User talk:Favre1fan93

Archives

2012 - 2013 2014

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. If I notice that you have been active but have not responded, I may place {{Talkback|Favre1fan93}} on your page in case you have missed my response.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Avengers/Iron Man 3

Hello, I started a talk page discussion on the list of Paramount Pictures films page. About adding Avengers and Iron man 3 to the page. Thanks for reading this message and have a good day. – TreCoolGuy (talk) 3, March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Favre1fan93. You have new messages at Corvoe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iron Man 2 hatnote

Hey, I took out your good faith addition of the hatnote to the Iron Man 2 page. I know some other pages do similar, but the proper way to handle it, per WP:RELATED, is to summarize related topics on the page with a link, and use hatnotes only for unrelated topics. Since the video game was released in conjunction with the film, rather than as an equally weighted but separate endeavor (like a film adaptation of a book), it doesn't really merit the hatnote. Cheers -Fandraltastic (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FOX Animated Universe

I have started a discussion on the talk page for the FOX Animated Universe to keep it. You can find the discussion right here. Thanks and have a good day. - TreCoolGuy (talk) 09 March 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Since you've recently participated in a related discussion at this article's talk page, I'd like to alert you that there is a secondary discussion at Saving Mr. Banks currently underway. This time, a consensus is being attempted to be reached, regarding the placement of one of the article's sections. Your input will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 18:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

S.H.I.E.L.D. quote

Regarding this edit, I don't know what you mean by it felt like a S.H.I.E.L.D. film. The article doesn't seem like it would lead one to that opinion. Also I've been trying to cut down on some of quotes in the article. This particular quote doesn't seem to say that much. I guess my question is: is it really necessary?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just speaking, if you compare this film to the first, this seems to focus more on Cap and SHIELD, while the first was just a Cap film. I don't know how much else it may be stated in the cast section, but it definitely seems like something to note, given their inclusion of Fury, Black Widow, Falcon (who is a SHIELD agent), and Pierce and the World Council. I understand the desire to cut down on the quotes, but I feel something noting this, if it is included with pairing Cap with SHIELD as he can't go back in time, or with the character quotes, would be helpful. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Iron Man 3

On 11 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iron Man 3, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Iron Man 3 grossed over $1 billion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iron Man 3. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for your help Victuallers (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adaline (film)

Will you please take a look at Draft:Adaline (film), the filming has begun now, please move it to Adaline (film) - thanks. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 02:17, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cap

Will do, my good colleague! --Tenebrae (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With the films premiere on hand and the international releases rolling out, do you think you can ask for preemptive temporary protection as is customary.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can approach Mark Arsten to keep an eye on the page, but I don't think it will really fly asking for protection preemptively. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it depends on the admin, I know we've done it pretty regularly in the past as protection is not punitive but done to prevent vandalism.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I usually approach Mark. I can look in the logs of the other pages, but do you know of anyone else? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well theres JGreb but he hasn't been very active lately.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ged UK is has also provided protection. I will approach Ged and Mark, though both have not been very active over the past few weeks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TriiipleThreat: Just wanted you to know, I got a prescreening ticket, so I will be seeing it on 3/20. I will work with Tenebrae to add the appropriate material when it comes time and quell any vandals, if you want to unwatch the page at some point to be spoiler free until you see it. Also, I messaged Callanecc about adding the page protection. We'll see where that goes. Also on a separate note, I have some (hopefully) free time this week, so I am working on making a Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe page. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky! Yeah, I'll probably unwatch it as the international releases near. However with you two, I know the article will be in good hands. I just hope you don't get overwhelmed, not just from vandals but from the influx of new editors unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Page protection will help with some of that.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm super excited! Apparently the ticket RSVPs "sold out" super quickly. I was refreshing the Facebook page all morning, and I had to leave at 12:30, so luckily it went live at noon. I do think that this page has been pretty good regarding spoilers. Unfortunately, I feel I know too much about the postcredit scene, but I've been deaf to anything else that might have been floating around. I'll let you know if Callanecc gets back and doesn't decide to protect the page (you'll obviously know if they do.) But I'll hound some admin if it gets bad come 3/26. (Hell, even the 20th might have people coming to the page.) - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have an admin watching the page. They are online for the next couple of days, and will block if they see it getting out of hand or I ping them. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, I have just unwatched the page.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I just got online now, so I may as well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TriiipleThreat: Wanted you to know that I wasn't able to get into the fan screening :( so, I'll be unwatching the page as well until I see it, which I don't know when that will be. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Strange and archive links

It looks like that an IP user from the UK is once again removing archive links on the Doctor Strange article. Thanks for catching his earlier removal. Mtminchi08 (talk) 23:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll be on the look out to see if it continues. Is this a recurring issue? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Archive 47#Archiving online links from November 18 and 19, 2013 regarding Doctor Strange and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Archive 47#Follow up regarding archive links from January 21 and 22, 2014 regarding Inhumans. Mtminchi08 (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh look at that! I was part of the discussions. Haha. My mind is so fried in real life and here on wiki. I still watch the page and will continue to do so. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox television episode

There are some issues with proposed parameters for {{Infobox television episode}}. I've left a message at WT:TV about this but unfortunately the templates used in the TV project draw little interest, even though they often cause us grief. Because of this I'm approaching experienced editors directly, with a view to getting some more input. The discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Infobox television episode provides an introduction to the issues. Your attention would be greatly appreciated. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Space Jam

Well unless those three editors explain what they feel is wrong, how I am supposed to know what is wrong? Linking to guidelines without a clear explanation for how these guidelines are actually relevant doesn't help anybody.

Jdogno5 (talk) 04:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To the administrators about the Space Jam article: Requested protection for the article until dispute has been resolved. Is that reassuring?

Jdogno5 (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Batman: Arkham Knight

On 19 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Batman: Arkham Knight, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Gotham City seen in Batman: Arkham City was redesigned for Batman: Arkham Knight, to allow space for the Batmobile, drivable for the first time in the Arkham series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Batman: Arkham Knight. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your significant contributions that helped promote Thor: The Dark World to good article status.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for catching that gaffe at South Park: The Stick of Truth. (I'm just glad that that page wasn't featured or anything, I thought I cleaned it up!) Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 07:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shailene Woodley's interview with Total Film

This video contains Shailene Woodley's interview with Total Film, where she states she may not be able to return to the Amazing Spider-man franchise. It is from Total Film's official YouTube channel. Is the link still allowed on Wiki? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube link yes, or better yet, it actually on Total Film's site (if it is). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-verse

Thanks, but I think you have me confused with another editor. I don't believe I ever mentioned anything about that storyline on the Project page, nor do I have any plans to edit or create any articles on it. The only intersection between my edits and that storyline is that when I added information to the Spider-Man 2099 article about that title's relaunch this July, I also added mention that that character will appear in the aforementioned storyline later in the fall, because the Newsarama story I cited mentioned this. But thanks anyway, buddy! Nightscream (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nightscream: D'oh! I was thinking of your 2099 post on the Comic project, and thought it was for this event. My mistake!! Still a useful article though. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on a source for comics articles

Hi. Your opinion could be very useful in this discussion. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 12:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no talk!

Hey man, I don't know for sure if you remember me, but I did the GA review for Iron Man 3. I just recently checked on what the Marvel Cinematic Universe's article was up to, and saw that you'd decided to nominate it and got a reviewer pretty quickly! Congrats! I hope it goes well for you. Any other stuff you've been working on lately? Corvoe (speak to me) 01:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Corvoe! Yes I do remember you. Thanks for checking in. Well, since we talked, most of the Marvel Cinematic Universe content was split off to List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films, and that is a Featured List candidate. I'm mainly working on the remaining film pages for the upcoming MCU films, and that is the main brunt work I can put in these days, with other minor stuff here and there. I'm also trying to finish up Forever Evil and Forever Evil: Blight, but I don't have the time to add remaining plots/reviews for what has come out, but it is on my to do list. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:49, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Damn! Well done, man. I'll see if I can give you a hand whenever I get a moment. I'm not familiar with either, but a few Google searches and articles can fix that. As far as my article work goes, I've been doing a lot of stuff on The FP, an article I made essentially single-handedly, that I've recently submitted to GA. I'm hoping for a review soon, but I know how they can be.

Based on the list's current state, I'll be amazed if it isn't promoted to a featured. It deserves it. Glad to see you're still working hard! Corvoe (speak to me) 04:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies to you specifically for my hastiness over at the Ant-Man page. I appreciate the fact that you're being cordial with me. It means a lot, actually. I don't blunder like that too often, but I appreciate the fact that you didn't jump on me. Corvoe (speak to me) 00:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gross of re-released films

Reported the matter here. Please care to comment and voice your opinions. Thank you. KahnJohn27 (talk) 14:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Loki's scepter as Infinity Stone

I undid your revision describing Loki's scepter as an Infinity Stone. In this article, Kevin Feige appears to deny that the scepter is an Infinity Stone. Richiekim (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Had not seen this article yet. Thanks for sharing. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The FP

I don't know if you saw my last message under "Long time no talk" due to the Ant-Man fiasco, but I was actually going to ask, if you had any time, if you'd be willing to look at The FP's GA review. If not, I totally understand. Corvoe (speak to me) 01:27, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to, but I unfortunately do not have the time to give to a review. I'm sorry! I would have if I did. Good luck with it! Let me know if you need help during the review, as I would be able to manage that. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, I appreciate the offered help all the same! I'll be sure to tell you when someone starts reviewing it. Thank you! Corvoe (speak to me) 10:26, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of wikilink on Outsider (comics)

Hi. Just wondering why you removed the wikilink to Jeromy Cox from the Outsider (comics) page. It's not a redundant link and the page exists. Kdring (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]