Jump to content

Hippocampus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) at 22:25, 27 June 2009 (→‎References: this must be wrong, PMIDs are never that format). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For other uses, see Hippocampus (disambiguation).
Hippocampus
The hippocampus is located in the medial temporal lobe of the brain. In this lateral view of the human brain, the frontal lobe is at left, the occipital lobe at right, and the temporal and parietal lobes have largely been removed to reveal the hippocampus underneath.
Identifiers
MeSHD006624
NeuroNames3157
NeuroLex IDbirnlex_721
TA98A14.1.09.321
TA25518
FMA275020
Anatomical terms of neuroanatomy

The hippocampus is a major component of the brains of humans and other mammals. It belongs to the limbic system and plays important roles in long term memory and spatial navigation. Like the cerebral cortex, with which it is closely associated, it is a paired structure, with mirror-image halves in the left and right sides of the brain. In humans and other primates, the hippocampus is located inside the medial temporal lobe, beneath the cortical surface. Its curved shape reminded early anatomists of the horns of a ram (Cornu Ammonis), or a seahorse. The name, in fact, was taken by the sixteenth century anatomist Julius Caesar Aranzi from the Greek word for seahorse (Greek: ιππος, hippos = horse, καμπος, kampos = sea monster).

In Alzheimer's disease the hippocampus is one of the first regions of the brain to suffer damage; memory problems and disorientation appear among the first symptoms. Damage to the hippocampus can also result from oxygen starvation (hypoxia), encephalitis, or medial temporal lobe epilepsy. People with extensive hippocampal damage may experience amnesia—the inability to form or retain new memories.

In rodents, the hippocampus has been studied extensively as part of the brain system responsible for spatial memory and navigation. Many neurons in the rat and mouse hippocampus respond as place cells: that is, they fire bursts of action potentials when the animal passes through a specific part of its environment. Hippocampal place cells interact extensively with head direction cells, whose activity acts as an inertial compass, and with grid cells in the neighboring entorhinal cortex.

Because of its densely-packed layers of neurons, the hippocampus has frequently been used as a model system for studying neurophysiology. The form of neural plasticity known as long term potentiation (LTP) was first discovered to occur in the hippocampus and has often been studied in this structure. LTP is widely believed to be one of the main neural mechanisms by which memory is stored in the brain.

Functions

Historically, the earliest widely held hypothesis was that the hippocampus is involved in olfaction. This idea was largely motivated by a belief, later shown to be false, that the hippocampus receives direct input from the olfactory bulb.[1] There continues to be some interest in hippocampal olfactory responses, particularly the role of the hippocampus in memory for odors, but few people believe today that olfaction is its primary function.[2][3]

Over the years, three main ideas of hippocampal function have dominated the literature: inhibition, memory, and space. The behavioral inhibition theory (caricatured by O'Keefe and Nadel as "slam on the brakes!")[4] was very popular up to the 1960s. It derived much of its justification from two observations: first, that animals with hippocampal damage tend to be hyperactive; second, that animals with hippocampal damage often have difficulty learning to inhibit responses that they have previously been taught. Jeffrey Gray developed this line of thought into a full-fledged theory of the role of the hippocampus in anxiety.[5] The inhibition theory is currently the least popular of the three.[6]

The second major line of thought relates the hippocampus to memory. Although it had historical precursors, this idea derived its main impetus from a famous report by Scoville and Brenda Milner[7] describing the results of surgical destruction of the hippocampus (in an attempt to relieve epileptic seizures), in a patient named Henry Gustav Molaison,[8] known until his death in 2008 as H.M.. The unexpected outcome of the surgery was severe anterograde and partial retrograde amnesia: H.M. was unable to form new episodic memories after his surgery and could not remember any events that occurred just before his surgery, but retained memories for things that happened years earlier, such as his childhood. This case produced such enormous interest that H.M. reportedly became the most intensively-studied medical subject in history.[9] In the ensuing years, other patients with similar levels of hippocampal damage and amnesia (caused by accident or disease) have been studied as well, and thousands of experiments have studied the physiology of activity-driven changes in synaptic connections in the hippocampus. There is now almost universal agreement that the hippocampus plays some sort of important role in memory; however, the precise nature of this role remains widely debated.[10][11]

The third important theory of hippocampal function relates the hippocampus to space. The spatial theory was originally championed by O'Keefe and Nadel, who were influenced by E. C. Tolman's theories about "cognitive maps" in humans and animals. O'Keefe and his student Dostrovsky in 1971 discovered neurons in the rat hippocampus that appeared to them to show activity related to the rat's location within its environment.[12] Despite skepticism from other investigators, O'Keefe and his co-workers, especially Lynn Nadel, continued to investigate this question, in a line of work that eventually led to their very influential 1978 book The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map.[13] As with the memory theory, there is now almost universal agreement that spatial coding plays an important role in hippocampal function, but the details are widely debated.[14]

Role in memory

See also: Amnesia

Psychologists and neuroscientists generally agree that the hippocampus has an important role in the formation of new memories about experienced events (episodic or autobiographical memory).[11][15] Some researchers view the hippocampus as part of a larger medial temporal lobe memory system responsible for general declarative memory (memories that can be explicitly verbalized—these would include, for example, memory for facts in addition to episodic memory).[10]

Severe damage to the hippocampus results in profound difficulties in forming new memories (anterograde amnesia), and often also affects memories formed before the damage (retrograde amnesia). Although the retrograde effect normally extends some years before the brain damage, in some cases older memories remain—this sparing of older memories leads to the idea that consolidation over time involves the transfer of memories out of the hippocampus to other parts of the brain.[16]

Damage to the hippocampus does not affect some types of memory, such as the ability to learn new motor or cognitive skills (playing a musical instrument, or solving certain types of puzzles, for example). This fact suggests that such abilities depend on different types of memory (procedural memory) and different brain regions. Furthermore, amnesic patients frequently show "implicit" memory for experiences even in the absence of conscious knowledge. For example, a patient asked to guess which of two faces they have seen most recently may give the correct answer the majority of the time, in spite of stating that they have never seen either of the faces before. Some researchers distinguish between conscious recollection, which depends on the hippocampus, and familiarity, which depends on portions of the medial temporal cortex.[17]

Role in spatial memory and navigation

Main article: Place cell
Spatial firing patterns of 7 place cells recorded from a single electrode in the dorsal CA1 layer of a rat. The rat ran several hundred laps clockwise around an elevated triangular track, stopping in the middle of each arm to eat a small portion of food reward. Black dots indicate positions of the rat's head; colored dots indicate places where action potentials occurred, using a different color for each cell.[18]

Studies conducted on freely moving rats and mice have shown that many hippocampal neurons have "place fields", that is, they fire bursts of action potentials when a rat passes through a particular part of the environment. Evidence for place cells in primates is limited, perhaps in part because it is difficult to record brain activity from freely-moving monkeys. Place-related hippocampal neural activity has been reported in monkeys moving around inside a room while seated in a restraint chair;[19] on the other hand, Edmund Rolls and his colleagues instead described hippocampal cells that fire in relation to the place a monkey is looking at, rather than the place its body is located.[20] In humans, place cells have been reported in a study of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who were undergoing an invasive procedure to localize the source of their seizures, with a view to surgical resection. The patients had diagnostic electrodes implanted in their hippocampus and then used a computer to move around in a virtual reality town.[21]

Place responses in rats and mice have been studied in hundreds of experiments over four decades, yielding a large quantity of information.[14] Place cell responses are shown by pyramidal cells in the hippocampus proper, and granule cells in the dentate gyrus. These constitute the great majority of neurons in the densely-packed hippocampal layers. Inhibitory interneurons, which make up most of the remaining cell population, frequently show significant place-related variations in firing rate, but much weaker than that shown by pyramidal or granule cells. There is little if any spatial topography in the representation: cells lying next to each other in the hippocampus generally have uncorrelated spatial firing patterns. Place cells are typically almost silent when a rat is moving around outside the place field, but reach sustained rates as high as 40 Hz when the rat is near the center. Neural activity sampled from 30–40 randomly chosen place cells carries enough information to allow a rat's location to be reconstructed with high confidence. The size of place fields varies in a gradient along the length of the hippocampus, with cells at the dorsal end showing the smallest fields, cells near the center showing larger fields, and cells at the ventral tip fields that cover the entire environment.[14] In some cases, the firing rate of rat hippocampal cells depends not only on place but also on the direction a rat is moving, the destination toward which it is traveling, or other task-related variables.[22]

The discovery of place cells in the 1970s led to a theory that the hippocampus might act as a cognitive map—a neural representation of the layout of the environment.[23] Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis. It is a frequent observation that without a fully functional hippocampus, humans may not remember where they have been and how to get where they are going: getting lost is one of the most common symptoms of amnesia.[24] Studies with animals have shown that an intact hippocampus is required for some spatial memory tasks, particularly ones that require finding the way to a hidden goal.[25] The "cognitive map hypothesis" has been further advanced by recent discoveries of head direction cells, grid cells, and border cells in several parts of the rodent brain that are strongly connected to the hippocampus.[14][26]

Brain imaging shows that people have more active hippocampi when correctly navigating, as tested in a computer-simulated "virtual" navigation task.[27] Also, there is evidence that the hippocampus plays a role in finding shortcuts and new routes between familiar places. For example, London's taxi drivers must learn a large number of places and the most direct routes between them (they have to pass a strict test, The Knowledge, before being licensed to drive the famous black cabs). A study at University College London by Maguire, et al. (2000)[28] showed that part of the hippocampus is larger in taxi drivers than in the general public, and that more experienced drivers have bigger hippocampi. Whether having a bigger hippocampus helps an individual to become a cab driver, or if finding shortcuts for a living makes an individual's hippocampus grow is yet to be elucidated. However, in that study Maguire, et al. examined the correlation between size of the grey matter and length of time that had been spent as a taxi driver, and found a positive correlation between the length of time an individual had spent as a taxi driver and the volume of the right hippocampus. It was found that the total volume of the hippocampus remained constant, from the control group vs. taxi drivers. That is to say that the posterior portion of a taxi driver's hippocampus is indeed increased, but at the expense of the anterior portion. There have been no known detrimental effects reported from this disparity in hippocampal proportions.[28]

Anatomy

Main article: Hippocampus anatomy
Nissl-stained coronal section of the brain of a macaque monkey, showing hippocampus (circled). Source: brainmaps.org

Anatomically, the hippocampus is an elaboration of the edge of the cerebral cortex.[29] It can be distinguished as a zone where the cortex narrows into a single layer of very densely-packed neurons, which curls into a tight S shape. The structures that line the edge of the cortex make up the so-called limbic system (Latin limbus = border): these include the hippocampus, cingulate cortex, olfactory cortex, and amygdala. Paul MacLean once suggested, as part of his triune brain theory, that the limbic structures comprise the neural basis of emotion. Most neuroscientists no longer believe that the concept of a unified "limbic system" is valid, though.[30]

The hippocampus as a whole has the shape of a curved tube, which has been analogized variously to a seahorse, a ram's horn (Cornu Ammonis, hence the subdivisions CA1 through CA4), or a banana.[29] It consists of ventral and dorsal portions, both of which share similar composition but are parts of different neural circuits.[31] This general layout holds across the full range of mammalian species, from hedgehog to human, although the details vary. In the rat, the two hippocampi resemble a pair of bananas, joined at the stem. In human or monkey brains, the portion of the hippocampus down at the bottom, near the base of the temporal lobe, is much broader than the part at the top. One of the consequences of this complex geometry is that cross-sections through the hippocampus can show a variety of shapes, depending on the angle and location of the cut.

Basic circuit of the hippocampus, as drawn by Santiago Ramon y Cajal. DG: dentate gyrus. Sub: subiculum. EC: entorhinal cortex

The entorhinal cortex (EC), the greatest source of hippocampal input and target of hippocampal output, is strongly and reciprocally connected with many other parts of the cerebral cortex, and thereby serves as the main "interface" between the hippocampus and other parts of the brain. The superficial layers of the EC provide the most prominent input to the hippocampus, and the deep layers of the EC receive the most prominent output. Within the hippocampus, the flow of information is largely unidirectional, with signals propagating through a series of tightly packed cell layers, first to the dentate gyrus, then to the [[|hippocampal subfields|CA3]] layer, then to the CA1 layer, then to the subiculum, then out of the hippocampus to the EC. Each of these layers also contains complex intrinsic circuitry and extensive longitudinal connections.[29]

Several other less salient connections play important roles in hippocampal function.[29] Beyond the output to the EC, additional output pathways go to other cortical areas including the prefrontal cortex, and another large output goes to the lateral septal area. The hippocampus receives modulatory input from the serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine systems, and from nucleus reuniens of the thalamus. A very important projection comes from the medial septal area, which sends cholinergic and GABAergic fibers to all parts of the hippocampus. The inputs from the septal area play a key role in controlling the physiological state of the hippocampus: destruction of the septal area abolishes the hippocampal theta rhythm, and severely impairs certain types of memory.[32]

The cortical region adjacent to the hippocampus is known collectively as the parahippocampal gyrus (or parahippocampus).[33] It includes the EC and also the perirhinal cortex, which derives its name from the fact that it lies next to the rhinal sulcus. The perirhinal cortex plays an important role in visual recognition of complex objects, but there is also substantial evidence that it makes a contribution to memory which can be distinguished from the contribution of the hippocampus, and that complete amnesia occurs only when both the hippocampus and the parahippocampus are damaged.[33]

Physiology

Examples of rat hippocampal EEG and CA1 neural activity in the theta (awake/behaving) and LIA (slow-wave sleep) modes. Each plot show 20 seconds of data, with a hippocampal EEG trace at the top, spike rasters from 40 simultaneously recorded CA1 pyramidal cells in the middle (each raster line represents a different cell), and a plot of running speed at the bottom. The top plot represents a time period during which the rat was actively searching for scattered food pellets. For the bottom plot, the rat was asleep.

The hippocampus shows two major "modes" of activity, each associated with a distinct pattern of neural population activity and waves of electrical activity as measured by an electroencephalogram (EEG). These modes are named after the EEG patterns associated with them: theta and large irregular activity (LIA). The main characteristics described below are for the rat, which is the animal most extensively studied.[34]

The theta mode appears during states of active, alert behavior (especially locomotion), and also during REM (dreaming) sleep.[35] In the theta mode, the EEG is dominated by large regular waves with a frequency range of 6–9 Hz, and the main groups of hippocampal neurons (pyramidal cells and granule cells) show sparse population activity, which means that in any short time interval, the great majority of cells are silent, while the small remaining fraction fire at relatively high rates, up to 50 spikes in one second for the most active of them. An active cell typically stays active for half a second to a few seconds. As the rat behaves, the active cells fall silent and new cells become active, but the overall percentage of active cells remains more or less constant. In many situations, cell activity is determined largely by the spatial location of the animal, but other behavioral variables also clearly influence it.

The LIA mode appears during slow-wave (non-dreaming) sleep, and also during states of waking immobility, such as resting or eating.[35] In the LIA mode, the EEG is dominated by sharp waves, which are randomly-timed large deflections of the EEG signal lasting for 200–300 msec. These sharp waves also determine the population neural activity patterns. Between them, pyramidal cells and granule cells are very quiet (but not silent). During a sharp wave, as many as 5–10% of the neural population may emit action potentials during a period of 50 msec; many of these cells emit bursts of several action potentials.

These two hippocampal activity modes can be seen in primates as well as rats, with the exception that it has been difficult to see robust theta rhythmicity in the primate hippocampus. There are, however, qualitatively similar sharp waves, and similar state-dependent changes in neural population activity.[36]

Theta rhythm

Main article: Theta rhythm

Because of its densely packed neural layers, the hippocampus generates some of the largest EEG signals of any brain structure. In some situations the EEG is dominated by regular waves at 3–10 Hz, often continuing for many seconds. These reflect subthreshold membrane potentials and strongly modulate the spiking of hippocampal neurons and synchronise across the hippocampus in a travelling wave pattern.[37] This EEG pattern is known as a theta rhythm.[38] Theta rhythmicity is very obvious in rabbits and rodents, and also clearly present in cats and dogs. Whether theta can be seen in primates is a vexing question.[39] In rats (the animals that have been the most extensively studied), theta is seen mainly in two conditions: first, when an animal is walking or in some other way actively interacting with its surroundings; second, during REM sleep.[40] The function of theta has not yet been convincingly explained, although numerous theories have been proposed.[41] The most popular hypothesis has been to relate it to learning and memory. For example, the phase with which theta at the time of stimulation of a neuron shapes the effect of that stimulation upon its synapses and therefore may affect learning and memory dependent upon synaptic plasticity.[42] It is well-established that lesions of the medial septum—the central node of the theta system—cause severe disruptions of memory. However, the medium septum is more than just the controller of theta, it is also the main source of cholinergic projections to the hippocampus.[29] It has not been established that septal lesions exert their effects specifically by eliminating the theta rhythm.[43]

Sharp waves

During sleep, or during waking states when an animal is resting or otherwise not engaged with its surroundings, the hippocampal EEG shows a pattern of irregular slow waves, somewhat larger in amplitude than theta waves. This pattern is occasionally interrupted by large surges called sharp waves.[44] These events are associated with bursts of spike activity, lasting 50–100 msec, in pyramidal cells of CA3 and CA1. They are also associated with short-lasting high-frequency EEG oscillations called "ripples", with frequencies in the range 150–200 Hz in rats. Sharp waves are most frequent during sleep, when they occur at an average rate around 1 per second (in rats), but in a very irregular temporal pattern. Sharp waves are less frequent during inactive waking states, and are usually smaller. Sharp waves have also been observed in humans and monkeys. In macaques, sharp waves are robust, but do not occur as frequently as in rats.[36]

One of the most interesting aspects of sharp waves is that they appear to be associated with memory. Wilson and McNaughton 1994,[45] and numerous later studies, reported that when hippocampal place cells have overlapping spatial firing fields (and therefore often fire in near-simultaneity), they tend to show correlated activity during sleep following the behavioral session. This enhancement of correlation, commonly known as reactivation, has been found to occur mainly during sharp waves.[46] It has been proposed that sharp waves are, in fact, reactivations of neural activity patterns that were memorized during behavior, driven by strengthening of synaptic connections within the hippocampus.[47] This idea forms a key component of the "two-stage memory" theory, advocated by Buzsáki and others, which proposes that memories are stored within the hippocampus during behavior, and then later transferred to the neocortex during sleep: sharp waves are suggested to drive Hebbian synaptic changes in the neocortical targets of hippocampal output pathways.[48]

Long-term potentiation

Main article: Long-term potentiation

Since at least the time of Ramon y Cajal, psychologists have speculated that the brain stores memory by altering the strength of connections between neurons that are simultaneously active.[49] This idea was formalized by Donald Hebb in 1948,[50] but for many years thereafter, attempts to find a brain mechanism for such changes came up empty. In 1973, Tim Bliss and Terje Lømo described a phenomenon in the rabbit hippocampus that appeared to meet Hebb's specifications: a change in synaptic responsiveness induced by brief strong activation and lasting for hours, days, or longer.[51] This phenomenon was soon referred to as long-term potentiation, abbreviated LTP. As a candidate mechanism for memory, LTP has been studied intensively over the following years, and a great deal has been learned about it.

The hippocampus is a particularly favorable site for studying LTP because of its densely packed and sharply defined layers of neurons, but similar types of activity-dependent synaptic change have now been observed in many other brain areas.[52] The best-studied form of LTP occurs at synapses that terminate on dendritic spines and use the transmitter glutamate. Several of the major pathways within the hippocampus fit this description, and show LTP.[53] The synaptic changes depend on a special type of glutamate receptor, the NMDA receptor, which has the special property of allowing calcium to enter the postsynaptic spine only when presynaptic activation and postsynaptic depolarization occur at the same time.[54] Drugs that interfere with NMDA receptors block LTP and also have major effects on some types of memory, especially spatial memory. Transgenic mice, genetically modified in ways that disable the LTP mechanism, also generally show severe memory deficits.[54]

Pathology

Aging

Age-related conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (for which hippocampal disruption is one of the earliest signs[55]) have a severe impact on many types of cognition, but even normal, healthy aging is associated with a gradual decline in some types of memory, including episodic memory and working memory. Because the hippocampus is thought to play a central role in memory, there has been considerable interest in the possibility that age-related declines could be caused by hippocampal deterioration.[56] Some early studies reported substantial loss of neurons in the hippocampus of elderly people, but later studies using more precise techniques found only minimal differences.[56] Similarly, some MRI studies have reported shrinkage of the hippocampus in elderly people, but other studies have failed to reproduce this finding. There is, however, a reliable relationship between the size of the hippocampus and memory performance—meaning that not all elderly people show hippocampal shrinkage, but those who do tend to perform less well on some memory tasks.[57] There are also reports that memory tasks tend to produce less hippocampal activation in elderly than in young subjects.[57]

In rats, where detailed studies of cellular physiology are possible, aging does not cause substantial cell loss in the hippocampus, but it alters synaptic connectivity in several ways.[58] Functional synapses are lost in the dentate gyrus and CA1 region, and NMDA receptor-mediated responses are reduced. These changes may account for deficits in induction and maintenance of long-term potentiation, a form of synaptic plasticity that has been implicated in memory. There are also age-related declines in hippocampal expression of several genes associated with synaptic plasticity.[59] Finally, there are differences in the stability of "place cell" representations. In young rats, the arrangement of place fields is usually altered if the rat is moved into a different environment, but remains the same if a rat is returned to an environment it has visited previously. In aged rats, the place fields frequently fail to "remap" when a rat is moved to a different environment, and also frequently fail to restore the original "map" when the rat is returned to the same environment.

Stress

The hippocampus contains high levels of mineralocorticoid receptors, which make it more vulnerable to long-term stress than most other brain areas.[60] Stress-related steroids affect the hippocampus in at least three ways: first, by reducing the excitability of some hippocampal neurons; second, by inhibiting the genesis of new neurons in the dentate gyrus; third, by causing atrophy of dendrites in pyramidal cells of the CA3 region. There is evidence that humans who have experienced severe, long-lasting traumatic stress (for example, holocaust survivors) show atrophy of the hippocampus, more than of other parts of the brain. These effects show up in post-traumatic stress disorder, and they may contribute to the hippocampal atrophy reported in schizophrenia and severe depression.[61] Hippocampal atrophy is also frequently seen in Cushing's syndrome, a disorder caused by high levels of cortisol in the bloodstream. At least some of these effects appear to be reversible if the stress is discontinued. There is, however, evidence mainly derived from studies using rats that stress shortly after birth can affect hippocampal function in ways that persist throughout life.[62]

Epilepsy

The hippocampus is often the focus of epileptic seizures: hippocampal sclerosis is the most commonly visible type of tissue damage in temporal lobe epilepsy.[63] It is not yet clear, though, whether the epilepsy is usually caused by hippocampal abnormalities, or the hippocampus is damaged by cumulative effects of seizures.[64] In experimental settings where repetitive seizures are artificially induced in animals, hippocampal damage is a frequent result: this may be a consequence of the hippocampus being one of the most electrically excitable parts of the brain. It may also have something to do with the fact that the hippocampus is one of very few brain regions where new neurons continue to be created throughout life.[65]

Schizophrenia

The causes of schizophrenia are not well understood, but numerous abnormalities of brain structure have been reported. The most thoroughly investigated alterations involve the cerebral cortex, but effects on the hippocampus have also been described. Many reports have found reductions in the size of the hippocampus in schizophrenic subjects.[66] The changes probably result from altered development rather than tissue damage, and show up even in subjects who have never been medicated. Several lines of evidence implicate changes in synaptic organization and connectivity.[67] It is unclear whether hippocampal alterations play any role in causing the psychotic symptoms that are the most important feature of schizophrenia. Anthony Grace and his co-workers have suggested, on the basis of experimental work using animals, that hippocampal disfunction might produce an alteration of dopamine release in the basal ganglia, thereby indirectly affecting the integration of information in the prefrontal cortex.[68] Others have suggested that hippocampal disfunction might account for disturbances in long term memory frequently observed in people with schizophrenia.[69]

Evolution

The hippocampus has a generally similar appearance across the range of mammal species, from monotremes such as the echidna to primates such as humans.[70] The hippocampal-size-to-body-size ratio broadly increases, being about twice as large for primates as for the echidna. It does not, however, increase at anywhere close to the rate of the neocortex-to-body-size ratio. Therefore, the hippocampus takes up a much larger fraction of the cortical mantle in rodents than in primates. In adult humans, the volume of the hippocampus on each side of the brain is about 3–3.5 cc, as compared to 320–420 cc for the volume of the neocortex.[71]

There is also a general relationship between the size of the hippocampus and spatial memory. When comparisons are made between similar species, those that have a greater capacity for spatial memory tend to have larger hippocampal volumes.[72] This relationship also extends to sex differences: in species where males and females show strong differences in spatial memory ability, they also tend to show corresponding differences in hippocampal volume.[73]

Non-mammalian species do not have a brain structure that looks like the mammalian hippocampus, but they have one that is considered homologous to it. The hippocampus, as pointed out above, is essentially the medial edge of the cortex. Only mammals have a fully developed cortex, but the structure it evolved from, called the pallium, is present in all vertebrates, even the most primitive ones such as the lamprey or hagfish.[74] The pallium is usually divided into three zones: medial, lateral, and dorsal. The medial pallium forms the precursor of the hippocampus. It does not resemble the hippocampus visually, because the layers are not warped into an S shape or enwrapped by the dentate gyrus, but the homology is indicated by strong chemical and functional affinities. There is now evidence that these hippocampal-like structures are involved in spatial cognition in birds, reptiles, and fish.[75]

In birds, the correspondence is sufficiently well established that most anatomists refer to the medial pallial zone as the "avian hippocampus".[76] Numerous species of birds have strong spatial skills, particularly those that cache food. There is evidence that food-caching birds have a larger hippocampus than other types of birds, and that damage to the hippocampus causes impairments in spatial memory.[77]

The story for fish is more complex. In teleost fish (which make up the great majority of existing species), the forebrain is distorted in comparison to other types of vertebrates: most neuroanatomists believe that the teleost forebrain is essentially everted, like a sock turned inside-out, so that structures that lie in the interior, next to the ventricles, for most vertebrates, are found on the outside in teleost fish, and vice versa.[78] One of the consequences of this is that the medial pallium ("hippocampal" zone) of a typical vertebrate is thought to correspond to the lateral pallium of a typical fish. Several types of fish (particularly goldfish) have been shown experimentally to have strong spatial memory abilities, even forming "cognitive maps" of the areas they inhabit.[72] There is evidence that damage to the lateral pallium impairs spatial memory.[79][80]

Thus, the role of the hippocampal region in navigation appears to begin far back in vertebrate evolution, predating splits that occurred hundreds of millions of years ago.[81] It is not yet known whether the medial pallium plays a similar role in even more primitive vertebrates, such as sharks and rays, or even lampreys and hagfish. Some types of insects, and molluscs such as the octopus, also have strong spatial learning and navigation abilities, but these appear to work differently from the mammalian spatial system, so there is as yet no good reason to think that they have a common evolutionary origin; nor is there sufficient similarity in brain structure to enable anything resembling a "hippocampus" to be identified in these species. Some have proposed, though, that the insect's mushroom bodies may have a function similar to that of the hippocampus.[82]

Notes

  1. ^ Finger, p. 183
  2. ^ Eichenbaum et al., 1991
  3. ^ Vanderwolf, 2001
  4. ^ Nadel et al., 1975
  5. ^ Gray and McNaughton, 2000
  6. ^ Best & White, 1999
  7. ^ Scoville and Milner, 1957
  8. ^ N.Y. Times, 12-06-2008
  9. ^ Squire, 2009
  10. ^ a b Squire, 1992
  11. ^ a b Eichenbaum and Cohen, 1993
  12. ^ O'Keefe and Dostrovsky, 1971
  13. ^ O'Keefe and Nadel, 1978
  14. ^ a b c d Moser et al., 2008
  15. ^ Squire and Schacter, 2002
  16. ^ Squire and Schacter, 2002, Ch. 1
  17. ^ Diana et al., 2007
  18. ^ Skaggs et al., 1996
  19. ^ Matsumara et al., 1999
  20. ^ Rolls and Xiang, 2006
  21. ^ Ekstrom et al., 2003
  22. ^ Smith and Mizumori, 2006
  23. ^ O'Keefe and Nadel
  24. ^ Chiu et al., 2004
  25. ^ Morris et al., 1982
  26. ^ Solstad et al., 2008
  27. ^ Maguire et al., 1998
  28. ^ a b Maguire et al., 2000
  29. ^ a b c d e Amaral and Lavenex, 2006
  30. ^ Kötter & Stephan, 1997
  31. ^ Moser and Moser, 1998
  32. ^ Winson, 1978
  33. ^ a b Eichenbaum et al, 2007
  34. ^ Buzsaki, 2006
  35. ^ a b Buzsáki et al., 1990
  36. ^ a b Skaggs et al., 2007
  37. ^ Lubenov & Siapas, 2009
  38. ^ Buzsáki, 2002
  39. ^ Cantero et al., 2003
  40. ^ Vanderwolf, 1969
  41. ^ Buzsáki, 2006
  42. ^ Huerta & Lisman, 1993
  43. ^ Kahana et al., 2001
  44. ^ Buzsáki, 1986
  45. ^ Wilson & McNaughton, 1994
  46. ^ Jackson et al., 2006
  47. ^ Sutherland & McNaughton, 2000
  48. ^ Buzsáki, 1989
  49. ^ Ramon y Cajal, 1894
  50. ^ Hebb, 1948
  51. ^ Bliss & Lømo, 1973
  52. ^ Cooke & Bliss, 2006
  53. ^ Malenka & Bear, 2004
  54. ^ a b Nakazawa et al., 2004
  55. ^ Hampel et al., 2008
  56. ^ a b Prull et al., 2000, p. 105
  57. ^ a b Prull et al., 2000, p. 107
  58. ^ Rosenzweig & Barnes, 2003
  59. ^ Burke & Barnes, 2006
  60. ^ McEwen, 1999
  61. ^ Campbell & MacQueen, 2004
  62. ^ Garcia-Segura, pp. 170–71
  63. ^ Chang and Lowenstein, 2003
  64. ^ Sloviter, 2005
  65. ^ Kuruba et al., 2009
  66. ^ Harrison, 2004
  67. ^ Harrison, 2004
  68. ^ Goto & Grace, 2008
  69. ^ Boyer et al., 2007
  70. ^ West, 1990
  71. ^ Suzuki et al, 2005
  72. ^ a b Jacobs, 2003
  73. ^ Jacobs et al., 1990
  74. ^ Aboitiz et al., 2003
  75. ^ Rodríguez et al., 2002
  76. ^ Colombo and Broadbent, 2000
  77. ^ Shettleworth, 2003
  78. ^ Nieuwenhuys, 1982
  79. ^ Portavella et al., 2002
  80. ^ Vargas et al., 2006
  81. ^ Broglio et al., 2005
  82. ^ Mizunami et al., 1998

References

Further reading

Journals

Books

  • edited by Per Andersen ... (2007). The Hippocampus Book. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195100273. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  • Henri M. Duvernoy, F. Cattin (2005). The Human Hippocampus: Functional Anatomy, Vascularization, and Serial Sections with MRI. Springer. ISBN 9783540231912.
  • Howard Eichenbaum (2002). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory. Oxford University Press US. ISBN 9780195141757.
  • edited by Patricia E. Sharp. (2002). The Neural Basis of Navigation: Evidence from Single Cell Recording. Springer. ISBN 9780792375791. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  • Philippe Taupin (2007). The Hippocampus: Neurotransmission and Plasticity in the Nervous System. Nova Publishers. ISBN 9781600219146.

Template:Neuroscience portal

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hippocampus&oldid=299015912"