nothing to do with the DYK nom, assuming this is a selfie - you can see her left shoulder appears to be raised - do we have a release from her for its use? Were it me, I would place that documentation, or at least a note of when she released it on the commons file so that other users were certain of its provenance.) Hook0 has 91 char and is cited in the article, though I think it is less "hooky" and has less broad appeal than alt1. Alt1 has 104 char, is cited, and has broad appeal IMO. Alt2 has 119 char, is cited, and has broad appeal. Thanks for creating it, very interesting article. Note to set builders, would be a good hook for International Women's Day, March 8, if it does not make it in for Black History Month. SusunW (talk) 15:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On hold until AFD concludes. If article is kept, then a review can be done. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Article has been kept at AFD, so a full review can proceed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
New enough, created 6 Feb, nom 13 Feb; long enough, 6736 char, neutral, no apparent copyvios, cited, QPQ done, no photo in nom. (Comment that has nothing to do with the DYK nom, assuming this is a selfie - you can see her left shoulder appears to be raised - do we have a release from her for its use? Were it me, I would place that documentation, or at least a note of when she released it on the commons file so that other users were certain of its provenance.) Hook0 has 91 char and is cited in the article, though I think it is less "hooky" and has less broad appeal than alt1. Alt1 has 104 char, is cited, and has broad appeal IMO. Alt2 has 119 char, is cited, and has broad appeal. Thanks for creating it, very interesting article. Note to set builders, would be a good hook for International Women's Day, March 8, if it does not make it in for Black History Month. SusunW (talk) 15:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)