User talk:Savidan

; Archives
	/Archive 1: December 2005 — February 2006; /Archive 2: March 2006; /Archive 3: April 2006 — May 2006; /Archive 4: June 2006 — July 2006; /Archive 5: August 2006 — January 2007; /Archive 6: Feburary 2007 — June 2007; /Archive 7: July 2007 — March 2008; /Archive 8: April 2008 — July 2009; /Archive 9: August 2009 — March 2010;

Birthright citizenship

Hello, Savidan. You have new messages at Richwales's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Richwales (talk · contribs · review) 05:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aboriginal title in the United States

On 11 August, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aboriginal title in the United States, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 06:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beechbone.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beechbone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Juntalocationwheel.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Juntalocationwheel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

Based on your edit summary, I'd like to clarify what I think the word "extensively" meant, namely that the case was cited many times, not that extensive parts of the case were cited. I didn't add the word and don't know how many times the Prop 8 proponents cited the case, so I have no idea whether the description is actually true. Nor do I know how many times constitutes "extensively." In addition, I think if one wants to make that point, it would be better to quantify it (e.g., cited eight times, or cited more than four times) and source it rather than using an ambiguous adjective. For that reason, I think your removal of the word is appropriate. If someone wants to go to the work to come up with a number, more power to them. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 23:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

aboriginal title - aboriginal case law

I realized this problem yesterday, and reverted by edits to some of the articles. Your proposed solution of "Aboriginal title case law" is excellent, but putting Aboriginal Title as a subcategory of Aboriginal Case Law makes little sense, as most of the articles included in the former are not case law articles. I don't have the time to make the new category at the moment, so I'll just disconnect the two categories for now. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 14:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once "Aboriginal title case law" is created, it would be a subcategory of both "Aboriginal title" and "Aboriginal case law." Neither "Aboriginal title" nor "Aboriginal case law" would be a subcategory of the other. Sorry if this wasn't clear from my earlier post. Savidan 16:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference NYC 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Ambassador Program and Wikipedia Academy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notice

I have nominated Simon Byrne for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Cirt (talk) 02:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK response

Please note I responded to your comment, at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Scott_Ashjian. -- Cirt (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy

Hello, your nomination of Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 10:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State v. Oneida County

On 21 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State v. Oneida County, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oneida II

Savidan, I did not add that template primarily to annoy you. See talk page for a further questions about where you get your sources from. Mjroots (talk) 17:34, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joint Tribal Council of the Passamaquoddy Tribe v. Morton

On 23 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joint Tribal Council of the Passamaquoddy Tribe v. Morton, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy

On 24 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Savidan. You have new messages at Dondegroovily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy Savidan's Day!

User:Savidan has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Savidan's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Savidan!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.

For a user ribbon you can use, see

Awesome Wikipedian

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aboriginal title in the Marshall Court

On 4 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aboriginal title in the Marshall Court, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 06:03, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work

I just wanted to say thanks for all of your good work on law related articles! Verkhovensky (talk) 20:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pratt-Yorke opinion

On 12 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pratt-Yorke opinion, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that mis-transcribed versions of the Pratt-Yorke opinion of 1757 were circulated in British North America by opponents of the Royal Proclamation of 1763? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Vatican City station

Ok, no problem. I just do some minor fixes. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hogwarts

Can you please unprotect Battle of Hogwarts? It has been over two years since you protected it. It is far too extreme to prevent autoconfirmed users from editing the page. The page currently redirects to a non-existant section in an article that does not contain any information about it. McLerristarr | Mclay1 04:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, but I would advise you to consult the previous AfDs first if you are considering recreating the article. Savidan 05:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Although I have no intention of recreating the article myself; I just wanted to fix the redirect. McLerristarr | Mclay1 09:00, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please verify the thing I corrected was indeed an error

Hi, I corrected something which I believe was a typo error on your part in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worcester_v._Georgia&action=historysubmit&diff=392626015&oldid=391406604 . However I want to make sure that I did not just undo an actual correction that you had made, as I am not familiar with the details of the case.

My edit is at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Worcester_v._Georgia&action=historysubmit&diff=400220366&oldid=399020572 . Thanks!

206.10.158.35 (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]