Talk:Minecraft
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Minecraft article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Minecraft" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Q1: Why doesn't this article have more information on blocks/crafting/mobs/entities/mods than it does?
A1: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is it a how-to guide. Articles should strive to present a broad overview of their subjects. Video game articles in particular try to describe general mechanics and gameplay instead of specific details. This helps to keep the article accessible to readers who may not otherwise be familiar with Minecraft. Q2: Why doesn't this article show the prices?
A2: Wikipedia is not a directory. Product prices should not be quoted in an article unless they can be sourced and there is a justified reason for their mention. In general, if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on the price of an object instead of just passing mention, this is an indication that its price may have encyclopedic significance. Prices listed by individual vendors, on the other hand, can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to be used to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices of a single product from different vendors. |
Minecraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 03/22-2018 by Netoholic.
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
TeenSuperDog7 (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add "MineCon 2018 was held as a livestream instead of being held at a show floor, like Minecon 2017. This was the second "MineCon Earth", it was streamed live on September 29, 2018." to the end of paragraph "Minecon" Currently, the "Minecon" paragraph only lists events from years 2012 through 2017, omitting 2018. A replay of the livestream mentioned was uploaded by the official Minecraft YouTube channel shortly after the event aired, that replay can be found here Gravitysilence (talk) 06:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Jonesey95 (talk) 09:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The Command Block
The command block is a block given only by commands.It can be used filling large areas or making titles, etc.
It is showed in Minecraft: Story Mode to summon a wither storm.Cmbeebe (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- This is WP:GAMECRUFT an not appropriate for the article unless reliable sources cover it. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Could information on command blocks be included if it were to include reliable sources? Hookje (talk) 18:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Why ask the question when it's already be answered? -- ferret (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am new to Wikipedia and don't fully grasp it yet. I was more or less asking if reliable sources was the only information missing, as I would like to make the change. Hookje (talk) 19:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Why ask the question when it's already be answered? -- ferret (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Could information on command blocks be included if it were to include reliable sources? Hookje (talk) 18:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Depends. It depends on how much of it there is and what sort of articles cover it. A list of game's blocks -- very likely not. Articles that cover update news -- likely not. Discussion of game's features with a mention -- probably not. A look at how the game uses redstone logic blocks -- may be. An article about how command blocks make custom maps -- likely. The point here is to include material proportional to its significance. It's hard to say without seeing the source first. Minecraft, as a game, is a very prominent subject with lots of sources. This means you see disproportionately many mentions of trivial details. WP:WAF advises to consider real-world implications and MOS:VG lists all the ways we shouldn't stray into details. We could theoretically source a lot, but we have to stop somewhere. Individual blocks is likely the limit, unless there really is significant sourcing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the input, I will review related sources and determine if its importance is notable. I will add further on this within 7 days and hopefully get feedback. A note to add: the command block, although an individual block is a part of the redstone system as a whole. I'd like to highlight on "how the game uses redstone logic blocks" and "how command blocks make custom maps" as these two features continue to have an impact of significance on the game. Hookje (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Depends. It depends on how much of it there is and what sort of articles cover it. A list of game's blocks -- very likely not. Articles that cover update news -- likely not. Discussion of game's features with a mention -- probably not. A look at how the game uses redstone logic blocks -- may be. An article about how command blocks make custom maps -- likely. The point here is to include material proportional to its significance. It's hard to say without seeing the source first. Minecraft, as a game, is a very prominent subject with lots of sources. This means you see disproportionately many mentions of trivial details. WP:WAF advises to consider real-world implications and MOS:VG lists all the ways we shouldn't stray into details. We could theoretically source a lot, but we have to stop somewhere. Individual blocks is likely the limit, unless there really is significant sourcing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Battle Royale Games to the Cathegories Category:Battle royale games LaXfar (talk) 14:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: Minecraft is not a BR game. There are mods and custom games/servers, but we don't add categories based on that. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, the article is about the base game, not any unofficial custom modes designed by players. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2019
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change from Minecraft being released in 2011 to 2009 Rdhuihnhjasi (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not done. @Rdhuihnhjasi: According to the home page of Official Minecraft Wiki, the game's official release was November 18, 2011. Development started in 2009, and pre-orders were collected in 2009, but the game was not released in 2009. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- To add, the official release of 1.0 was in 2011. Versions before that were betas. -- ferret (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Proposed change: add Nintendo Switch to list of supported Realms platforms
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Information to be added or removed: Realms also supports the Xbox One, Windows 10, Android, iOS, Nintendo Switch, and Kindle platforms.
Explanation of issue: Add Nintendo Switch to the above list of supported platforms.
References supporting change: https://minecraft.net/en-us/realms/faq/ Minecraft.net. 31 July 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
HelenAngel (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- The COI editor did not mention where this change would be made, which would be to the last sentence of the Minecraft#Multiplayer section. The COI editor also failed to mention that adding this claim would require the portion of a preceding sentence in the same section to be omitted:
"and Nintendo Switch support to come later in 2017"
. Note: Due to the similarity of my username and the subject of this claim, I will not make this edit myself, and ask other editors to apply it (if they see fit to do so). Thank you. Spintendo 01:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)- @HelenAngel and Spintendo: Done -- ferret (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request in Feb 2019
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add this hat to the top of the page
76.102.7.183 (talk) 22:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- I don't believe anyone would confused the two games. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- I am not sure what other editors may think, but It could be confused with Minicraft.
Hookje (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Edit request
Please include ghasts and zombie pigmen to the sentence discussing the nether world so the Ghast disambiguation page can link here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.90.162 (talk) 02:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- The problem with including these mentions is they are WP:GAMECRUFT/WP:GAMEGUIDE. Without context, these names don't mean anything to the reader. But explaining them is not the sort of detail Wikipedia goes into. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not asking you to make a game guide. I'm asking you to enable a link to the article from a disambig page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.90.162 (talk) 05:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Add a redirect/anchor to the Ghast mention on this page? ~ Dissident93 (talk) 05:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- I mean what I requested. I want the Ghast disambig page to link to this article, but some bumfk there keeps reverting it because the word Ghast isn't on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.90.162 (talk) 21:52, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- They want to link Ghast DAB page to Minecraft. But that fails WP:DABMENTION. So they want a mention of "ghast" added to Minecraft. Which would fail MOS:VG, because we would need to explain it and we don't go into such gameplay detail. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:57, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- I would consider Ghast to be notable and would request Ghast to included, linked to Ghast (disambiguation), with a brief description of Ghast, such as "a weeping flying mob found in the nether" or something similar, and a picture to give context and meaning to the reader to relate the description and picture. Hookje (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- We don't link to disamb pages either way. There's nothing particularly notable about any minecraft creature other than the Creeper. -- ferret (talk) 18:31, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- No one is asking you to link to the disamb page. Someone is asking you to mention a video game creature to note that creatures are part of what makes the Nether environment different than the normal environment of the game. If you can't do that the edit request changes to outright remove the mention of the nether at all. You'll of course refuse to do that because it is actually important to the article and you'll move the goalposts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.90.162 (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Or, you can re-read Hookje's message, where they clearly did ask that it be linked to the disambiguation page. -- ferret (talk) 15:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- No one is asking you to link to the disamb page. Someone is asking you to mention a video game creature to note that creatures are part of what makes the Nether environment different than the normal environment of the game. If you can't do that the edit request changes to outright remove the mention of the nether at all. You'll of course refuse to do that because it is actually important to the article and you'll move the goalposts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.90.162 (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- We don't link to disamb pages either way. There's nothing particularly notable about any minecraft creature other than the Creeper. -- ferret (talk) 18:31, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- I would consider Ghast to be notable and would request Ghast to included, linked to Ghast (disambiguation), with a brief description of Ghast, such as "a weeping flying mob found in the nether" or something similar, and a picture to give context and meaning to the reader to relate the description and picture. Hookje (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Add a redirect/anchor to the Ghast mention on this page? ~ Dissident93 (talk) 05:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not asking you to make a game guide. I'm asking you to enable a link to the article from a disambig page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.90.162 (talk) 05:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2019
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "20188" to "2018" (Minecraft China). It is a spelling mistake. 188.69.212.76 (talk) 23:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Done — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 23:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Edit Fequest
Jreesebot (talk) 10:16 , 25 March 2019(EST)
On the cloning page it says, "After the release of Minecraft, some video games were released with various similarities with Minecraft, and some were called "clones" of the game. Examples include Ace of Spades, CastleMiner, CraftWorld, FortressCraft, Terraria, and Total Miner"
I think somewhere on this article it should mention that many people consider terraria a game inspired by minecraft, and not a minecraft clone. Jreesebot (talk) 14:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class video game articles
- High-importance video game articles
- B-Class indie game articles
- Indie video game task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- B-Class Sweden articles
- Low-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages
- B-Class Internet culture articles
- Mid-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors