Jump to content

Talk:Fox News

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AntiDionysius (talk | contribs) at 00:17, 22 July 2024 (Reverted edit by 2600:6C58:47F:CF20:B558:4783:81DF:9BB1 (talk) to last version by 76.170.142.83). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


The Dominion controversy was in their analysis and entertainment shows, not in their journalistic reporting

This was FOX's official position in court, and it has been accepted by every actor involved in the controversy and case. It is important to explain clearly that it wasn't FOX's journalistic reporting and journalistic standards that were in question, but instead, their entertainment shows, which operate under different standards, including contractually. 201.207.239.205 (talk) 07:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fox has "journalistic reporting and journalistic standards" ? when did this happen? ValarianB (talk) 12:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fox lost. So, I don't know that their "official position" had much credence. O3000, Ret. (talk) 13:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How relevant is the difference between the journalistic, i.e. "news reporting", and the political commentary parts of Fox? I guess the most pertinent question to ask here is, "Is Fox News characterized predominantly by their journalistic arm or their commentary arm?", or, put another way, "When people think of Fox, are they thinking of the news room or the opinion section?". I think the fact that the Fox News organization is not a monolith is a lot less important than that Fox is heavily identified with Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Jesse Waters and Fox's other opinion hosts, rather than Fox's news hosts. 67.180.148.167 (talk) 07:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Hanity

Martial arts cannot stop someone with an assault rifle firing several rounds per second. It’s simply not true! 2601:190:500:6652:B02D:4523:91D7:5A2B (talk) 02:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Woke' California prosecutor 'ironically in charge of ethics' charged with felonies

Left-wing Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon's right-hand woman is facing nearly 11 felony charges after state prosecutors say she helped herself to confidential information about 11 deputies as far back as 2018 and took it with her when she left the sheriff's office to work for the DA three years later. 37.111.164.109 (talk) 08:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain in detail the changes you hope to make to this specific article about Fox News. Nothing you have written has anything to do with Fox News. You can do better than this if you try. Cullen328 (talk) 08:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How is this at all relevant to Faux News?Dimadick (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And while we're at it, the "left-wing" claim is a bit odd for a man who has been a member of both the Democratic and Republican Parties. But at least his assistant DA was awake. I assume that's what you mean by "woke". This section would look better with a hat. O3000, Ret. (talk) 17:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2024

This article needs to show in its immediate description that FNC is tabloid/sensationalist and should hold no other description. This article needs to show people right away that FNC is propagandic and uses subliminal messages to brainwash its viewers. 2600:1014:B036:9CB9:283E:78FF:FEAB:BBFD (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide a reliable source to support the change you wish to be made. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 23:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“Conservative”

I don’t think the fact that Fox News is “conservative” needs to be mentioned in the first sentence of the first paragraph; maybe that should be briefly discussed toward the end of the intro. 76.170.142.83 (talk) 06:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]