Jump to content

Talk:Muhammad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sghaier mohamed (talk | contribs) at 11:12, 28 July 2014 (→‎muhammed photo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Template:Pbneutral

Good articleMuhammad has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
January 8, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 30, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
July 5, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 2, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
May 14, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Error: The code letter muh-im for the topic area in this contentious topics talk notice is not recognised or declared. Please check the documentation.

Edit page title request

Please Edit the page title from Muhammad to Muhammad Paigambar. talk

Semi-protected edit request on 2 July 2014

/* Edit request */ please add pbuh after each occurence of "MUHAMMAD" , pbuh stands for pece be upon him, AND IT is compulsory to say this after the name of the prophet muhammad (pbuh). source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_be_upon_him_(Islam) abdulla 10:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullatasleem (talk • contribs) 10:19, 2 July 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles#Islamic honorifics. Favonian (talk) 10:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2014

Please remove all the pictures those are depicting Hazrat Muhammad (Sm), because these are contrary to the Islamic believe and tradition. 202.4.173.55 (talk) 06:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please see the FAQ at the top of the page and read that wikipedia is not censored. Thank you Somchai Sun (talk) 08:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gharaneegh in the newly published secular scholarly sources

The current text only reflects a specific point of view and states it as a fact:

Muhammad, desperately hoping for an accommodation with his tribe, either from fear or in the hope of succeeding more readily in this way, pronounced a verse acknowledging the existence of three Meccan goddesses considered to be the daughters of Allah, and appealing for their intercession. Muhammad later retracted the verses at the behest of Gabriel, claiming that the verses were whispered by the devil himself.[72][82][n 5] This episode known as "The Story of the Cranes" (translation: قصة الغرانيق, transliteration: Qissat al Gharaneeq) is also known as "Satanic Verses". Some scholars argued against the historic authenticity of these verses on various grounds.[83] While this incident received widespread acceptance by early Muslims, strong objections to it were raised starting from the 10th century, on theological grounds. The objections continued on this point until rejection of these verses eventually became the only acceptable orthodox Muslim position.[84]

Below is an example of an academic source that does NOT agree with the above account of story:

Most European biographers of Muḥammad, on the other hand, accept it as historical on the assumption that it is inconceivable that later Muslims could have invented it (e.g., Watt, Mecca, 103). This reason, however, is in itself insufficient. The story in its present form (as related by al-Ṭabarī, al-Wāḳidī, and Ibn Saʿd) cannot be accepted as historical for a variety of reasons given in al-ḳurʾān , at 404. This does not rule out the possibility of some historical kernel behind the story.

"Muḥammad," Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Edited by P. J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W. P. Heinrichs et al. Brill Online, 2014

I therefore propose to rewrite the section.--Kazemita1 (talk) 07:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2014

i want to complain about the content of the article. the file (Mohammed receiving revelation from the angel Gabriel.jpg) show a virtual photo for the prophet muhammed. In Islam it's prohibited to draw the photo of a prophet. please remove it very soon. --Sghaier mohamed (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Sghaier mohamed (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Wikipedia is a secular site that does not abide by the rules of any religion. Plenty of people have brought it up before, see Talk:Muhammad/images, where you should have posted this to begin with. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

muhammed photo

(my english is a little bit bad) as you insist to not delete the photo of muhammad. there are alternatives solutions that can solve the probleme.

  • putting a tag that hide photo FIRST (without any advanced options) and show it when giving permission.
  • hidding the face of muhamed and the angel with photoshop.

it must be menthioned that this is an virtual photo because there is no real photo for the prophet Muhamed. --Sghaier mohamed (talk) 06:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One of the FAQ at the top of the page already explains how readers can hide the pictures if they want. DeCausa (talk) 11:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Muhammad&oldid=618802738"