Jump to content

User talk:Gogo Dodo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 108.0.243.72 (talk) at 03:09, 31 July 2010 (→‎Ouran Host Club page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
  • Use a descriptive subject/headline.
  • If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
  • Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
  • If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

Thanks!

You are speedy! [1] Active Banana (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

haha its cool dude

right on dude. i guess the back of my hand really didnt need a wikipedia... but it sure kept me from being bored all day at work.

but ya gotta admit. it was kinda funny (which coincidentally fits the guidelines for a G3 tag, not a G1 tag)

have a great date mate

Frostypb88 (talk) 22:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

also is there anyway you could email me a transcript of that artical. i think it was hillarious and im going to repost it on my facebook. message me if you could.

thanks!!

Frostypb88 (talk) 23:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

im going to take that as a you didnt think it was neerly as funny as i did. i dont see any reason you cant just copy and paste to an email.

Frostypb88 (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duke of York's Royal Military School

Thank's for your help ref correcting OriginalFatTulip's vandalism of the Duke of York's Royal Military School page. Much appreciated.

Spicandspan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spicandspan (talk • contribs) 00:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is everyone reverting constructive edits to Kal Ho Naa Ho?

Can you please tell me what's so bad about the edit I made to Kal Ho Naa Ho that it needed to be reverted (three times so far)? I am only here to help. BollyJeff || talk 01:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tasha9713

Re your warning, you made a typo which is why the template didn't work I fixed it for you. Mjroots (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TEK

Hi, Gogo Dodo. The pages I created (User:TEK and User talk:TEK were intended to redirect to my user page and talk page, for convenience. Thanks, TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

R.V.C.Bodley

...which you deleted. I was asked to create this page for an IP (see T.E.Lawrence talk page.) I explained this situation on the discussion page. Might you restore it so the IP can build the article? Rumiton (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your header

Looks good. I copied it. :-) TEK (talk • e-mail) 14:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My friend's band needs a wiki page...

The Show. and you deleted it. What did I do wrong? Can you help me make one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CjsRoxMySox (talk • contribs) 05:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me.

I recently created a page, and it's been deleted without reason or warning. Please explain?

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Alaur24[reply]

Hello, I was wondering why you deleted my newly created article. I put alot of work into it, and it wasn't finished. You left no reason why you deleted it. And I would like one. You can't just delete something without a reason for doing so. I followed the rules, so what is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaur24 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could I try again?

Well I didn't actully finish it. Is it possible you could put it back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaur24 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please?

Well I wasn't finished it. Is it possible if you could put it back?

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I find that very unfair and disrespectful. I'm published, but not as a book. Instead online. Many people are so. I don't get it. All my hard work just went down the drain. Thanks. And the link? On other pages other people have done the total opposite to the rules, and still theirs isn't deleted. Wikipedia is ment to be for people to publish their own stuff, but how can we if people like you delete it.

Just put it back up!

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see your point. But I don't think you've looked into this enough.

On the website I've published it, I've won several rewards for my books, stories & Poems. Does that mean anything at all? --Alaur24 (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, on the website people can review you? So how 'bout that? :) --Alaur24 (talk) 08:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay. I give up. You win, smarty pants. Haha. Oh well... I guess I'll just have to wait then. Anyway, do you do anything besides Wikipedia? Your like on it all the time, haha. Or is that to much of a personal question to answer? :P

--Alaur24 (talk) 08:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. I'll stick around. What time is it for you? It's 6:56 PM here. =) --Alaur24 (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the grumpysaurus page

please please please don't delete it, it's about my dad, he doesn't kno whow to use the internet, so the whole idea is seeing how long it takes for him to find the page, he picked the title, there is a £50 bet on so please please please don't delete it!!! let me know x —Preceding unsigned comment added by HCaliat (talk • contribs) 18:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?

my page is a joke towards my father, that me and my siblings have made, he knows and thinks it's hilarious, and before we had a chance to show the grandparents, you have deleted it, it is not offencive otherwise i would not have done it!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HCaliat (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

...for blocking this vandal. I frankly cannot understand how a person can waste his time on doing something like this. Funny isn't it... Shahid • Talk2me 20:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Yeh, I hope so. He is angry that Playback singer, an article on which he kept adding his sneaky vandalism, is protected now. Thanks again, Shahid • Talk2me 20:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:(

i am not having a go but why did you delete my article why??? i made article for all my family and friends to see but you have gone and ruined it!! :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovemcdonalds (talk • contribs) 21:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful!

I see you're getting quite a few "enemies" there — be careful! TEK (talk • e-mail) 23:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't anything new for me as it has been going on for years. It goes with being an admin. I wouldn't call them "enemies" either, just upset people who think I've spoiled their fun by deleting their articles. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of E! Entertainment Television

E! Entertainment Television Movietime original files and docs support that Larry Namer, Brian Owens, Rick Portin, Mike Sobel, Bill Zaccheo, Mark Hale, and others launched the network. If you research Alan Mruvka you will discover that his own info, which he wrote on his Wiki bio, is ridiculous and exaggerated--how could he produce 20,000 hours of programming (much less one, he had nothing to do with production at Movietime) when the network was only on the air (20 hours a day plus infomercials) 11,000 hours before he was removed from Movietime!! And if born in 1967, did he really go to college and have a business background, and then come up with a network idea when he was 16 years old in 1984? Any sourced materials that support the above claims have been manipulated, probably by Mruvka. He supplied some of the money that started the network and was on the Board of Movietime until removed by the cable operators in early 1989. He had absolutely no operational responsibilities for Movietime, though he has erroneously claimed production responsibility in his self-penned Wikipedia bio. If you want pdf's of the Movietime launch, I can email them to you. ---- Pienza89 (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the Way, I forgot to add that most of the first two paragraphs of the E! history were written by me before I formally registered. I worked with all the people who launched the network, and named those most responsible for its successful launch. They were the operational heads of departments which created the concept and did the work and came up with the ideas and operation to do the launch, which was financed by a half dozen companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the Greenwood press attribute which you refer to, which ironically is a channel description written by me when I worked in the U.K. for a cable company and described E! for our channel guide. At least put the following in, which is directly from the article and more accurate than letting two people take the credit for the significant idea, work, and contribution of others:

"launched by Larry Namer, Alan Mruvka, Brian Owens, and others on July 31 1987 as Movietime a low-budget service that....... " —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of E! Entertainment Television -- your source for intro has been written inaccurately

The Anthony Slide book, 1991, does not say that Mruvka launched the channel, WHICH HE DIDN'T, but wrote that Mruvka co-founded the network, WHICH HE DID BECAUSE HE WAS THE FIRST INVESTOR: "Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications........."(page 94) Mruvka had no operational responsibility whatsoever for the network at its launch, or thereafter--he was on the Board of Directors and one of more than twenty shareholders at the network's launch. And author Slide had no facts for his info, as HBO and the cable TV operators did not invest in Movietime until one year after its launch. He probably had interviewed Mruvka or Namer and got the full story wrong.

This is what I got from googling ("The television industry: a historical dictionary mruvka"_ your source for the Mruvka claim on launching Movietime: http://www.uksuperweb.co.uk/tv.html to to #17 . Otherwise that google just goes circular to wikipedia . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once more before the breach--A "launch of a network " is not the same as a "founding"

Once more, quoting directly from the page (94) of the source you are using, "The Television Industry: a historical dictionary" by Anthony Slide:

"Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications, American Television & Communications, Continental Cablevision, Cox Cable, News Channel Corp., United Cable, and Warner Brothers Studio,"(page 94)

This is not by any means the same as what you have now written in Wikipedia:

"E! Entertainment Television was founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka[1][2] on July 31, 1987 as Movietime, a service that aired movie trailers.........."

The channel was absolutely not founded in 1987 (it was incorporated as the Movietime business about a year earlier), but it was indeed launched on July 31, 1987 by a group you will or can not recognize, and I will try to find a true source about this. Meanwhile, if you must recognize the veracity here as the Slide book material, you would do best to complete the error by exactly writing/inserting what Slide wrote: "Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications, American Television & Communications, Continental Cablevision, Cox Cable, News Channel Corp., United Cable, and Warner Brothers Studio," notwithstanding that Slide did not have a clue about what he was writing here. Or you can let me recognize Mruvka, as one of many launchers, which I previously wrote to compromise and let him have his ego-rub.

Truly, take a look at the Alan Mruvka Wiki bio he wrote, which has many blatantly ridiculous claims--PLEASE LOOK AT IT. Mruvka writes "While with E!, Mruvka oversaw production of over 20,000 hours of programming ........" There are 8,760 hours in a year, so even if he had anything to do with production (which he did not), in the year and a half Mruvka was associated with the network, was he really 13,000 hours of the network, including the thousands of hours of paid infomercial hours late at night? And "Mruvka was born ....in 1968, " and "studied architecture at the University of Miami and New York’s Pratt Institute," so was he really just nineteen years old when Movietime launched." Lots of well-deserving people don't need Mruvka stealing their due. Pienza89 (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am learning how to work with Wikipedia, thank you, and I will dig out some archives and try to get this right when I have time. BUT meanwhile, I find some hypocrisy in your actions in that you insist from the Anthony Slide book that Namer and Mruvka founded the network, but now you won't complete the Anthony Slide's statement that HBO and others launched the network. If you believe me, then you'd accept my edit. If you don't believe me, then you would fully put in what the Slide source wrote. I don't get the inconsistency. If you use the source, then use the source and write "Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications........." And if you don't, and believe what I have written, then go back to my edits. It should be "either, or" , and not your pick and choice from a written source and me--that's consistency and I would think that is what Wikipedia is trying to achieve in these "factual" disputes. Pienza89 (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote that the HBO group was in the second paragraph so there was no need to put the complete Slide reference into the first paragraph, but I COMPPLETELY WROTE THE SECOND PARAGRAPH. The HBO et al ownership is what I wrote, which I mentioned when I first wrote you. Yes I wrote that paragraph before I registered, because why register when I was the originator of almost all of the first two paragraphs? When Mruvka changed the opening and took out the other people's names who launched the network, I had to register to start editing that text. But again, the second paragraph was completely written by me so I stand by what I wrote: you either accept what I wrote or completely take out the (my) non-referenced material and put in the Slide page 94. Otherwise your "corrections" are illogical, using my material when it seems right to you but then not using it when it might be in conflict with an interview with Mruvka. Pienza89 (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


"It appears to me that the second paragraph evolved (like most content on Wikipedia) from edits by multiple editors, not you as an anonymous IP alone." I am sorry that you tire so easily, but, again, I wrote all of the second paragraph except for the last sentence, so it did not stem from "multiple editors." You do a disservice when you challenge the veracity of a person who made a solid contribution and then had another person change it. There were no multiple editors in the second paragraph, and the HBO et al sentences, as well as all except the last, were mine, alone. So why don't you remove them, unless you continue to want it both ways, accepting what I write but then dropping what I write as you editorialize. Pienza89 (talk) 23:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

making a bio

how do i work the template ?...i tried to do a simple thing like changing my name on the page an it wouldnt make the change for me ...why is that ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by YOUNGFLIZO201 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this is youngflizo201 ...i didnt kno hhow to reply back to a message ...but i had sent u a previous message about making a bio...an im not makin an autobiography...young flizo is an artist out of jersey that i support ...an i felt is though i wanted to do this for him ...an i dont kno how to do it ...i got everything written but i dnt kno how to edit the title and change it to "Young Flizo"..it still has the Category:Hip hop biography stubs title up there...and i also want to kno when wuld i be able to see this wikipedia article for him if i was to google his name like the other artist that have one  ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by YOUNGFLIZO201 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dealing with vandals

I was just in a bit of an edit war with User talk:221.134.144.14 over Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham..., and I see over 20 messages on the talk page for vandalism, and a big message at the top that I don't really understand. Why can't they be stopped/blocked permanently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 23:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I saw up to 7 warnings per month, plus I saw 6 "final" warnings and a 24 hour block. What does it take to do a full block, murder?  :-) BollyJeff || talk 00:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're very kind

To remove my silly templated warning from your user talk. "Automated tool is no excuse" is 100% correct. Mea culpa. I don't know how it happened but it was obviously my fault. Thanks for your patience. Tiderolls 00:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To touch on another matter. Is this image on commons? I don't want to rev/del without a significant reason, but in light of the recent media rants I did not want to leave it unattended. The vandal meant the image as an insult but I don't know if it really is an insult. If you feel lead to action, please...go ahead. Tiderolls 00:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting my userpage

Thanks, that's fine, Yes "inappropriate images" indeed. Not that I'm not used to it in my (former) line of work here. I seem to have stumbled into quite a nest of litte thugs here. Herostratus (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that at least one person posting used what looks like a typical real life name. Given the nature of the material being posted, is this a problem I wonder. I guess nothing more can be done about it? Herostratus (talk) 04:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Show

I added new references. The album is on amazon and billboard, and this band is very important. they just recently played the O2 Arena, also played by Kelly Clarkson and Hole. They have also been mentioned in publications such as Jersey Beat and Village Voice. Although they are still an indie band, they have many radio stations internationally that have the Show in consistant rotation. The album has sold over 30,000 copies, and still is selling consistently. The Show are going to be huge pretty soon, so their wiki has to come now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CjsRoxMySox (talk • contribs) 03:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Elise Trent"

Hi! The page I created was for a college class and the lesson being taught was "self-branding." one of our assignments was to create a page about ourselves. I created the page NOT cause I wanted a page about myself but because I have to for class. As proof that we did the assignment, we have to email the link of the wikipedia page to our professor. I would highly appreciate you not deleting the page again as I cannot turning my homework if you do.

Thank you.

Elise —Preceding unsigned comment added by EliseMTrent (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm afraid that you'll have to create your page at another site, such as Wetpaint. Wikipedia is not the site to host pages about yourself, and there should be no exceptions to the regulations. Thanks, TEK (talk • e-mail) 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trollwatching

Thanks, I was starting to get sick of that guy. Though I'm expecting more, I don't think this is through yet. I'm going to go to bed now. Though if when I wake up I find all of my contributions have been blanked and my userpage has been moved to "Elektrik Shoos on wheels" I'm going to wave my virtual fist at you. :) Cheers, goodnight. elektrikSHOOS 08:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 08:46, 10 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Elektrik Shoos to User talk:Elektrik Shoos on wheels (revert)
• 08:46, 10 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs | block) moved User:Elektrik Shoos to User:Elektrik Shoos on wheels (revert)
What? Oh, I'm sorry. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Partsearch Technologies

I dont understand how this page is advertising when its information. Admin Acroterion let me know about how this criteria and I have not copied any material directly from the company website. Please tell me how to make sure this page stays up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John.neidhardt (talk • contribs) 18:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page Craig Buie

Why did you delete my page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frecky04 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MACEO MAYS

Maceo Mays is a well known author to wit: can be verified. There has been many attempts to enter his personal bio including citations and references are deleted. How should we proceed so his information will not be deleted?

Sieberr1 (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Hon. Denise Chilton[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sock is back

Sadly enough, the sock is back and he started vandalising Playback singer again, removing sourced information and adding false. I think the page should be protected again for a longer period of time. Shahid • Talk2me 20:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spam on user talk pages

In regard to your block of Eatinqueens... I haven't been here long, but I've already seen this a couple of times now (new users spamming/advertising on their talk pages). Is this something that needs to be mentioned in policy (people think it's ok?) or is it merely a way that users think they can get away with through going unnoticed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gz33 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed pretty common. I'm not sure exactly why though. Sometimes it is like you say, they are trying to avoid being noticed. Other times, I think they just don't know and think their talk page is a good place to put their ad. No policy addition is necessary as it is already covered in blocking policy. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I see its covered there now. I was looking at the Promotion policy and the link policies which seemed to give of the idea that they mainly meant for article space gz33 (talk) 06:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The blocking policy allows for spam/advertising blocks no matter where they edit. The funniest spam I see is on Talk:Main Page. I really don't understand that one since there are big warning messages all over the place with that, but I guess some editors are just determined to place their ad. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Any spam/vandalism here is pretty hard to understand really, what with how quickly it tends to disappear. I mean is a couple of seconds of display time really that worth it?gz33 (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock

Clear sock puppet - Wisdom24 (talk · contribs). He opened his account on the 9th of July and thus can edit the page now. This is frankly becoming tedious. Shahid • Talk2me 15:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gogo Dodo,

I was adding a few professional game reviews from this site - http://www.download-free-games.com/review/all/score-high/ - when I got flagged for external links.

Would it be appropriate to keep adding links to these reviews on relevant pages?

Thanks,

JimTheGamer (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

list of bhangra bands

why have you edited it and included hip hop acts which are NOT LIVE BHANGRA BANDS?

stop vandalizing proper pages dude

JOSH? a bhangra band

you gotta be kidding me

do you even know what bhangra is you little folkhopper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noxiousnews (talk • contribs) 02:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ufuoma Ejenobor

hello Gogo, thank you for you contributions and correction on the Ufuoma Ejenobor page. it shows that we still have committed editors on the site. But it would be more appropriate to check on facts before completely deleting an article especially if the articles are not easily verified from your side of the world. if there are problems regarding a page, they should be discussed and PROPERLY VERIFIED before deletion. we could work together on building and correcting articles in which language and other factors are lacking. thank yo very muchAnnaadoms (talk) 02:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?Annaadoms (talk) 05:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the edit for feburary has already been handled yeah? (i hope i am not the confused one now) there were other links on the page ..maybe you werent patient enough to read them anyway its a lot of work now starting to search for them all over again. take your time to read through them all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaadoms (talk • contribs) 05:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the February edit has been attended to already. there are reliable links there..you just weren't patient enough to read through them all. it would take a long while to source through for them again. let me know if there are other correctionsAnnaadoms (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gogo, consider having a look at the history Ufuoma Ejenobor. Annaadoms does not seem to grasp some of the rules here, as far as puffery, reliable sources, etc. are concerned and it's getting a bit tiresome. I mean, even if this, "She also earned a badge as the school’s Head girl 1998/99 session," were relevant, it would still need verification. We have either a fan or an autobiography. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also think I hear some quacking; time will tell. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like your opinion

While out on my nightly patrol, I came across an odd page. I would like your opinion/decision on what should happen. The anomaly in question is Subash Sinchuari. I was going to add an A7 tag, but I checked the history. Using the very first version, [2], I wouldn't add a CSD tag (I'm more cautious than most when it to CSD tags, though). The strangest part is that the only non-bot to edit it, and cut out 95 percent of the content, is the initial author. The page isn't truly blank so neither did I tag it for G7. I'm just not sure how to handle it. CSD? Prod? If there's someone/someplace you want me to ask, lemme know. TheTito Discuss 10:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the help. I was getting a headache looking at his contris. TheTito Discuss 04:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message from WikiEditor90546

this company is significant to the United States of America and it will be on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor90546 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jelin george Fashion Designer

Hi

I had contributed and article as she is upcoming fashion designer n i had submit it do help me how can i contribute on wikepedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfreddsouza (talk • contribs) 05:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Gogo

I repent.

Oh yeah and what did I get caught for exactly? Cause I did some bad stuff but I'm clean from now on, I swear. Wouldn't want to get banned for some prior misdeeds! I can assure you - no bad edits (NBE) post 2:39 AM Central Time July 20, 2010! Oh and good job on all the medals you have on your main page - I hope to be like you one day! :) 66.112.225.187 (talk) 07:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHY

why are u deleting my page??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkohlwein (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amigo Choi

May I know why you deleted the article? Thanks. 116.49.135.38 (talk) 12:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted twice back in 2009, but I did delete Talk:Amigo Choi, which you created, because you created an article in the Talk name space. I recommend that you sign up for an account so that you can create the article in the proper name space or make a request to create an article at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No wonder. Would you mind telling which page under Articles for creation should I submit the request? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.49.135.38 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why not just create a username? SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
I second SchmuckyTheCat's suggestion. If you create an account, you can create the article yourself. But if you choose to not create an account, if you use the WP:Article Wizard, one of the last steps will let you make a Articles for Creation request in the proper place. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible to have the content back so that I can create the article? 116.49.135.38 (talk) 18:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am sure there is a very good reason for you not to have a named account. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
If you create a user account, I would be happy to restore the talk page into your user space, but there isn't much there. You wrote a single sentence stating that she was a television presenter for TVB. The rest were category and stub templates. It is probably easier for you to just rewrite the article from scratch since it would need more than a single sentence to meet the notability guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

page deleted.. requesting help to return article

Deletion review for The X Factor Fan Site

An editor has asked for a deletion review of The X Factor Fan Site. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Robtencer (talk) 20:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why so many admins wanted to delete my article so quickly? Without giving advice or criticism, or editing help to keep the page, they were so quick to delete, that the page went live and within an hour, it was gone. Please tell me, if you are the type of person to help, or are the type of person to make speedy deletions? I am pleading for your help, to make a worthy version of my article, that will withstand attack. Are you that person?

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo yo Gogo

Howdy! Well, saw your GRAND WORK on the Kevin Mann article. Must say, i'm impressed! However, please please please go ahead and change that FA-class to something more believable. I don't know why you changed it to an FA article in the first place because obviously it doesn't meet that standard =/

Your friend, Hugo

PS. !!!!!! "This user has written or significantly contributed to 2 featured lists on Wikipedia."

Just read this on your main page... must say, I'm MEGA-happy for you! Well, goodnight, and keep up the great work, sailor. 66.112.225.187 (talk) 06:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.225.187 (talk) 06:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article was labeled as an FA-class article by an anonymous IP back in June. I did not do that. I have corrected the assessment. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)

bobby smalldridge

hi

im new to wikipedia, and tried to set up a page for bobby smalldridge, this has been deleted by you,

he has appeard on television a number of times and debuts on the feature film in 2011 called foster, he is also listed on imdb

i would love to add him, on this site but i think i have done something wrong can you help?

dan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danburridge (talk • contribs) 12:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Can you explain to me why you deleted my page? I created it for a reason. Not for it to be immediately deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.144.139 (talk) 03:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are not logged in and have no deleted edits under this IP, I don't know what page you are referring to. However, it is likely because whatever topic you were writing about did not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Nothing

You should not have deleted this page. They are one of the more successful and lauded indie rock bands this year with lots of people like myself looking to learn more about them.

Stellar review: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/14280-gemini/

Number 2 in sales: http://www.insound.com/

Honestly, I don't know how much you keep up with music, but if you have little or no knowledge of current music trends, you should probably refrain from deleting things you know nothing about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.132.158 (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring your personal attack, the article was deleted because it made no claim towards him meeting the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. In fact, the entire article was just an Infobox template, his name, his stage name, that he is an "indie pop" artist, and where he was from. You are welcome to create an account (or log back into your account) and recreate the article providing citations to establish his notability. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Admin's Barnstar
Thanks --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 03:13, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic List of bhangra bands. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NuclearWarfare‎

Could you also semi-protect the page too, please? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:40, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's set, though NativeForeigner and I were overwriting each other. I backed out and will let NativeForeigner set the final protection settings. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okie Dokie. :) If you are good with filters, you might want to check the filter that is supposed to protect the page from stuff like that and add to it as they seem to have changed their...not sure what you call that, sick BS. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking in to it. Yes, the message has been changing. They haven't quite decided what the message should be. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okie Dokie, just wanted to let you know of that in case you weren't aware. Seems like you all have it covered, so I will step back and let the admins have it from here. Great job all of you. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:57, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, either I fixed or I made a total mess. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What do they have against NW? NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we will know once the protection comes off in a couple days, though I think it should stay on for longer than that, but that isn't up to me. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of A Harlot Demise

Sorry about leaving the page idle and unkempt lol but is there a possibility I could get information on how upload an image to the article, this way I can make the page something nice to look at. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelios2 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ruggamugg - another account?

I see you just banned this user for abusing multiple accounts. It looks like Sugerall (talk · contribs) is another one. --Biker Biker (talk) 07:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block on User:Fineonegolfks

I'd block account creation as I suspect this is a series of spam accounts. Regards --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 09:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I see the CU discovered a pile of accounts. The IP that they all originated from has been blocked for awhile. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, my whack-a-mole revealed more than I expected. AD Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You did a great job spotting the pattern. Good work! =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

email

Gogo Dodo, Just giving you the heads up that I sent you an email. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariaflags (talk • contribs) 16:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:ElSonoma

Could you look at User:ElSonoma who recreated The Sonoma Dude less than 13 hours after it was deleted yesterday? He had the gall to admit on my talkpage yesterday that he was paid to promote the subject and then made the same claim today on the article's talkpage. Hopefully, by the time I finish this message, I will see that you already took care of the situation. Or, you might be taking a breather - but, it's back to the grindstone for you. ;) ----moreno oso (talk) 20:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Mimvi" page

Re: 23:56, 26 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted "Mimvi" ‎ (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content)) Before posting more material nominated for deletion, I wanted to draw your attention to the fact that though Mimvi is a new company, they are a publicly traded company on the OTC. See: (OTCBB: MIMV) as stated in the deleted article. The search engine is a live and functional entity as noted by the linked url in the article, which also links to other related wikipedia articles such as the page on Mimvi founder, Kasian Franks See latest revision in my personal space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Datumfestus/Mimvi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datumfestus (talk • contribs) 00:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

substansive content

Hi, GOGO DODO, i am new on wikipedia, i tried to upload my collge information on Wikipedia, and i wish that if someone serch it on google my college name would be there as in the list of institutions in LEYTON UK. i am not fimiliar with encyclopedic writing so what what information i felt better i keep that on my article. but u have deleted it with this reason.

* 18:27, 19 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted "Mont rose college" ‎ (A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content)

Please suggest me what to do now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrosecollege (talk • contribs) 14:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ZAP (motor company)

Hi. It looks likely to me that there is sockpuppetry going on at ZAP (motor company). I left a note on Jiachunhui's talk page, but then I got to thinking that the evidence might be considered to be pretty thin. Should I delete my comment? Or should I escalate this? Thanks. Ebikeguy (talk) 21:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Ebikeguy (talk) 22:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ouran Host Club page

The Ouran host club page is being vandalized by people. Maybe you can block the page to keep people from vandalizing? 108.0.243.72 (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything recently that is vandalism. I do see some editors cutting down on the character descriptions on the main article, but I wouldn't classify that as vandalism. If you have an issue with cutting down the length of the descriptions, I recommend that you bring up the issue on the article talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you looked at the history, there were people who wrote that Tamaki was an idiot and that Haruhi should've ended up with Hikaru. Check this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ouran_High_School_Host_Club&action=historysubmit&diff=376056585&oldid=376034810 108.0.243.72 (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, stop speedy deleting stuff!

It's really annoying when people do that! --SamB (talk) 07:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, I was annoyed at the way you seem to have speedy deleted the Legostar Galactica page without warning -- or at least, you didn't mention having given any warning in the deletion message, and I can't exactly check now. (That's really the thing I find most infuriating about deletion: it's hard for mere mortals to see for themselves whether or not an article really deserved it, unless they happen to have somehow snarfed a copy of its' entire history just before deletion...)

Anyway, in this case, it seems the page would not have met the criteria for speedy deletion if it had made a plausible claim of importance. It seems that this would have been easy to fix: the creator thinks that Legostar Galactica is the first webcomic to be made of Legos; even if he's wrong, it seems to have been among the first, and very influential. Even without a reliable source, such a claim would (if plausible) make A7 inapplicable.

Sorry to have started off so harsh, even if deletion of stuff I might have liked does tend to make me cranky... -- SamB (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elockid‎

Might be a good idea to semi-protect his talk page for 12 or 24. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:59, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. Thanks Dude. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was busy filling out some forms about this particular problem. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for handling the situation! Elockid (Talk) 11:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message from User:Don Jow

My page has been deleted five times thus far today, and when asked why all I receive is a link to a page I have read with less than sufficient reason for your actions. I have been told that it was deleted because the page was about a real person. This shows great hypocrisy in you considering there are hundreds, even thousands of pages on this site about people. I have been told its because I am not "important" or "significant" enough to have my own page. I would like to ask you this; who are you to judge how important or significant I am? This article has not been left up long enough to receive and editing to add substantial material, you know me on no personal level, and it is thoroughly insulting and obscene of you to judge a person based upon their financial income or time spent in front of a camera. I have also been told I did not have links to a place providing some sort of material in which you provide no explanation of what you want. I provided links in all of my material, many of which redirected the reader within this website. I put the time into writing this to you, and I expect a real response this time. Or maybe I should ask for someone famous since the only "real" people on this site are? Please, answer me. Why am I not allowed to make this page? I have followed all of your guidelines and you fail to provide me with one reason why you have acted in this way.

I thank you in advance for the un-through and un-helpful answer that I will receive.

Sincerely, Don Jow, the "not real" and "not famous enough" person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Jow (talk • contribs) 18:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is Wikipedia. If you want to edit here then you must obey our policies. And frankly, you aren't important enough to be included on this encyclopedia. TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And if you continue creating the page then you will most likely be blocked for disruptive behavior.
Just as I thought, couldn't even take 10 seconds to respond. If you would leave the page up you might learn a thing or two. You have no right to judge me, and if you feel that me trying to make use of your website the way it was created to be is disruptive then that is your choice. You have still yet to give me one good reason other than "you are not important enough" which is a matter of opinion. I don't know where you went to school, but encyclopedias are not bias and you sir, are bias and prejudice. I ask you again for a real answer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Jow (talk • contribs) 19:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but a Google search returned only 505 results, and most of them are probably other people with the same name. Also if you take the time to actually read our policy pages you might understand a thing or two. The "links" mean citations from a published source. Can you find anything at all to cite about yourself? If you keep the autobiography stuff to your own namespace then nobody will care. TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually as a matter of fact I did read it, long before obeying it. More than half of the "links" I used were from this website, and if that is not good enough for you then you should stop reading now and seriously think about your Terms. Perhaps if you looked at the page you would see that I do have "anything at all" to cite about myself. Personally I liked your hostile response better, it showed that you are actually human and your Terms are frustrating you almost as much as they frustrate me. Don Jow (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erm. Please read WP:Citing sources and Citation. You obviously don't understand what a citation is. TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Um, you know, you really really aren't supposed to write about yourself, regardless of how notable you might be; see WP:Autobiography for details. (Of course, if someone else wrote one and somehow managed to establish your notability, I'm sure nobody would mind if you corrected the spelling of your dog's name, but other than that kind of thing ...) -- SamB (talk) 20:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curling

I added a reference from the official Olympics website which clearly states that curling is a game, not a sport. Can you stop vandalizing the page by reverting my edit? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spacemoney (talk • contribs) 20:46, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&oldid=376365012"