User talk:Alison

Thank you!

Well .... where to start?

I just want to thank everyone - I can't possibly reply to everybody :) - for being so loving and supportive over the last few days. I said what I had to say and left for a few days, just to get some breathing space. I'd actually been thinking seriously about leaving over the last few weeks, as the unwanted attentions from certain people and the pressures of the current ArbCom case were beginning to wear me down. I truly wasn't expecting the kind of responses that came flooding in. I really don't know what to say. I've archived everything, my original message and all your responses, as well as a message to others at the top, at User:Alison/Depression. As I said, I hope others in a similar situation can read this, understand it, and take some comfort from it all.

Love you all, friends :)

-- Alison ^❤

PS: I guess I'd better get back to work, then! WP:RPP is calling out to me :)

PPS: Amit, it's lovely to see you back on here, too, with job intact!

From one to another

I've recently read it suggested that you might have felt that I "must be annoyed at (you) for picking up the Alison nick on enwiki". Could I just say you were fully welcome to it! Indeed, I didn't even look for it as 'AlisonW' is what I have used all over the place for many years as I know so so many Alison's IRL so use the W at all times - in addition to a 'nom de plume' which, of course, you know about as do many others (Kato is right, it isn't a 'secret' per se, I just try to not the two get written on the same webpage together) and is all quite above board, albeit reading the comments is providing me with a lot of amusement at the moment ;-P Nor, btw, will SUL annoy me at all and I'd happy to let you have meta:User:Alison on meta: right now if you would like it (and ask nicely) as at the time I registered that protective nick you weren't using User:Alison yourself and protection is a good thing™ (unlike meta:User:Alison is a douchebag lol). Keep up the good work. --AlisonW (talk) 23:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/2008FromKawasaki

Alison, I know you're taking a break, but this case is link to ongoing massive sockpuppetry and you or other clerk close the case regardless of my addition. Please looking at the case. Thanks.--Appletrees (talk) 08:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please ask a clerk at RFCU to re-open the case, if you've added further information. Thanks - Alison ^❤ 08:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't know how to ask, so can you tell me how to ask it? Do I add a comment at the page or at talk? I need the case to be re-checked, because I have to prepare a RFCU based on that. --Appletrees (talk) 08:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can post a message to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks/Noticeboard stating which case you wish to re-activate and what you'd like done. A clerk will come along, evaluate your request and do what's necessary - Alison ^❤ 08:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do that. --Appletrees (talk) 08:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because Appletrees slanders Japan, a lot of users dislike him. For instance, he tried to apply racist's tag to a famous philosopher Fukuzawa Yukichi in Japan. [1] Moreover, he made the category of "Category:Anti-Chinese sentiment in Japan" and "Category:Anti-Korean sentiment in Japan". He only shouted, "You are SOCKS" though a lot of users advised to his attitude.

--124.87.134.96 (talk) 13:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Alison, please check this disruptive ip sock 124.87.134.96 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) - He might be a banned user for his abusive sockpuppetry and his disruption, so appeared to avenge me because I filed on them. Hmm.. this must be stopped. To anon, the Japanese educator you admire is hugely criticized by China, Korea, and other Asian countries for his theory. The category is a counterpart of {{lc|Anti-Japanese sentiment in Japan]] that you might've created. You also created malicious categories like Category:Korean culture of Japanese origin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and fake articles. You must stop now. --Appletrees (talk) 13:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing the Universe from Core Contest

Hey Alison,

I don't think our paths have crossed much, but I know that we share a wonderful common friend in Fvasconcellos. :) I hope that the New Year's being good to you! :) I'm sorry to bother you, but I had something earnest to Talk about and I'm sure that you'll be kind enough to Listen.

The promotion of VanTucky's article on Domestic sheep to Featured Article set me thinking again about the Core Contest, which a lot of us participated in, back when November was crossing over into December last year? It's been about two months, and there's been no decision, so I'm guessing that it must be very hard to decide between so many good articles?

So I was looking at all my shelves of delicious canned food from my garden's harvest last year and thinking that I don't need money anyway, when some wonderfully good and hard-working Wikipedians really do need it. I participated mainly for the fun of it — and maybe a little for the vanity of it, which is scarcely a noble reason. :P So I'd like to withdraw my entry, on Universe, to make your decision easier and swifter; maybe it wasn't in the running anyway, but I'd like to do whatever lies within my little scope to help those who need it. Willow (talk) 09:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FTF

Hello, Alison! :) Thanks for joining Portal:Feminism/Feminism_Task_Force. Are you good at making templates or userboxes? I need someone on the force to make some templates and userboxes for the task force's use. If you are good at this sort of thing, Please let me know on my talk page or on the FTF talk page. Thanks!--Grrrlriot (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection

Hey Ali. I have semi protected your page for a while because of IP abuse. Feel free to unprotect when you are back online, of course. If anyone new or unregistered user requires help from Ali in the meantime, feel free to drop me a line and I'll see if I can help. Rockpocket 08:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*sob* How come you get all the loving while I get neglected? :)— Dark ^(talk) 08:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh - thanks, Rockpocket! Don't know me very well, do they? :) - Alison ^❤ 13:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a second opinion

Hi Alison. Sorry to bother you when you are busy, but could you take a look at Talk:List of massacres#Consensus if you have a moment. There's been a lot of edit warring at the article historically, and we've managed to (more or less) restrict to a voluntary 0RR during discussion on the article talk page to agree what the article's scope should be. We have now pretty much agreed a way forward, which is to restrict the article to events which are known in Wikipedia as massacres. This solution immediately devolves any arguments about sources and what exactly constitutes a massacre away from the list article and onto the individual articles, which seems proper to me. Anyway, I am keen to move forwards but User:Sarah777 has stated at User talk:John#No consensus that she is unable to accept the consensus and requests another admin to look at it. We have spent a good long time discussing it and Sarah has made a lot of criticisms of how the article is now (which are merited) and of our proposed way forwards, but without suggesting a more constructive solution. I feel she may accept you as a neutral party. Please see what you think. Thanks in advance. --John (talk) 22:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spamer

Hi Alison. The spamer Vladimir Nosov (contributions from account Vladimir Nosov ), contributions from IP 87.248.227.82 ), that you Warning many times against his Spam to their Site conflictologist.narod.ru. (See his User talk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vladimir_Nosov ), deleted these warnings.

His Site are now in the Blacklist (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Spam_blacklist ), for Spam in many Wiki.

But this User now tries to delete that information, blanking the page with warnings. See [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

This include the violation of the 3RR Rule.

15.02 12.42 [8]

15.02 18.37 [9]

15.02 20.31 [10]

Do you can do something to stop this? Thank you in advance.

--Kettre (talk) 19:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hello, Alison;

Thank you for the quick CU on the latest incarnations of Tile join. J. Spencer (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Grawps?

96.230.58.229 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), 67.161.117.209 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), and 76.238.185.76 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)). Enjoy. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 06:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jéské. Honestly, these are only one-off, throwaway addresses. There are no accounts behind these and there's honestly nothing I can do here. I'm really sorry, but it's WP:RBI time here - Alison ^❤ 06:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but at this point I'd be violating 3RR if I did. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 07:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

coming atcha Tvoz |talk 07:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Thanks for the info. Once back atcha :) - Alison ^❤ 07:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Careful, you don't want to be assused of being a member of Camp Alison :) One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 07:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bleargh!! Wonder if Tvoz is Irish?(for whatever definition of that term you like) - Alison ^❤ 07:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's like a perverse form of McCarthyism. Also "Archtransit was asked to comment on this finding privately and his answer was felt to be quite evasive, focussing on why it was better that an accusation should not be made, rather than evidence which might help refute it" - that sounds awfully familiar doesn't it? One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 07:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vero

Another email headed your way. Thankees :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 08:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for checkuser

The instructions throughout the Requests for checkuser process are confusing, especially in the instances of repeat offenders. At some point, can someone review the instructions with an eye open to ease of use? Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 14:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OhanaUnited's RFA

.:

Thank you!

:.

On the move

You missed Image:Once Upon A Time-1.jpg, Image:Once Upon A Time-2.jpg. Tyrenius (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, leave them here! They aren't allowed on Commons! One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too late!! - Alison ^❤ 20:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whaddya mean "Too late!!"? I went to upload it to Commons first, only I saw the big sign saying it wasn't allowed on there, and as I didn't get the same sign here I uploaded it here instead. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blargh - you're right. Photo of a sculpture clause. Bummer :b - I wanted to use it on another wiki - Alison ^❤ 20:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's CC 3.0, so you can upload it there with attribution can't you? Or I could join and upload it? One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey Allie, thanks for all your hard work re Archtransit. My my, all the egg on my face sure is delish... :/ Ah well. Lolcats are balm for any situation. I'll mail ya. ~ Riana ⁂ 20:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should use that instead of the dull old

Confirmed. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Created for that very reason! ;) ~ Riana ⁂ 20:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now all we need is one of a cat getting into the laundry basket or a dresser draws with the title "Sox Likely!" SirFozzie (talk) 20:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

giggles* Thanks Riana! SirFozzie (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh - these are absolutely awesome :) Wish I'd had these for a .. *ahem* ... case last week :) Have to use these somewhere!! - Alison ^❤ 21:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another one for you. Will ^(talk) 23:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just can't wait for these to show in a real RFCU! -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It'll happen, it'll happen :) Thanks, guys! - Alison ^❤ 01:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We should create a wikipedia page called "lolsox" or something, and make some for "socks unrelated", etc. Will ^(talk) 10:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ding!

I sent you email. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Checking my inbox .... - Alison ^❤ 06:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done and sorted - Alison ^❤ 06:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry about my not so subtle nudge. Yeesh. =\ -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Star turn

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

You should have this on your page. You go beyond the call of duty with that checking facility of yours. Just don't move it to Commons.;) Tyrenius (talk) 03:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh - thank you so much for the barnstar, Ty. I'll try not to wreck the place too much! - Alison ^❤ 04:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some wikibreak

Thanks for the prompt action on the Downtrip / Wikzilla RFCU. Have a good night! Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all - Alison ^❤ 06:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like your new message, Alibrat? :D SirFozzie (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone knows that Allie loves getting her messages... :) it's an excuse to ignore the wikibreak, Fozzie. — Dark ^(talk) 06:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmph! Trolls - the lot of ye. Now, where's me banhammer? ;) - Alison ^❤ 06:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Ali DOES do the work of four admins.. because her heart is pure.. pure what, I'm not so sure.. (hides the banhammer underneath a bunch of sweaty sox and runs) ;) SirFozzie (talk) 06:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky I have the un-blockhammer (and the weekly oil bribes) or I'll be run over by the AllieBot :) — Dark ^(talk) 06:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can run but you can't hiiiide. Muhahaha!! - Alison ^❤ 06:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi, Alison! I'm sure you get bombarded with these requests but, could you do a checkuser on IP:64.230.5.184 (puppetmaster) with user:Chris Bobik and user:Chaweb (sockpuppets). The IP is the vocal one and is uncivil as seen here and here. They were all made within a twenty-four hour period and made identical revisions to this article (concerning the Skateboard and Artist subsections). I do believe, however, that this is a brand-new user and is not aware about the offense of sockpuppets. Thanks for your help! --Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 05:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Hi there. I'm sorry, but I'm not seeing a clear checkuser rationale for this case right now - Alison ^❤ 06:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway! :) (and for the speedy response, too!). --Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 06:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser

Can you please tell that evasion of ban and similar edit pattern is not taken as evidence, why? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have provided little or no evidence that the editor you wish to check is related to the banned editor. The checkuser process delves into an editor's privacy. We need good justification in doing this, rather than just a hunch, y'know ... - Alison ^❤ 07:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Allie - would you mind running that check, m'darling? I've blocked the account indefinitely as a likely Hkelkar sockpuppet, but it would be nice to have confirmation. It's just that it really does fit Hkelkar's edit pattern, and Nishkid agrees. Again, if the account is confirmed as Mr Kelkar, taking the IP out of the playing field would be great, though admittedly we can't block all of Texas just to nail Hkelkar. Not that anyone would notice if we did, but anyway...Cheers, Moreschi ^{If you've written a quality article...} 09:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm - okay, so. If Nishkid is calling it and if he's pretty sure, then it's worth a shot. He knows Hkelkar well .... - Alison ^❤ 00:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - all sorted, as well as your other case - Alison ^❤ 01:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for both checks. Much obliged. Moreschi ^{If you've written a quality article...} 15:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hazrat Saab RA.jpg

I just deleted three images that were taken from http://www.hijaz.biz/. I just noticed that the same user, User:Hijazi, has uploaded the above on commons. It appears to be the same as the one available at http://www.hijaz.biz/. Can you check it out if you have time. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 00:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just found the full size image at http://www.aqeedah.co.uk/hijazcollege/AWS.htm. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Obvious copyvio / no source info. Now deleted on commons and uploader notified. Thanks again - Alison ^❤ 01:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CygnetSaIad

Hmmm... You performing this CU was way beyond the pale. CS hasn't edited in months and check user is not for phishing. There are a couple of issues here: A) Are IP edits more questionable and B) What is check-user supposed to be for?

You do not have to log in to edit articles on Wikipedia.

The "IP abuse" as you styled it were at worst controversial edits. Had these been done while logged in (to any account) I find it very hard to believe that there would have been any thoughts to escalating things in this manner. Are you comfortable telling me how closely you examined the IP contributions before proceeding?

"The tool is to be used to fight vandalism, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project. It must be used only to prevent damage to any of Wikimedia projects."

I don't understand what good it was suggested would come to the encyclopaedia from this check user, what damage to the project was prevented. There was not even the suggestion that the IP had double voted, commited vandalism, etc etc etc. When among the worst that can be said about an IP is that they issue a polite warning that someone has reverted three times, really... words fail me.

If I sound a little bit cranky, that's because I am. I've tried to refactor this to be nice. I've got no doubt that you do good work, mean the best, etc. I can accept that in this instance you made a mistake. I think you owe me either an apology or a very full and frank explanation of how much you thought about this CU before performing it and what you perceive as the expectations and limitations are of your use of check user privileges. I look forward to discussing this with you further.

I'll watch this page,

152.91.9.144 (talk) 03:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'll address this in detail tonight. I've left a brief note at the RFCU case page. Thanks - Alison ^❤ 23:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The conversation has moved over → here, if anyone's following - Alison ^❤ 18:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been deleted. Jehochman ^Talk 19:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jehochman. I was kinda hoping they'd have seen my response so they were aware of my position and rationale. Not to worry - I can email it on if requested. Thanks again - Alison ^❤ 19:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Troubles may be over

		The Sock-Busting Barnstar
		For using your hammy checkuser fists in an unbiased, non-partisan, fair and (usually) thorough manner.... One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 16:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Hack :) I sincerely hope they are. At the very least, two of the ringleaders are gone or at least have gone underground. Maybe everyone will get on a bit better from here on in. Fingers crossed & thanks for all the good work you've been doing. Now, where's that article you've been promising me? :) - Alison ^❤ 19:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC) (answer: go write it yourself, you lazy cow! :) )[reply]

Feh, I've been busy doing all sorts. See my contribs on Commons today for starters. It'll be finished before the end of the weekend, I don't want you writing a lackluster version.... One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh - I'll edit-war ya over your version :) - Alison ^❤ 19:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC) (and yayy for Commons. It's so peaceful over there)[reply]

Indeed, I needed a quite day to avoid trolling. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can easily sort out a few more "notches" for ya, if you like :) I'm sure Foz could oblige, too - Alison ^❤ 19:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quite possibly, but look who's talking! Quite... And as normal, that's just the tip of the iceberg, even a cursory investigation has revealed that someone is standing on a sugar pedestal :) One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Owch!! He'd do well to listen to the wise words of that Arbtrator, too. Tsk indeed - Alison ^❤ 19:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He'd do well to take note of my recent investigations, and realise that if I choose to put a case together it won't be a pleasant experience.... One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm officially lame

This is proof my marbles might not all be there! :P ~Eliz81^(C) 00:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be ready for the yelling and the screaming

I approve of the action you've taken, but hopefully no admins edit it either while protected. Just.. Ugh. I see both sides, that's why I have a request in to the clerk (Rlevse) to determine if it is BLP or not and what action to be taken. SirFozzie (talk) 18:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks Foz. I know it's not your revision, too :) However, this has turned utterly stupid so I'm slamming on the brakes for an hour. Talk page, the lot of you :D - Alison ^❤ 18:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's the wrong version... One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 18:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But of course!! Let me go fix it to another wrong version :) - Alison ^❤ 18:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be a wrong version to write "I am a fish" 400 times on it, ie Arnold Rimmer (Hack will get the reference, at least)? (Just having a larf, I need one :) SirFozzie (talk) 19:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In answering the question, "What does the red spectrum tell us about quasars?" -- write bigger -- there are various words that need to be defined. What is a spectrum, what is a red one, why is it red, and why is it so frequently linked with quasars? One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And the page is unprotected, and heeeeerrre comes the editwarriors! *bangs head against wall* SirFozzie (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link please, I'm ready for action! One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[11] SirFozzie (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crum375 went right back to it. Lawrence § t/e 20:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alison, just a note. Crum still has yet to full revert all his post-protection edits. He just did the last one. Lawrence § t/e 20:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I'm on IRC if you want to talk... --Deskana (talk) 20:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You note

Sorry about that. I missed your pp due to ec. Of course it would be nice if the protecting admin removed the BLP violation as part of the protection, but that's asking too much, I guess. ;^) Crum375 (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You still have to restore your other post-pp edit. Lawrence § t/e 20:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It actually is too much. I've added protection twice today and have absolutely no interest in which way the dice falls. You've already had "your way" once in that. FWIW, I'm not seeing much in the way of BLP there, but how and ever. Let's everyone wait on an official answer here - Alison ^❤ 20:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user: DirDar

This user who filed the checkuser request for user: Tajik is actually a sock of user: Khampalak. Please check that too. Thanks. TruePashtoon (talk) 00:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives
2004	Entire year
2005	Jan • Jun						Jul • Dec
2006	Jan • Jun						Jul • Dec
2007	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2008	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2009	Jan • Jun						Jul • Sep			Oct	Nov	Dec
2010	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2011	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2012	Entire year
2013	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep • Dec
2015	Entire year
2016	Entire year
2017	Entire year
2018	Entire year
2019	Entire year
2020	Entire year
2021	Entire year
2022	Entire year
2023	Entire year
2024	Entire year