User talk:Egsan Bacon
Your GA nomination of Claudia Octavia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Claudia Octavia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Claudia Octavia
The article Claudia Octavia you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Claudia Octavia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 09:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Claudia Octavia
On 8 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Claudia Octavia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nero's divorce of Claudia Octavia (pictured) caused public outcry – so he had her executed instead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Claudia Octavia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Claudia Octavia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Reply of Egsan Bacon
Hi, thanks for the message a short while ago - my Samsung S10 rebooted itself so no idea how it did what it did! 😊
Kind regards
Juanpumpchump (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome. My phone's pretty unpredictable too. I can't imagine how tedious doing any of the wiki formatting on one must be. Egsan Bacon (talk) 23:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sausage fingers don't help much too! :)
- Juanpumpchump (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
number one official teenager comment
well f**k you piece of sh*t 120.17.231.218 (talk) 03:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women In Red
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Judgement of Paris
I understand I have no sources, and just a general understanding, but one further point. Since the dawn of civilization, and probably before, society has been run by men. Men have made the rules - Kings, Emperors, and some women who wanted the power and wealth that goes with making the rules - it always goes to the people who make the rules. But gods want to make men and women perfect, equal, together. And they cannot be equal until they have equal power. The elite, men of the ruling classes, studied these texts and missed the point, they're men! Let's not do it again. Homer is the Bible. There's few clues in the Odyssey too. ItsBeautifulOnTheMountain (talk) 18:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- One of the key aspects of how we create articles on Wikipedia is that it's not about what we know, or what we theorize, it's about what reliable sources have to say on a subject. Wikipedia is meant to be a tertiary source, documenting what secondary sources think of a topic, not a place to debut new and innovative hypotheses. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- I understand, Wikipedia is the knowledge. But we also have to imagine, and speculate, and discover. Maybe it should have gone in the notes? Or somewhere else? Just think it's something to think about. I love my theory. ItsBeautifulOnTheMountain (talk) 11:08, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks
Thanks for the report, it's appreciated. in the future reporting at AIV alone is fine. It has a faster response time, and it's less to revdel during cleanup. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not a problem, thanks for the info. On the subject of revdel, it looks like Cluebot's standard reversion edit summary includes the username of the person whose edit it's reverting. The other reversions have the reverted usernames, also. Egsan Bacon (talk) 00:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Should all be cleaned up now. Thanks for the heads up. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Pandemic
Why drag it out further, it's over, ases and deaths declined, by May things went to more normalcy and is in the backdrop of society, several documentations show and prove this, including the end of the emergency. I hate it when this gets drawn out all for the sole purpose of fear mongering.
If you want examples, there's some: https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/05/1136367 https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/who-ends-covid-global-health-emergency-rcna83046 SCPdude629 (talk) 01:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)SCPdude629
Women in Red - November 2023
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red February 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Editor experience invitation
Hi Egsan Bacon :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Ships
This change on the Arizona that your mooting is major. It would make this disambiguation page different from the numerous others we already have, some 200. I wouldn't nind so much, but your not even involved in the ships's project and here you are messing with it. The Arizona page is not an appropraite forum for such a radical change. Broichmore (talk) 07:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
True black hair is rare
I have jet black hair and it's so rare as blonds or gingers Wish l (talk) 21:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Congratulations on ranking among the top three most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Excellent work! – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
?
This is the first time I've had a paragraph censored WHILE I'm editing and adding sources and references. WHAT kind of problem do you have? 66.81.178.51 (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- It really cheapens the word "censorship" when people use it for things like "being disagreed with" or "expecting sourcing standards to be followed". "While" you were adding sources is an odd description of what you were doing, since you should have added it as part of your edit, not twenty minutes later after being reminded twice, and when you added it in March, you didn't feel the need to provide any sources then.
- As for
WHAT kind of problem do you have?
, you might want to read WP:CIVIL. You might also want to read the article's talk page, where I outline all the other issues I have with your addition to the article. I don't think it benefits the article at all, and I don't think your new source says what you're using it to support. Egsan Bacon (talk) 21:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)- I use the correct word, because for some strange reason you have been reversing my edit, literally WHILE I was precisely adding link and reference.
- So if it seems strange to you that I go through the article and add a reference some time later, imagine how strange it seems to me (and anyone else), that someone, and for some strange reason, literally in the middle of an edit and precisely for adding these references and the article is perfect is dedicated to hindering the process without even waiting for it to finish. Striking, at least. 66.81.178.51 (talk) 23:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Anyone who looks at the timestamps of your edits would be extremely skeptical about that "while" you keep using, as I remain. You are aware you're expected to provide the reference at the same time as the information it's sourcing, right? I also can't help but note you haven't expressed any thoughts you may have about anything else I wrote here, or at the article's talk page. Pity. Egsan Bacon (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Congratulations on ranking among the top three most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Excellent work! – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC) |