Talk:2024 Columbia University pro-Palestinian campus occupation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sawerchessread (talk | contribs) at 22:59, 24 April 2024 (→‎Mention of "Burn Tel Aviv" and praise for hamas in the article: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cherrypicked Response section?

Is everyone condemning the occupation? Noone in support? The Response section looks like it was made to deliberately include only the response that condemn the occupation. 2A02:85F:E058:1000:8CB0:8FDA:A957:83E9 (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority of government authorities in the United States are solidly pro-Israel. Evaporation123 (talk) 23:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 April 2024

2024 Columbia University pro-Palestinian campus occupationGaza Solidarity Encampment – Name given to the protest by the protesters. MountainDew20 (talk) 19:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBECRNovem Linguae (talk) 01:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Disagree. Current name is more descriptive than proposed and proposed violates our commitment to a neutral point of view. But, the current is too long. Maybe once the year is over it could be moved to 2024 Columbia University protests or something else that's descriptive with the benefit of hindsight. Uhoj (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There still should be a better, shorter name like "Columbia University pro-Palestinian occupation" or "2024 Columbia University Protests". MountainDew20 (talk) 23:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ignore this, I saw you said the same. MountainDew20 (talk) 23:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with "2024 Columbia University protests" is that there have been multiple 2024 protests at Columbia before 17 April, for example over the skunk attack incident in January. This ongoing protest is different because of the nature of how it is being conducted (a campus occupation). Evaporation123 (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree: Not everyone protesting on the Columbia campus is part of the encampment, such as the faculty that recently walked out in support of the students. Perfecnot (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose we don't have to use the official name of things, and the overall scope of this article is wider than just the encampment. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Gaza Solidarity Encampment redirects to this page anyways, and the scope of the article is beyond just the area of tents being that there is activity all over campus and around its perimeter as well. Evaporation123 (talk) 23:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose we should use the name commonly used in the sources. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 01:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to NPOV name without adequate justification, and different name used by RS. FortunateSons (talk) 07:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 April 2024

Background could be read to mean that it's outside agitators making their way to Columbia rather than students of the university. Here's one way to clarify the situation:

Pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel students have gathered at Columbia University during the Israel–Hamas war.
+
Pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel students have staged demonstrations at Columbia University during the Israel–Hamas war.

Uhoj (talk) 21:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 22:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 April 2024


As stated above in the Claims about "skunk" attack discussion topic, the claim that student protestors were attacked with an Israeli Defense Forces chemical agent ("skunk") is disputed. I propose the following clarification:

In January 2024, students at a pro-Palestinian demonstration on campus were attacked with [[Skunk (weapon)|Skunk]], a foul-smelling spray usually used as crowd control by the [[Israel Defense Forces]], causing various injuries. In response, demonstrators organized a protest outside the university. The incident is currently being investigated by the [[New York City Police Department]] as a potential hate crime. SJP and JVP published a report in which they stated the perpetrators were former IDF soldiers and current Columbia students.
+
In January 2024, students at a pro-Palestinian demonstration on campus were sprayed with a foul-smelling substance which they claimed to be [[Skunk (weapon)|Skunk]], a chemical used for crowd control by Israeli police forces. At least three students sought medical treatment after the incident. The [[New York Police Department]] announced that that they would investigate the incident as a potential hate crime. In March, Columbia expelled the student allegedly involved in spraying the substance. In April, the student in question, a former Israeli Defense Forces soldier, filed a lawsuit against the university under the pseudonym John Doe, claiming that he had released non-toxic fart spray purchased from Amazon. At a congressional hearing on antisemitism that same month, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce presented campus posters, featuring a blue and white skunk with a Star of David on its back, as evidence of anti-Semitic harassment on campus.

BrokeBoneGrinder (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I first raised my concern about the misinformation in this article at 04:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC), although my original discussion post on the topic has since been removed from this talk page, citing WP:ECR. I am concerned at how this article is presenting a disputed and highly provocative claim about a sensitive topic (that a pro-Israeli student had access to an IDF chemical and used it against protestors) as a proven fact, and it seems to me a violation of WP:NPOV. Almost every news article that has been written about this topic presents the claim that the students were sprayed with skunk as a claim made by the pro-Palestinian protestors -- however, this Wikipedia article currently does not use the same language, instead presenting it as proven fact, citing a relatively obscure news organization the Middle East Eye, an outlet which has its own history of controversy related to antisemitism rather than any of the other major news organizations that have chosen more moderate language to convey the non-established nature of the claim. BrokeBoneGrinder (talk) 19:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b "'Negligence': Columbia students furious at university after skunk water doused on protesters". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 2024-04-19.
  2. ^ Tress, Luke (2024-02-02). "Thousands of activists gather outside Columbia U to protest treatment of campus pro-Palestinian groups". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Retrieved 2024-03-11.
  3. ^ Khalifeh, Ramsey (2024-01-23). "NYPD investigating claims that pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia were hit with 'skunk spray'". Gothamist. Retrieved 2024-01-24.
  4. ^ Tress, Luke (2024-02-02). "Thousands of activists gather outside Columbia U to protest treatment of campus pro-Palestinian groups". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Retrieved 2024-03-11.
  5. ^ King, Wyatt; Gregor-Splaver, Gabriella; Heath, Elliot; Mendell, Chris; Salinas, Maggie; Pillai, Dashika; Zuloaga, Joseph; Ramirez, Isabella; Karam, Esha (24 January, 2024). "'Serious crimes': A pro-Palestinian rally turned site of police investigation, in photos and videos". Columbia Spectator. Spectator Publishing Company. Retrieved 23 April 2024. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ Khalifeh, Ramsey (2024-01-23). "NYPD investigating claims that pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia were hit with 'skunk spray'". Gothamist. Retrieved 2024-01-24.
  7. ^ Forgash, Emily; Mendell, Chris (17 April, 2024). "Student accused of alleged chemical spray sues Columbia, claims substance was 'non-toxic fart spray'". Columbia Spectator. Spectator Publishing Company. Retrieved 23 April 2024. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ Otterman, Sharon (17 April, 2024). "Here are some of the recent antisemitism allegations against Columbia". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 23 April 2024. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 April 2024 (2)

change: "The protests encouraged other actions at New York University and Yale University." to "The protests encouraged other actions at New York University, Yale University, MIT, Tufts University, Emerson College, and University of Michigan." Oldhum (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of "Burn Tel Aviv" and praise for hamas in the article

https://www.timesofisrael.com/dozens-arrested-at-yale-columbia-pauses-in-person-classes-amid-anti-israel-protests/ https://www.nationalreview.com/news/pro-palestinian-protesters-outside-columbia-urge-hamas-to-burn-tel-aviv-to-the-ground/ It's claim that they are peaceful protests, so it's important to give context. I think it's important to mention that they are praising hamas (a terror organzation in USA) and are calling to burn tel aviv. 84.110.218.178 (talk) 15:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources
National Review is considered partisan. I think Times of Israel can be cited.
We can probably include better sources of the documented antisemitic chants. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 21:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
added something to April 21st. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 21:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only time "burn tel aviv to the ground" appears in the times of israel article is from a linked tweet by a former Israeli ambassador and "Director of the Digital Diplomacy Bureau, Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs." This is not a reliable source. Kire1975 (talk) 22:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, times of Israel apparently lurched rightwards sometime in the past few decades. I have no clue what consensus is, its not banned on WP:RSP but its not mentioned either. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]