Euthanasia and the slippery slope
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it. |
| Part of a series on |
| Euthanasia |
|---|
| Types |
| Views |
| Groups |
| People |
| Books |
| Jurisdictions |
| Laws |
| Alternatives |
| Other issues |
Critics of euthanasia sometimes claim that legalising any form of the practice will lead to a slippery slope effect, resulting eventually in non-voluntary euthanasia.
Non-voluntary euthanasia is sometimes cited as one of the possible outcomes of the slippery slope argument, in which it is claimed that permitting voluntary euthanasia to occur will lead to the support and legalization of non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.[1] However, studies of the Netherlands after the introduction of voluntary euthanasia state that there was no evidence to support this claim[2][3] while other studies state otherwise.[4]
A study from the Jakobovits Center for Medical Ethics in Israel argued that a form of non-voluntary euthanasia, the Groningen Protocol, has "potential to validate the slippery-slope argument against allowing euthanasia in selected populations".[5] Anesthesiologist William Lanier says that the "ongoing evolution of euthanasia law in the Netherlands" is evidence that a slippery slope is "playing out in real time".[6] Pediatrician Ola Didrik Saugstad says that while he approves of the withholding of treatment to cause the death of severely ill newborns where the prognosis is poor, he disagrees with the active killing of such newborns.[7] Countering this view, professor of internal medicine Margaret Battin finds that there is a lack of evidence to support slippery slope arguments.[8] Additionally, it is argued that the public nature of the Groningen Protocol decisions, and their evaluation by a prosecutor, prevent a "slippery slope" from occurring.[9][10]
A study by Jochemsen and Keown, from the Dutch Lindeboom Institute, a Christian organisation,[11] published in the peer reviewed Journal of Medical Ethics, argued that euthanasia in the Netherlands is not well controlled and that there is still a significant percentage of cases of euthanasia practiced illegally.[4] Raanan Gillon, from the Imperial College School of Medicine, University of London commented that "what is shown by the empirical findings is that restrictions on euthanasia that legal controls in the Netherlands were supposed to have implemented are being extensively ignored and from that point of view it is surely justifiable to conclude, as Jochemsen and Keown do conclude, that the practice of euthanasia in the Netherlands is in poor control".[12]
Lawyer Eugene Volokh argued in his article The Mechanism of the Slippery Slope that judicial logic could eventually lead to a gradual break in the legal restrictions for euthanasia,[13] while medical oncologist and palliative care specialist, Jan Bernheim, believes the law can provide safeguards against slippery-slope effects, saying that the grievances of euthanasia opponents are unfounded.[10]
Euthanasia opponent Ian Dowbiggin linked the Nazis' Action T4 to the resistance in the West to involuntary euthanasia. He believes that the revulsion inspired by the Nazis led to some of the early advocates of euthanasia in all its forms in the U.S. and U.K. removing non-voluntary euthanasia from their proposed platforms.[14]
A 2009 review study of euthanasia in Holland concluded that no slippery slope effect has occurred,[15] while another study of the same year found that abuse of the Dutch euthanasia system is rare.[16] In 2010, a study found that there is no evidence that legalizing assisted suicide will lead us down the slippery slope to involuntary euthanasia.[17]
Most critics rely predominantly on Dutch evidence of cases of "termination of life without an explicit request" as evidence for the slide from voluntary euthanasia to non-voluntary euthanasia.[18][19] One commenter wrote that that critics who rely on this slippery slope argument often omit two important elements, thereby using flawed logic.[18] First, the argument is only effective against legalization if it is legalization which causes the slippery slope; and secondly, it is only effective if it is used comparatively, to show that the slope is more slippery in the Netherlands than it is in jurisdictions which have not legalized assisted suicide or euthanasia;[18] since these questions have not been addressed by critics, little attention has been paid to available evidence on causation and comparability.
Research review studies
In the most recent review paper on euthanasia in the Netherlands, namely the 2009 paper entitled Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia from the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain? written by researchers from the Department of Public Health in the Netherlands, it was found that "public control and transparency of the practice of euthanasia is to a large extent possible" and that "[n]o slippery slope seems to have occurred".[20]
References
- ^ "Voluntary Euthanasia". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. March 29, 2010. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
- ^ Ryan, C.J. (1998). "Pulling up the runaway: the effect of new evidence on euthanasia's slippery slope". Journal of Medical Ethics. 24 (5): 341–344. doi:10.1136/jme.24.5.341. PMC 1377611. PMID 9800591.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ van der Maas, P.J.; van Delden, J.J.M. (1991). "Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life". The Lancet. 338 (8768): 669–674. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91241-L.
- ^ a b Jochemsen H, Keown J (1999). "Voluntary euthanasia under control? Further empirical evidence from The Netherlands". J Med Ethics. 25 (1): 16–21. doi:10.1136/jme.25.1.16. PMC 479162. PMID 10070633.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Jotkowitz, Alan; Glick, S; Gesundheit, B (2008). "A Case Against Justified Non-Voluntary Active Euthanasia (The Groningen Protocol)". The American Journal of Bioethics. 8 (11): 25. doi:10.1080/15265160802513085. ISSN 1526-5161.
- ^ Lanier, William (2007). "Physician Involvement in Capital Punishment: Simplifying a Complex Calculus". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 82 (9): 1043–1046. doi:10.4065/82.9.1043-a.
{{cite journal}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Saugstad, OD. (2005). "When newborn infants are bound to die". Acta Paediatr. 94 (11): 1535–7. doi:10.1080/08035250500340412. PMID 16303690.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Battin, Margaret P. (2008). "Physician-Assisted Dying and the Slippery Slope: The Challenge of Empirical Evidence". Willamette Law Review. 45 (1): 107–108.
- ^ Sauer, Pieter J.J.; Verhagen, A.A. Eduard (2009). "The Groningen Protocol, Unfortunately Misunderstood". Neonatology. 96 (1): 11. doi:10.1159/000196883.
- ^ a b "Laws can safeguard the dying". www.theaustralian.com.au. Retrieved 2010-12-24.
{{cite web}}: Text "The Australian" ignored (help) - ^ "Lindeboom Instituut Studiecentrum voor medische ethiek vanuit de christelijke levensbeschouwing". www.lindeboominstituut.nl. Retrieved 2011-01-01.
- ^ Raanan Gillon (1999). "Euthanasia in the Netherlands - down the slippery slope ?". J Med Ethics. 25 (1): 3–4. PMC 479159. PMID 10070630.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Eugene Volokh, 'The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope', 116 Harvard Law Review 1026 (2003) [1] JSTOR 1342743
- ^ Dowbiggin, Ian Robert (2002). A merciful end: the euthanasia movement in modern America. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. [, page needed], . ISBN 0-19-515443-6.
- ^ Rietjens, JA.; van der Maas, PJ.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen, BD.; van Delden, JJ.; van der Heide, A. (2009). "Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia from the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain?". J Bioeth Inq. 6 (3): 271–283. doi:10.1007/s11673-009-9172-3. PMID 19718271.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Norwood, F.; Kimsma, G.; Battin, MP. (2009). "Vulnerability and the 'slippery slope' at the end-of-life: a qualitative study of euthanasia, general practice and home death in The Netherlands". Fam Pract. 26 (6): 472–80. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp065. PMID 19828573.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Lesser, H. (2010). "Should it be legal to assist suicide?". J Eval Clin Pract. 16 (2): 330–4. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01394.x. PMID 20367858.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ a b c Lewis, P. (2007). "The empirical slippery slope from voluntary to non-voluntary euthanasia". J Law Med Ethics. 35 (1): 197–210. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00124.x. PMID 17341228.
{{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=(help) - ^ "The empirical slippery slope from voluntary to non-voluntary euthanasia". business.highbeam.com. Retrieved 2011-01-01.
{{cite web}}: Text "HighBeam Business: Arrive Prepared" ignored (help) - ^ "Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia from the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain?". www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 2011-01-03.
