Jump to content

User talk:czar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CR4ZE (talk | contribs) at 04:03, 11 April 2014 (→‎GTA V FAC). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


I am obsessed by the plain facts:
writing them literally down
is all the poetry I can.

Know that I esteem my editorial independence. Even as

I reject payment to edit or advocate on anyone's behalf.


Declarations



    Galak-Z screenshots

    Saw on Commons that 17-bit have released some media, well done. I was in contact with 17-bit last year to get Skulls of the Shogun media released. They agreed to it, but never followed it up. My contact was Colin Williamson (colin[at]17-bit.com). Given that your correspondence is fresher, maybe you could chase this up. - hahnchen 16:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks—I'll ask czar  23:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    ...though now I'm thinking I'll have a better response post-GDC czar  03:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    DYK for Menacer

    The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

    Book reviews

    1. Talk:Cutting_the_Mustard:_Affirmative_Action_and_the_Nature_of_Excellence#Additional_book_reviews
    2. Talk:Sex,_Sin,_and_Blasphemy:_A_Guide_to_America's_Censorship_Wars#Additonal_book_reviews

    Could use help at both of those.

    Thank you very much for your kind offer,

    Cirt (talk) 06:19, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    DYK for Galak-Z: The Dimensional

    Orlady (talk) 08:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Red Phoenix

    I appreciated your post on his talk page and was disappointed that he chose to expunge the entire thread rather than take the chance to extend the olive branch. I have extended an olive branch of my own, so we'll see what happens. As an impartial observer, I hope you would be willing to facilitate further if a dialogue can be established. Indrian (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you. Well, it's his prerogative to delete his talk page threads and I respect that. I think it might be best to put his talk page on your watchlist and just reach out in solidarity when he's back in town. Anything more right now could be construed as an unwelcome advance czar  00:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, it seems I misunderstood his intention for the delete. It was actually a move to start the discussion fresh. We have talked more, and I think this is resolved now. Mostly just misunderstanding based on us talking around each other a bit and feeling the strain of a pretty massive wiki undertaking (the Saturn GAR) while juggling real life as well. Thanks again for your intervention, which I do believe was useful for resetting the discussion. Indrian (talk) 00:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Good, I'm glad. I look forward to seeing Saturn at FAC some day. Take care czar  00:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Lucia Lacarra

    Hi there. Thanks for your review of Lucia Lacarra. I've added ALT1 at Template:Did you know nominations/Lucia Lacarra.--Rosiestep (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Your GA nomination of Threes!

    The article Threes! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Threes! for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CR4ZE -- CR4ZE (talk) 01:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Just to note, there are some referencing mistakes, at the bottom of the reflist. Thanks, Matty.007 19:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    They were just added. Fixed now. Thanks czar  20:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    DYK for 18F

    Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    DYK for Threes!

    The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

    Re: Wisp (Sonic) table

    Assuming this concern of yours was about the article's GAN, not DYK (there aren't such stringent guidelines for DYKs, right?), I should say that I realized while drawing up the table that they're normally frowned upon in WP:VG. The reason I included it anyway is that many of the Wisps in it are referred to by name in the prose and image captions, sometimes more than once, and it would be tedious and awkward to describe each type of Wisp outside a table. Probably the least relevant aspect, if I had to remove one, would be the games each appears in, but I think it really is better with that. Would it help to auto-collapse the table? Tezero (talk) 02:42, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    @Tezero: Right—it's totally outside the DYK scope but I wanted to give you a heads up anyway. I think this would be a good question to throw to WTVG before you sink more time into it czar  02:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    GOCE March 2014 barnstar

    The Modest Barnstar
    This Modest Barnstar is awarded to czar for copy edits totalling over 4000 words during the GOCE March 2014 copy edit drive. Thank you very much for participating! Diannaa (talk) 18:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Testing the waters on Blood Knights

    I've been doing articles on XBLA games for several years now, and I've been getting better it over time. I've recently brought Blood Knights up to GA level, and it's the first article I've done that I feel might been a viable candidate for Featured Article. Before I move forward with that, however, I wanted to ask you and a few other people that are involved in video game FACs what their thoughts are on the matter. In short, does the article have a realistic chance of going through FAC successfully? How much work would it take to be at that level? Your thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    @Sven Manguard: I think its brevity works in its favor. I have a few thoughts—I'll put them on the talk page czar  13:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Have you found the sources you mentioned at the FAC? I'm a little worried as I don't want the FAC to be closed without promotion due to a lack of feedback. You didn't seem to think it was hugely necessary, though. Tezero (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    @Tezero: My connections don't have the mags handy, and I wouldn't hold the FAC for them. I'm backed up in meatspace, but will get to your reply as soon as I can czar  02:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright. Well, heh, I hope I can get your support soon (fixing any further issues of yours as necessary), as the FAC may not be kept up much longer. Tezero (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Did You Know submission etiquette (for lack of a better word)

    Hi, thanks for pointing out the error at the DYK for 2048 (video game), but what'd you mean by "revise the original hook"? This is my first participation in a DYK submission, but from looking at the others, it looked like any change needed an alt. Was I wrong in assuming that? Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 23:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    @Supernerd11: Typically, it's just easier to revise the original hook if it's only a one- or two-word change. ALTs are more for completely new hook content or significant rephrasing czar  02:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, okay. Thanks! Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 02:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    GTA V FAC

    Thanks for your comments. I have fixed up most of your points and have left a couple of follow-up questions as well. Please get back to me. Thanks. CR4ZE (tc) 04:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @CR4ZE: I've been mulling over that tab for the past few hours. It's a long one, and wikEd makes my eyes bleed czar  04:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Next FAC I do for you, I'll try and use list-defined refs instead. ;-) I still want to hear back from you about what to do with Gameplay. I prefer the way it's organised now, but I'm happy to hear your thoughts. CR4ZE (tc) 04:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Pinging @Czar: Support time? CR4ZE (tc) 04:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    This Month in GLAM: March 2014





    Headlines
    Read this edition in fullSingle-page

    To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

    Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 20:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)