User talk:Feminist

Your GA nomination of The dress

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The dress you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 21:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The dress

The article The dress you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The dress for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 17:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

The stupid way in which you moved "Embrace, extend, and extinguish"

The way you moved that article "without leaving a redirect" created a mess, which I had to clean up. Next time, DO NOT MOVE "without leaving a redirect" (unless in in special circumstances which did not apply to that article). Thank you. AnonMoos (talk) 19:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Celebrity Nazis

Tila Tequila self-identifies as a Nazi - look, so calling her a "Celebrity Nazi" in a discussion thread is simply fair comment. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

I know. She also claims to believe that the Earth is flat. Does it mean such a comment is appropriate in an AfD discussion for an article about another topic, especially when it doesn't add anything to the discussion? Absolutely not. feminist 13:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Template:Batsmen with a ODI batting average above 40

I would like you to reconsider your close of Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 2#Template:Batsmen with a ODI batting average above 40. I don't think Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket was informed of the deletion discussion, and if they had been, I think the consensus would have been in favour of keeping. As it is, there were only two deletion !votes. One was based on 40 being an arbitrary number, but in fact in ODI cricket 40 is always used as a benchmark average. So, please relist. StAnselm (talk) 20:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Already done by Plastikspork. feminist 10:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

your closure of AFD

Your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanbashi-dōri-yonchōme Station did not address the multiple other articles nominated. Perhaps you could amend your closure to be more explicit? --doncram 05:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

What other articles? All articles included in the AfD received the same closure: merge to Tosaden Kōtsū Sanbashi Line. feminist 14:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

When I read your close, I thought it seemed possible you did not see that multiple articles are covered by the AFD. You just say "merge", not "merge them all" or anything indicating a plural. Right, one can read what you wrote as applying to all, but it is not explicitly clear that you see that it involves multiple articles. Not a huge problem, but you could slightly revise the closure to make that clear. Or not. --doncram 15:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Done. feminist 15:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Cara Mund

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Worshipers of the Mandarax has been nominated for discussion

Category:Worshipers of the Mandarax, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Feminist, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh666 22:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Deplorable listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deplorable. Since you had some involvement with the Deplorable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Questions at RfA for Megalibrarygirl

Hi, regarding the questions you left at the RfA for User:Megalibrarygirl could you please see the notes left there? Could you either elaborate on how those two terse questions relate to adminship, or remove them? In isolation, the second one comes off as obtuse and jarring. That may not have been your intent. But some elaboration or clarification might help. (diff) Also, the talk page of the RfA has a discussion as well. Thanks. -- Fuzheado | Talk 14:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Take the Wheel listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Take the Wheel. Since you had some involvement with the Take the Wheel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Europe's last dictatorship

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Europe's last dictatorship, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ibicdlcod (talk) 16:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

The Downs (anchorage)

Hi Feminist: Makes sense. Thanks. Acad Ronin (talk) 13:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Feminist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Feminist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

IABot Job 1153

Hello! Just a heads up, your IABot job 1153 job has been frozen for several days at 878/4604 pages complete. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Noted. feminist (talk) 00:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello Feminist and @Balon Greyjoy:. The bot job number 1178 was not running since it was submitted. I think it is because the page Claude Debussy caused the bot not to run the job. I have just performed the job 1181 without the Claude Debussy article, and the bot is running through the pages you've asked it to do. Thanks, Iggy (talk) 11:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Drafts

I notice that you have taken an interest in my drafts. My first priority for these would be building the disambig resolvers, which will replace disambiguation pages with missing primary topics for the terms. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

IABot Job 1178

Hello! Similar to my last post, you are showing a job on IABot (1178) as frozen. It has not completed a single page since it was submitted, and @Iggy the Swan: submitted your job without Claude Debussy, which was completed. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 01:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. feminist (talk) 13:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

RM system is running at maximum capacity

Please let the current multi-move requests for train station moves get processed before entering any more. The system is stressed to its limits and running at maximum capacity. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay. feminist (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Sigh. See Wikipedia talk:Requested moves#Merging move requests. You can combine these if group them together in reasonable amounts. wbm1058 (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

I created them separately because they concern different metro systems. feminist (talk) 10:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:World Taekwondo 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World Taekwondo 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

station disambiguation

I notice you're adding station disambiguation tags to many dab pages. In a few cases like Grand Central Station (disambiguation), Columbia Station (disambiguation), Alexandria Station, the page contains entries that are not railway stations. I don't know if that makes any difference, but I thought I'd bring it to your attention in case it does. If not, no problem. Station1 (talk) 07:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

I check whether the disambiguation pages only list railway/public transport stations before using the {{station disambiguation}} template, but I am human and I make mistakes. Thanks for the heads-up. feminist (talk) 07:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

No problem. If I see any other I'll just revert. Station1 (talk) 07:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much for the recognition. It is very much appreciated!
Regards, Spintendo ᔦᔭ 18:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Bilzerian

Hi, this closure does not seem non-controversial to me. I wonder if you would be open to letting someone else close it? K.e.coffman (talk) 20:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

I disagree, but okay. feminist (talk) 01:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

. codes Disambiguation Page

Hello, and thank you for your nomination. My argument is which policy group seems to be in question or conflict (CoI)? Habatchii (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)