Jump to content

User talk:Ebe123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user helped get "Moe Goes from Rags to Riches" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 5 February 2012.
This user helped "The Bob Next Door" become a good article on 29 February 2012.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has file mover rights on the English Wikipedia
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 202.124.72.139 (talk) at 10:37, 13 August 2011 (→‎Universe Today: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Change image
Change image

Change
image

Babel user information
en-N This user has a native understanding of English.
fr-N Cet utilisateur a pour langue maternelle le français.
zh-1 这位用户的中文达到初级水平。
...This user would like to be able to speak more languages.
Users by language


This user is a wikiarchaeologist and likes looking through page history for no particular reason.±

Error! You are not listed on the volunteers list for Abuse Response!

wiki-5This user is a master Wikipedia editor.
User Page Talk Page Barnstar(s) Contributions Userboxes E-mail

User:Ebe123/TemplateArchive

Emails will be sent to my alternate account, which I never check unless I am expecting a message. There is absolutely no way that I will read your email message unless you leave a note about it here, on this talk page. I will not be held accountable for not seeing your message if you do not leave me a note here. It doesn't have to be fancy, but make it obvious please. You may put {{YGM}} on my talk page for the note. Also, please use email sparingly. If it can be discussed on the talk page, I would far prefer it there.

Thanks for your understanding, Ebe123

Thanks to User:Sven Manguard for helping for the note.

Retiring

I am officially retiring after this message,

This has been a bit over 1 year where I edited wikipedia. I do have tons of Wikistress from a couple months ago. Yesterday, the 17 June 2011, I finally realized that I am no good here. It would be better if I wasn't here at all so that others don't have to spend that much time here. I do like to new page patrol, and help out but I am no good at either. People might now think that I read the messages on my talk page or anywhere else but I do. I do keep attention on all of my messages. Even very uncivil comments such as Promethean (talk · contribs)'s editor review comments. I admit it, I am just a "power hungry flag-whore". I will be on other wikis but here there are too many people (47,930,166) and to many policies. We could merge many together. en.wikipedia is overcomplicated. I am way better at translating on meta. Good bye, ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 11:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I may come back to make some projects.

Oups, forgot to say. I will be screwing up my userpage. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 11:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Best wishes and good luck with whatever you choose to do next. I have gone ahead and removed your rollback and reviewer rights since you will no longer be using them. 28bytes (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, good luck. I don't think that you're "no good" here. I can't speak for anyone else, but I kept an eye on your edits from time to time, not becuase I thought you were "no good" but because I thought you showed potential and obviously wanted to help out. You did make some mistakes, but I think that was partly because of the areas you chose to focus on, which perhaps were more the domain of more experienced editors. That said, there's absolutely no point being here if it causes you stress or if it's not fun for you. You seemed to like the "meta" side of things here, so maybe Meta will be better for you. --BelovedFreak 15:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I am here now to make a wizard for getting new users to learn the ropes from strategy:Proposal:Accelerating the learning curve for new editors. Thanks for removing the privileges, I know that I will not use them anymore but if I come back completely refreshed, could I re-request them? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 15:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, WP:PERM is just a click away. 28bytes (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa, there's no need to retire, most of us started out as rights-hungry, I myself was guilty of this myself. But that doesn't mean we can't turn over a new leaf and focus on other things. I do hope you come back out of retirement in 1 or 2 months, you always did your best to follow policy. A retirement/wikibreak will help alleviate your burdens. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:34pm • 12:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Ethnikos Gazoros F.C.

Hello Ebe123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ethnikos Gazoros F.C., a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR— 16:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC), Logan Talk Contributions 16:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Logan's talk page. Logan Talk Contributions 16:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Hewitt

Why did you request unporotection of that article at RfPP? Firstly, you're clearly not aware of the background (it was protected because of serious BLP violations, not because of some worthless ruling by a body that didn't have the power to make it) and secondly, the instructions and the policy clearly state that you should consult the protecting admin (for which you could pick myself, SlimVirgin or Cenarium) first, all the more so when you're not familiar with the previous issues. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that an admin should fix the article, not just protect it. By just protecting it, you are just protecting the article from improvement. Just add an edit-notice to read WP:BLP before editing the article. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do agree with you that WP:ArbCom or as you call "GovCom" did not have the power to do it. It wasn't even worth the Wikimedia Foundation to host it. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from that, could you also explain what you mean by saying the arbcom ruling has "expired"? — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Read for yourself. WP:ARB/N. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong ruling. I apologise for the delay in replying, I've been busy, but that article is the subject of a completely different ruling. Requesting unprotection of articles, especially those where there are serious BLP issues (that would not be negated by asking people nicely to read a policy), without consulting the protecting admin is a very bad idea and very discourteous. And doing it without the slightest bit of research beyond a quick glance at the protection log is an even worse one. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't an sysop or someone else that can edit protected pages try to fix the problems? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The version that's protected is not the one with problems. If you have an edit you'd like to make, use the {{editprotected}} template and an admin will be along. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So why is the article protected if the version dosn't have any problems? ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 23:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because there has been a history of BLP problems. If we leave it unprotected, those problems are likely to continue. —GFOLEY FOUR— 16:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Bans aren't called "blocks" on ACC. Cheers, —GFOLEY FOUR— 20:23, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why you're removing the dead links on IPhone? WP:DEADLINK says "do not delete a URL solely because the URL does not work any longer." Is there some other reason for the removal of the references? Replacing dead links with citation needed tags is contradicted by WP:DEADLINK, which says "WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published on-line." - SudoGhost™ 23:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know WP:DEADLINK. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, my apologies then. I'm trying to find archived versions, hopefully to save the references. - SudoGhost™ 21:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least that I stopped myself. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Bolivia

For someone who's apparently semi-retired, you still seem to be making lots of edits... Anyway, can you decide whether or not you want to continue with this nomination? Not responding to comments for some weeks does tend to suggest that you've lost interest. If you want to withdraw it, no problem, just let me know. BencherliteTalk 08:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to continue. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DRN

Hi there, just letting you know I've undone your adding of a new section link to this page, as it defeats the purpose of having the page, which is to use the button to add a new section, as we are trying to add some structure to the page. But thanks for setting up auto archiving. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 21:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for saying that the auto-archiving is good. I thought that the new section link was good because that on other pages like that one, there are those links. You cannot have all is what I say in this situation. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's a common feature on most boards, but is counter-productive to the purpose of the new board, which is to keep discussions focused and on topic. Allowing people to bypass the form that they need to fill out in order to give us an understanding on the issues they are bringing to the board kinda defeats the purpose of the board, so I've removed the section link. Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 22:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that you're right. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at ReelAngelGirl's talk page.

About your Admin Coaching request

Your submission at Admin Coaching has been moved from the current request list to older requests, as requests where the submitter has not visited the page for at least 6 weeks are moved.

You are welcome to update and return your request to the current request list should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request) to show your continued interest in the project. If you do update, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited!

If you no longer require admin coaching, please remove your request. I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia!

Regards, -- Mlpearc powwow 10:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC-7)

Speedy deletion declined: Soulscraper (album)

Hello Ebe123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Soulscraper (album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 only applies where the artist has no article. This may well fail WP:NALBUMS, but it can't be speedied. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 12:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should users be allowed to remove current block notices

When changing section titles it is helpful to check if there are links to the title, and update them. When (correctly) appending the question mark to the section title it broke the link from CENT. I have now updated CENT. SilkTork *Tea time 18:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oups, I didn't know that it was on CENT. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Neil Munro (footballer)

Hello Ebe123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Neil Munro (footballer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing for Scotland is certainly a sufficient claim of importance to pass A7. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA reviewed

Hi there, just letting you know I have reviewed "The Real Housewives of Fat Tony". It is currently on hold for seven days. Sanders11 (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flash info: Failed. That is what I think will happen. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 17:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's really no need to feel like that. There are only a few points remaining, I would just appreciate it if you only said points were done when you had actually changed them. Sanders11 (talk) 21:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: List of Almost Heroes episodes page marked for deletion

The article in question does in fact exist. The link wasn't working because of a typo. I would assume that it is not standard to mark things for deletion without the slightest hesitation. The show is easily found through Google and through the Wikipedia search bar anyways. I was also in the middle of editing the page from scratch. Looking at your talk page I see several speedy deletion declines... CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 20:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a speedy deletion, also, sorry for the misunderstanding, I looked at Almost Heroes and other names because I thought that it must be a typo. Well sorry for the misunderstanding. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other

Hello Ebe 123,

I saw your note on my talk page. Thank you. I appreciate your help and can sure use any mentoring possible. I am interested in sincerely contributing to Mr. Gutierrez' biography. I am afraid I went in to the biography and inserted changes, and it caused a whole lot of problems, which I apologize. If you have time, would you mind helping me add to Mr. Gutierrez' biography. I would like to work to make it the best site possible and contribute as a team. Fluffermutter established a talk page. I incorporated his suggestions and wrote additional information. Your help is greatly appreciated. And, I will be glad to pay you for your time to help me edit. Thank you.--Maryphillips1952 (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC) My email is maryphillips52@yahoo.com[reply]

Okay, Also, you do not have to say your e-mail because that in your prefs, you may do it and also, please put "{{@}}" instead of "@". ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explain

Could you please explain this edit? I asked a perfectly valid question, and you simply removed the thread, most likely because you just wanted WP:DRAMA with your so-called retirement. Are you actually retiring, which could hurt your adoptees, or was it just a way to get attention? Honestly, I don't appreciate what you did. Logan Talk Contributions 00:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC) What, I am not retiring but I will not have ethernet or Wi-fi for 7 days. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 11:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fatbitchology AfD

Why do you need to refer the above page to an AfD? --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:14, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am making an AfD for the article. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 17:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I read that and I'm still wondering why it needs an AfD? Don't have a problem with it really, but just wondering why it needs the AfD --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability, and possible vandalism. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 17:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I guess policies will be followed either way. Thanks for clearing that up for me :) --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

La goutte de pluie

Hello Ebe123, please stop writing on La goutte de pluie's talk page and nominating her files for deletion. This is starting to border on harassment, in my opinion. I don't know if this image should be deleted, as I try to keep away from the file namespace, but even if it were, it's really not appropriate of you to nominate it, after being so vocal on La goutte de pluie's talk page. Please, disengage and start ignoring her; there are many other editors who will be ready to intervene, should she break any rules. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image here also is copyrights violation. I don't know how to nominate it for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.13.247 (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Ebe123, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:Ebe123. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts has been created

I would like to inform you that Wikipedia:Wikiproject Abandoned Drafts has been created. You indicated during the proposal that you would like to join, so please do so. We would really appreciate any help you could give. SilverserenC 05:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abril-horpel/Julio Abril

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Abril-horpel's talk page. Message added 15:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

23 July 2011

Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:OTRS noticeboard.
Message added MorganKevinJ(talk) 13:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Raegenhare's talk page.

CSD G7?

Hi. How is Wikipedia:WikiProject_Abandoned_Drafts/Virtual_Tales a G7 candidate?--v/r - TP 14:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, figured it out.--v/r - TP 14:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Typo fixing

Please do not engage in typo-fixing on talk pages, noticeboards, and the like. See WP:TPO. Thanks, –xenotalk 19:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if xeno had this edit in mind, but it is certainly a WP:TPO vio. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Banning tag

Hi Ebe123 you added a banned=yes to tree shaping. diff Slowart and Blackash (myself) had our topic ban changed to being allowed to edit the article and related subjects. We have a ban about the title only, we are not to discuss the title of the art-form except for under prescribed circumstances. Please read Summary. Please remove or change the banning section of the banner, as the way it is now is misleading. Blackash have a chat 10:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Raegenhare's talk page.

Janni Lee Simner

Unless better sources are found, I'm probably going to PROD Janni Lee Simner or take it to AfD. At it's current state, it is doubtful it will pass it. May I suggest moving it back into the user namespace instead so it can be worked on and all this trouble can be avoided? Thanks.--Yaksar (let's chat) 07:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikification drive

Heya Ebe - first of all, welcome to the Project, and more specifically to the August drive. However, just so you know, the drive doesn't "officially" start until 0:00 UTC time on August 1st, so I've removed the articles you had listed. Again though, thank you for participating, and happy wikifying. :) Nolelover Talk·Contribs 23:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarifying. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 10:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wondering if you would want to participate in the Abandoned Drafts Drive. My experience with abandoned drafts show that lots need to be wikifyed. We also don't have that many participants. I thought you might be interested in participating. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 14:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Abandoned drafts"? What exactly is that? Sounds interesting - can you give a link? Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts is the WikiProject link and WP:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Drive is the drive link. Abandoned Drafts are userspace drafts which were not edited for a long time (see WP:STALEDRAFT) or that the editor is retired. We take the pages, improve them to wikipedia's standards (includes wikifying) and then we get them to mainspace. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 14:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Huh...that's an interesting one. I'll be happy too, but I'm just so incredibly busy right now that I can't make any promises. Thanks for the link though! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Its okay to not participate. Its your call. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 14:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I also estimated about 500 to 1000 userspace drafts are abandoned. Enormous. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 14:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse Response Project!

Congratulations! You have been accepted to the Abuse Response team. Welcome! I"ll see you around!=)--Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 21:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token fa54f106a474719cf54f61dfbf8bbafa

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

I released my draft article

I have released the article Skybot Scheduler to the article space, placed a new FUR on the logo page and fixed the article names. Now I winder if all is allright now. --Henk.Wiersema (talk) 21:48, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding non-free files on user talk pages. Put a colon before. Also, don't go off topic. You start by talking about the company before the product which is the subject. ~~010001010100001001000101|123~~ talkContribs (binary) 21:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

It's really impressive the drive you've set up for the Wikiproject. You're really invested in this. :3 SilverserenC 00:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to join the drive? ~~EBE!@#~~ talkContribs 12:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing, for the August 1 2011 Signpost, there will be an announcement! ~~EBE!@#~~ talkContribs 14:27, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh? I'm surprised I wasn't contacted about that. And, yes, i'll be joining the drive. SilverserenC 04:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I tried contacting you but something went wrong. You might get a notification in a couple of days though. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 10:27, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GiBberish point raised

Please insert the pointer to the related WP:COMPUNITS talk page as you see fit. Reverted text reproduced below.

See WP:COMPUNITS –89.204.153.166 (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oups, sorry for that. It just appeared very strange and like vandalism. Sorry. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 10:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, admittedly the title is very far from a NPOV, maybe use something better. –89.204.153.166 (talk) 11:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikification Drvie

Hey Ebe, just wanted to drop you a quick note about your work on the August Wikification drive. While I most certainly appreciate your work there, I just want to ask you to make sure that you're only taking credit for articles that you really work on and actually finish wikifying. For example, this diff shows that all you did to your first credited article was remove a gallery and the wikify tag. If you think that an article doesn't need to be wikified at all, and there are plenty of those, then please just remove the tag and go on. However, Ryan Vesey was able to do a good bit more. Also, this article and this one (especially the lead and Honors sections) aren't fully wikifed. If you need any help, drop me a note. Cheers, Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify's August Newsletter



Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume I, Issue IV, October 2011


To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Talkback

Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Waterfox's talk page.
Message added 16:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Waterfox ~talk~ 16:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ebe123. You have new messages at Nathan2055's talk page.
Message added Nathan2055talk). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nathan2055talk 22:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am so so so so so sorry about the vandalism. I had to go to the toilet and my brother got on my computer -.- Im telling my mum and dad and he may get grounded. I am so so so so sorry ); — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.71.7 (talk) 10:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for the apology but that reason is in the arguments to avoid. I searched your WHOIS, all is fine. Sorry but I'm not an admin so I can't decide whether to block or not. Just don't take it personally. You may go back in about 1 week. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 11:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This guy's lying, ignore him. WP:BROTHER is the oldest excuse in the book and this IP doesn't have any constructive edits that would suggest his computer was hijacked. Hut 8.5 11:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I know that. Also, I said that to him. Just like I was watching my computer screen and refrehing every second. Each time, I used rollback immediately. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 11:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

help!

I've come across an article called Caustic humour. I was wanting to report it but i have absolutly no idea how to. also could you please tell me if it's worth reporting and what is classed as worth reporting. thanks. Naomib1996 (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What by report? ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 19:53, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Drive

Hi Ebe, I'm willing to join the August drive but clueless what I've to do; guidelines ain't helping much. Would you please help me by giving some demo? — Bill william comptonTalk 08:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that the guidelines arn't helping much, I will do like screenshots to show better. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 10:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted changes made to 'Tobacco packaging warning messages'

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/User_talk:87.228.147.68

Hi Ebe123,

Wondering why you thought the changes weren't constructive.

Just a mistake, I make errors, I must of been thinking of another edit, I will revert. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 17:14, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Universe Today

Is there some reason why you want this article to link to the book Bad Astronomy instead of the web site Badastronomy.com? -- 202.124.72.139 (talk) 10:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ebe123&oldid=444605573"