User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
Welcome from WP:STiki!
hllo EusufHasan (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC) Congratulations from STiki!
Raju ungumdidi McT (talk) 12:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Wikidata weekly summary #234 Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
 Thanks to everyone who celebrated the birthday by organizing or attending to an event, letting a message on Wikidata or on the social networks, writing a story or creating a present! Here's the list of the birthday presents from the community and development team:
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. Deeply unhelpful editWhat, exactly, was the "Unexplained removal of content" associated with this revert? Beyond the removal of the nag-tags which were no longer pertinent given the work Pawłowska had done on the article, I'm not seeing ANY content removed. So, please explain. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:21, 7 November 2016 (UTC) l love your worksPrizzzz if you get more time on Zimbabwean musicians prizzzz add more about Zim Dance hall and Zim house music — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tysonncube (talk • contribs) 11:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Please consider pollingHi there - I came across your name in the list of administrator hopefuls and I think now would be a good time to test the waters. Please consider creating a poll entry at WP:ORCP -- samtar talk or stalk 14:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Your deleting postDear Raju, I hope that you read what is written when you undo others contribution however small it is. You have done the same twice. You didnt even bother to heck the links. I will request you to check the news online its in tribune, The times of India and other sites. You can take the credit for all I care. Hope you bring my contributions after checking as i am tired of you undoing same. Stop acting like you own the page as it exist to give information and knowledge. You dont have to act like a snob. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogesh D Churi (talk • contribs) 19:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/125,366alHi. You left a note on the user talk page of Article66612 (talk · contribs) to let them know about Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/125,366al. However, you haven't created the latter investigation. If you do, note that there's another obvious sock: 857,829,456AL1 (talk · contribs). Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 19:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2016
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 03:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
User pageDo not edit my userpage again. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 20:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC) HiHi why did you tag one of my pagees? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby232332 (talk • contribs) 20:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC) New deal for page patrollersHi CAPTAIN RAJU, In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created. Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work. Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2016)
Wikidata weekly summary #235Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
This is the Wikidata summary of the week before 2016-11-12.
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here.
HiWhat happened. Is it not factual information? What authority do you have to remove the update — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:648E:6C16:D940:38D7:D0BB:429 (talk) 18:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. New Page Review needs your helpHi CAPTAIN RAJU, As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically). Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review. It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial. (Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC) November 2016
hiHi bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.35.168.6 (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Notable tagDear Did you know??? National Award wining actors are notable. — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 13:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC) User group: New Page Reviewr Hello CAPTAIN RAJU. Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2016)
Added the internal links in pagesAs mentioned by you on the page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-Sensitive_Zone; I have added internal links to various pages containing the content and I want you to give a second opinion on the page. Jn045 (talk) 08:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Wikidata weekly summary #236Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) rajuuuuusup raju — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingabston2003 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC) Abigail SpencerI don't get why you reverted me here. I added sourced reviews of her acting in her current series. If you think the reviews are too one sided, feel free to look for negative ones and add them. I also added a source for her being part Cherokee - this was a cat in this article but not sourced (see history where someone else yanked it out before). Thanks. 2600:1001:B014:D3CF:7C2D:431C:8B42:ABFD (talk) 22:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC) December 2016 at Women in Red
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging New Challenge for Oceania and AustraliaHi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 4 November 2016
New Page Review - newsletter
Hello CAPTAIN RAJU,
 If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) . November 2016
Not vandalismI am not interested in edit-warring. I have stated relevance, as was requested, so I put it back. This is not vandalism. UtherPendrogn (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Why User Edit Me talk page Patroller1 (talk · contribs) 7:47PM, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Fuck and vandalismI see no vandalism, but I do see edit warring and have blocked accordingly. Please though read WP:VANDALISM carefully - that's a content dispute, not vandalism. Doug Weller talk 15:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC) My changes were fair — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.64.37.72 (talk) 22:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2016)
TarpenningDear Captain Raju, Very simply. This person was doping. This person received a 2 year ban for doping, which ended his career. This person has been posting fake citations and reasoning on this Wiki page for years, which are simply UNTRUE. There are literally hundreds of citations all over the net speaking about his ban, they are easily findable and clickable, there is nothing published anywhere that says, "such a ban could not happen today" or whatever fictional line this person repeatedly throws into the page, along with a fake link that leads nowhere (and there is nowhere on the USTF or any other athletics website that says anything like this). Furthermore if one looks at the commentary, it is obvious that this person is editing his own wiki page, with comments such as, "come and see me and I'll show you", which could even be construed as threatening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.242.59.74 (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Wikidata weekly summary #237Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here.
Change to Natasha pageHi Captain Raju, I would like to dispute your undoing of my contribution. "Columbia" should be "Colombia" on that page, and is a typo. I can re-do the contribution but leave more adequate documentation. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natokr (talk • contribs) 20:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. Reflecting Party and Play --- Real Defintions / Real Science / Real NeutralityI am not sure why there is such a resistance to modifcation of the Party and Play page as it should be. AS IT STANDS -- IT IS HOMOPHOBIC IN IT'S CREATION AND OVER-EMPASIS ON GAY M4M and Meth Usage. Do you agree? I will as I have with JamesBWatson who deleted my talk discussion --- then I placed this below to him -- then he restored my debate. CARE TO DEBATE THESE ISSUES? Following The Rules : NeutralityDear Mr. Watson. I accept your explication, but I would like to place this back into a debate and a correction of this article. I am not sure how best to do this. My name is James M Driskill. There is substantial evidence that the article that is presently on the Wikipedia presented for many years is in fact bias to the truth. That bias places certain misunderstandings of this term into the memeplex of the society which is highly questionable to the motives and cause to effects of how the usage of this misunderstanding is used and can be used and/or abused upon users of the information society. I am not attempting to self-promote myself -- except that what I have to express is the truth. Before you delete me [ censor ] would you please open and read in full both the plato.standford.edu article and Computing and Moral Responsibility as well as the legal law brief of Kang on Information Privacy also at .ntia.doc.gov-PDF Both these position papers reflects what is necessary and in the correction of information online. That is in fact my only mission here. Thank you. BTW: If you look at the domain registration of realuphuman.net --- you will find that the Corp Name I hold this under is "In The Mindway" -- Would you please conduct your own google.books search for this phrase and realize that I am indeed a contributing source to this wikipedia's book title : Information Theory : Last Chapter Meme Information Warfare Also for clarity, you may delete my comments outright -- but they were substainally archived at this location : realuphuman.net/WebDomains/en.wikipedia.org/Party and Play I think maybe the tag was added because of all the homophobic subtext? A completely naive reader only reading this article might be led to think sex on meth was a purely gay phenomenon. PNP might be gay slang, but I highly doubt gay men are the only people who have sex while high. Quodfui (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Thank You Kindly For The Restoration Of My Talk Discussion It is much much apprecated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RealUpHuman (talk • contribs) 22:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
-- 12:42, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 (UTC)
Userpage review?Question: I got a notification that my user page was reviewed - "The page User:Chrissymad has been reviewed" by CAPTAIN RAJU, was just curious what that was about and if it was related to the speedy deletion spam I got yesterday from a troll? Thanks! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC) regarding kalamanchhello..... my name is siddharth who just created a kalamanch page..... i guess u have some issues regarding it....plz share with me..
Children of Sancheztwitch.tv/C_O_Sanchez — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoSanchez (talk • contribs) 17:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Too fastYou applied this tag too quickly. Clearly, the editor was in the process of building the article, but you tagged it for "no content" within two minutes of its creation. In general, I like to give a user some time to develop their article before tagging (except for egregious cases of spam, attack pages or copyright violations). My general rule of thumb is to allow at least 15 minutes after creation. Anything faster is too bitey and discourages new editors. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Overhasty CSD taggingHeyo CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted your A3 tagging of a new article, two minutes after its creation. It is stated on the policy page that at least a few minutes should be spared before using A1 or A3 to give the author some time to come up with content. I usually wait for 10-15 minutes before using either of them and some admins recommend even more. It is only to give a fair chance to the newcomers who aren't exactly aware as to how Wikipedia functions. Best, Yash! 17:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
三唑仑去哪买1Just wanted to give you a heads up because I realize 三唑仑去哪买1 was in another language but even so it's gibberish (and spam, think spam emails like "buy this drug" followed by a bunch of nonsensical sentences.) edit: it's about where to purchase triazolam followed by something about Utah... Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 20:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Pan Am 103You appear to have reverted an edit I made in the above article, asking "in what way is this (cited) article erroneous?" As I indicated quite clearly, I explained this in detail on the Talk page for the article. I would be grateful if you would read this explanation and engage in some dialogue if you disagree with any of it, rather than reverting my edit so high-handedly. Morag Kerr (talk) 01:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Your talk pageFriendly request: please get rid of the bright colours on your talk page. Certain users with colour deficiencies or sensory processing issues like myself (or even people that suffer from migraines brought on by bright lights/colours), may find reading your TP difficult. Wikipedia has a non-discrimination policy which underlines the issues certain people have when trying to read articles or pages with non-compliant colours. For more information, please see this and this. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 12:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
my comment was removed as it was not considered constructive.I made an edit to the top of the Square Inc. Page listing my experience with the company and attempting to contact customer support directly. I believe the information is very helpful as many users are lead to believe they have access to customer support between 6am and 6pm pst, when in fact this is a bold faced lie. The turn around time for customer questions is 1-2 business days. I have a question that needed to be resolved within 30 min and was more or less told to sit and spin. I would like my edit to be kept on the page. but please feel free to move to any area you see fit. I believe the people researching customer service for their merchant service should know there is no direct customer support offered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CB03:9960:4442:263D:D2C6:A952 (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC) Constructive edit of Auiones reverted by STikiHello Captain Raju, I just found that my modification of article Auiones was reverted automatically and flagged as testing/vandalism. The sentence in Latin I had corrected was incomplete as can be seen from the citation of the same text in article Nerthus. Please correct the citation yourself. Best regards, Joachim Schnitter (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC) You seem to revert constructive edits by flagging them as vandalism. If you have no clue about the validity please consult Nerthus which contains the same Latin text or consult Tacitus' Germania.The Latin text is incomplete. Try to find the Latin words for river (flumen) and forest (silva) to understand what is missing. Joachim Schnitter (talk) 07:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 1 December
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
Melba Patillo BealsWell, I was trying to add a picture of her in the info box. I added a link where it asked, but when I saved it, it didn't appear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerry424 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
My edits are CORRECTMy edits are correct edits about the eps from trivium as stated by the Trivium Website its self and from Matt Heafy in an interveiw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ65KMTjCnI, http://store.trivium.org/ember-to-inferno-ab-initio-deluxe-cd.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgspike (talk • contribs) 18:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC) December 2, 2016 Ceremony of CarolsI am a member of a group of university students editing the Benjamin Britten's Ceremony of Carols article as part of a class project. We're currently working from multiple computers to add a large amount of information to the page. We have everything drafted up, it's a simple matter of putting it all in the editor and formatting it, which will take a bit of time. I'm posting this message at 13:27 EST, and we should be finished no later than 15:00 EST. If you could hold off on flagging or editing that particular article until then, it would be very much appreciated. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JHughen1 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC) Lucki Starr PageHi! The page I made about Lucki Starr is a page I created because she's a solo artist and is important, having the credits to prove so. I'm not sure why the page was deleted because it is " about myself" when I am nothing but a huge supporter of Lucki Starr. Can you please shed some light on how I can fix the page and get it back as I did work really hard on it. Thanks Luckistarrfanpage (talk) 2 December 2016 (UTC) Mangifera indica editHi Captain Raju, If you read the revision, and open the reference it refers to (which was already existing before the revision), it mentions it in the source. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.69.22.122 (talk) 23:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC) Dear sir, i want to read the philippines drug war article in telugu. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
