Talk:Napoleon: Difference between revisions
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
Why is Napoleon Bonaparte’s surname not used as part of the title of the article? He never formally dropped his surname and was and is certainly referred to as Napoleon, Bonaparte or his full name Napoleon Bonaparte. I have plenty of books with and the titles of them use his full name. Many other languages on Wikipedia use his full name, why does the English version only just his first name?--[[User:FriendlyFerret9854|FriendlyFerret9854]] ([[User talk:FriendlyFerret9854|talk]]) 18:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC) |
Why is Napoleon Bonaparte’s surname not used as part of the title of the article? He never formally dropped his surname and was and is certainly referred to as Napoleon, Bonaparte or his full name Napoleon Bonaparte. I have plenty of books with and the titles of them use his full name. Many other languages on Wikipedia use his full name, why does the English version only just his first name?--[[User:FriendlyFerret9854|FriendlyFerret9854]] ([[User talk:FriendlyFerret9854|talk]]) 18:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
:I don’t see anything in the [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)]] article which would warrant omitting Napoleon’s surname from the title of the article, see [[WP:SINGLENAME]].--[[User:FriendlyFerret9854|FriendlyFerret9854]] ([[User talk:FriendlyFerret9854|talk]]) 18:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC) |
:I don’t see anything in the [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)]] article which would warrant omitting Napoleon’s surname from the title of the article, see [[WP:SINGLENAME]].--[[User:FriendlyFerret9854|FriendlyFerret9854]] ([[User talk:FriendlyFerret9854|talk]]) 18:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::Hi. You already asked the same question on 23 February 2022, [[Talk:Napoleon/Archive_7#Napoleon_Bonaparte_not_just_Napoleon]]. On 24 February {{nping|SergeWoodzing}} gave an answer. Also in the article the alternative spelling of "Napoleone Buonaparte" has been given fairly recently. I hope this answers your question. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 18:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:52, 13 June 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Napoleon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Napoleon was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 20 dates. [show]
February 26, 2004, July 17, 2004, October 15, 2004, December 2, 2004, February 26, 2005, July 17, 2005, July 17, 2006, July 17, 2007, February 26, 2008, February 26, 2009, February 26, 2010, February 26, 2013, February 26, 2014, February 26, 2015, February 26, 2017, February 26, 2018, February 26, 2019, February 26, 2021, May 5, 2021, and February 26, 2022 |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
|
GA Reassessment
Napoleon
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted Its now been a matter of months and the issues aren't sorted. While length itself is not a GA issue, when it does get above 100kb it suggests there are failures in using summary style. Either way the presence of multiple citation needed tags is reason enough to delist this article. Aircorn (talk) 03:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Previous GAR was 5 years ago, and there seem to be some significant issues to adress.
- Article is too long, with a readable prose size of over 18,000 words, almost twice the recommended 10,000. As noted by Jehochman on the talk page, more content should be moved to subarticles and replaced by summary style.
- The lead, too, is way too long, consisting of 5 lengthy paragraphs. The expositions of his wars and campaigns should probably somehow be condensed. There's also a balance issue, with the last paragraph extolling Napoleon's achievements - including a direct quote from a historian taking up more than half the paragraph - without mentioning any negatively viewed aspects of his legacy, e.g. reinstating slavery in the Caribbean. An additional paragraph focusing on the latter was recently added, though not in an optimal way, and has since been removed again. See also Talk:Napoleon#Lead: length and recent addition.
- There are six {{citation needed}} tags, five of which date back all the way to 2016.
- Reference errors as noted by Jehochman at Talk:Napoleon#Citations.
There might be additional issues that I'm unaware of. The ones above seem altogether sufficient to justify a GAR, especially for such a vital and prominent article. Lennart97 (talk) 14:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- You may be intrested in the discusion held before on the talk page, in wich i proposed a way to cut the lead to five shorter paragraphs, so far i have proposed it, but i would want to hear your opinion, and how to improve it. (we are talking about the lead). we talked about this. So far we need consensus, and focus on the problem itself.Nuevousuario1011 (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- I was notified of this GAR - but I have no real interest, experience or expertise with the article,a dn am not currently writing on Wikipedia. However the concerns expressed are clearly something that someone should be able to fix in a matter of days, expending about the same amount of energy as a GAR would take. Why not fix it instead? By the way, excessive length is really a silly object to an article's quality, some topics need to be longer than the standard article to provide sufficient coverage of the relevant literature - without having read this one, I'd not be surprised if this is a such a topic. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 12:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I notified you only because you were involved in the previous GAR, hope you don't mind. I nominated the article for a community review because I'm not personally able to fix the article's problems, it's as simple as that. More specifically, per the guidelines at WP:GAR, I 1)
don't believe satisfies the good article criteria
and 2)[am] not confident in [my] ability to assess the article
- thus a community reassessment seems like the correct choice. - You may have a point about the article length, but isn't that what spinning off content and using summary style in the main article is for? I'm pretty sure I've seen length considerations in GA reviews, anyway. Maybe Jehochman who first noted the length as an issue wants to comment on this as well. Lennart97 (talk) 12:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I notified you only because you were involved in the previous GAR, hope you don't mind. I nominated the article for a community review because I'm not personally able to fix the article's problems, it's as simple as that. More specifically, per the guidelines at WP:GAR, I 1)
- . I hope the issues can be corrected within the scope of this review. Summary style is not hard to do, nor does it take very long. I fixed the worst reference issues. Some that remain may require an editor with more reference expertise than my level. @El C: might know who to contact. Jehochman Talk 14:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the category Category:Royal reburials 67.173.23.66 (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Done --SergeWoodzing (talk) 01:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Short stature
I believe this reversal again corrupted the cited source. If that source gives his height as a bullying issue, that must remain in the article. I will reinstate it soon unless someone can convince me here not to. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
"Born as"
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article starts by saying Napoleon Bonaparte (born Napoleone di Buonaparte...), apparently because some editor in 2014 "supposed" that's how an Italian parish priest would record his name. He was however born as Napoleone Bonaparte or Buonaparte (both spellings are used in his baptism certificate), without the "di". Therefore, please remove the "di" in his birth name. See the baptism certificate at e.g. https://art.rmngp.fr/fr/library/artworks/fac-simile-de-l-acte-de-bapteme-de-napoleon-redige-en-italien_carton or https://www.corsicatheque.com/Histoire-personnages-historiques/Napoleon-Bonaparte-1769-1821/Napoleon-Bonaparte-acte-de-naissance). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:1810:b414:7900:3187:21e0:f02f:3a8d (talk • contribs) 22:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done Note that this is also supported by the Encyclopæpia Britannica. ;; Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 21:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Napoleon
Napoleon Bonaparte............ 2409:4053:494:DFA4:0:0:682:A8A4 (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Napoleon why not another name
His name as emperor was Napoleon (no surname). Later Napoleon I, since there were two more. Being emperor is his major claim to fame. Thus this make historians confused 🤔 but the name Napoleon 1,2,3 helps to recognise the ruler. 2409:4053:494:DFA4:0:0:682:A8A4 (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there, the question of what to name this article has come up 6 times since the article's creation. I would recommend you look at previous discussions (which you can find links to at the top of this talk page) before deciding whether it's worth having another discussion on the topic again. Thanks! SamWilson989 (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Napoleon or Napoleon Bonaparte
Why is Napoleon Bonaparte’s surname not used as part of the title of the article? He never formally dropped his surname and was and is certainly referred to as Napoleon, Bonaparte or his full name Napoleon Bonaparte. I have plenty of books with and the titles of them use his full name. Many other languages on Wikipedia use his full name, why does the English version only just his first name?--FriendlyFerret9854 (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t see anything in the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) article which would warrant omitting Napoleon’s surname from the title of the article, see WP:SINGLENAME.--FriendlyFerret9854 (talk) 18:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi. You already asked the same question on 23 February 2022, Talk:Napoleon/Archive_7#Napoleon_Bonaparte_not_just_Napoleon. On 24 February SergeWoodzing gave an answer. Also in the article the alternative spelling of "Napoleone Buonaparte" has been given fairly recently. I hope this answers your question. Mathsci (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- Selected anniversaries (February 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (July 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (July 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (July 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (July 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2013)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2014)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2015)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2017)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2018)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2019)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2021)
- Selected anniversaries (May 2021)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2022)
- A-Class biography articles
- A-Class biography (military) articles
- Top-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- A-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Top-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- A-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Low-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- A-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- A-Class military history articles
- A-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- A-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- A-Class Napoleonic era articles
- Napoleonic era task force articles
- A-Class European history articles
- Top-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- A-Class European Microstates articles
- Low-importance European Microstates articles
- A-Class Andorra articles
- Low-importance Andorra articles
- Andorra articles
- WikiProject European Microstates articles
- A-Class France articles
- Top-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- A-Class Italy articles
- High-importance Italy articles
- All WikiProject Italy pages
- A-Class Africa articles
- Mid-importance Africa articles
- A-Class Saint Helena articles
- Top-importance Saint Helena articles
- WikiProject Saint Helena articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- A-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press