Jump to content

51st state

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 216.69.219.3 (talk) at 00:21, 10 May 2010 (→‎District of Columbia: proposed by whom or by what group / elected body? citation needed.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Two other uses

The 51st state, in American political discourse, is a phrase that refers to areas either seriously or derisively considered candidates for addition to the 50 states already part of the Union. Before 1959, when Alaska and Hawaii joined the U.S., the term "the 49th state" was used.

"51st state", when used in a negative sense, can refer to independent nations which are, or are perceived to be, under excessive American influence or control. In various countries around the world, people who believe their local and/or national culture has become too Americanized sometimes use the term "51st state" in critical reference to their respective countries.[1] The term 51st stater usually refers to non-U.S. residents who emulate mannerisms and culture of an American, or a non-American politician who is a supporter of the United States, especially its foreign policy.

Under Article IV, Section Three of the United States Constitution, which outlines the relationship among the states, Congress has the power to admit new states to the union. The states are required to give "full faith and credit" to the acts of each other's legislatures and courts, which is generally held to include the recognition of legal contracts, marriages, and criminal judgments. The states are guaranteed military and civil defense by the federal government, which is also obligated by Article IV, Section Four, to "guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government." New states are admitted into the Union by the precedents and procedures established by the Northwest Ordinance. Following the precedent established by the Enabling Act of 1802, an Enabling Act must be passed by Congress as a prerequisite to admission. The act authorizes the people of a territory to frame a constitution, and lays down the requirements that must be met prior to consideration for statehood.

Possible candidates

District of Columbia

The District of Columbia is often mentioned as a likely candidate for statehood. In Federalist No. 43 of the Federalist Papers, James Madison considered the implications of the definition of the "seat of government" found in the United States Constitution. Although he noted potential conflicts of interest, and the need for a "municipal legislature for local purposes,"[2] Madison did not address the district's role in national voting. At the time, some believed that giving the district full voting rights would be like giving Congress its own separate vote, increasing its power at the expense of the citizens. However, the city's population has grown to almost 600,000 people (larger than Wyoming's and comparable to those of several other states—ignoring that the District has no rural areas), and the calls for suffrage have increased.

Of the potential candidates, citizens of the District of Columbia tend to be most supportive of statehood, yet this would require amendment of the United States Constitution. D.C. residents who support this movement sometimes use the Revolutionary War protest motto "Taxation without representation," denoting their lack of Congressional representation; the phrase is now printed on newly issued D.C. license plates (although a driver may choose to have the D.C. website address instead). President Bill Clinton's presidential limousine had the "Taxation without representation" license plate late in his term, while President George W. Bush had the vehicle's plates changed shortly after beginning his term in office.[3]

This position was carried by the D.C. Statehood Party, a minor party; it has since merged with the local Green Party affiliate to form the D.C. Statehood Green Party. The nearest this movement ever came to success was in 1978, when Congress passed the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment. Two years later in 1980, local citizens passed an initiative calling for a constitutional convention for a new state. In 1982, voters ratified the constitution of the state, which was to be called New Columbia. The drive for statehood stalled in 1985, however, when the D.C. Voting Rights Amendment failed because not enough states ratified the amendment within the seven-year span specified.

Statehood will likely remain a highly contentious political issue due to the political demographics of the city. D.C. has long voted overwhelmingly Democratic, and the addition of another state would likely guarantee two Democratic Senators in a closely divided Senate.

Another proposed optioncn would be to have Maryland, from which the current land was ceded, retake the District of Columbia, as Virginia has already done for its part, while leaving the National Mall, the United States Capitol, and the White House in a truncated District of Columbia, thereby preventing any Congressional favoritism toward any state (as was the Founders' reason for the District in the first place). This would give D.C. residents the benefit of statehood while precluding the creation of a 51st state.

Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico statehood referenda have been consistently, though narrowly, unsuccessful. In each referendum, statehood supporters are matched almost equally by supporters of maintaining the status quo (the balance of the votes being cast by supporters of full independence), although support for statehood has risen in each successive popular referendum.[4]

The Puerto Rico Democracy Act (H.R. 2499) is a proposed United States federal statute that would provide for referendums to be held in Puerto Rico to determine the island's ultimate political status. It has been introduced twice in the United States Congress, first in 2007 and again in 2009.

On April 29, 2010, the United States House of Representatives voted 223–169 to approve a measure for a federally sanctioned process for Puerto Rico's self determination. The measure would allow Puerto Rico to set a referendum on whether to continue its present form of commonwealth political status or move to a different political status. If Puerto Ricans vote to maintain its current political status, the Government of Puerto Rico is authorized to conduct additional plebiscites at intervals of every 8 years from the date that the results of the prior plebiscite are certified. If Puerto Ricans vote to have a different political status for the territory, a second referendum would determine whether it becomes a U.S. state, an independent country, or a sovereign nation associated with the U.S. that will not be subject to the Territorial Clause of the United States Constitution.[5] During the House debate, a fourth option to retain its present form of commonwealth (status quo) political status was added as an option in the second plebiscite. [6] [7]

Immediately following U.S. House of the U.S. Congress passage, H.R. 2499 was sent to the U.S. Senate, where it was given two formal readings and referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. H.R. 2499 has been scheduled for a hearing before the aforementioned committee at 9:30 A.M., on Wednesday, May 19th, 2010. This hearing will be for gathering testimony on the bill.[8]

If Puerto Rico were a U.S. state, it would rank 27th in population, and have six seats in the House of Representatives.[9][10][11] Puerto Rico has been under U.S. sovereignty for over a century and Puerto Ricans have been U.S. citizens since 1917; but the island’s ultimate status still has not been determined and its 3.9 million residents still do not have voting representation in their national government. Puerto Rico currently has limited representation in Congress in the form of a Resident Commissioner, a nonvoting delegate, and the current Congress had returned the Commissioner's power to vote in the Committee of the Whole, but not on matters where the vote would represent a decisive participation.[12] Puerto Rico has elections on the United States presidential primary or Caucus of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party to select delegates to the respective parties national conventions although presidential electors are not granted on the Electoral College.

Contrary to common misconception, residents of Puerto Rico pay U.S. federal taxes: import/export taxes, federal commodity taxes, social security taxes, etc. Most residents do not pay federal income tax but pay federal payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare). However, federal employees, or those who do business with the federal government, Puerto Rico-based corporations that intend to send funds to the U.S. and others also pay federal income taxes. Puerto Ricans may enlist in the U.S. military. Puerto Ricans have fully participated in all U.S. wars since 1898. All persons born in Puerto Rico after 1941 are legally natural born citizens of the United States, one of the constitutional requirements to be President of the United States.[13][14][15]

President George H.W. Bush raised the statehood before Congress in his first State of the Union message:

There’s another issue that I’ve decided to mention here tonight. I’ve long believed that the people of Puerto Rico should have the right to determine their own political future. Personally, I strongly favor statehood. But I urge the Congress to take the necessary steps to allow the people to decide in a referendum.[16]

Bush issued a memorandum on November 30, 1992 to heads of executive departments and agencies establishing the current administrative relationship between the Federal Government and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. This memorandum directs all Federal departments, agencies, and officials to treat Puerto Rico administratively as if it were a State insofar as doing so would not disrupt Federal programs or operations.[17] On December 23, 2000, President Bill Clinton signed executive Order 13183, which established the President's Task Force on Puerto Rico's Status and the rules for its membership. Section 4 of executive Order 13183 (as amended by executive Order 13319) directs the Task Force to "report on its actions to the President ... on progress made in the determination of Puerto Rico's ultimate status." President George W. Bush signed an additional amendment to Executive Order 13183 on December 3, 2003, which established the current co-chairs and instructed the Task Force to issue reports as needed, but no less than once every two years.[9][10]

The statehood position is carried by the New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico. Both the Democratic Party and Republican Party, in their respective 2008 party platforms, have expressed their support of the rights of the United States Citizens in Puerto Rico to determine the destiny of the Commonwealth to achieve a future permanent non-territorial political status with government by consent and full enfranchisement.[18][19]

The Republican Party platform of 2008 says:

We support the right of the United States citizens of Puerto Rico to be admitted to the Union as a fully sovereign state after they freely so determine. We recognize that Congress has the final authority to define the constitutionally valid options for Puerto Rico to achieve a permanent non-territorial status with government by consent and full enfranchisement. As long as Puerto Rico is not a state, however, the will of its people regarding their political status should be ascertained by means of a general right of referendum or specific referenda sponsored by the U.S. government.[20]

The Democratic Party platform of 2008 says:

We believe that the people of Puerto Rico have the right to the political status of their choice, obtained through a fair, neutral, and democratic process of self-determination. The White House and Congress will work with all groups in Puerto Rico to enable the question of Puerto Rico's status to be resolved during the next four years.[21]

Its population in the 2000 census was 3,927,776. (Kentucky ranked 26th, with 4,206,074, and Oregon ranked 27th, with 3,700,758.)

A hypothetical merging of several former and current Pacific US territories into a single state.

Other U.S. territories or former territories

Other less likely contenders are Guam and the United States Virgin Islands, both of which are unincorporated organized territories of the United States, although the latter could merge with Puerto Rico due to their proximity (although they have very different histories, cultures & languages). Also the Northern Mariana Islands, which is a commonwealth like Puerto Rico, and American Samoa, an unorganized, unincorporated territory could attempt to gain statehood. Some proposals call for the Virgin Islands to be admitted with Puerto Rico as one state (often known as the proposed "Commonwealth of Prusvi," for Puerto Rico/U.S. Virgin Islands), and for the amalgamation of U.S. territories or former territories in the Pacific Ocean, in the manner of the "Greater Hawaii" concept of the 1960s. Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands would be admitted as one state, along with Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Marshall Islands (though these latter three entities are now separate sovereign nations, which have Compact of Free Association relationships with the United States). Such a state would have a population of 441,171 (slightly lower than Wyoming's population) and an area of 911.82 square miles (slightly smaller than Rhode Island). American Samoa could possibly be part of such a state, increasing the population to 506,040 and the area to 988.65 square miles, or it may become a county of Hawaii.[citation needed] Radio Australia, in late May 2008, issued signs of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands becoming one again and becoming the 51st state.[22]

Location Population Area (sq. mi.) Comments
Puerto Rico 3,994,259 3,514 July 2007 estimate
United States Virgin Islands 112,000 133.73 July 2005 estimate
Total 4,106,259 3,647.73     Puerto Rico & U.S. Virgin Islands
Location Population Area (sq. mi.) Comments
Palau 19,907 177 July 2005 estimate
Northern Mariana Islands 80,801 184.17 July 2005 estimate
Marshall Islands 61,963 69.8 July 2005 estimate
Guam 175,877 209.85 July 2008 estimate
Federated States of Micronesia 108,500 271 July 2006 estimate
Subtotal 441,171 911.82 Former Trust Territories + Guam
American Samoa 64,869 76.83 July 2006 estimate
Total 511,917 988.65     Former Trust Territories + American Pacific

Use internationally

Because of their cultural similarities and close alliances with the United States, it is said–in jest or derisively–that some countries are the 51st state. In other countries, movements with various degrees of support and seriousness have proposed U.S. statehood.

Canada

In Canada, "the 51st state" (or sometimes "the Maple Leaf state") is an emotional trigger phrase generally used in such a way as to imply that if a certain political course is taken, Canada's destiny will be to become "the 51st state".

The implication is not without historical basis: The U.S. invaded Canada during the American Revolution; a group of Irish raiders attacked Canada from the U.S. after the American Civil War[23]. Several U.S. politicians in the 19th century also spoke in favor of annexing Canada.[24]

In modern times, becoming "the 51st state" is usually raised either as a potential consequence of adopting policies that propose greater integration or cooperation with the United States (such as the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement in 1988, or the current debate over the creation of a common defense perimeter), or as a potential consequence of not adopting proposals intended to resolve the issue of Quebec sovereignty (such as the Charlottetown Accord in 1992, or the Clarity Act in 1999).

The phrase is usually used in local political debates, in polemic writing or in private conversations. It is rarely used by politicians themselves in a public context, although at certain times in Canadian history political parties have used other similarly loaded imagery. In the 1988 federal election, the Liberals asserted that the proposed Free Trade Agreement amounted to an American takeover of Canada[25] — notably, the party ran an ad in which Tory strategists, upon the adoption of the agreement, slowly erased the Canada-U.S. border from a desktop map of North America.[26] Within days, however, the Tories responded with an ad which featured the border being drawn back on, as an announcer intoned "Here's where we draw the line."[27]

A few fringe groups in Canada have actively campaigned in favor of joining the United States. These annexationist movements have not attracted much mainstream attention, although surveys have found that a minority of Canadians expressed some support for the concept, ranging from as many as 19 per cent in a Léger Marketing survey in 2001[28] to just seven per cent in another survey by the same company in 2004.[29]

One notable recent allusion to "51st state" discourse came from the Canadian indie rock group Octoberman, whose 2009 album Fortresses includes a song titled "51", which describes the narrator's reaction to an announcement that Canada has been annexed by the United States.

In the United States, use of the term "the 51st state" when applied to Canada can serve as either a positive or negative reference, depending on the context. In some circumstances, the term is used from a U.S. perspective to highlight the similarities and close relationship between Canada and the United States. However, the term is more often used disparagingly, intended to deride Canada, or make it appear as an unimportant or inconsequential neighbor of the United States.

Alberta

Alberta is referred to as "the Texas of the north"[30]; the two share similarities in terms of conservative social values and an economy defined by cattle ranching and petroleum extraction and processing. A number of Albertans have expressed dissatisfaction at Canada's policies towards the province, particularly with regards to national energy policy and equalization payments. Some Albertans accuse Canada of stealing money from the province's vast oil reserves to distribute to the rest of the country; however the redistribution of windfall provincial earnings as equalization payments to most provinces is standard practice, and all provinces have been the recipient of this funding at some point in time, including Alberta, although this sentiment was not directly tied to union with the United States.[31][32] An August 2005 poll commissioned by the Western Standard pegged support for the idea that "Western Canadians should begin to explore their options outside of Canada" at 42% in Alberta and 35.6% across the four Western provinces.[33]

Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island

During the Quebec referendum, 1995, there was media speculation that one potential consequence of Quebec's secession from Canada might be that the three Maritime Provinces of Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island, would be economically disadvantaged by their geographic isolation from the remaining Canadian provinces, and would therefore secede from Canada and be admitted to the United States as three new states. However, each of the provincial legislatures deny there is or ever was any intent to join the United States.

Quebec

In the Quebec general election, 1989, Parti 51 ran for elections proposing secession of Quebec from Canada and annexation to the US. The party attracted just 3,846 votes across the entire province, 0.11 per cent of the total votes cast.

Latin America

Central America

Due to geographical proximity of the Central American countries to the U.S. which has powerful economic influences and political importance in the Americas (including periods of U.S. military occupations), there were several movements and proposals by the United States during the 19th and 20th centuries to annex some or all of the 6 or 7 Central American republics (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras with the formerly British-ruled Bay Islands, Nicaragua, Panama which has the U.S.-ruled Canal Zone territory from 1903 to 1979, and formerly British Honduras or Belize since 1981). These movements and proposals all failed.

In 1855, American filibuster William Walker staged a coup in civil war-torn Nicaragua with the intent of adding additional slave states to the Union. He installed himself as president in 1856, but was overthrown by a coalition of Central American nations.

Cuba

Home to 500,000 American land owners before the outbreak of the Spanish-American War, Cuba was projected to become US territory through a potential purchase from the Spanish empire. In 1859, Senator John Slidell introduced a bill to place thirty million dollars into the hands of the President, to be applied towards the purchase of Cuba from Spain.[34][35]

The pro-independence movement in Cuba was funded and supported by the U.S., as guerrilla leaders pleaded for annexation for statehood in the 1880s and early 1890s, but Cuban revolutionary leader José Martí objected and called for Cuban nationhood. The Teller Amendment to the congressional reply to President William McKinley's War Message imposed a condition of the United States military action in Cuba that the U.S. could not annex Cuba but only leave "control of the island to its people." In the Treaty of Paris which ended the Spanish-American War, Spain relinquished all claim of sovereignty over Cuba, but did not cede it to the U.S. as it did other territories. Despite this the Platt Amendment, which superseded the Teller amendment in 1901, allowed the United States certain rights and it was several years before U.S. troops were withdrawn.

From 1903 to 1958, the U.S. opted to back every government, most notably the General Fulgencio Batista regime who was ousted in 1959 by Fidel Castro. Castro erected an independent socialist/communist government which has been in power ever since.

Dominica

In 1898 one or more news outlets in the Caribbean noted growing sentiments of resentment of British rule in Dominica, including the system of administration over the country. These publications attempted to gauge sentiments of annexation to the United States as a way to change this system of administration.[36]

Dominican Republic

In 1869, Dominican president Buenaventura Báez tried to persuade the United States to annex his debt-ridden, war-torn nation.[citation needed] U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant supported this plan, but the annexation treaty failed in the 56-member Senate 28-28, falling well short of the two-thirds required by the Constitution.[37]

Guyana

There is an organization dedicated to the integration of Guyana with the United States, GuyanaUSA. Their claim is based on the idea that Guyana has strong connections with the United States in terms of people (100,000 people have joint Guyanese-American citizenship and 350,000 Guyanese live in the U.S., half as many as remain in Guyana). It is the only South American country with English as its official language. Guyana, however, appears to have partly committed itself to the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and also the South American integration organisation, becoming a founding member of the Union of South American Nations in 2008.

Haiti

Time Magazine columnist Mark Thompson suggested that Haiti had effectively become the 51st state after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. The widespread destruction from the earthquake prompted a quick and extensive response from the United States and the U.S. military utilized Haitian air and sea ports to facilitate foreign aid.[38]

Mexico

A hypothetical merging of United States and Mexico as 82 states.

The idea of incorporating Mexico as several new states of the United States has existed ever since the Mexican–American War of 1846-1848, when the All Mexico Movement proposed annexing Mexico by force. Today this idea stresses the strong economic and political connections between Mexico and the United States and the high recurring cost of defending a 2,000-mile border. In 1913 during border skirmishes between the United States and Mexico, it was proposed by some that the U.S. annex Chihuahua.

The northeast region, consisting of the states of Tamaulipas, Coahuila, and Nuevo León (where claims about federal taxes and water usage are similar to the proposed U.S. states complaints[citation needed]) is frequently alleged to be more alike in general mentality to Texas than to the rest of the country.[citation needed] These three states formed the core of the short-lived 19th century Republic of the Rio Grande.

Groups that suggest this union use several arguments to support their views, such as that both countries are Federal Republics, that their cultures are compatible despite the language difference as proved by the integration of millions of Mexicans into the U.S. via the 1986 U.S. Amnesty, that Mexico is extremely rich in natural resources with the potential to be a prosperous country, but that this is being prevented mainly by a long series of corrupt governments dominated by a small rich elite, which is the real reason for illegal immigration to the United States, and that therefore by dissolving the Mexican government along with the border, both countries would prosper better as an enlarged United States, with Mexicans turned into U.S. citizens and no longer treated as illegal aliens. One proposal called the Megamerge Dissolution Solution by T.L. Winslow calls for the U.S. to make the first move by officially inviting the Mexican people to dissolve their government and form statehood conventions and submit constitutions to Congress, claiming that it can be done in as little as five years during the Obama administration, with Mexico becoming anywhere from 10-15 new states (Mexico has 31 states). The new bigger U.S. would be better able to seal its (now shorter) borders against terrorists, and the extra territory would benefit from mass 2-way free migration, eventually equalizing development and opportunities while mixing the populations and creating a new paradigm for the region and the world.[39]

In 1853, filibuster William Walker conquered the Mexican states of Baja California and Sonora with the intent of adding new slave states to the Union. Within three months he had incorporated both states into the independent Republic of Sonora, but a lack of support from the US Government and increasing pressure from the Mexican Government forced him to retreat.

Asia and Pacific

Australia

Since the Second World War, Australian culture has been increasingly dominated by influences from the USA. The USA shares major joint military and government interests with Australia in part of the ANZUS Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951. Australia is an English-speaking country and is regarded as a close ally to the USA. The USA and Australia also have, remarkably, very similar governments, political systems and histories. While Australia is a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, with Queen Elizabeth II as head of state in her role as Queen of Australia, both governments are federal, have a House of Representatives and a Senate that are elected in similar fashions, and State governments that operate in similar fashion. The United States and Australia were also both largely formed from British subjects who were disgruntled and discriminated against, albeit for differing reasons, resulting in a common frontier mentality and self image in which the nations were carved out of a wilderness and formed into a free, prosperous nation. The similarities in both politics and culture between Australia and the United States have been remarked upon throughout history, and can be seen reflected in the close relations between the two nations at virtually every level and type of relationship that exists between them.

In Australia, the term '51st State' is used as a disparagement of a perceived invasion of American cultural or political influence.[40]

Iraq

A resident of Seattle mockingly declares Iraq the 51st U.S. state.

Several publications suggest that the Iraq War is a neocolonial war to make Iraq the 51st state, usually a tongue-in-cheek statement.[41][42][43]

Israel

Several websites assert that Israel is the 51st state due to the annual funding and defense support it receives from the United States. An example of this concept can be found in 2003 when Martine Rothblatt published a book called "Two Stars for Peace" that argued for the addition of Israel and the Palestinian Territories as the 51st and 52nd states in the Union.

Japan

Despite the United Nations guarantee of the protection and preservation of Japanese sovereignty, some American congressmen insisted they should annex a war-defeated Japan. The U.S. armed forces rejected such a plan during the Japanese Instrument of Surrender on the USS Missouri.

However, in Article 3 of the Treaty of San Francisco between the Allied Powers and Japan, which came into force in April 1952, the U.S. put the outlying islands of the Ryukyus, including the island of Okinawa–home to over 1,000,000 Okinawans related to the Japanese–and the Bonin Islands, the Volcano Islands, and Iwo Jima into U.S. trusteeship.[44] All these trusteeships were slowly returned to Japanese rule. Okinawa was returned on May 15, 1972, but the U.S. continues to station troops in the island's bases, an emotional subject for many Okinawans who despised foreign occupation left over from the World War II era.[45]

Philippines

The Philippines has a small grassroots movement for statehood. Originally part of the platform of the Liberal Party (Philippines), then known as the Federalista Party, the party dropped it in 1907 which coincided with the name change.[46][47] As recently as 2004, the concept has been part of a political platform in the Philippines.[48] Supporters of this movement have mainly been Filipinos that had fought as members of the United States armed forces in various wars during the Commonwealth period.[49][50]

Various suggestions for Philippine statehood have included its entry as a whole or the partial entry of the westernized north, leaving the predominantly Muslim parts of Mindanao to form its own country (see Moro National Liberation Front) or join Indonesia. The movement initially had a significant impact during the early American colonial period,[47] however in recent history it is no longer a mainstream movement,[51] and is primarily a minor social movement.[52][53]

Taiwan

When the Treaty of San Francisco and Treaty of Taipei were finalized, the United States, as leader of the World War II Allies and in its position as "principal occupying power" under the treaties[54] , was given the internationally agreed responsibility of administration of the former Formosa, which it then continued to delegate (in the form of an "agency" relationship) to Chiang Kai-shek's Republic of China. The ongoing debates and disagreements in regard to the legal and political status of Taiwan remains, with some commentators believing it to be an independent or quasi-independent state that seeks more international recognition from members of the United Nations, functioning under the Formosa government. Neither the San Francisco Peace Treaty nor the Treaty of Taipei specified who should exercise sovereignty over Taiwan after the Allied Forces had relinquished control. The People's Republic of China was not a signatory to either treaty.

A poll in 2003 among Taiwanese residents aged between 13 and 22 revealed that, when given the options of either becoming a province of China or a state within the U.S., 55% of the respondents preferred statehood while 36% chose joining with China.[55]

Europe

Albania

Albania is often cited as the 51st state due to its perceived strongly pro-USA positions mainly because of the Kosovo policy of the U.S. In reference to President George W. Bush's 2007 European tour, Edi Rama, Tirana's mayor and leader of the opposition Socialists, said: "Albania is for sure the most pro-American country in Europe, maybe even in the world ... Nowhere else can you find such respect and hospitality for the President of the United States. Even in Michigan, he wouldn't be as welcome." At the time of ex-Secretary of State James Baker's visit in 1991, there was even a move to hold a referendum declaring the country as the 51st American state.[56][57]

Italy

The Party of Reconstruction in Sicily, which claimed 40,000 members in 1944, campaigned for Sicily to be admitted as a U.S. state.[58] This party was one of several Sicilian separatist movements active after the downfall of Italian Fascism. Sicilians felt neglected or underrepresented by the Italian government, especially after the annexation of 1861 when Sicily was part of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies based in Naples. The large population of Sicilians in America and the American-led Allied invasion of Sicily in July-August 1943 may have contributed to the sentiment.

Following the Second World War there was also the Italian Unionist Movement, which called for Italy to become the 49th U.S. state.[59] The party was able to elect one member of parliament, Ugo Damiani.[60]

Poland

Poland is staunchly pro-American (see Poland – United States relations), dating back to General Tadeusz Kościuszko's leading American revolutionaries, and reinforced following favorable American interventions in World War I (leading to the creation of an independent Poland), World War II (re-creating an independent Poland), and the Cold War (culminating in a Polish state independent of Soviet influence), and contributing a large force in the "Coalition of the Willing" in Iraq. Poland has been referred to as "the 51st state" by CIA officials, especially in connection to extraordinary rendition.[61]

United Kingdom

The UK has sometimes been called the 51st state due to the close and "special" relationship between the two countries which began with Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill during World War II, and more recently continued during the prime ministries of Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.[62]

Related terms have been used in books and film. In the 1979 film Americathon, which is set in a fictional 1998, the United Kingdom (re-named as Limeyland) has become the 57th state, and the logos of a Safeway grocery store hangs on the Palace of Westminster. In the novel, 51st State, by Peter Preston (published in 1998), the United Kingdom leaves the European Union and becomes the 51st state of the USA. In The Light of Other Days, a 2000 novel by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter, the United Kingdom joins the United States, with the Prime Minister serving as governor and the Royal Family exiled to Australia. The 2001 British film The 51st State, starring Samuel L. Jackson and Robert Carlyle, is set in Liverpool, England that makes fun of US-UK relations. The film was released under the title Formula 51 in the United States and Canada due to sensitivity to the term "51st state" there.

The term has also been used in music. The 1986 album The Ghost of Cain by the English rock band New Model Army features a track called 51st State, which refers to the UK under Margaret Thatcher. The song "Heartland" on the 1986 album Infected, by the English band The The, ends with the refrain "This is the 51st state of the U.S.A."

Use in other organizational contexts

Frequently, organizations (NGOs, etc.) based primarily in the United States have smaller branches elsewhere. These branches may often be called the group's "51st state."

  • The Democratic National Committee recognizes each state for electoral purposes; however it also gives Democrats Abroad delegate votes to represent the approximately seven million U.S. citizens living abroad. In the context of the DNC, Democrats Abroad is often considered the "51st state."
  • In the Fallout introduction FMV, a newsreel-style film displays a news brief about US Soldiers in newly annexed Canada. A US soldier is shown wearing Power armor with an American flag waving behind him in a typical propaganda style. The flag displays one large white star (representing the federal government) in the centre of a thirteen-star circle, which stands for the 13 commonwealths the U.S. divided into in the 2070s.
  • In the film Meet the Robinsons, Lewis travels to the future, and while there, tries to hide his identity, saying he is from Canada. One of his future cousins replies, "You must mean North Montana. Hasn't been called Canada in years."
  • In the Star Trek: The Next Generation second season episode "The Royale," a 52 Star flag is shown on a piece of debris. The episode did not make clear where the 51st and 52nd states were, only that they joined in the 21st century. In the episode, Commander Riker says that the flag dates the debris between the years of 2033 and 2079.
  • In Robert Forward's novel Rocheworld, astronauts are launched on an interstellar mission to Barnard's Star by the Greater United States of America, a country formed when the 12 Canadian provinces and territories (the novel was written well before the existence of Nunavut was proposed) joined with the United States.
  • In the alternate history of the comic series Watchmen, Vietnam is mentioned as the 51st state after the presence of the godlike superhero Doctor Manhattan during the war changes the outcome. In the trailer for the film adaptation, the flag on Eddie Blake's coffin has 51 stars.[63]
  • In the 1998 anime series Brain Powerd, the mammoth alien spaceship Orphan surfaces in the Pacific Ocean and is occupied by the United States, which proclaims it as the 53rd state. It is never specified what the 51st and 52nd states are.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Sverige var USAs 51a delstat" "EU kritiserar svensk TV", Journalisten (Swedish)
  2. ^ The Federalist #43
  3. ^ A Brief History of Washington D.C.
  4. ^ Let Puerto Rico Decide: An Introduction to Puerto Rico's Status Debate
  5. ^ "US lawmakers clear path for new Puerto Rico referendum", Agence France-Presse, April 29, 2010.
  6. ^ "US lawmakers clear path for new Puerto Rico referendum", Agence France-Presse, April 29, 2010.
  7. ^ "Text of H.R. 2499: Puerto Rico Democracy Act of 2010", govtrack.us, April 29, 2010.
  8. ^ Official Website of the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
  9. ^ a b Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (December 2005)[dead link]
  10. ^ a b Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (December 2007)
  11. ^ H.R.900: To provide for a federally sanctioned self-determination process for the people of Puerto Rico., Library of Congress THOMAS {{citation}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  12. ^ Rules of the House of Representatives
  13. ^ 8 USC 1402
  14. ^ Liptak, Adam. A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue. The New York Times, July 11, 2008. Retrieved on 2008-11-21
  15. ^ Constitutional Topic: Citizenship, U.S. Constitution Online, retrieved 2009-04-28
  16. ^ "Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 2009-12-19.
  17. ^ http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL32933_20090804.pdf
  18. ^ "Democratic Party Platforms: 2008 Democratic Party Platform:". presidency.ucsb.edu. Retrieved 2008-11-11.
  19. ^ "Republican Party Platforms: 2008 Republican Party Platform:". presidency.ucsb.edu. Retrieved 2008-11-11.
  20. ^ 2008 republican Platform : Government Reform, gop.com
  21. ^ 2008 Democratic Party Platform, August 25, 2008, The American Presidency Project.
  22. ^ Combined Guam, CNMI could become US state
  23. ^ The Fenian Raids
  24. ^ J.L. Granatstein, Norman Hillmer. For Better or For Worse, Canada and the United States to the 1990s. Mississauga: Copp Clark Pitman, 1991
  25. ^ Stephen Azzi, "Election of 1988". histori.ca.
  26. ^ "Tories ahead in tepid pool of election ads". Global News, September 25, 2008.
  27. ^ Carolyn Ryan, "The true north, strong and negative". cbc.ca, 2006.
  28. ^ Leger Marketing survey, 2001.
  29. ^ Leger Marketing survey, 2004.
  30. ^ Bush says Obama 'deserves my silence' (March 17, 2009), MSNBC (from Associated press).
  31. ^ Equalization for the 21st century
  32. ^ Ontario falls to have-not status amid economic slump, Newfoundland reverses its status, metronews.ca, November 3, 2008 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)[dead link]
  33. ^ Kevin Steel (August 22, 2005), A nation torn apart, westernstandard.ca, retrieved 2008-12-05
  34. ^ "Monthly Record of Current Events", Harper's New Monthly Magazine, vol. XVIII, Harper and Brothers, 1859, p. 543
  35. ^ The Cuban Scheme, The New York Times, January 21, 1859, retrieved 2009-01-04
  36. ^ "Dominica: The Push for Annexation with the United States". The Dominican.net. Retrieved 2009-06-09.
  37. ^ "U.S. Senate: Art & History Home > Origins & Development > Powers & Procedures > Treaties". United States Senate. Retrieved 2008-10-17.
  38. ^ Thompson, Mark (16 January 2010). "The U.S. Military in Haiti: A Compassionate Invasion". Washington: TIME. Retrieved 18 January 2010. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |separator= (help)
  39. ^ http://tlwinslow.weebly.com/megamerge-the-dissolution-solution.html
  40. ^ e.g.: John Pilger (January 2, 2007), Australia: the new 51st state, informationclearinghouse.info; first published at the New Statesman, retrieved 2008-01-11
  41. ^ Let’s make Iraq our 51st state!
  42. ^ "The Fifty-first State?". The Atlantic. November 2002. Retrieved 2008-08-13.
  43. ^ Matthew Engel (2003-03-19). "Iraq, the 51st state". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2008-08-13.
  44. ^ San Francisco Peace Treaty ([dead link]), Universität Efurt, 8 September 1951 (came into force on April 28, 1952).[dead link]
  45. ^ Sayuri Daimon (May 14, 2002), Handover of Okinawa to Japan was prickly issue, The Japan Times.
  46. ^ "Facts about Nationalist Party: place in Philippine history, as discussed in Philippines: The period of U.S. influence:". eb.com. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  47. ^ a b "A Collaborative Philippine Leadership". U.S. Library of Congress. countrystudies.us. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  48. ^ Marco Garrido (29 January 2004). "An American president of the Philippines?". Asian Times. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  49. ^ Soberano, Rawlein G. (1976). "The Philippine Statehood Movement: A Resurrected Illusion, 1970-1972". The southeast asian studies. 13 (4): 580–587. doi:19760300. Retrieved 21 December 2009. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help)
  50. ^ Francisco, Luzviminda (1973). "The First Vietnam: the U.S.-Philippine War of 1899". Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars. 5 (4): 15. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  51. ^ Lawson, Gary (2004). The constitution of empire: territorial expansion and American legal history. Yale University Press. p. 272. ISBN 9780300102314. Retrieved 21 December 2009. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  52. ^ Jim Nach (1979–1980). "The Philippine Statehood Movement of 1971-1972". Cornell University Library. Retrieved 12 December 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  53. ^ Guillermo Gomez Rivera (10 December 2008). "A national language lesson from Puerto Rico". EMANILA. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  54. ^ Treaty of San Francisco, Article 23, April 28, 1952, retrieved 2009-03-26
  55. ^ Public Opinion, Market research, TVBS Poll Center, retrieved 2008-11-11 (MS Word document, Chinese, See item 4) August 19, 2003
  56. ^ Craig S. Smith (8 June 2007), Pro-U.S. Albania set to roll out the red carpet for Bush, International Herald Tribune
  57. ^ "Altered States". The Wall Street Journal. April 17, 2010. Retrieved 19 April 2010.
  58. ^ Finkelstein, Monte S. (1998). Separatism, the Allies and the Mafia: The Struggle for Sicilian Independence, 1943-1948. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press. p. 78. ISBN 0-934223-51-3.
  59. ^ "ITALY: The 49th State". Time. April 15, 1946. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
  60. ^ http://www.cameradeputati.demoserver.it/site/it-IT/L'Aula/Biografie/?nominativo=Damiani%20Ugo&letter=D
  61. ^ Shane, Scott (June 22, 2008). "Inside a 9/11 Mastermind's Interrogation". The New York Times. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
  62. ^ "51st State?". Promo Magazine. Retrieved 2008-08-31. {{cite web}}: Text "Promotional marketing industry similarities between America and England:" ignored (help)
  63. ^ Watchmen Trailer - in b4 copyright