Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
I have already gave the {{user:Cupper52}} two warnings regarding his actions while dealing with AFD. The user is not following proper [[WP:Before]] and is not checking the resources and all. He is simply nominating random articles for deletion within 1 or 2 minutes. I think he is trying to obtain autopatrolled or any other rights, so he need to participate in AFD's and all. Is there any way we can stop this behaviour from the user [[User:Kashmorwiki|Kichu]]🐘 <sup>[[User talk:Kashmorwiki|<i style="color:blue">Discuss</i>]]</sup> 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
Ministers of State pages
Hi @Spleodrach: Great to come onto Wikipedia and find you've done the page for Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, the very next one I was planning to do! It's good to be able to collaborate on this reformatting. It's a more legally precise way of listing them; even if there will be discontinuities, e.g., Trade Promotion moving between DFA and DETE, at least we're doing it in line with the official changes of responsibilities, rather than trying to formulate our own throughlines. And it means for each department, we can have a page for the department with general descriptions of current functions and responsible bodies and the table of transfers, a page for the government minister, and a page for the ministers of state. For disestablished departments like Labour or P&T, I'd imagined including the MoS list on that page, neither being that long, and they're now a closed set, so the pages won't get that long either.
One small idea, that came to me through the process, that in the relevant Government pages, the link to Minister of State at the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment should be in the column for department, rather than responsibilities. This is from a MOS:LINKCLARITY perspective, and frees up the responsibilities column to link to either specific responsibilities that would still get their own pages (e.g. European Affairs, Children, Disability) or to a body like the OPW or EPA. It also means that where there are separate departments but one responsibility (again, e.g. Children pre-2011), each list of Ministers of State page would be linked in the Departments column (so as Education, Health, Justice). Open to suggestions and variations on this. —Iveagh Gardens (talk) 13:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This page, as it was, is rather damaging and biased against the person involved and or his political party due to the selective nature of topics mentioned in the political career chapter and how they were presented.
Why you would suggest that edits about the results of his elections and the preference votes he obtained, his new office location and the fact that he has been elected in two different constituencies is biased and unrelated information is quite interesting to say the least.
However, the main points in the original piece, whilst in my view clearly biased against the person, have been left unedited and only additional information about these two selected topics has been provided in order to provide a reader with greater clarity on the issues originally included. They were included to provide a reader with additional information on the two points raised to let the reader make up their own minds. Is that not fair instead of just reading what you believe to be allowable? The additional information provided are facts and have been referenced from many different Irish news articles that were included. Why would they be removed?
As the edits have been twice removed, it is clear in my opinion that there may be another agenda going on here. As a result, I am using this mechanism in the first instance to resolved the situation.
I am requesting that these edits that have been made be returned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.19.140.22 (talk) 19:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to Feighan's talk page. Spleodrach (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Delany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
As of 17 June 2021, I will not be as active on Wikipedia due to loss of interest. Nowadays, I only participate in AfD or MfD discussions or, rarely, edit articles.
You might want to leave a message on my talk page.
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
{{Firefox topicon}}
This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Spleodrach.
Five pillars
The fundamental principles of Wikipedia may be summarized in five "pillars":
I joined Wikipedia on 5 June 2020. On the same day, I made my first edit.
As a confirmed user
A week after joining Wikipedia, I made my tenth edit, making me a confirmed user. Two days later, I made my twentieth edit. On the same day, I edited a semi-protected article for the first time. On June 22, 2020, I got my first message. It was from Mattythewhite, warning me that I didn’t provide a reliable source for the article Sergio Agüero. The next day, I edited a pending changes protected page for the first time. The article was Jonny Evans. Shortly afterwards, I had a warning of being blocked from editing because I wasn’t citing a reliable source on the article Roberto Firmino. On July 12 I made my 90th edit and two days later I made my 100th edit. Just over a month later, I made my 200th edit on the page Gargoyles (comics). On August 23, I was thanked for the first time, by BenMacDui. On August 28, I made my 300th edit on my user page. On 1 October I made my 400th edit on Ankara River.
As an extended confirmed user
Just five days after making my 400th edit, I made my 500th edit on the page Talk:Central District (Lenjan County). On the same day, I edited an extended confirmed protected article for the first time, on Eniola Aluko. On 8 October I joined the Wikipedia Adventure. Click here to have a go. On the same day, I was thanked for the fifth time by Deepfriedokra. On 25 October I made my 1,000th edit on the page Recognition of same-sex unions in Estonia. Nine days later I was thanked for the tenth time by GeometryDashFan12. By 5 December I had created more than 100 global accounts. I enabled my Twinkle preferences on 23 December 2020. In the beginning of January the following year I made my 2000th edit on Jana Pérez reverting vandalism. On 30 January I installed HotCat. But the same day I got given a one-week block for making bad reverts on vandalism. I began to slow down and check when reverting vandalism after the block expired. On 8 February I made my 3,000th edit tagging the article Dowzariv. I stopped actively editing in early April.
Topics I edit
I now edit all kinds of articles in Wikipedia now.
Most of the articles I edit are related to football. All of the pages I edited were either related to me or football until 2 July 2020.
My IP addresses if I get logged out.
User:Cupper52-2 my account alternative.
Statistics
Notice:I need to update this some time soon.
Over 70 edits
Been on Wikipedia for around 2 months
Edited 3 templates so far
Created 7 pages so far (2 User, 2 User talk, 3 template talk)
This user is at an intermediate level of Religious and/or Spiritual understanding. Depending on how it is expressed, this user might very well be considered a traditionalist.
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect COVID-19 Pandemic. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#COVID-19 Pandemic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JsfasdF252 (talk) 23:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
