User talk:TreCoolGuy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Doctor Strange[edit]

Please note that this film has NOT been announced by Marvel, and all information is still considered rumors. In addition, the Johnny Depp information traces back to Latino-Review, which is not a reliable source. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok no problem - TreCoolGuy (talk) 18 January 2014

Johnny Depp filmography[edit]

There was no reason to revert my edit removing studio as studios are not a necessary column to have in an actor filmography. Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY, the only columns that are required are Year, Title, Role, and Notes. Adding a studio column will just clutter the table and add information that isn't about HIS filmography. LADY LOTUSTALK 18:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Other users have been on that page and kept it how I left it and had no problem about the edit Lady Lotus. -- TreCoolGuy talk 20 January 2014
Just because noone has objected to it doesn't mean it should stay. It clutters the table and has nothing to do with his films. The studio should be on the films article page not the actors. LADY LOTUSTALK 19:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
But there is enough room for the studios to be put in there Lady. TreCoolGuy talk 20 January 2014
Just because there is enough room for it STILL doesn't mean it belongs there. Again, look at WP:FILMOGRAPHY for reference. And you are now in violation of WP:3RR for continuing to revert the edit and not take it to the talk page like I told you to. WP:EDITWARRING can cause you to be blocked. LADY LOTUSTALK 19:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I can easily put a WP:EDITWARRING on you just because you have a problem with it doesn't mean everyone else does. So please for the last and final time Do not redirect my edits on Johnny Depp. Thanks -- TreCoolGuy talk 20 January 2014
And you need to understand that sometimes your edits are going to be reverted. You can't keep reverting them just because you don't agree with the editor doing it. I had a reasonable excuse and all your arguments were were just "nobody else has a problem with it" and nothing of note. I referenced MoS and you referenced your opinion, take it to the talk page instead. LADY LOTUSTALK 19:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I was going to post this in a separate heading as a friendly knowledge update regarding the Iron Man trilogy page you are working on, but it will apply to this too. Tre, just because other stuff exists (ie "in film pages" or in this case, a studio column) doesn't mean that it is necessarily correct, or more should follow their example. So in this case, Lady Lotus is correct in saying there is no purpose for the studio column in a filmography table. Additionally, as I noted to you on TriiipleThreat's talk page, an Iron Man trilogy page is essentially the same page that is being discussed to merge back, and would not really serve a purpose itself, when the Marvel Cinematic Universe page and the individual pages are done so well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Guardians / Star-Lord[edit]

Here's the source: [1] never mentioned as Star-Lord. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet[edit]

You have been confirmed a sockmaster. Why haven't they blocked you?... TDFan2006 (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

First of all that was awhile ago second why don't you mind your own business dude. -- TreCoolGuy (talk) 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Platinum Dunes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Meyers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Fall Out Boy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 07:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marvel Cinematic Universe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''[[Doctor Strange#Film]]'' and ''Avengers 3'' will be in Phase Three.<ref name="PhaseThreeFilms">{{cite web|url=http://sciencefiction.com/2014/02/18/marvel-studios-phase-three-plans-leak/|title=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Reason?[edit]

I have recently been keeping an eye on HoshiNoKaabii2000 and TreCoolGuy? And your reason for this is because? -- TreCoolGuy

Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Untitled Man of Steel sequel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Explain[edit]

Care to explain this and this? Rusted AutoParts 00:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

First of all I can explain the first one, you humiliated me infront of everyone on Wiki by calling me a Sock puppet and showing that I was suspended for a period of time. I just wanted you to know how that feels. - TreCoolGuy
Just because RAP did it to you does not mean you should do it to them. Conversely, RAP should have shown civility in the first place and this wouldn't have happened. gsk 07:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Tre, you may feel "humiliated", but you were proven positive as a sock puppet and blocked for it. It was in accordance with policy that your user page was replaced with a sock puppet template (considering it was originally User:DrummerSP reported as the puppeteer.) And you'veretty much confirmed you a sock puppet here as you've answered for the action taken by an IP that I linked up above. And I highly doubt two individuals would go out of their way to taunt me a out being blocked. I'm seriously considering opening another investigation. Rusted AutoParts 13:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
What's the point Rusted? You want to know why I did those two thing well here I'll tell you. You made my life on Wiki a living hell, you always delete or redo my articles for some stupid reason if its "oh you have to look at the talk page" and when I go there for SOME articles it's not there. When I put reliable sources confirming that it is true, I don't know if you hate me or like to piss me off but you redo them. Then you called me a sock puppeteer THREE god damn times. The first one I admit that I did deserve being suspended but you didn't have to publicity humiliate me calling me a sockpuppeter, showing everyone on Wikipedia that hey he got suspended for three months. Then you blamed me for other sockpuppets and don't give me that crap you that, "Well you were a sockpuppeter" first of all I do you think that if I was caught again I would probually have six months or a year suspension. I learned my listen do you think I want that? And third check my IP address and the other people who you claim to being a sockpuppet and check their sockpuppet addresses and see, "Hmmm... This guy isn't a sockpuppet of this other guy maybe we should leave him alone and maybe he won't be so mad at you." And honestly you really think that you can do any of that and point false accusations on other wikipedians? No because you were suspended too! You were just suspended because you did something you wanted to do and you acted like a little five year old and got suspended. You even cursed at another wikipedian not one like three times. You don't deserve your position in Wiki while Favre1fan93 or TriiipleThreat or even User:GSK because they actually deserve it and you don't because you abuse you power. And by the way after reading my rant you didn't even say sorry for accusing me of being a sockpuppet the second and third time. You said sorry to everyone else except me you really have a lot of nerve dude. Like I said you don't deserve it. - TreCoolGuy
Clarification: TPS means that I'm a talk page stalker because I often watch user talk pages and may choose to inject constructive commentary in some cases. It wasn't a jab at you, which you would have realized if you had read the accompanying article. gsk 17:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Oh sorry about that User:GSK I thought you were calling me a stalker I would like to really apologize about that not up with the wiki language. I am sorry again about my actions. - User:TreCoolGuy

Your signature[edit]

Hi TreCoolGuy, please modify your custom signature so that it includes the time and date in the standard format, see Wikipedia:Signatures. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

I saw you added the date manually with your sig on the Admin notice board. If you have not changed your default sig preferences, you can get the proper time implementation by using four ~ (this is located next to the 1 key + shift). So by doing ~~~~, you get Username (talk) proper time stamp. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

ANI Notice[edit]

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. gsk 21:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christopher Nolan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memento (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  AdmrBoltz 00:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
May I ask for what reason Admrboltz? - User:TreCoolGuy
Hello? Admrboltz may I ask for what reason did you block me? - User:TreCoolGuy

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. gsk 02:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Interaction ban[edit]

Hello TreCoolGuy, with this edit, in enacting a consensus of the community reached at the Administrator's Noticeboard, I hereby inform you that you are banned from

  • interacting with Rusted AutoParts
  • undoing his edits
  • making reference to or commenting on him or his actions
  • replying to him in any discussion
  • editing his user talk space
  • filing WP:ANI reports about him except to clarify or abolish this interaction ban or to report violations of the interaction ban.

The discussion leading to the ban may be viewed here. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 11:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Lukeno's Talk Page[edit]

Hey TreCoolGuy, just so you know, your reply on Lukeno94's talk didn't exactly look civil, you should maybe check out WP:UNCIVIL. TDFan2006 (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Don't change my comment. See WP:CHANGECOMMENT. TDFan2006 (talk) 12:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Then don't call me that TDFan2006 - User:TreCoolGuy

Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Recommend IBAN for TreCoolGuy and TDFan2006. Thank you. gsk 20:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Apology[edit]

Forgive me. I didn't mean to say anything which stressed you. TDFan2006 (talk) 08:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean? TDFan2006 (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Just saying its ok TDFan2006. - TreCoolGuy
Oh, thanks. I should maybe apologise to the other guy. TDFan2006 (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited G.I. Joe (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ray Stevenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FOX Animated Universe[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article FOX Animated Universe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like a made-up term. Zero sources available when googling. Article is original research at best.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nymf (talk) 07:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Family Guy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 08:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Http,--anjake04.deviantart.com-art-Cigarettes-and-Valentines-165615913.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Http,--anjake04.deviantart.com-art-Cigarettes-and-Valentines-165615913.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. gsk 19:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon Your addition to Cigarettes and Valentines has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Http,--anjake04.deviantart.com-art-Cigarettes-and-Valentines-165615913.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Http,--anjake04.deviantart.com-art-Cigarettes-and-Valentines-165615913.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Development of Untitled Batman/Superman Filml, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2 Chainz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 02:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Fast & Furious 7 has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 03:04, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

I have blocked you indefinitely as you do not appear to be here to edit constructively. -- John Reaves 15:53, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
For what? The 2 Chainz one was a joke and the Fast and Furious 7 being the last film has been mentioned in respect to Paul Walker John.
That is exactly why you're blocked indefinitely. Editing on Wikipedia is no laughing matter. - Areaseven (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
So let me get this straight you blocked me with indefinitely because I made a joke on Wikipedia? And don't give me that no laughing matter crap, it was set so it would not appear on the wiki page only to be seen when someone is about to edit it Areaseven.
Just so you know, I don't have the privileges to block or unblock anyone. - Areaseven (talk) 06:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I think an indefinite block for two (minor) edits is absolutely overkill. gsk 02:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! - TreCoolGuy
GSK, look at the overall content of their editing. At some point competence is required. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
True, and I'm one of the last people to propose TCG's unblocking, but while the 2 Chainz edit was unnecessary, the Fast and Furious 7 edit seems to be, at most, original research. I still think it's overkill to jump from a three day block to an indefinite block in a time period of less than two months. Just my two cents. gsk 04:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
The 2 Chainz edit was just pure Biography of a Living Person vandalism. A editor with a long block history and history of disruptive editing should not even risk making those type of edits, yet he decided to and look at the result. STATic message me! 04:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of DC Cinematic Universe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DC Cinematic Universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DC Cinematic Universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Reason?[edit]

You put another investigation on me? If I remember that we are not aloud to talk and mention about each other. Guess you must have forgotten. - TreCoolGuy

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TreCoolGuy, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Whatever you guys have nothing better to do than to blame stuff on me. - TreCoolGuy

You are a known sock holder and you both do the same things. Also if your account is blocked indefinitely then how did you know about the investigation?--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 11:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Spider-Man[edit]

HA! I told you that the Spider-Man film was in the MCU, though it has been already been confirmed twenty times before hand every time you said I was wrong. Now you owe me an apology - TreCoolGuy

He never said it wasn't. He just said that the sources weren't clear enough. Most of us believed that it was in the MCU but also agreed that policies on reliable sources prevented its addition. So if anyone should be giving an apolgy it should be you for constantly creating new accounts and trying to discredit editors who are doing everything by the policies that Wikipedia standards are set by--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 17:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Your refusal to get the point is truly remarkable. The information was not verifiable until now. Please read WP:Verifiability, not truth and enjoy your block.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
First you stay out of this, and second you can't admit that you were wrong and I was right. Your ego is too big to admit you were wrong and it has been confirmed before about Spiderman in February. Hell I was right about the whole Mandarin Ben Kingsley Iron Man 3 thing and you said I was wrong and I was right. So yeah "enjoy your block" coming from the guy who has the biggest ego that will make Kayne West blush doesn't mean anything. - TreCoolGuy
Tre, I have tried to help you but you refuse accept Wikipedia policy and guidelines especially when it comes to verifying information and identifying reliable sources. I don't recall any discussion about the Mandarin. I'll admit the "enjoy your block" comment was a bit childish, but I really do hope you take this time to famarilize yourself with the aforementioned policies and guidelines so if one day your indefinite block is lifted, then you'll be a better editor because of it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Batman v Superman logo.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Batman v Superman logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

New investigation[edit]

Guys, Guys you got to stop accusing other users for stuff that they didn't do. Especially you Rusted I thought we had an agreement to stay away and not mention each other on Wikipedia... Guess I'm not the only one who likes to do whatever he wants. But... They could be me or they could not be me or maybe one is? Who knows well... maybe Rusted because he is obsessed with my account. - TreCoolGuy