User talk:Wikidas
WiKIdas | User Page | User Talk | Contributions | My Sandbox | My Favorites | My Links
HelloI am well, thanks! I have been busy with school and exams, but my exams are soon to be over so I can return :) --Shruti14 talk • sign 02:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Your edits in the Hungarian Vedic Creationism articleHi! Your edits regarding that article are not in line with any Wikipedia policy. Please consider using the Talk page before removing any sections from it. Thank you. G ambrus (talk) 06:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Swaminarayan GAI think Swaminarayan is now ready for a GA - before nominating it, I request you to give your input on the articles talk page. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 10:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC) CfD problemsRe some of your nominations here, this is now the third time in my memory that I have had to ask you not to manually empty a category before nominating it for deletion. This is inappropriate, especially when you don't reveal in your nominating statement that you have done this and merely innocently claim that it is an "empty category". This is disruptive at CfD and it troubles many editors who participate there and it makes it difficult to assess the true merits of deleting the category. Consider this the last time I'll ask you not to do this. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
SamadhiIf you want to use the Moving Paramhans Swami MaheshwaranandaParamhans is honorific title, but some titles are not left out when being referenced in public. Removing the title would result in a discrepancy between naming in the press and naming on the Wiki, which would lead to confusion about who is who. See Paramahansa Yogananda as example. Another example is removing the title "pope" and saying only Paul. Who is that??? Another thing is that the name Paramhans Swami Maheshwarananda is on all his books and within his passport. This name can not be shortened as it is legally his name. Atmapuri (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Spelling of Sanskrit in english is debatable. What counts is the passport. His passport yields: Paramhans Swami Maheshwarananda. Nothing else. That is his legal name. That can not be shortened. Are you sure you will need a copy of the passport to settle this dispute? Why is in India possible to have a legal name like that (which includes spiritual honorific titles), is a separate issue. It's not allowed to just anybody. Atmapuri (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed your work to Outline of Hinduism. Nicely done. Please consider joining WP:WPOOK. The Transhumanist 23:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Award
Your interpretation of WP:RSDo really you assert that MiD DAY and The Hindu aren't reliable sources as per your recent edit to International Society for Krishna Consciousness? __meco (talk) 21:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
someone has reverted back telling that this is a splinter organization :It seems I got it wrong :) trakesht (talk) 11:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC) New articles on ISKCONUser Eronel189 has created a bunch of new articles on ISKCON. Please take a look at them.
its speed delete material.
Names_of_GodThank you for your comments at Talk:Names_of_God but I'm afraid that until you can come up with the necessary sources to back up your assertions, Wikipedia policy does not permit editors to use article space to propagate their thoughts to the world. Feel free to come up with a rationale other than "its big", and to provide proper sources for your theories (whatever they are) as Wikipedia policy demands. Should you insist on not providing sources, and not otherwise conforming to Wikipedia policy (which will defacto be your position if you choose to revert to your pet version), I'm afraid that I will have to assume that you are not acting in the interests of this encyclopedia and/or that you intend to compromise its integrity. Thank your for your attention. For further information, please refer to the policy pages linked at the talk page. -- Fullstop (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC) ps: Since your seem to be specifically het up about Names of God in Hinduism, I suggest you create an article named Names of God in Hinduism and add that to the disambiguation page. "Names of God in Hinduism" is presently a redirect, so you may wish to recycle that for your use. -- Fullstop (talk) 20:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
WP:BLPRead this section: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Sources#Self-published sources#Using the subject as a self-published source --Gaura79 (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Talkback![]() You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Mr.TrustWorthy----Talk to Me! 00:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC) List of ISKCON SannyasisTalk moved to Talk:List of current ISKCON Sannyasis
Swaminarayan Hinduism articleHi Wikidas, As a new wiki user, I tried to edit the 'others' section of the above mentioned article as I feel it's not correct, only to have my edits removed and the article reverted. I am a member of the gunatit samaj and feel you haven't understood it's position when you talk about it "claiming successorship" I also tried to add in the other wings of the samaj (anoopam mission & gunatit jyot). Is it you I need to speak to about getting my edits accepted? Sincerely Jakrabbit27 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakrabbit27 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
re: Baghavata Purana discussionHi Wikidas, I'm guessing that it may have been my comments in an earlier discussion on the BP talk page that elicited your 'slagging Prabhupada' comment on Dbachmann's talk page. I didn't take any joy in presenting those very reliable sources that were so unkind to Prabhupada's translation of the Baghavata Purana. But the editor who kept insisting on using Prabhupada as a source in the article left me no choice, and I will respond the same way again if need be. As the article stands right now, I think it's extremely respectful of all traditions, of Krishna, of bhakti, and of a very sacred and beautiful scripture - and reflects my own respect for all of the above. Priyanath talk 20:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:DVDHaridasa.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:DVDHaridasa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 05:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC) Your template on Avatar (2009 film) pageHello, Wikidas. I could see your suggested inclusion of a Hindu Vaisnava disambiguation template on Avatar film page as a well-intended move, albeit now reverted. On a slightly different front, I have been researching and trying to add the movie's well-reported connection with Hinduism, but the current consensus there seems to be against its inclusion in the Critical reception section (however it is footnoted in Themes and inspirations). To cover these and other existing worthwhile religious and cultural analyses of the movie, I am contemplating a separate article "Avatar (2009 film) -- Underlying religious themes" or something similar, which would provide a better place for information on its religious and cultural aspects, with Hinduism connections among them. Would you be interested to participate? Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 01:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC) AfD of Ronnie NelsonWith your permission, I'd like to request that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Nelson be closed early as "userfy". I've been helping out the author, and he's emailed me several print sources that suggest to me that the subject is notable. I'll help him rewrite it before we move it back into mainspace.--Father Goose (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Question on edit related to Bhagavad GitaHi
I noticed you have removed the titles of 18 chapters from the Bhagavad Gita page Bhagavad gita. Your comment refers to lack of reliable source. I had added a reference to Gita press website as the source. Gita Press is a well known and well established publisher of religious texts. Refer Gita Press page. Sbinfinity (talk) 18:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Sbinfinity
CommentI'd appreciate you don't call me Devamrita Dave, cheers. I don't practice any form of religion anymore and am no longer affiliated. My concern with the deletion of the Harikes page is simply on the bounds of the original AFD reason, which imo is invalid. Chopper Dave (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Bhaktivedanta Narayana Goswami![]() Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhaktivedanta Narayana Goswami. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC) AfD nomination of Bhakti Prajnana Kesava Goswami![]() Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhakti Prajnana Kesava Goswami (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Afd Asaram BapuHello. Thanks for the message. I do understand that over the period of time the article has changed shape and matter but I think that's not enough to mark the article for deletion. I think we should spend time to improve the article and not delete it. Rohit (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC) DYK for ISKCON Guru SystemHi!Why the reversion? Is not he an antievolutionist? Againme (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Request for Undeletion of Wiki Page :- Paramahansa Srimat Swami Nigamananda Saraswati DevHello,
My sincier request to you and Wiki, to restore the page. If you have any concerns about the content on the page please let us know. If we have not provided necesssry references, then it may be due to our mistake, or we never found out that the page needs some kind of citation or something like that nature. But that does not diminish or falsify the information we provided about our GURU. Please restore the page , and let us know what are the things you need to adhere to wiki's standards. Actually I am not a very technical person, but I will try to learn and fix those issues. Subrat Nayak 13:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
Karma in HinduismJai Shree Krishna, Wikidas I have extensively wrote sections on Karma in Hinduism. Do you or other members have information on Sri Caityana's views on karma? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma_in_Hinduism#Vaishnavism for other saints' views. Thanks for your help. Raj2004 (talk) 01:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC) Wikidas, any help? Raj2004 (talk) 16:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Try Bhakti Schools of Vedanta, by Swami Tapsyananda Ramakrishna Press I misplaced my copy. Raj2004 (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Shaunaka Rishi DasDear Wikidas, I need your advice. I note that you changed the spelling of my name as follows: (moved Shaunaka Rishi Das to Saunaka Risi Dasa: Consistent spelling) I have a problem with this as Shaunaka Rishi Das is my legal name - it represents the legal spelling of my name. the point about consistency is strange as you cannot pronounce the latter spelling properly without Sanskrit diacritics. therefore is it not consistency with a bad norm. I would prefer if, in this case you could change my name spelling back to how others expect it. I am sorry to be late in spotting this but other pointed it out, including people from academia, BBC, government who, when looking me up on google are not sure if it me or not, and I doubt if wikipedia is designed to confuse. I have taken the liberty to write to you as I cannot find out who else to contact. I hope you can help. Shaunaka —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaunaka (talk • contribs) 17:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer![]() Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC) DYK minor issue
I'm not a DYK regular, so I don't know whether the 200 character limit is inclusive or exclusion of the opening "that" and closing "?". In your case, it makes a difference, if I count correctly. I've got a question in to Daniel Case, but if you know the answer, please let me know. I'm also posting to point out that the first image includes two people, but doesn't identify which one is Kurt. Can you modify the caption to indicate? Thanks.--SPhilbrickT 18:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC) Hello! It's been a long time since I've heard from you; hope you're doing well. :) I wanted to ask your opinion on the editing of an article - the Pañcaratra texts are a critical part of the devotional literature of Gaudiya Vaishnavas as well as Sri Vaishnavas; however, there is a clear distinction made about which texts are included in the devotional literature of each tradition. The Pañcaratra article as it stands now appears to be VERY heavily focused on the Sri Vaishnava perspective, and no clear distinction made between the included texts (and derived beliefs/practices) of each religion. Perhaps there should be a reorganization of this article - but how should this be addressed? --Shruti14 talk • sign 17:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Kurt MausertHi. You really need to stop puffing up the Kurt Mausert article. A lot of the text you're adding is poorly sourced or uses non-reliable sources). You're also skewing the article towards a WP:POV that's heavily promoting Mausert, which violates policy. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC) Something elseHare Krsna, why did you revert everything? You delete, but what good do you do instead? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.133.79.202 (talk) 21:42, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
factual error re Prof. Friedhelm HardyYour entry of 4 Aug 2008 on Friedhelm Hardy contains an important error. Friedhelm Hardy did not convert to Hinduism. He was sympathetic to and learned in in all aspects of Hinduism, but he was not a convert. I have edited the page and changed "one of the first and prominent westerners converted Hindu Professors" to "Professor of Indian Religion". Enverhodja (talk) 20:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC) KrishnologyI am rather annoyed with the deletion of Krishnology. I would have preferred turning it into a redirect without going through AfD, in order to preserve the valuable information in the edit history. I consider this the result of your uncooperative attitude. I do hope we can now work together to produce an encyclopedic discussion of the topic of "Krishna theology" at Krishnaism. --dab (𒁳) 09:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC) wait, I see the history has been preserved here. This is a good idea, and I hope we can gradually export the valid items to the live article. --dab (𒁳) 09:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
VanipediaDear Wikidas I was wondering if you would be interested to write an article entitled "Vanipedia" in Wikipedia. As yet we have no article about this project. Vanipedia's presence is growing daily and it would be good to have it represented on Wikipedia. Please let me know if this interests you. I am contactable at visnu.murti@pamho.net your servant Visnu Murti dasa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.111.42.40 (talk) 06:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Great, I will gather some articles that were written and send them to you. Hopefully in the next two days. Then you can see if it is enough material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.111.73.100 (talk) 16:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Hi Wikidas these are the articles that i could find that have been written about Vanipedia. Let me know if any of these help, and if you need more info. thanks for helping. Much appreciated. your servant Visnu Murti http://news.iskcon.org/node/1480 http://www.dandavats.com/?p=6641 http://friendsofthebbt.org/vanipedia-first-year http://friendsofthebbt.org/vanipedia http://news.iskcon.org/node/3145 http://friendsofthebbt.org/[title]-109 http://brihadmrdanga.com/?p=1871 http://brihadmrdanga.com/?p=1375 http://www.dandavats.com/?p=7964 http://www.dandavats.com/?p=5232 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.111.73.100 (talk) 18:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Wikidas thanks very much for your honest feedback. The comprehensive nature of Vanipedia's research and presentation should indeed make it very successful in time. I guess we are just not there yet. A little info for you. I founded this project on the 15th of January 2007 when we bought the domain Vanipedia.org. Unbeknown to me, that was the day Wiki turned 6. Now amazingly so, I had not heard of Wiki until only one month previously. Thus it had existed for 6 full years without my knowledge. So after 4 years Vani has come to appreciate very much the ethos of how Wiki runs. While our "wiki" is specific we do draw a lot of inspiration from Wikipedia. We are maybe still (in the eyes of the world) only at the foundational stages of construction. A few people working to get an herculean project rocking. We do not have any independent worldly articles on Vanipedia as yet. Your suggestion to add it on to an existing page (Prabhupada's would be the best) is a good idea. What is the procedure for that? Can you help with this? thanks for taking your time to help me in this learning curve. your servant Visnu Murti dasa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.111.73.100 (talk) 06:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC) Sri Devananda Gaudiya MathI am definitely being stopped from expanding the article Sri Devananda Gaudiya Math, The said article has been deleted prejudicially, without proper considering it's notablity or importance. <snip> Snthakur ( সৌমেন্দ্র নাথ ঠাকুর ) (talk) 16:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
AfD Malati DasiHello Wikidas. I thought you might be interested to look at this AfD Malati Dasi and take part in the deletion discussion. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Yadunandana Swami for deletion![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yadunandana Swami until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaura79 (talk) 07:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Hridaya Caitanya Dasa for deletion![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hridaya Caitanya Dasa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaura79 (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Kurt Mausert for deletion![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Mausert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaura79 (talk) 08:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Give me a Break!Hello Wikidas! Regarding the ISKCON logo: You are acting as if no organization in the history of planet earth has ever changed its logo after the founder's logo! The article is about ISKCON, not about your personal opinion of what ISKCON should or shouldn't do. Also you act as if I have added some "illegitimate" logo on the page. I have added nothing. I have simply removed a historic logo which does not belong on the masthead. The historic logo certainly has a place on the page, just not on the masthead. 24.21.65.7 (talk) 00:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Wow, this is one of the strangest things I have ever read! You are accusing me of "conducting business?" That is bizarre. I'm a bookkeeper. How could correctly editing wikipedia be conducting "business?" Very, very strange. Also your questions are completely irrelevant because they all have to do with opinion and not fact. You claim: "The logo designed by the founder-acarya has more value as far as Wikipedia goes..." Actually no. This article is about ISKCON, and whether you like it or not ISKCON has a new logo. If you don't like it, then you can try to have it changed or include the old logo in a historical perspective. You ask: "is there any particular reason you do not like the original logo?" What I like or dislike is totally irrelevant. The old logo is simply not the ISKCON logo. To say that it is would be a blatant falsehood within wikipedia. It is as simple as that. Whether anybody likes the artwork or not is moot. You ask: "Do you have reliable third party source suggesting the reasons why the old logo is not valid anymore?" Another totally irrelevant question. The reason why the logo was changed is totally separate from the fact that IT WAS CHANGED. What is so difficult about the concept that the ISKCON logo was changed and if people are coming to wikipedia to read about ISKCON, the outdated logo should not be on the masthead? You then go on to accuse me of having some sort of "business interest" in correctly editing wikipedia, even though I'm just a bookkeeper!? Come on, please. You then go on to insinuate that because I am a "new contributor" I have less claim to the facts then you. Wikidas, I respect the amount of time and effort and energy you have placed into wikipedia, but from time-to-time you will be wrong, and that's alright! 24.21.65.7 (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello Wikidas. Since you are interested in the history of Gaudiya Vaishnavism and ISKCON in particular, I thought to let you know of the ISKCON-related FAC nomination. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC) Behaviour not up to the standards of WikiDear Wikidas, you have clearly expressed your disappreciation of [Paramhans Swami Maheshwarananda]. Everybody has their own right to the their oppinion. However, to systematically go fishing around articles where could be references to his work and delete them can hardly be considered ethical and in the spirit of Wikipedia. As I can see from your comments, you dispute the value of a reliable source when his works are being referenced. Reliable sources on Vedanta and Advaita can only include those, who are considered an authority on the subject by those who actually study and follow this teachings. Within Hinduism, the Vedanta and Advaita are followed by the seven Akharas established by Adi Shankaracharya. The Mahanirvani Akhara is considered one of the major ones. If you read the biography of the author for which you dispute source reliability, you will notice that he holds the highest title of Mahamandaleshwar in Hindusim as the memeber of Mahanirvani Akhara. His view is not the view of one yogi, but shared by all followers of Adi Shankaracharya. The Acharya of Panchayati Mahanirvani Akhara said during the Kumbha Mela 2010 in Haridwar that: "... there are many stars among Mahamandaleshwars of Vedanta but among them the very incredible star is Swami Maheshwarananda..." and other member of the governing body said "... Swami Vivekanada also went abroad, but the work of Swami Maheshwarananda is unexcelled... ". The 15min video from Haridwar recorded in Feb 2010 can be seen here. Do you have other information? Atmapuri (talk) 20:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
ANI NoticeHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Help with Repeated insertion of material regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. New ANI NoticeI see you haven't been notified about the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing - Systematical removal of edits out of religious prejudice regarding an issue with which you have been involved. Dougweller (talk) 08:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Jagadguru Kripalu Ji Maharaj![]() If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Wikimedia Stories ProjectHello, My name is Victor Grigas, and I'm a storyteller at the Wikimedia foundation. We're telling stories of Wikipedia users, editors, donors, programmers and staff to paint a picture of who uses Wikipedia - for the 2011 fundraiser. I am in the process of planning a trip to India to gather stories from Indian Wikipedians in face-to-face interviews (possibly on video). My primary goal is to conduct 15-20 interviews, and hopefully enough of my interviews will make compelling stories that will effectively solicit donations from the public. These stories may also be used for other communication purposes by the foundation. I found your userpage on a list of prolific Wikipedians and thought I’d reach out to you. Prolific editing is always a good story to tell! If you are interested in participating, please contact me via my email: vgrigas@wikimedia.org Thank you for your time! Victor About me: I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2005, and have a background in film, video and audio. My userpage can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas Images on KrishnaKrishna, WP Hinduism GA seems too have one to many images, some violating MoS. As a regular editor, would appreciate your comments here. Thanks! Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 11:04, 31 December 2011 (UTC) Jagadguru Kripalu MaharajHare Krushna, I see you have a sandbox for article Kripalu ji maharaj. User talk:Lotusjuice already has created Jagadguru Kripalu Maharaj and I made it to dyk. Please review and add missing points. Thank You. -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 14:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC) Removal of unsourced contentThx for removing tagged/unsourced from 'Names of God' (in 2008!). On 'Talk' I had queried a particularly questionable statement/sentence in the article. There was no response. But recently I discovered that you had removed the offending sentence about 6 weeks later! Great! I'll sleep much better now! (True!) Thx again. Regards --Lepton6 (talk) 14:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Balakrishna.jpg![]() Thanks for uploading File:Balakrishna.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC) -Not used no more. I==Help with Jagannath== As a prominent ISKCON related contributor, can you write about Jagannath in Gaudiya Vaishnavism and the ISKCON movement in the article on Jagannath.This is an impotant topic not covered in the present article sids (talk) 15:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC) |