Jump to content

WikiLeaks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sampadakudu (talk | contribs) at 08:03, 25 November 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiLeaks
Graphic of hourglass, colored in blue and grey; a circular map of the western hemisphere of the world drips from the top to bottom chamber of the hourglass.
Type of site
Document archive
Available inMultilingual
OwnerThe Sunshine Press[1]
Created byJulian Assange
URLwww.wikileaks.org
CommercialNo

WikiLeaks is an international organization that publishes submissions of otherwise unavailable documents from anonymous sources and leaks. Its website, launched in 2006, is run by The Sunshine Press.[1] Within a year of its launch, the site claimed a database that had grown to more than 1.2 million documents.[3]

The organization has described itself as having been founded by Chinese dissidents, as well as journalists, mathematicians, and start-up company technologists from the U.S., Taiwan, Europe, Australia, and South Africa.[1] Newspaper articles and The New Yorker magazine (June 7, 2010) describe Julian Assange, an Australian journalist and Internet activist, as its director.[4] Assange himself has stated that he is "the heart and soul of this organization, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson, original coder, organizer, financier, and all the rest"[5].

WikiLeaks has won a number of awards, including the 2008 Economist magazine New Media Award.[6] In June 2009, WikiLeaks and Julian Assange won Amnesty International's UK Media Award (in the category "New Media") for the 2008 publication of "Kenya: The Cry of Blood – Extra Judicial Killings and Disappearances",[7] a report by the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights about police killings in Kenya.[8] In May 2010, the New York Daily News listed WikiLeaks first in a ranking of "websites that could totally change the news".[9]

In April 2010, WikiLeaks posted video from a 2007 incident in which Iraqi civilians were killed by U.S. forces, on a website called Collateral Murder. In July of the same year, WikiLeaks released Afghan War Diary, a compilation of more than 76,900 documents about the War in Afghanistan not previously available for public review.[10] In October the group released a package of almost 400,000 documents called the Iraq War Logs in coordination with major commercial media organisations.

History

WikiLeaks first appeared in public on the Internet in January 2007.[11] The site states that it was "founded by Chinese dissidents, journalists, mathematicians and start-up company technologists, from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa".[1] The creators of WikiLeaks have not been formally identified.[12] It has been represented in public since January 2007 by Julian Assange and others. Assange describes himself as a member of WikiLeaks' advisory board.[13] News reports in The Australian have called Assange the "founder of Wikileaks".[14] As of June 2009, the site had over 1,200 registered volunteers[1] and listed an advisory board comprising Assange, Phillip Adams, Wang Dan, C. J. Hinke, Ben Laurie, Tashi Namgyal Khamsitsang, Xiao Qiang, Chico Whitaker and Wang Youcai.[15] Despite appearing on the list, when contacted by Mother Jones magazine in 2010, Khamsitsang said that while he received an e-mail from WikiLeaks, he had never agreed to be an advisor.[16]

WikiLeaks states that its "primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to be of assistance to people of all regions who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations."[1][17]

In January 2007, the website stated that it had over 1.2 million leaked documents that it was preparing to publish.[18] An article in The New Yorker said

One of the WikiLeaks activists owned a server that was being used as a node for the Tor network. Millions of secret transmissions passed through it. The activist noticed that hackers from China were using the network to gather foreign governments’ information, and began to record this traffic. Only a small fraction has ever been posted on WikiLeaks, but the initial tranche served as the site’s foundation, and Assange was able to say, "[w]e have received over one million documents from thirteen countries."[19][20]

Assange responded to the suggestion that eavesdropping on Chinese hackers played a crucial part in the early days of WikiLeaks by saying "the imputation is incorrect. The facts concern a 2006 investigation into Chinese espionage one of our contacts were involved in. Somewhere between none and handful of those documents were ever released on WikiLeaks. Non-government targets of the Chinese espionage, such as Tibetan associations were informed (by us)".[21] The group has subsequently released a number of other significant documents which have become front-page news items, ranging from documentation of equipment expenditures and holdings in the Afghanistan war to corruption in Kenya.[22]

The organization's stated goal is to ensure that whistle-blowers and journalists are not jailed for emailing sensitive or classified documents, as happened to Chinese journalist Shi Tao, who was sentenced to 10 years in 2005 after publicising an email from Chinese officials about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre.[23]

The project has drawn comparisons to Daniel Ellsberg's leaking of the Pentagon Papers in 1971.[24] In the United States, the leaking of some documents may be legally protected. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution guarantees anonymity, at least in the area of political discourse.[25] Author and journalist Whitley Strieber has spoken about the benefits of the WikiLeaks project, noting that "Leaking a government document can mean jail, but jail sentences for this can be fairly short. However, there are many places where it means long incarceration or even death, such as China and parts of Africa and the Middle East."[26]

On 24 December 2009, WikiLeaks announced that it was experiencing a shortage of funds[27] and suspended all access to its website except for a form to submit new material.[28] Material that was previously published was no longer available, although some could still be accessed on unofficial mirrors.[29][30] WikiLeaks stated on its website that it would resume full operation once the operational costs were covered.[31][32] WikiLeaks saw this as a kind of strike "to ensure that everyone who is involved stops normal work and actually spends time raising revenue".[33] While it was initially hoped that funds could be secured by 6 January 2010,[34] it was only on 3 February 2010 that WikiLeaks announced that its minimum fundraising goal had been achieved.[35]

On 22 January 2010, PayPal suspended WikiLeaks' donation account and froze its assets. WikiLeaks said that this had happened before, and was done for "no obvious reason".[36] The account was restored on 25 January 2010.[37]

On May 18, 2010, WikiLeaks announced that its website and archive were back up.[38]

As of June 2010, WikiLeaks was a finalist for a grant of more than half a million dollars from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation,[39] but did not make the cut.[40] WikiLeaks commented, "Wikileaks was highest rated project in the Knight challenge, strongly recommended to the board but gets no funding. Go figure”. WikiLeaks said that the Knight foundation announced the award to "'12 Grantees who will impact future of news' – but not WikiLeaks" and questioned whether Knight foundation was "really looking for impact".[40] A spokesman of the Knight Foundation disputed parts of WikiLeaks' statement, saying "WikiLeaks was not recommended by Knight staff to the board."[41] However, he declined to say whether WikiLeaks was the project rated highest by the Knight advisory panel, which consists of non-staffers, among them journalist Jennifer 8. Lee, who has done PR work for WikiLeaks with the press and on social networking sites.[41]

On July 17, Jacob Appelbaum spoke on behalf of WikiLeaks at the 2010 Hackers on Planet Earth conference in New York City, replacing Assange due to the presence of federal agents at the conference.[42][43] He announced that the WikiLeaks submission system was again up and running, after it had been temporarily suspended.[42][44] Assange was a surprise speaker at a TED conference on 19 July 2010 in Oxford, and confirmed that WikiLeaks was now accepting submissions again.[45][46]

Upon returning to the U.S. from Holland, on July 29, Appelbaum was detained for three hours at the airport by U.S. agents, according to anonymous sources.[47] The sources told Cnet that Appelbaum's bag was searched, receipts from his bag were photocopied, his laptop was inspected, although in what manner was unclear.[47] Appelbaum reportedly refused to answer questions without a lawyer present, and was not allowed to make a phone call. His three mobile phones were reportedly taken and not returned.[47] On July 31, he spoke at a Defcon conference and mentioned his phone being "seized". After speaking, he was approached by two FBI agents and questioned.[47]

Administration

According to a January 2010 interview, the WikiLeaks team then consisted of five people working full-time and about 800 people who worked occasionally, none of whom were compensated.[33] WikiLeaks has no official headquarters. The expenses per year are about €200,000, mainly for servers and bureaucracy, but would reach €600,000 if work currently done by volunteers were paid for.[33] WikiLeaks does not pay for lawyers, as hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal support have been donated by media organisations such as the Associated Press, The Los Angeles Times, and the National Newspaper Publishers Association.[33] Its only revenue stream is donations, but WikiLeaks is planning to add an auction model to sell early access to documents.[33] According to the Wau Holland Foundation, WikiLeaks receives no money for personnel costs, only for hardware, travelling and bandwidth.[48] An article in TechEYE.net wrote

As a charity accountable under German law, donations for Wikileaks can be made to the foundation. Funds are held in escrow and are given to Wikileaks after the whistleblower website files an application containing a statement with proof of payment. The foundation does not pay any sort of salary nor give any renumeration [sic] to Wikileaks' personnel, corroborating the statement of the site's German representative Daniel Schmitt (real name Daniel Domscheit-Berg)[49] on national television that all personnel works [sic] voluntarily, even its speakers.[48]

Relation with the Wikimedia Foundation

It is sometimes assumed that WikiLeaks is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation and is connected to Wikipedia, Wikibooks, and other Wiki-organizations. This is not the case, and WikiLeaks has no relationship with any of those groups.[50]

Site management issues

There has been public disagreement between Julian Assange and Daniel Domscheit-Berg, who was suspended by Assange and on September 28 announced he would leave the company.[51][52][53] In October 2010, it was reported that Moneybookers, which collected donations for WikiLeaks, had ended its relationship with the site. Moneybookers stated that its decision had been made "to comply with money laundering or other investigations conducted by government authorities, agencies or commissions."[54]

Hosting

WikiLeaks describes itself as “an uncensorable system for untraceable mass document leaking”. WikiLeaks is hosted by PRQ, a Sweden-based company providing “highly secure, no-questions-asked hosting services.” PRQ is said to have “almost no information about its clientele and maintains few if any of its own logs.” The servers are spread around the world with the central server located in Sweden.[55] Julian Assange has said that the servers are located in Sweden (and the other countries) "specifically because those nations offer legal protection to the disclosures made on the site". He talks about the Swedish constitution, which gives the information providers total legal protection.[55] It is forbidden according to Swedish law for any administrative authority to make inquiries about the sources of any type of newspaper.[56] These laws, and the hosting by PRQ, make it difficult to take WikiLeaks offline. Furthermore, "Wikileaks maintains its own servers at undisclosed locations, keeps no logs and uses military-grade encryption to protect sources and other confidential information." Such arrangements have been called "bulletproof hosting."[57][58]

On August 17, 2010, it was announced that the Swedish Pirate Party will be hosting and managing many of WikiLeaks' new servers. The party donates servers and bandwidth to WikiLeaks without charge. Technicians of the party will make sure that the servers are maintained and working.[59][60] Some servers are hosted in underground cold war era nuclear shelters. The physical security layer is 30m White Mountains solid bedrock.[61]

WikiLeaks is based on several software packages, including MediaWiki, Freenet, Tor, and PGP.[62] WikiLeaks strongly encouraged postings via Tor due to the strong privacy needs of its users.[63]

Policies

The "about" page originally read: "To the user, Wikileaks will look very much like Wikipedia. Anybody can post to it, anybody can edit it. No technical knowledge is required. Leakers can post documents anonymously and untraceably. Users can publicly discuss documents and analyze their credibility and veracity. Users can discuss interpretations and context and collaboratively formulate collective publications. Users can read and write explanatory articles on leaks along with background material and context. The political relevance of documents and their verisimilitude will be revealed by a cast of thousands."[64]

However, WikiLeaks established an editorial policy that accepted only documents that were "of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical interest" (and excluded "material that is already publicly available").[65] This coincided with early criticism that having no editorial policy would drive out good material with spam and promote "automated or indiscriminate publication of confidential records."[66] It is no longer possible for anybody to post to it or edit it, as the original FAQ promised. Instead, submissions are regulated by an internal review process and some are published, while documents not fitting the editorial criteria are rejected by anonymous WikiLeaks reviewers. By 2008, the revised FAQ stated that "Anybody can post comments to it. [...] Users can publicly discuss documents and analyze their credibility and veracity."[67] After the 2010 relaunch, posting new comments to leaks was no longer possible.[68]

Verification of submissions

Template:Wikinewshas

WikiLeaks states that it has never released a misattributed document. Documents are assessed before release. In response to concerns about the possibility of misleading or fraudulent leaks, WikiLeaks has stated that misleading leaks "are already well-placed in the mainstream media. [Wikileaks] is of no additional assistance."[69] The FAQ states that: "The simplest and most effective countermeasure is a worldwide community of informed users and editors who can scrutinize and discuss leaked documents."[70]

According to statements by Assange in 2010, submitted documents are vetted by a group of five reviewers, with expertise in different fields such as language or programming, who also investigate the background of the leaker if his or her identity is known.[71] In that group, Assange has the final decision about the assessment of a document.[71]

Investigations, censorship and harassment

Police raid on German WikiLeaks domain holder's home

The home of Theodor Reppe, registrant of the German WikiLeaks domain name, wikileaks.de, was raided on 24 March 2009 after WikiLeaks released the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) censorship blacklist.[72] The site was not affected.[73][74][75]

Chinese censorship

The Chinese government currently attempts to censor every web site with "wikileaks" in the URL, including the primary .org site and the regional variations .cn and .uk. However, the site is still accessible from behind the Chinese firewall through one of the many alternative names used by the project, such as "secure.sunshinepress.org". The alternate sites change frequently, and WikiLeaks encourages users to search "wikileaks cover names" outside mainland China for the latest alternative names. Mainland search engines, including Baidu and Yahoo!, also censor references to "wikileaks".[76]

Potential future Australian censorship

Wikinews has related news:

On 16 March 2009, the Australian Communications and Media Authority added WikiLeaks to their proposed blacklist of sites that will be blocked for all Australians if the mandatory internet filtering censorship scheme is implemented as planned.[77][78]

Thai censorship

The Centre for the Resolution of the Emergency Situation (CRES) is currently censoring the website WikiLeaks in Thailand[79] and more than 40,000 other webpages[80] due to the emergency decree in Thailand imposed because of political instabilities (Emergency decree declared beginning of April 2010[81]). When trying to access the WikiLeaks website, internet users are redirected to this webpage.

Harassment and surveillance

According to The Times, WikiLeaks and its members have complained about continuing harassment and surveillance by law enforcement and intelligence organizations, including extended detention, seizure of computers, veiled threats, “covert following and hidden photography.”[82]

After the release of the 2007 airstrikes video and as they prepared to release film of the Granai airstrike, Julian Assange has said that his group of volunteers came under intense surveillance. In an interview and Twitter posts he said that a restaurant in Reykjavik where his group of volunteers met came under surveillance in March; there was "covert following and hidden photography" by police and foreign intelligence services; that an apparent British intelligence agent made thinly veiled threats in a Luxembourg car park; and that one of the volunteers was detained by police for 21 hours. Another volunteer posted that computers were seized, saying "If anything happens to us, you know why ... and you know who is responsible."[83] According to the Columbia Journalism Review, "the Icelandic press took a look at Assange’s charges of being surveilled in Iceland [...] and, at best, have found nothing to substantiate them."[84]

WikiLeaks has claimed that Facebook deleted their fan page, which had 30,000 fans.[85][86][87][88]

Other activities

Icelandic Modern Media Initiative

In August 2009, Kaupthing, a large bank, succeeded in obtaining a court order gagging Iceland’s national broadcaster, RUV, from broadcasting a risk analysis report showing the bank's substantial exposure to debt default risk. This information had been leaked by a whistleblower to WikiLeaks and remained available on the WikiLeaks site; faced with an injunction minutes before broadcast the channel ran with a screen grab of the WikiLeaks site instead of the scheduled piece on the bank. Citizens of Iceland felt outraged that RUV was prevented from broadcasting news of relevance.[89] Therefore, WikiLeaks has been credited with inspiring the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a bill meant to reclaim Iceland's 2007 Reporters Sans Frontieres ranking as first in the world for free speech. It aims to enact a range of protections for sources, journalists, and publishers.[90][91] Birgitta Jónsdóttir, a former volunteer for WikiLeaks and member the Icelandic parliament, is the chief sponsor of the proposal.

Possible move to Switzerland

On 4 November 2010, Julian Assange told Swiss public television TSR that he is seriously considering seeking political asylum in neutral Switzerland and setting up a Wikileaks foundation in the country to move the operation there.[92][93] According to Assange, Switzerland and Iceland are the only countries where WikiLeaks would feel safe to operate.[94][95]

Notable leaks

Pre-2009

Apparent Somali assassination order

WikiLeaks posted its first document in December 2006, a decision to assassinate government officials signed by Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys.[19] The New Yorker has reported that

[Julian] Assange and the others were uncertain of its authenticity, but they thought that readers, using Wikipedia-like features of the site, would help analyze it. They published the decision with a lengthy commentary, which asked, “Is it a bold manifesto by a flamboyant Islamic militant with links to Bin Laden? Or is it a clever smear by US intelligence, designed to discredit the Union, fracture Somali alliances and manipulate China?” ... The document’s authenticity was never determined, and news about WikiLeaks quickly superseded the leak itself.[19]

Daniel arap Moi family corruption

On 31 August 2007, The Guardian (Britain) featured on its front page a story about corruption by the family of the former Kenyan leader Daniel arap Moi. The newspaper stated that the source of the information was WikiLeaks.[96]

Bank Julius Baer lawsuit

Main article: Bank Julius Baer vs. Wikileaks lawsuit

In February 2008, the wikileaks.org domain name was taken offline after the Swiss Bank Julius Baer sued WikiLeaks and the wikileaks.org domain registrar, Dynadot, in a court in California, United States, and obtained a permanent injunction ordering the shutdown.[97][98] WikiLeaks had hosted allegations of illegal activities at the bank's Cayman Island branch.[97] WikiLeaks' U.S. Registrar, Dynadot, complied with the order by removing its DNS entries. However, the website remained accessible via its numeric IP address, and online activists immediately mirrored WikiLeaks at dozens of alternate websites worldwide.[99]

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a motion protesting the censorship of WikiLeaks. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press assembled a coalition of media and press that filed an amicus curiae brief on WikiLeaks' behalf. The coalition included major U.S. newspaper publishers and press organisations, such as the American Society of Newspaper Editors, The Associated Press, the Citizen Media Law Project, The E.W. Scripps Company, the Gannett Company, The Hearst Corporation, the Los Angeles Times, the National Newspaper Publishers Association, the Newspaper Association of America, The Radio-Television News Directors Association, and The Society of Professional Journalists. The coalition requested to be heard as a friend of the court to call attention to relevant points of law that it believed the court had overlooked (on the grounds that WikiLeaks had not appeared in court to defend itself, and that no First Amendment issues had yet been raised before the court). Amongst other things, the coalition argued that:[99]

"Wikileaks provides a forum for dissidents and whistleblowers across the globe to post documents, but the Dynadot injunction imposes a prior restraint that drastically curtails access to Wikileaks from the Internet based on a limited number of postings challenged by Plaintiffs. The Dynadot injunction therefore violates the bedrock principle that an injunction cannot enjoin all communication by a publisher or other speaker."[99]

The same judge, Judge Jeffrey White, who issued the injunction vacated it on 29 February 2008, citing First Amendment concerns and questions about legal jurisdiction.[100] WikiLeaks was thus able to bring its site online again. The bank dropped the case on 5 March 2008.[101] The judge also denied the bank's request for an order prohibiting the website's publication.[99]

The Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Lucy Dalglish, commented:

"It's not very often a federal judge does a 180 degree turn in a case and dissolves an order. But we're very pleased the judge recognized the constitutional implications in this prior restraint."[99]

Guantánamo Bay procedures

A copy of Standard Operating Procedures for Camp Delta–the protocol of the U.S. Army at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp–dated March 2003 was released on the WikiLeaks website on 7 November 2007.[102] The document, named "gitmo-sop.pdf", is also mirrored at The Guardian.[103] Its release revealed some of the restrictions placed over detainees at the camp, including the designation of some prisoners as off-limits to the International Committee of the Red Cross, something that the U.S. military had in the past repeatedly denied.[104]

On 3 December 2007, WikiLeaks released a copy of the 2004 edition of the manual,[105] together with a detailed analysis of the changes.[106]

Scientology

On 7 April 2008, WikiLeaks reported receiving a letter (dated 27 March) from the Religious Technology Centre claiming ownership of several recently leaked documents pertaining to OT Levels within the Church of Scientology. These same documents were at the center of a 1994 scandal. The email stated:

The Advanced Technology materials are unpublished, copyrighted works. Please be advised that your customer's action in this regard violates United States copyright law. Accordingly, we ask for your help in removing these works immediately from your service. – Moxon and Kobrin[107]

The letter continued on to request the release of the logs of the uploader, which would remove their anonymity. WikiLeaks responded with a statement released on Wikinews stating: "in response to the attempted suppression, Wikileaks will release several thousand additional pages of Scientology material next week",[108] and did so.

Sarah Palin's Yahoo email account contents

Main article: Sarah Palin email hack

In September 2008, during the 2008 United States presidential election campaigns, the contents of a Yahoo account belonging to Sarah Palin (the running mate of Republican presidential nominee John McCain) were posted on WikiLeaks after being hacked into by members of Anonymous.[109] The contents of the mailbox seemed to suggest that she used the private Yahoo account to send work-related messages in order to evade public record laws.[110] The hacking of the account was widely reported in mainstream news outlets.[111][112][113] Although WikiLeaks was able to conceal the hacker's identity, the source of the Palin emails was eventually publicly identified in another way[clarification needed][114] as being David Kernell, a 20-year-old economics student at the University of Tennessee and the son of Democratic Tennessee State Representative Mike Kernell from Memphis.[115] Kernell attempted to conceal his identity by using the anonymous proxy service ctunnel.com, but, because of the illegal nature of the access, ctunnel website administrator Gabriel Ramuglia assisted the FBI in tracking down the source of the hack.[116]

BNP membership list

After briefly appearing on a blog, the membership list of the far-right British National Party was posted to WikiLeaks on 18 November 2008. The name, address, age and occupation of many of the 13,500 members were given, including several police officers, two solicitors, four ministers of religion, at least one doctor, and a number of primary and secondary school teachers. In Britain, police officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP, and at least one officer was dismissed for being a member.[117] The BNP was known for going to considerable lengths to conceal the identities of members. On 19 November, BNP leader Nick Griffin stated that he knew the identity of the person who initially leaked the list on 17 November, describing him as a "hardliner" senior employee who left the party in 2007.[118][119][120] On 20 October 2009, a list of BNP members from April 2009 was leaked. This list contained 11,811 members.[121]

2009

In January 2009, over 600 internal United Nations reports (60 of them marked "strictly confidential") were leaked.[122]

On 7 February 2009, WikiLeaks released 6,780 Congressional Research Service reports.[123]

In March 2009, WikiLeaks published a list of contributors to the Norm Coleman senatorial campaign[124] and a set of documents belonging to Barclays Bank that had been ordered removed from the website of The Guardian.[125]

Climatic Research Unit emails

Main article: Climatic Research Unit email controversy

In November 2009, controversial documents, including e-mail correspondence between climate scientists, were illegally released[126] from the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climatic Research Unit (CRU). According to the university, the emails and documents were obtained through a server hacking; one prominent host of the full 120MB archive was WikiLeaks.[127][128]

Internet censorship lists

WikiLeaks has published the lists of forbidden or illegal web addresses for several countries.

On 19 March 2009, WikiLeaks published what was alleged to be the Australian Communications and Media Authority's blacklist of sites to be banned under Australia's proposed laws on Internet censorship.[129] Reactions to the publication of the list by the Australian media and politicians were varied. Particular note was made by journalistic outlets of the type of websites on the list; while the Internet censorship scheme submitted by the Australian Labor Party in 2008 was proposed with the stated intention of preventing access to child pornography and sites related to terrorism,[130] the list leaked on WikiLeaks contains a number of sites unrelated to sex crimes involving minors.[131][132] When questioned about the leak, Stephen Conroy, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy in Australia's Rudd Labor Government, responded by claiming that the list was not the actual list, yet threatening to prosecute anyone involved in distributing it.[133] On 20 March 2009, WikiLeaks published an updated list, dated 18 March 2009; it more closely matches the claimed size of the ACMA blacklist, and contains two pages which have been independently confirmed to be blacklisted by ACMA.

WikiLeaks also contains details of Internet censorship in Thailand, including lists of censored sites dating back to May 2006.[134]

Bilderberg Group meeting reports

Since May 2009, WikiLeaks has made available reports of several meetings of the Bilderberg Group.[135] It includes the group's history[136] and meeting reports from the years 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1960, 1962, 1963 and 1980.

2008 Peru oil scandal

On 28 January 2009, WikiLeaks released 86 telephone intercept recordings of Peruvian politicians and businessmen involved in the "Petrogate" oil scandal. The release of the tapes led the front pages of five Peruvian newspapers.[137]

Serious nuclear accident in Iran

On 16 July 2009, Iranian news agencies reported, the head of Iran's atomic energy organization Gholam Reza Aghazadeh had abruptly resigned for unknown reasons after 12 years in office.[138] Shortly after WikiLeaks released at report disclosing a "serious nuclear accident" at the Iranian Natanz nuclear facility in 2009.[139][140] The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) released statistics according to which the number of enriched centrifuges operational in Iran mysteriously declined from about 4,700 to about 3,900 beginning around the time the nuclear incident WikiLeaks mentioned would have occurred.[141][142]

According to media reports the accident may have been the direct result of a cyberattack at Iran's nuclear program, carried out with the stuxnet computer-worm.[143][144]

Toxic dumping in Africa: The Minton report

In September 2006, commodities giant Trafigura commissioned an internal report about a toxic dumping incident in the Ivory Coast,[145] which (according to the United Nations) affected 108,000 people. The document, called the Minton Report, names various harmful chemicals "likely to be present" in the waste — sodium hydroxide, cobalt phthalocyanine sulfonate, coker naphtha, thiols, sodium alkanethiolate, sodium hydrosulfide, sodium sulfide, dialkyl disulfides, hydrogen sulfide — and notes that some of them "may cause harm at some distance". The report states that potential health effects include "burns to the skin, eyes and lungs, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of consciousness and death", and suggests that the high number of reported casualties is "consistent with there having been a significant release of hydrogen sulphide gas".

On September 11, 2009, Trafigura's lawyers, Carter-Ruck, obtained a secret "super-injunction"[146] against The Guardian, banning that newspaper from publishing the contents of the document. Trafigura also threatened a number of other media organizations with legal action if they published the report's contents, including the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation[145] and The Chemical Engineer magazine.[147] On 14 September 2009, WikiLeaks posted the report.[148]

On 12 October, Carter-Ruck warned The Guardian against mentioning the content of a parliamentary question that was due to be asked about the report. Instead, the paper published an article stating that they were unable to report on an unspecified question and claiming that the situation appeared to "call into question privileges guaranteeing free speech established under the 1689 Bill of Rights".[149] The suppressed details rapidly circulated via the internet and Twitter[150][151][152] and, amid uproar, Carter-Ruck agreed the next day to the modification of the injunction before it was challenged in court, permitting The Guardian to reveal the existence of the question and the injunction.[153] The injunction was lifted on 16 October.[154]

Kaupthing Bank

WikiLeaks has made available an internal document[155] from Kaupthing Bank from just prior to the collapse of Iceland's banking sector, which led to the 2008–2009 Icelandic financial crisis. The document shows that suspiciously large sums of money were loaned to various owners of the bank, and large debts written off. Kaupthing's lawyers have threatened WikiLeaks with legal action, citing banking privacy laws. The leak has caused an uproar in Iceland.[156] Criminal charges relating to the multibillion euro loans to Exista and other major shareholders are being investigated. The bank is seeking to recover loans taken out by former bank employees before its collapse.[157]

Joint Services Protocol 440

Joint Services Protocol 440 ("JSP 440") is the name of a British 2001 Ministry of Defense 2,400-page restricted document for security containing instructions for avoiding leaks in the information flow due to hackers, journalists, and foreign spies.[158][159] The protocol was posted on WikiLeaks on 3 October 2009.

9/11 pager messages

On 25 November 2009, WikiLeaks released 570,000 intercepts of pager messages sent on the day of the September 11 attacks.[160][161][162] Bradley Manning (see below) commented that those were obvious NSA intercepts.[163] Among the released messages are communications between Pentagon officials and New York City Police Department.[164]

2010

U.S. Intelligence report on WikiLeaks

On 15 March 2010, WikiLeaks released a secret 32-page U.S. Department of Defense Counterintelligence Analysis Report from March 2008. The document described some prominent reports leaked on the website which related to U.S. security interests and described potential methods of marginalizing the organization. WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange said that some details in the Army report were inaccurate and its recommendations flawed,[165] and also that the concerns of the US Army raised by the report were hypothetical.[166] The report discussed deterring potential whistleblowers via termination of employment and criminal prosecution of any existing or former insiders, leakers or whistleblowers. Reasons for the report include notable leaks such as U.S. equipment expenditure, human rights violations in Guantanamo Bay and the battle over the Iraqi town of Fallujah.[167]

Baghdad airstrike video

Main article: July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike

On 5 April 2010, WikiLeaks released classified U.S. military footage from a series of attacks on 12 July 2007 in Baghdad by a U.S. helicopter that killed 12, including two Reuters news staff, Saeed Chmagh and Namir Noor-Eldeen, on a website called "Collateral Murder". The footage consisted of a 39-minute unedited version and an 18-minute version which had been edited and annotated. Analysis of the video indicates that the pilots thought the men were carrying weapons (which were actually camera equipment). When asked if they were sure that the men were carrying weapons, they answered in the affirmative.[168] The military conducted an "informal" investigation into the incident, but has yet to release the investigative materials (such as the sworn statements of the soldiers involved or the battle damage assessment) that were used, causing the report to be criticized as "sloppy."[169]

In the week following the release, "Wikileaks" was the search term with the most significant growth worldwide in the last seven days as measured by Google Insights.[170]

Arrest of Bradley Manning
Main article: Arrest of Bradley Manning

A 22-year-old US Army intelligence analyst, PFC (formerly SPC) Bradley Manning, was arrested after alleged chat logs were turned in to the authorities by former hacker Adrian Lamo, in whom he had confided. Manning reportedly told Lamo he had leaked the "Collateral Murder" video, in addition to a video of the Granai airstrike and around 260,000 diplomatic cables, to WikiLeaks.[171][172] WikiLeaks said "allegations in Wired that we have been sent 260,000 classified US embassy cables are, as far as we can tell, incorrect."[173] WikiLeaks have said that they are unable as yet to confirm whether or not Manning was actually the source of the video, stating "we never collect personal information on our sources", but that they have nonetheless "taken steps to arrange for his protection and legal defence."[172][174] On June 21, Julian Assange told The Guardian that WikiLeaks had hired three US criminal lawyers to defend Manning but that they had not been given access to him.[175]

Manning reportedly wrote, "Everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed."[176] According to the Washington Post, he also described the cables as "explaining how the first world exploits the third, in detail, from an internal perspective."[177]

Afghan War Diary

Main article: Afghan War Diary

On July 25, 2010,[178] WikiLeaks released to The Guardian, The New York Times, and Der Spiegel over 92,000 documents related to the war in Afghanistan between 2004 and the end of 2009. The documents detail individual incidents including friendly fire and civilian casualties.[179] The scale of leak was described by Julian Assange as comparable to that of the Pentagon Papers in the 1970s. The documents were released to the public on July 25, 2010. On July 29, 2010 WikiLeaks added a 1.4 GB "Insurance File" to the Afghan War Diary page. The file is AES encrypted and has been speculated to serve as insurance in case the WikiLeaks website or its spokesman Julian Assange are incapacitated, upon which the passphrase could be published (q.v.).[180]

About 15,000 of the 92,000 documents have not yet been released on WikiLeaks, as the group is currently reviewing the documents to remove some of the sources of the information. Speaking to a group in London in August 2010, Assange said that the group will "absolutely" release the remaining documents. He stated that WikiLeaks has requested help from the Pentagon and human-rights groups to help redact the names, but has not received any assistance. He also stated that WikiLeaks is "not obligated to protect other people's sources...unless it is from unjust retribution."[181]

According to a report on the Daily Beast website, the Obama administration has asked Britain, Germany and Australia among others to consider bringing criminal charges against Assange for the Afghan war leaks and to help limit Assange's travels across international borders.[182] In the United States, a joint investigation by the Army and the Federal Bureau of Investigation may try to prosecute "Mr. Assange and others involved on grounds they encouraged the theft of government property".[183]

The Australia Defence Association (ADA) stated that WikiLeaks' Julian Assange "could have committed a serious criminal offence in helping an enemy of the Australian Defence Force (ADF)."[184] Neil James, the executive director of ADA, states: "Put bluntly, Wikileaks is not authorised in international or Australian law, nor equipped morally or operationally, to judge whether open publication of such material risks the safety, security, morale and legitimate objectives of Australian and allied troops fighting in a UN-endorsed military operation."[184]

WikiLeaks' recent leaking of classified US intelligence has been described by commentator of The Wall Street Journal as having "endangered the lives of Afghan informants" and "the dozens of Afghan civilians named in the document dump as U.S. military informants. Their lives, as well as those of their entire families, are now at terrible risk of Taliban reprisal."[185] When interviewed, Assange stated that WikiLeaks has withheld some 15,000 documents that identify informants to avoid putting their lives at risk. Specifically, Voice of America reported in August 2010 that Assange, responding to such criticisms, stated that the 15,000 still held documents are being reviewed "line by line," and that the names of "innocent parties who are under reasonable threat" will be removed.[186] Greg Gutfeld of Fox News described the leaking as "WikiLeaks' Crusade Against the U.S. Military."[187] John Pilger has reported that prior to the release of the Afghan War Diaries in July, WikiLeaks contacted the White House in writing, asking that it identify names that might draw reprisals, but received no response.[188][189]

According to the New York Times, Amnesty International and Reporters Without Borders criticized WikiLeaks for what they saw as risking people’s lives by identifying Afghans acting as informers.[190] A Taliban spokesman said that the Taliban had formed a nine-member "commission" to review the documents "to find about people who are spying."[190] He said the Taliban had a "wanted" list of 1,800 Afghans and was comparing that with names WikiLeaks provided, stating "after the process is completed, our Taliban court will decide about such people."[190]

Love Parade documents

Sometime after the Love Parade stampede in Duisburg, Germany on July 24, 2010, the local news blog Xtranews published internal documents of the city administration regarding Love Parade planning and actions by the authorities. The city government reacted by acquiring a court order on August 16 forcing Xtranews to remove the documents from its blog.[191] Two days later, however, after the documents had surfaced on other websites as well, the government stated that it would not conduct any further legal actions against the publication of the documents.[192] On August 20, WikiLeaks released a publication titled Loveparade 2010 Duisburg planning documents, 2007-2010, which comprised 43 internal documents regarding the Love Parade 2010.[193][194]

Iraq War Logs

Main article: Iraq War documents leak
Wikinews has related news:

In October 2010, it was reported that WikiLeaks was planning to release up to 400,000 documents relating to the Iraq War.[195] Julian Assange initially denied the reports, stating: "WikiLeaks does not speak about upcoming releases dates, indeed, with very rare exceptions we do not communicate any specific information about upcoming releases, since that simply provides fodder for abusive organizations to get their spin machines ready."[196] The Guardian reported on 21 October 2010 that it had received almost 400,000 Iraq war documents from WikiLeaks.[197] On 22 October 2010, Al Jazeera was the first to release analyses of the leak, dubbed The War Logs. WikiLeaks posted a tweet that "Al Jazeera have broken our embargo by 30 minutes. We release everyone from their Iraq War Logs embargoes." This prompted other news organizations to release their articles based on the source material. The release of the documents coincided with a return of the main wikileaks.org website, which had been offering no content since 30 September 2010.

The BBC quoted the Pentagon referring to the Iraq War Logs as "the largest leak of classified documents in its history." Media coverage of the leaked documents focused on claims that the US government had ignored reports of torture by the Iraqi authorities during the period after the 2003 war.[198]

Announcements on upcoming leaks

In May 2010, WikiLeaks said they had video footage of a massacre of civilians in Afghanistan by the US military which they were preparing to release.[199][200]

In an interview with Chris Anderson on 19 July 2010, Assange showed a document WikiLeaks had on an Albanian oil well blowout, and said they also had material from inside BP,[201] and that they were "getting enormous quantity of whistle-blower disclosures of a very high caliber"[202] but added that they have not been able to verify and release the material because they do not have enough volunteer journalists.[203]

At a press conference on October 23, Assange announced that they would soon leak classified documents that WikiLeaks claimed would expose the "despotic" regime of the Russian government.[204][205]

On November 22, an announcement was made by the WikiLeaks twitter feed that the next release would be "7x the size of the Iraq War Logs."[206][207] US authorities and the media have speculated that they may contain diplomatic cables.[208]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f "Wikileaks:About". WikiLeaks. Archived from the original on 14 March 2008. Retrieved 3 June 2009.
  2. ^ "wikileaks.org – Traffic Details from Alexa". Alexa Internet, Inc. Retrieved 29 August 2010.
  3. ^ "Wikileaks has 1.2 million documents?". WikiLeaks. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  4. ^ McGreal, Chris. Wikileaks reveals video showing US air crew shooting down Iraqi civilians, The Guardian, April 5, 2010.
  5. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/world/24assange.html
  6. ^ Winners of Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Award Announced[dead link] 22 Apr 2008
  7. ^ Kenya: The Cry of Blood – Extra Judicial Killings and Disappearances, Sep 2008[dead link] WikiLeaks.
  8. ^ Amnesty announces Media Awards 2009 winners Amnesty.org.uk, 2 June 2009
  9. ^ Reso, Paulina (20 May 2010). "5 pioneering Web sites that could totally change the news". Daily News. Retrieved 8 June 2010.
  10. ^ "AP Interview: WikiLeaks to publish new documents". www.ap.org. 8 August 2010. Retrieved 8 August 2010. [dead link]
  11. ^ Steven Aftergood (3 January 2007). "Wikileaks and untraceable document disclosure". Secrecy News. Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  12. ^ Paul Marks (13 January 2007). "How to leak a secret and not get caught". New Scientist. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  13. ^ Agence France Press (11 January 2007). "Chinese cyber-dissidents launch WikiLeaks, a site for whistleblowers". The Age. Melbourne. Retrieved 17 June 2010.
  14. ^ Richard Guilliatt (30 May 2009). "Rudd Government blacklist hacker monitors police". The Australian. Retrieved 17 June 2010.
  15. ^ "WikiLeaks:Advisory Board". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 16 June 2010. [dead link]
  16. ^ "Inside WikiLeaks' Leak Factory". Mother Jones. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  17. ^ "Cyber-dissidents launch WikiLeaks, a site for whistleblowers". South China Morning Post. 11 January 2007. Archived from the original on 12 February 2007. Retrieved 28 February 2008. {{cite news}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 21 February 2007 suggested (help)
  18. ^ Kearny (11 January 2007). "Wikileaks and Untraceable Document Disclosure". Now Public News. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 28 February 2008., Wikileaks.
  19. ^ a b c "WikiLeaks and Julian Paul Assange". The New Yorker. Retrieved 8 June 2010.
  20. ^ "Wiktionary definition of tranche". En.wiktionary.org. 13 October 2010. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  21. ^ "Wikileaks denies Tor hacker eavesdropping gave site its starte". The Register. Retrieved 10 July 2010.
  22. ^ "Wikileaks Releases Secret Report on Military Equipment". The New York Sun. 9 September 2007. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  23. ^ "Leak secrets trouble free". Scenta. 15 January 2007. Archived from the original on 27 November 2007. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  24. ^ Scott Bradner "Wikileaks: a site for exposure", Linuxworld, 18 January 2007. Retrieved 18 January 2007.
  25. ^ Scott Bradner "Wikileaks: a site for exposure", Linuxworld, 18 January 2007. Retrieved 18 January 2007.
  26. ^ Staff Reports (18 January 2007). "Whistleblower Website Coming". Free-Market News Network. Retrieved 28 February 2008. [dead link]
  27. ^ "twitter.com/wikiLeaks at 1.24am 24 Dec 2009". Twitter.com. 24 December 2009. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  28. ^ "Wikileaks is overloaded". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 31 December 2009. "To concentrate on raising the funds necessary to keep us alive into 2010, we have reluctantly suspended all other operations, but will be back soon."wikileaks.org
  29. ^ "Wikileaks Mirror". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 13 February 2010.
  30. ^ "Another Wikileaks Mirror". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 13 February 2010.
  31. ^ "Wikileaks is overloaded". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 17 February 2010.
  32. ^ Butselaar, Emily (29 January 2010). "Dig deep for Wikileaks". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 30 January 2010.
  33. ^ a b c d e Interview with Julian Assange, spokesperson of Wikileaks: Leak-o-nomy: The Economy of Wikileaks.
  34. ^ WikiLeaks. "at 7:42am 5 Jan 2010". Twitter.com. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  35. ^ "www.twitter.com/wikileaks at 3 February 5.51pm". Twitter.com. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  36. ^ "Paypal has again locked our..." WikiLeaks. Twitter. Retrieved 26 January 2010.
  37. ^ "Paypal has freed up our..." WikiLeaks. Twitter. Retrieved 26 January 2010.
  38. ^ [1].
  39. ^ No Secrets, by Raffi Khatchadourian, New Yorker, June 7, 2010.
  40. ^ a b Cohen, Noam (17 June 2010). "Knight Foundation Hands Out Grants to 12 Groups, but Not WikiLeaks - Media Decoder Blog - NYTimes.com". Mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  41. ^ a b WikiLeaks questions why it was rejected for Knight grant Yahoo! News, 17 June 2010
  42. ^ a b Previous post Next post. "Wikileaks Reopens for Leakers | Threat Level". Wired.com. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  43. ^ McCullagh, Declan (16 July 2010). "Feds look for Wikileaks founder at NYC hacker event | Security - CNET News". News.cnet.com. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  44. ^ Jacob Appelbaum WikiLeaks Next HOPE Keynote Transcript - 07/17/10
  45. ^ "TED Blog | Updated: Surprise speaker at TEDGlobal: Julian Assange in Session 12". Blog.ted.com. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  46. ^ "Julian Assange - TED Talk - Wikileaks". Geekosystem. 19 July 2010. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  47. ^ a b c d Mills, Elinor (28 July 2010). "Researcher detained at U.S. border, questioned about Wikileaks | InSecurity Complex - CNET News". News.cnet.com. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  48. ^ a b "Wau Holland Foundation sheds light on Wikileaks donations - Hardware, ISP, travelling costs". TechEye. 13 July 2010. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  49. ^ Theunis Bates Contributor. "WikiLeaks' Woes Grow as Spokesman Quits Site". Aolnews.com. Retrieved 22 October 2010. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  50. ^ Clark, Andrew (30 August 2010). "Not much love lost between Wikipedia and WikiLeaks". The Guardian. London.
  51. ^ "WikiLeaks chief lashes out at media during debate". Google.com. 30 September 2010. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  52. ^ "WikiLeaks Spokesman Quits, Blasts Founder Julian Assange As Paranoid Control Freak, Admits To Using Fake Name", by Henry Blodget, September 28, 2010, San Francisco Chronicle
  53. ^ "WikiLeaks' Woes Grow as Spokesman Quits Site". Aolnews.com. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  54. ^ Benson, Pam (16 October 2010). "WikiLeaks donation site shutdown by operator". CNN.
  55. ^ a b Fredén, Jonas (14 August 2010). "[[:Template:Sv icon]] Jagad och hatad - men han vägrar vika sig". Dagens Nyheter. {{cite news}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)
  56. ^ Helin, Jan (14 August 2010). "[[:Template:Sv icon]] Därför blir Julian Assange kolumnist i Aftonbladet". Aftonbladet. Retrieved 15 August 2010. {{cite news}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)
  57. ^ Goodin, Dan (21 February 2008). "Wikileaks judge gets Pirate Bay treatment". The Register. Retrieved 13 March 2009.
  58. ^ "What is Wikileaks?". CNN. 25 July 2010. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  59. ^ TT (17 August 2010). "Piratpartiet sköter Wikileak-servrar" (in Template:Sv icon). DN.se. Retrieved 22 October 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  60. ^ "Swedish Pirate Party to host WikiLeaks servers". CNN. 18 August 2010. Retrieved 21 August 2010.
  61. ^ "Episode 11 - White Mountain, Fit For A James Bond Villain!". YouTube. 15 April 2009. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  62. ^ "Is Wikileaks accessible across the globe or do oppressive regimes in certain countries block the site?". WikiLeaks. 2008. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  63. ^ "On the risks of serving whenever you surf" (PDF). freehaven.net. Retrieved 17 June 2010.
  64. ^ "What is Wikileaks? How does Wikileaks operate?". WikiLeaks. 2008. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  65. ^ "WikiLeaks' submissions page". WikiLeaks. Archived from the original on 19 April 2008. Retrieved 17 June 2010.
  66. ^ "Wikileaks and untracable document disclosure". Secrecy News. Federation of American Scientists. 3 January 2007. Retrieved 21 August 2008.
  67. ^ "What is Wikileaks? How does Wikileaks operate?". WikiLeaks. 2008. Archived from the original on 4 May 2008. Archived by the Internet Archive on May 4, 2008 from the original[dead link]
  68. ^ Dave Gilson (19 May 2010). "WikiLeaks Gets A Facelift". Mother Jones. Retrieved 17 June 2010.
  69. ^ Daniel Friedman "Web site aims to post government secrets"[dead link], Federal Times, 4 January 2007.
  70. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". WikiLeaks. Archived from the original on 1 July 2007. Retrieved 17 June 2010.
  71. ^ a b "Inside WikiLeaks' Leak Factory". Mother Jones. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  72. ^ "Hausdurchsuchung bei Inhaber der Domain wikileaks.de" (in English and translated from German). Archived from the original on 21 September 2009. Retrieved 21 September 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  73. ^ "Wikileaks raided by German police". Networkworld.com. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  74. ^ Police raid home of Wikileaks.de domain owner over censorship lists[dead link]
  75. ^ "Police raid Wikileaks owner". Straitstimes.com. 25 March 2009. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  76. ^ "Is Wikileaks blocked by the Chinese government?". WikiLeaks. 2008. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  77. ^ Moses, Asher (16 March 2009). "Banned hyperlinks could cost you $11,000 a day". Melbourne: The Age. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  78. ^ "Australia secretly censors Wikileaks press release and Danish Internet censorship list, 16 Mar 2009". WikiLeaks. 16 March 2009. Retrieved 16 March 2009. [dead link]
  79. ^ "Thailand blocks access to WikiLeaks website". Bangkok: Thai Visa. 18 August 2010. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
  80. ^ Barta, Patrick (17 August 2010). "Thai Groups Denounce Website Censorship". USA: The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
  81. ^ "Citing Instability, Thailand Extends Emergency Decree". USA: New York Times. 6 July 2010. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Text "http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/world/asia/07thailand.html" ignored (help)
  82. ^ Campbell, Matthew (2010-04-11) Whistleblowers on US ‘massacre’ fear CIA stalkers, The Times
  83. ^ Matthew Campbell (11 April 2010). "Whistleblowers on US 'massacre' fear CIA stalkers". London: The Sunday Times.
  84. ^ "Thin Ice". CJR. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  85. ^ "Twitter / WikiLeaks: Facebook deletes WikiLeaks fanclub with 30k fans". Twitter.com. 20 April 2010. Retrieved 22 April 2010.
  86. ^ "WikiLeaks claims Facebook deleted its page, 30000 fans". News.com.au. 2010-04-2q. Retrieved 23 April 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  87. ^ "Wikileaks Claims Facebook Deleted Their Fan Page Because They "Promote Illegal Acts"". Gawker. 20 April 2010. Retrieved 21 April 2010.
  88. ^ "Wikileaks Fan Page Pulled Down for Being "Inauthentic," Says Facebook". techPresident. 21 April 2010. Retrieved 22 April 2010.
  89. ^ AP News, 2009, "Iceland Court Lifts Gag Order After Public Outrage," http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Iceland+court+lifts+gag+order+after+public+outrage-a01611956752
  90. ^ "Iceland's journalism freedom dream prompted by Wikileaks". BBC. 13 February 2010.
  91. ^ "Icelandic Modern Media Initiative". immi.is.
  92. ^ "Julian Assange compte demander l'asile en Suisse". TSR. 4 November 2010.
  93. ^ "WikiLeaks founder says may seek Swiss asylum". Reuters. 4 November 2010.
  94. ^ "WikiLeaks-Gründer erwägt Umzug in die Schweiz". ORF. 5 November 2010.
  95. ^ http://www.almanar.com.lb/newssite/NewsDetails.aspx?id=161016&language=en
  96. ^ Rice, Xan (31 August 2007). "The looting of Kenya". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  97. ^ a b "Wikileaks.org under injunction" (Press release). WikiLeaks. 18 February 2008. Archived from the original on 6 March 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  98. ^ "Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. et al. v. Wikileaks et al". News.justia.com. Retrieved 13 March 2009.
  99. ^ a b c d e "Judge reverses Wikileaks injunction". The Inquirer. 2 March 2008. Retrieved 23 September 2009.
  100. ^ Philipp Gollner (29 February 2008). "Judge reverses ruling in Julius Baer leak case". Reuters. Retrieved 1 March 2008.
  101. ^ Claburn, Thomas (6 March 2008). "Swiss Bank Abandons Lawsuit Against Wikileaks: The wiki had posted financial documents it said proved tax evasion by Bank Julius Baer's clients". InformationWeek.
  102. ^ "Sensitive Guantánamo Bay Manual Leaked Through Wiki Site", Wired 14 November 2007
  103. ^ specific address at The Guardian.
  104. ^ "Guantanamo operating manual posted on Internet". Reuters. 15 November 2007. Retrieved 15 November 2007. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  105. ^ "Camp Delta Operating Procedure (2004)". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 13 March 2009. [dead link]
  106. ^ "Changes in Guantanamo SOP manual (2003–2004)". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 13 March 2009. [dead link]
  107. ^ "Church of Scientology collected Operating Thetan Documents, including full text of legal letter". 4 June 2008.[dead link]
  108. ^ "Church of Scientology warns Wikileaks over documents". 4 July 2008.
  109. ^ See the article "Anonymous (Group)"
  110. ^ "Group Posts E-Mail Hacked From Palin Account – Update". Wired.
  111. ^ Shear, Michael D. (18 September 2008). "Hackers Access Palin's Personal E-Mail, Post Some Online". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 18 September 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  112. ^ "FBI, Secret Service Investigate Hacking of Palin's E-mail". foxnews.com. 18 September 2008. Retrieved 18 September 2008.
  113. ^ Swaine, Jon (18 September 2008). "Sarah Palin's email account broken into by hackers". London: telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 18 September 2008.
  114. ^ "Palin Email Hacker Found". Slashdot. Retrieved 21 September 2008.
  115. ^ "Federal Bureau of Investigation – Knoxville Division – Press Releases – Department of Justice". Knoxville.fbi.gov. Retrieved 16 November 2009.
  116. ^ "Memo to US Secret Service: Net proxy may pinpoint Palin email hackers". TheRegister. Retrieved 21 September 2008.
  117. ^ "'BNP membership' officer sacked". BBC. 21 March 2009. Retrieved 23 March 2009.
  118. ^ Cobain, Ian (19 November 2008). "BNP membership list posted online by former 'hardliner'". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 19 November 2008.
  119. ^ "BNP Membership List Exposed". Infoshop News. Retrieved 19 November 2008.
  120. ^ Lea, Michael; Boden, Nicola (19 November 2008). "Police officer faces investigation after being 'outed' as BNP supporter in membership leak". London: DailyMail. Retrieved 19 November 2008.
  121. ^ Booth, Robert (20 October 2009). "BNP membership list leaked". London: Guardian. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
  122. ^ Radio, Britannia (15 January 2009). "Britannia Radio". Britanniaradio.blogspot.com. Retrieved 13 March 2009.
  123. ^ "Change you can download: a billion in secret Congressional reports". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 13 March 2009. [dead link]
  124. ^ "The Big Bad Database of Senator Norm Coleman". 11 March 2009. Retrieved 17 June 2010. [dead link]
  125. ^ "Barclays Bank gags Guardian over leaked memos detailing offshore tax scam". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 17 June 2010. [dead link]
  126. ^ Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. "Government Response to the House of Commons Science and Technology 8th Report of Session 2009-10: The disclosure of climate date from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia" (PDF). The Stationery Office. ISBN 9780101793421.
  127. ^ "WikiLeaks.org aims to expose lies, topple governments". New York Post. 29 November 2009.
  128. ^ Moses, Asher (2 February 2010). "Wikileaks shuts down, unable to plug funding gap (Sydney Morning Herald)". Smh.com.au. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  129. ^ Colin Jacobs (19 March 2009). "Leaked Government blacklist confirms worst fears". Electronic Frontiers Australia. Retrieved 19 March 2009.
  130. ^ Vivian Wai-yin Kwok (19 March 2009). "Aussie Internet Blacklist Has Gray Areas". Forbes.com. Retrieved 19 March 2009.
  131. ^ Asher Moses (19 March 2009). "Leaked Australian blacklist reveals banned sites". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 19 March 2009.
  132. ^ Liam Tung (19 March 2009). "Wikileaks spills ACMA blacklist". ZD Net Australia. Retrieved 19 March 2009.
  133. ^ Nic MacBean (19 March 2009). "Leaked blacklist irresponsible, inaccurate: Conroy". ABC News. Retrieved 19 March 2009. I am aware of reports that a list of URLs has been placed on a website. This is not the ACMA blacklist." He says that the published list purports to be current on 6 August 2008, and contains approximately 2,400 URLs, whereas the ACMA blacklist for the same date contained 1,061 URLs. "There are some common URLs to those on the ACMA blacklist. However, ACMA advises that there are URLs on the published list that have never been the subject of a complaint or ACMA investigation, and have never been included on the ACMA blacklist," he said. "ACMA is investigating this matter and is considering a range of possible actions it may take including referral to the Australian Federal Police. Any Australian involved in making this content publicly available would be at serious risk of criminal prosecution. {{cite news}}: line feed character in |quote= at position 106 (help)
  134. ^ "Internet Censorship in Thailand". wikileaks.org. Archived from the original on 16 January 2008. Retrieved 17 June 2010.
  135. ^ "Bildeberg Group Documents". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 11 May 2009. [dead link]
  136. ^ "Bilderberg Group History, 1956". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 11 May 2009. [dead link]
  137. ^ "86 interceptaciones telefonicas a politicos y autoridades peruanos, más del caso Petrogate, 2008". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 16 November 2009. [dead link]
  138. ^ "Iranian nuclear chief steps down". BBC News. 16 July 2009. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  139. ^ "Serious nuclear accident may lay behind Iranian nuke chief%27s mystery resignation". wikileaks.[dead link]
  140. ^ "Serious nuclear accident may lay behind Iranian nuke chief's mystery resignation". wikileaks. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  141. ^ "German Cyber-Security Expert: Stuxnet's Target, Natanz Reactor". www.richardsilverstein.com. 23 September 2010. Retrieved 2 October 2010.
  142. ^ Clayton, Mark (25 February 2009). "Stuxnet worm mystery: What's the cyber weapon after?". Yahoo News. Retrieved 28 September 2010. [dead link]
  143. ^ "6 mysteries about Stuxnet". Blog.foreignpolicy.com. Retrieved 28 September 2010.
  144. ^ Paul Woodward (22 February 1999). "Iran confirms Stuxnet found at Bushehr nuclear power plant". Warincontext.org. Retrieved 28 September 2010.
  145. ^ a b "A gag too far". Index On Censorship. October 2009. Retrieved 14 October 2009.[dead link]
  146. ^ "Minton report secret injunction gagging The Guardian on Trafigura", WikiLeaks, retrieved 15 October 2009
  147. ^ Duckett, Adam (13 October 2009). "Trafigura story breaks". The Chemical Engineer. Retrieved 14 October 2009. [dead link]
  148. ^ "RE: Caustic Tank Washings, Abidjan, Ivory Coast" (PDF). Retrieved 16 October 2009. [dead link]
  149. ^ Leigh, David (12 October 2009). Guardian gagged from reporting parliament. The Guardian.
  150. ^ Rusbridger, Alan (14 October 2009). The Trafigura fiasco tears up the textbook. The Guardian.
  151. ^ Higham, Nick (13 October 2009). When is a secret not a secret? BBC News.
  152. ^ The mysterious British House of Commons. Wikipedia Reference Desk
  153. ^ Leigh, David (13 October 2009). "Gag on Guardian reporting MP's Trafigura question lifted". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
  154. ^ Beckford, Martin (16 October 2009). "Secret Trafigura report said 'likely cause' of illness was release of toxic gas from dumped waste". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 16 October 2009.
  155. ^ "Financial collapse: Confidential exposure analysis of 205 companies each owing above €45M to Icelandic bank Kaupthing, 26 September 2008". WikiLeaks. 29 July 2009. Retrieved 22 September 2009.
  156. ^ "Miklar hreyfingar rétt fyrir hrun". RÚV. 31 July 2009. Retrieved 22 September 2009.
  157. ^ "Failed Icelandic bank seeks 197 million euros from former staff". AFP. 17 May 2010.
  158. ^ Tom Chivers. "MoD 'how to stop leaks' document is leaked" The Daily Telegraph 5 October 2009. Retrieved 6 October 2009.
  159. ^ Kalle Holmberg. "Brittisk instruktion mot läckor har läckt ut" Dagens Nyheter, 6 October 2009. Retrieved 6 October 2009.
  160. ^ [911.wikileaks.org "Wikileaks 9/11 Pager Data Website"]. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  161. ^ 8:18 p.m. ET (25 November 2009). "570,000 pager messages from 9/11 released MSNBC 25 November 2009". MSNBC. Retrieved 30 April 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  162. ^ Jennifer Millman (1 December 2009). "Analysis of 9/11 Pager Data Paints Chilling Picture". NBC New York.
  163. ^ Chris Williams (7 June 2010). "Wikileaks' US army 'leaker' arrested". TheRegister.
  164. ^ Kevin Poulsen (25 November 2009). "Wikileaks Says It Has Half-a-Million 9/11 Pager Messages". Wired.
  165. ^ Mccullagh, Declan (15 March 2010). "U.S. Army worried about Wikileaks in secret report". CNET News, CBS Interactive. Retrieved 15 March 2010.
  166. ^ Strom, Stephanie (17 March 2010). "Pentagon Sees a Threat From Online Muckrakers". nytimes. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
  167. ^ "U.S. Intelligence planned to destroy WikiLeaks" (PDF).[dead link]
  168. ^ Elisabeth Bumiller; Brian Stelter (6 April 2009). "Video Shows U.S. Killing of Reuters Employees". New York Times. Retrieved 7 April 2010.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  169. ^ Khatchadourian, Raffi (2010-04-09) The WikiLeaks Video: Reading the Report, The New Yorker
  170. ^ Current Google Insights trends: Wikileaks posts classified military video, Masters, The Independent, (2010-04-12)
  171. ^ Poulsen, Kevin; Zetter, Kim (6 June 2010). "U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe". Wired. Retrieved 15 June 2010.
  172. ^ a b "US intelligence analyst arrested over security leaks". BBC News. 7 June 2010. Retrieved 15 June 2010.
  173. ^ Fildes, Jonathan (7 June 2010). "Hacker explains why he reported 'Wikileaks source'". BBC News. Retrieved 15 June 2010.
  174. ^ Fildes, Jonathan (8 June 2010). "Wikileaks site unfazed by arrest of US army 'source'". BBC News. Retrieved 15 June 2010.
  175. ^ Traynor, Ian (21 June 2010). "WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange breaks cover but will avoid America". guardian.co.uk. London. Retrieved 21 June 2010.
  176. ^ Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter (6 June 2010). "U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe". Wired.
  177. ^ Ellen Nakashima (10 June 2010). "Messages from alleged leaker Bradley Manning portray him as despondent soldier". The Washington Post.
  178. ^ Birmingham, John (1 October 2010). "The Man Who Fell to Earth". The Monthly. Retrieved 25 October 2010. {{cite news}}: More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)
  179. ^ "Afghanistan war logs: the unvarnished picture". guardian.co.uk. London. 25 July 2010. Retrieved 26 July 2010.
  180. ^ Zetter, Kim. "WikiLeaks Posts Mysterious 'Insurance' File". Wired.com. Retrieved 31 July 2010.
  181. ^ Julian E. Barnes; Jeanne Whalen (12 August 2010). "Pentagon Slams WikiLeaks' Plan to Post More War Logs". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 13 August 2010.
  182. ^ Shenon, Philip. "U.S. Urges Allies to Crack Down on WikiLeaks". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 10 August 2010.
  183. ^ Entous, Adam; Perez, Evan (20 August 2010). "Prosecutors Eye WikiLeaks Charges". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 21 August 2010. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  184. ^ a b "Assange may have committed offence: ADA". The Sydney Morning Herald. 28 July 2010.
  185. ^ "WikiLeaks 'Bastards'". The Wall Street Journal. 29 July 2010.
  186. ^ "Sweden Withdraws Arrest Warrant for Embattled WikiLeaks Founder". .voanews.com. 21 August 2010. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  187. ^ "WikiLeaks' Crusade Against the U.S. Military". Fox News. 28 July 2010.
  188. ^ "Why Wikileaks Must Be Protected". Zcommunications.org. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  189. ^ WikiLeaks and Pentagon Disagree About Talks 201-08-19
  190. ^ a b c Burns, John (23 October 2010). "WikiLeaks Founder on the Run, Trailed by Notoriety". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
  191. ^ Konrad Lischka: Einstweilige Verfügung - Duisburg verbietet Blogger-Veröffentlichung zur Love Parade at Spiegel Online on 2010-8-18 (German)
  192. ^ Loveparade-Dokumente offen im Internet at wdr.de (German. Retrieved 2010-8-26.
  193. ^ "Loveparade 2010 Duisburg planning documents, 2007-2010". Retrieved 21 August 2010. [dead link]
  194. ^ WikiLeaks releases documents on Love Parade tragedy at news.com.au on 2010-8-21
  195. ^ "WikiLeaks May Release 400,000 Iraq War Documents". CBS News. 16 October 2010. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  196. ^ Assange, Julian (18 October 2010). "Where do all these claims about WikiLeaks doing something on Iraq today (Monday) come from?". WikiLeaks. Retrieved 18 October 2010.
  197. ^ "Iraq war logs: secret files show how US ignored torture". The Guardian. 22 October 2010. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  198. ^ "Huge Wikileaks release shows US 'ignored Iraq torture'". BBC News. 23 October 2010. Retrieved 23 October 2010.
  199. ^ Campbell, Matthew (11 April 2010). "Whistleblowers on US 'massacre' fear CIA stalkers". London: The Times. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
  200. ^ Warrick, Joby (19 May 2010). "WikiLeaks works to expose government secrets, but Web site's sources are a mystery". The Washington Post. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
  201. ^ Chris Anderson. Julian Assange: Why the world needs WikiLeaks. TED. Event occurs at 11:28. Retrieved 2 August 2010. November last year ... well blowouts in Albania ... Have you had information from inside BP? Yeah, we have a lot ...
  202. ^ Assange TED interview. Event occurs at 13:55
  203. ^ By Richard Galant, CNN (16 July 2010). "WikiLeaks founder: Site getting tons of 'high caliber' disclosures - CNN.com". Edition.cnn.com. Retrieved 1 August 2010. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  204. ^ "Bank raid could have been warning against planned WikiLeaks Russian corruption expose says Alexander Lebedev".
  205. ^ http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/1026/WikiLeaks-ready-to-drop-a-bombshell-on-Russia.-But-will-Russians-get-to-read-about-it
  206. ^ http://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/6564225640042499
  207. ^ Andrea Petrou. "WikiLeaks promises leak "seven times bigger than Iraq"".
  208. ^ http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n235797
Wikiquote has quotations related to WikiLeaks.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Wikileaks.

Interviews

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WikiLeaks&oldid=398775606"