User talk:ShahadatHossain

Welcome!

Hello, Shahadat.natore6400, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Arun Saha (Actor), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 01:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arun Saha (Actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arun Saha (Actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 01:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dipu Number Two.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dipu Number Two.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dipu Number Two.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dipu Number Two.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dipu Number Two.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dipu Number Two.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arun Saha (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Born. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dipu Number Two.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dipu Number Two.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dipu Number Two (Film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abul Khair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dipu Number Two 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dipu Number Two 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dipu Number Two 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dipu Number Two 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strange unblock request

Can you explain why you posted an unblock request on my talk page? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Reviewing has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 12:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Textile Today, May, 2018.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Textile Today, May, 2018.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Textile Today, May, 2018.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Textile Today, May, 2018.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tareen Jahan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dl2000 (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karamot Ullah Biplob

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karamot Ullah Biplob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.karamotullah.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Badsha Bulbul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Higher School Certificate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaniz Almas Khan

Hello ShahadatHossain,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kaniz Almas Khan for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaniz Almas Khan

Hello ShahadatHossain,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kaniz Almas Khan for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

When you write an article note that

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person or organisation claims or interviewing its subject. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
If you write about a person you must satisfy the notability guidelines for people
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections, nor links to sales sites like Amazon.
you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
If you have a conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for a person or organisation, or otherwise are acting on their behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ShahadatHossain. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ShahadatHossain|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
If you remove speedy deletion tags yourself, you will be blocked

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I've asked you three times if you have a WP:COI and you have ignored all my requests, so I've blocked you for a month. Usually I block indefinitely, but I'll give you one more chance. When the block expires, if you continue editing without responding to the COI query, I'll block you indefinitely. With regard to your draft, it's clear that some of the sources still don't meet the WP:RS criteria. Either they are quoting her (BBC), we don't know who is writing them (Golden Business]] or they are blatant promo rather than neutral reporting Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:03, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShahadatHossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Recently, An admin has blocked me. He has asked me if I have a WP:COI but I am not a paid Contributor. I just interested to contribute media related article. Recently, I have submitted a article in my sub page User:ShahadatHossain/Kaniz Almas Khan but he want to select it promotional. And he tell me that it's clear that some of the sources still don't meet the WP:RS criteria. But You can check that all of those source is Identifying reliable sources. Some sourse are international news and somes are national newspapers. You can check the magazines and see if these are the national daily newspapers of Bangladesh. Now he has blocked me for 1 month, which I think he used to be very rough with me. And my personal sense is that some administrators abused abuse of rights. I think he personally did it a violent act. I request you to unblock me.

Decline reason:

You still haven't answered the question. Do you have any conflict of interest at all? You don't necessarily need to be paid. Yamla (talk) 11:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShahadatHossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Recently, An admin has blocked me. He has asked me if I have a WP:COI but I am not a paid Contributor. Recently, I have submitted a article in my sub page User:ShahadatHossain/Kaniz Almas Khan but he want to select it promotional. And he tell me that it's clear that some of the sources still don't meet the WP:RS criteria. But You can check that all of those source is Identifying reliable sources. Some sourse are international news and somes are national newspapers. You can check the magazines and see if these are the national daily newspapers of Bangladesh. This article is already in bengali wikipedia, check it কানিজ আলমাস খান. Now an admin has blocked me for 1 month, which I think he used to be very rough with me. And my personal sense is that some administrators abused abuse of rights. I think he personally did it a violent act. I have not any external relationship with this article title. I Just intersected about Media, film, model, singer etc relented article. I request you to unblock me.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Kaniz Almas

The article Kaniz Almas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

recreation of a page that was salted at Kaniz Almas Khan

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaniz Almas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kaniz Almas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRehse (talk) 19:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ShahadatHossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Understand what I did and why I have been blocked. I thought that Kaniz Almas is notable and in Bengali wikipedia, There has article about Kaniz Almas. So, before I try to create this article with more reference. I have used national newspeper link. I thought that she will be notable like bengali wikipedia. but now I believe that my thinking was wrong. I do not make this type of edit anymore, I promise that. Please give me one more chance. I hope I will be do better for this bad experience. Thank you. Mention: @Ad Orientem:Shahadat Hossain (talk) 17:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I Understand what I did and why I have been blocked. I thought that Kaniz Almas is notable and in Bengali wikipedia, There has article about Kaniz Almas. So, before I try to create this article with more reference. I have used national newspeper link. I thought that she will be notable like bengali wikipedia. but now I believe that my thinking was wrong. I do not make this type of edit anymore, I promise that. Please give me one more chance. I hope I will be do better for this bad experience. Thank you. Mention: <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]]:</span>[[User:ShahadatHossain|Shahadat Hossain]] ([[User talk:ShahadatHossain#top|talk]]) 17:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I Understand what I did and why I have been blocked. I thought that Kaniz Almas is notable and in Bengali wikipedia, There has article about Kaniz Almas. So, before I try to create this article with more reference. I have used national newspeper link. I thought that she will be notable like bengali wikipedia. but now I believe that my thinking was wrong. I do not make this type of edit anymore, I promise that. Please give me one more chance. I hope I will be do better for this bad experience. Thank you. Mention: <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]]:</span>[[User:ShahadatHossain|Shahadat Hossain]] ([[User talk:ShahadatHossain#top|talk]]) 17:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I Understand what I did and why I have been blocked. I thought that Kaniz Almas is notable and in Bengali wikipedia, There has article about Kaniz Almas. So, before I try to create this article with more reference. I have used national newspeper link. I thought that she will be notable like bengali wikipedia. but now I believe that my thinking was wrong. I do not make this type of edit anymore, I promise that. Please give me one more chance. I hope I will be do better for this bad experience. Thank you. Mention: <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]]:</span>[[User:ShahadatHossain|Shahadat Hossain]] ([[User talk:ShahadatHossain#top|talk]]) 17:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}