Jump to content

October Crisis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:647:ca00:bf00:e15c:b19e:28d5:c5cb (talk) at 04:20, 28 July 2020 (Added additional sites of note.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

October Crisis
Part of the Quebec sovereignty movement

Troop movements during the surrender of the Chenier Cell
DateOctober 5 – December 28, 1970
Location
Result Decisive Canadian victory
Belligerents
 Canada
 Province of Quebec
Front de libération du Québec
Commanders and leaders
Pierre Trudeau
Robert Bourassa
Donald Stovel Macdonald
Gilles Turcot
Pierre Laporte
Jean Drapeau
Paul Rose
Jacques Rose
Francis Simard
Jacques Lanctôt
Jacques Cossette-Trudel
Bernard Lortie
Units involved
Royal 22e Régiment
Sûreté du Québec
Chénier Cell
Liberation Cell
Casualties and losses
Deputy Premier kidnapped and murdered
British diplomat kidnapped (later released)
≈30 arrested

The October Crisis (French: Crise d'Octobre) occurred in October 1970 in the province of Quebec in Canada, mainly in the Montreal metropolitan area. Members of the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ) kidnapped the provincial Deputy Premier Pierre Laporte and British diplomat James Cross. In response, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau invoked the only peacetime use of the War Measures Act. The kidnappers murdered Laporte and negotiations led to Cross's release.

The Premier of Quebec Robert Bourassa and the Mayor of Montreal Jean Drapeau supported Trudeau's invocation of the War Measures Act, which limited civil liberties. The police were enabled with far-reaching powers, and they arrested and detained, without bail, 497 individuals, all but 62 of whom were later released without charges. The Government of Quebec also requested military aid to the civil power, and Canadian Forces deployed throughout Quebec; they acted in a support role to the civil authorities of Quebec.[2]: 86–91 

At the time, opinion polls throughout Canada, including in Quebec, showed widespread support for the use of the War Measures Act.[3] The response, however, was criticized at the time by prominent politicians such as René Lévesque and Tommy Douglas.[4]

The events of October 1970 galvanized opposition to the use of violence in efforts to gain Quebec sovereignty and accelerated the movement towards electoral means of attaining greater autonomy and independence,[1]: 256  including support for the sovereigntist Parti Québécois, which formed the provincial government in 1976.

Background

From 1963 to 1970 the Quebec nationalist group Front de libération du Québec detonated over 950 bombs.[5] While mailboxes, particularly in the affluent and predominantly Anglophone city of Westmount, were common targets, the largest single bombing was of the Montreal Stock Exchange on February 13, 1969, which caused extensive damage and injured 27 people. Other targets included Montreal City Hall, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the T. Eaton Company department store[6], armed forces recruiting offices, railway tracks, and army installations. FLQ members, in a strategic move, had stolen several tons of dynamite from military and industrial sites, and, financed by bank robberies, they threatened through their official communication organ, known as La Cognée, that more attacks were to come.

By 1970, 23 members of the FLQ were in prison, including four convicted of murder. On February 26, 1970, two men in a panel truck, including Jacques Lanctôt, were arrested in Montreal when they were discovered with a sawed-off shotgun and a communiqué announcing the kidnapping of the Israeli consul. In June, police raided a home in the small community of Prévost, north of Montreal in the Laurentian Mountains, and found firearms, ammunition, 300 pounds (140 kg) of dynamite, detonators, and the draft of a ransom note to be used in the kidnapping of the United States consul.[7]

Timeline

A postal box in Montreal bearing the graffiti FLQ oui (FLQ yes) in July 1971. The FLQ conducted several bombings of post boxes which typically bore a decal of the Royal Coat of Arms of Canada.
  • October 5: Montreal, Quebec: Two members of the "Liberation Cell" of the FLQ kidnap British diplomat James Cross from his home. The kidnappers are disguised as delivery men bringing a package for his recent birthday. Once the maid lets them in, they pull out a rifle and a revolver and kidnap Cross. This is followed by a communique to the authorities containing the kidnappers' demands, which include the exchange of Cross for "political prisoners", a number of convicted or detained FLQ members, and the CBC broadcast of the FLQ Manifesto. The terms of the ransom note are the same as those found in June for the planned kidnapping of the U.S. consul. At this time, the police do not connect the two.
  • October 8: Broadcast of the FLQ Manifesto in all French- and English-speaking media outlets in Quebec.
  • October 10: Montreal, Quebec: Members of the Chenier Cell approach the home of the Deputy Premier of the province of Quebec, Pierre Laporte, while he is playing football with his nephew on his front lawn. Members of the "Chenier cell" of the FLQ kidnap Laporte.
  • October 11: The CBC broadcasts a letter from captivity from Pierre Laporte to the Premier of Quebec, Robert Bourassa.[8]
  • October 12: General Gilles Turcot sends troops from the Royal 22e Régiment to guard federal property in the Montreal region, by request of the federal government.[9] Lawyer Robert Lemieux is appointed by the FLQ to negotiate the release of James Cross and Pierre Laporte. The Quebec Government appoints Robert Demers.[10]
  • October 13: Prime Minister Trudeau is interviewed by the CBC with respect to the military presence.[11] In a combative interview, Trudeau asks the reporter, Tim Ralfe, what he would do in his place. When Ralfe asks Trudeau how far he would go, Trudeau replies, "Just watch me".
  • October 14: Sixteen prominent Quebec personalities, including René Lévesque and Claude Ryan, call for negotiating "exchange of the two hostages for the political prisoners". FLQ's lawyer Robert Lemieux urges Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) students to boycott classes in support of FLQ.
  • October 15: Quebec City: The negotiations between lawyers Lemieux and Demers are put to an end.[12] The Government of Quebec formally requests the intervention of the Canadian army in "aid of the civil power" pursuant to the National Defence Act. All three opposition parties, including the Parti Québécois, rise in the National Assembly and agree with the decision. On the same day, separatist groups are permitted to speak at the Université de Montréal. Robert Lemieux organizes a 3,000 student rally in Paul Sauvé Arena to show support for the FLQ; labour leader Michel Chartrand announces that popular support for FLQ is rising[8] and states "We are going to win because there are more boys ready to shoot members of Parliament than there are policemen."[13] The rally frightens many Canadians, who view it as a possible prelude to outright insurrection in Quebec.
  • October 16: Premier Bourassa formally requests that the government of Canada grant the government of Quebec "emergency powers" that allow them to "apprehend and keep in custody" individuals. This results in the implementation of the War Measures Act, allowing the suspension of habeas corpus, giving wide-reaching powers of arrest to police. The City of Montreal had already made such a request the day before. These measures come into effect at 4:00 a.m. Prime Minister Trudeau makes a broadcast announcing the imposition of the War Measures Act.
  • October 17: Montreal, Quebec: The Chenier cell of the FLQ announces that hostage Pierre Laporte has been executed. He was strangled and then stuffed in the trunk of a car and abandoned in the bush near Saint-Hubert Airport, a few miles from Montreal. A communique to police advising that Pierre Laporte has been executed refers to him derisively as the "minister of unemployment and assimilation". In another communique issued by the "Liberation cell" holding James Cross, his kidnappers declare that they are suspending indefinitely the death sentence against him, that they will not release him until their demands are met, and that he will be executed if the "fascist police" discover them and attempt to intervene. The demands they make are: 1) The publication of the FLQ manifesto. 2) The release of 23 "political prisoners". 3) An airplane to take them to either Cuba or Algeria (both countries that they feel a strong connection to because of their struggle against colonialism and imperialism). 4) The re-hiring of the "gars de Lapalme". 5) A "voluntary tax" of 500,000 dollars to be loaded aboard the plane prior to departure. 6) The name of the informer who had sold out the FLQ activists earlier in the year.[14] Controversially, police reports not released to the public until 2010 state that Pierre Laporte was accidentally killed during a struggle. The FLQ subsequently wanted to use his death to its advantage by convincing the government that they should be taken seriously.[failed verification][15]
  • October 18: While denouncing the acts of "subversion and terrorism – both of which are so tragically contrary to the best interests of our people", columnist, politician, and future Premier of Quebec René Lévesque criticizes the War Measures Act: "Until we receive proof (of the size the revolutionary army) to the contrary, we will believe that such a minute, numerically unimportant fraction is involved, that rushing into the enactment of the War Measures Act was a panicky and altogether excessive reaction, especially when you think of the inordinate length of time they want to maintain this regime."[16]
  • November 6: Police raid the hiding place of the FLQ's Chenier cell. Although three members escape the raid, Bernard Lortie is arrested and charged with the kidnapping and murder of Pierre Laporte.
  • December 4: Montreal, Quebec: After being held hostage for 62 days, kidnapped British Trade Commissioner James Cross is released by the FLQ Liberation Cell after negotiations between lawyers Bernard Mergler and Robert Demers.[12][17] Simultaneously, the five known kidnappers, Marc Carbonneau, Yves Langlois, Jacques Lanctôt, Jacques Cossette-Trudel and his wife, Louise Lanctôt, are granted safe passage to Cuba by the government of Canada after approval by Fidel Castro. They are flown to Cuba by a Canadian Forces aircraft. Jacques Lanctôt is the same man who, earlier that year, had been arrested and then released on bail for the attempted kidnapping of the Israeli consul. [citation needed]
  • December 23: Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau announces that all troops stationed in Quebec will be withdrawn by January 5, 1971.[18]
  • December 28: Saint-Luc, Quebec: The three members of the Chenier Cell still at large, Paul Rose, Jacques Rose, and Francis Simard, are arrested after being found hiding in a 6 m tunnel in a rural farming community. They would later be charged with the kidnapping and murder of Pierre Laporte.

War Measures Act and military involvement

Canadian Forces stand guard in downtown Montreal. (Image: Montreal Gazette October 18, 1970)

When CBC reporter Tim Ralfe asked how far he was willing to go to stop the FLQ, Trudeau replied: "Just watch me." Three days later, on October 16, the Cabinet under his chairmanship advised the Governor General to invoke the War Measures Act at the request of the Premier of Quebec, Robert Bourassa, and the Mayor of Montreal, Jean Drapeau. The War Measures Act gave sweeping powers of arrest and internment to the police. The provisions took effect at 4 a.m., and, shortly thereafter, hundreds of suspected FLQ members and sympathizers were rounded-up. In total 497 people were arrested, including singer Pauline Julien and her partner, future Quebec Minister Gérald Godin, poet Gaston Miron, union activist Michel Chartrand and journalist Nick Auf der Maur.

This act was imposed only after the negotiations with the FLQ had broken off and the Premier of Quebec was facing the next stage in the FLQ's agenda.[19]: 88 

At the time, opinion polls in Quebec and the rest of Canada showed overwhelming support for the War Measures Act;[20][21] in a December 1970 Gallup Poll, it was noted that 89% of English-speaking Canadians supported the introduction of the War Measures Act, and 86% of French-speaking Canadians supported its introduction. They respectively had 6% and 9% disapproving, the difference being undecided.[19]: 103  Since then, however, the government's use of the War Measures Act in peacetime has been a subject of debate in Canada as it gave police sweeping powers of arrest and detention.

Simultaneously, under provisions quite separate from the War Measures Act and much more commonly used, the Solicitor-General of Quebec requisitioned the deployment of the military from the Chief of the Defence Staff in accordance with the National Defence Act. Troops from Quebec bases and elsewhere in the country were dispatched, under the direction of the Sûreté du Québec (Quebec's provincial police force), to guard vulnerable points as well as prominent individuals at risk. This freed the police to pursue more proactive tasks in dealing with the crisis.

The two named Canadian Forces operations were Operation Ginger to mount guards on the Government of Canada buildings and important residences outside of Quebec, and Operation Essay to provide aid to the civil power in Quebec.[22] The Royal 22e Régiment, more commonly known as the "Van Doos", the most famous French-Canadian regiment in the Canadian Army, was deployed to Montreal to guard buildings; it was understood that deploying troops from English-speaking regiments in Quebec as an aid to civil power would be politically problematic, and throughout the operation, the Army made a point of deploying primarily French-Canadian soldiers to guard buildings in Quebec.[23]: 257  The Royal 22e Régiment was based in Quebec City, but it felt that having the "Van Doos" perform guard duty in Montreal, the largest city in Quebec, would be less likely to offend public opinion.[23]: 257  The Canadian Army saw no action during its deployment which lasted until November 12 and only one soldier was killed, when he tripped over his loaded rifle on guard duty and inadvertently killed himself with his own gun.[23]: 257 

Outside Quebec, mainly in the Ottawa area, the federal government deployed troops under its own authority to guard federal offices and employees. The combination of the increased powers of arrest granted by the War Measures Act, and the military deployment requisitioned and controlled by the government of Quebec, gave every appearance that martial law had been imposed. A significant difference, however, is that the military remained in a support role to the civil authorities (in this case, Quebec authorities) and never had a judicial role. It still allowed for the criticism of the government, and the Parti Québécois was able to go about its everyday business free of any restrictions, including the criticism of the government and the War Measures Act.[19]: 88 

Nevertheless, the sight of tanks on the lawns of the federal parliament was disconcerting to many Canadians. Moreover, police officials sometimes abused their powers and detained without cause prominent artists and intellectuals associated with the sovereignty movement.[24]

Canadian Forces bomb disposal robot from the Canadian War Museum, used during the October Crisis

The October Crisis was the only occasion in which the War Measures Act was invoked in peacetime. The FLQ was declared an unlawful association, which meant that under the War Measures Act the police had full power to arrest, interrogate and hold anyone whom they believed was associated with the FLQ: "A person who was a member to this group, acted or supported it in some fashion became liable to a jail term not to exceed five years. A person arrested for such a purpose could be held without bail for up to ninety days."[25] It is estimated that within the first 24 hours of the War Measures Act being put in place, police mobilized to arrest suspects of the unlawful organization. The police conducted 3000 searches and 497 people were detained.[26]

Also, the War Measures Act violated and limited many human rights of people being incarcerated: "Everyone arrested under the War Measures Act was denied due process. Habeas corpus (an individual's right to have a judge confirm that they have been lawfully detained) was suspended. The Crown could detain a suspect for seven days before charging him or her with a crime. In addition, the attorney general could order, before the seven days expired, that the accused be held for up to 21 days. The prisoners were not permitted to consult legal counsel, and many were held incommunicado."[27]

There were a few, of people having cause to be upset by the method of their interrogation, but most of those interviewed after had little cause to complain and several even commented on the courteous nature of the interrogations and searches.[19]: 88  In addition, the Quebec Ombudsman, Louis Marceau, was instructed to hear complaints of detainees, and the Quebec government agreed to pay damages to any person unjustly arrested. On February 3, 1971, John Turner, Minister of Justice of Canada, reported that 497 persons had been arrested under the War Measures Act, 435 of whom had already been released. The other 62 were charged, of whom 32 were accused of crimes of such seriousness that a Quebec Superior Court judge refused them bail. About Trudeau's invocation of the War Measures Act, the Canadian historian Desmond Morton wrote: "It was unprecedented. On the basis of facts then and revealed later, it was unjustified. It was also a brilliant success. Shock was the best safeguard against bloodshed. Trudeau's target was not two frightened little bands of terrorists, one of which soon strangled its helpless victim: it was the affluent dilettantes of revolutionary violence, cheering on the anonymous heroes of the FLQ. The proclamation of the War Measures Act and the thousands of grim troops pouring into Montreal froze the cheers, dispersed the coffee-table revolutionaries, and left them frightened and isolated while the police rounded up suspects whose offense, if any, was dreaming of blood in the streets".[23]: 257 

Aftermath

Pierre Laporte was eventually found to have been killed by his captors while James Cross was freed after 59 days as a result of negotiations with the kidnappers who requested exile to Cuba rather than facing trial in Quebec. The cell members responsible for Laporte's death were arrested and charged with kidnapping and first-degree murder after they returned.

The response by the federal and provincial governments to the incident still sparks controversy. This is the only time that the War Measures Act had been put in place during peacetime in Canada.[28] A few critics (most notably Tommy Douglas and some members of the New Democratic Party[29]) believed that Trudeau was excessive in advising the use of the War Measures Act to suspend civil liberties and that the precedent set by this incident was dangerous. Federal Progressive Conservative leader Robert Stanfield initially supported Trudeau's actions but later regretted doing so.[30]

In 1972, Michael Forrestall, the defence critic in the Conservative shadow cabinet, warned when Trudeau again stated he would use the War Measures Act again, "the deliberate use of the military to enforce the will of one group of Canadians over the will of another group of Canadians is detrimental to the credibility of the armed forces."[23]: 257  The size of the FLQ organization and the number of sympathizers in the public was not known. However, in its Manifesto, the FLQ stated: "In the coming year (Quebec Premier Robert) Bourassa will have to face reality; 100,000 revolutionary workers, armed and organized."[31] Given that declaration, along with seven years of bombings and the wording of their communiques throughout that time that strove to present an image of a powerful organization spread secretly throughout all sectors of society, the authorities took significant action.

The events of October 1970 marked a significant loss of support for the violent wing of the Quebec sovereigntist movement that had gained support over nearly ten years,[1]: 256  and increased support for political means of attaining independence, including support for the sovereigntist Parti Québécois, which went on to take power at the provincial level in 1976. After the defeat of the Meech Lake Accord, which sought to amend the Constitution of Canada to resolve the passage by a previous government of the Constitution Act 1982 without Quebec's ratification, a pro-independence political party, the Bloc Québécois, was also created at the federal level.

The deployment of the military as an aid to civil power was very unpopular with the senior leadership of the Canadian Forces.[23]: 257  In the 1950s, the primary purpose of the Canadian Army was to fight against the Red Army in Central Europe if World War Three broke out.[23]: 238  During the Pearson years and even more so under Trudeau, there was a tendency on the part of the government to cut military spending and to shift the role of the Canadian Forces over to more as an internal security force.[23]: 256  In 1968–69, Trudeau had seriously considered pulling out of NATO and stayed only to avoid damaging relations with the United States and Western Europe.

On April 3, 1969, Trudeau announced that Canada would stay in NATO after all, but he drastically cut military spending and pulled out half of the 10,000 Canadian soldiers and airmen stationed in West Germany.[23]: 255  In the same speech, Trudeau stated that safeguarding Canada against external and internal threats would be the number-one mission of the Canadian Forces, guarding North America in co-operation with the United States would be the number-two mission, and NATO commitments would be the number-three mission.[23]: 255  In early 1970, the government introduced a white paper Defence in the Seventies, which stated the "Priority One" of the Canadian Forces would be upholding internal security rather than preparing for World War III, which of course meant a sharp cut in military spending since the future enemy was now envisioned to be the FLQ rather than the Red Army.[23]: 256 

The October Crisis, much to the dismay of the generals, was used by Trudeau as an argument for transforming the Canadian Forces into a force whose "Priority One" was internal security.[23]: 257  Many officers knew very well that the "Priority One" of internal security was "a greater threat than any other potential role."[23]: 255  By the end of the 1970s, the Canadian Forces had been transformed by Trudeau into an internal security force that was not capable of fighting a major conventional war.[23]: 259–260 

By 1982, all the convicted participants had been paroled, and all of those sent to Cuba had returned to Canada, some completing short sentences in Canada.

In 1988, the War Measures Act was replaced by the Emergencies Act and the Emergency Preparedness Act.

Cinema and television

  • Action: The October Crisis of 1970 and Reaction: A Portrait of a Society in Crisis, two 1973 documentary films by Robin Spry.[32]
  • Les Ordres, a historical film drama, directed in 1974 and based on the events of the October Crisis and the War Measures Act; concerning the effect it had on people in Quebec.[33]
  • Quebec director Pierre Falardeau shot in 1994 a movie titled Octobre which tells a version of the October Crisis based on a book by Francis Simard.[34]
  • is partially set in Montreal during the October Crisis and features fictional FLQ members planning a bombing.[35]
  • CBC Television produced a two-hour documentary program Black October in 2000, in which the events of the crisis were discussed in great detail. The program featured interviews with former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, former Quebec justice minister Jérôme Choquette, and others.[36]
  • La Belle province, 2001 documentary film by Ad Hoc Films Montreal. Tele-Quebec, on the events leading to the death of Pierre Laporte.[37]
  • L'Otage, 2004 documentary film by Ad Hoc Films Montreal. Tele-Quebec, Richard Cross, his wife and his daughter remember how they suffered during October 1970.
  • Tout le monde en parlait « La crise d'Octobre I » Radio Canada 2010. Documentary relating the events of October 1970.[38][39]
  • An eight-part miniseries about some of the incidents of the October Crisis titled October 1970 was released on October 12, 2006.[40]
  • Just Watch Me: A Trudeau Musical, a 2015 Play at the Vancouver Fringe Festival[41]

References

  1. ^ a b c Fournier, Louis (1984). F.L.Q. : the anatomy of an underground movement. Toronto: NC Press. ISBN 9780919601918. OCLC 11406935.
  2. ^ English, John (2009). The life of Pierre Elliott Trudeau (1st ed.). Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf Canada. ISBN 9780676975215. OCLC 68815662.
  3. ^ "Chronology of the October Crisis, 1970, and its Aftermath – Quebec History". Retrieved April 13, 2008.
  4. ^ "Top Ten Greatest Canadians – Tommy Douglas". Archived from the original on April 25, 2008. Retrieved April 13, 2008.
  5. ^ "The Globe and Mail: Series – Pierre Elliott Trudeau 1919–2000". Archived from the original on January 18, 2008. Retrieved April 20, 2008. Seven people had died and dozens had been injured. In retrospect, it seems impossible, but one bomb was planted somewhere in Quebec every 10 days.
  6. ^ https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/jan-1-1969-when-flq-bombs-rang-in-the-new-year-for-montrealers/article33462689/
  7. ^ "Chronology of the October Crisis, 1970, and its Aftermath – Quebec History". .marianopolis.edu. Archived from the original on February 13, 2007. Retrieved February 19, 2011.
  8. ^ a b Bothwell, Robert; Drummond, Ian M.; English, John (January 1989). Canada since 1945: power, politics ... – Google Books. ISBN 9780802066725. Retrieved February 19, 2011 – via Google Books.
  9. ^ Appendix D of “The October Crisis, 1970: An Insiders View”, by Prof. William Tetley. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on June 14, 2009. Retrieved June 23, 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. ^ Tetley, William. The October Crisis, 1970 : An Insider View, pg 202. Demers, Robert. "Memories of October 70 (2010)" https://sites.google.com/site/octobercrisis70/
  11. ^ "The October Crisis: Civil Liberties Suspended | CBC Archives". Archives.cbc.ca. Retrieved February 19, 2011.
  12. ^ a b Demers, Robert. "Memories of October 70 (2010)" https://sites.google.com/site/octobercrisis70/
  13. ^ "The Globe and Mail: Series – Pierre Elliott Trudeau 1919–2000". Archived from the original on January 18, 2008. Retrieved April 13, 2008.
  14. ^ FLQ: The Anatomy of an Underground Movement
  15. ^ "Révélations sur la mort de Pierre Laporte" [Revelations on the murder of Pierre Laporte]. Radio Canada (in French). September 24, 2010. Retrieved March 18, 2013.
  16. ^ "Statement by René Lévesque on the War Measures Act – Quebec History". Faculty.marianopolis.edu. October 17, 1970. Retrieved February 19, 2011.
  17. ^ Montreal Star interview of Bernard Mergler published December 7, 1970 http://www.tou.tv/tout-le-monde-en-parlait/S05E16 Archived March 8, 2013, at the Wayback Machine [archive]
  18. ^ "Chronology of the October Crisis, 1970, and its Aftermath – Quebec History". .marianopolis.edu. Archived from the original on February 13, 2007.
  19. ^ a b c d Tetley, William (2007). The October Crisis, 1970 : an insider's view. Montréal [Que.]: McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 9780773576605. OCLC 716062232.
  20. ^ "Chronology of the October Crisis, 1970, and its Aftermath – Quebec History". Retrieved April 13, 2008. There was widespread editorial approval of the action taken by the federal government; only Claude Ryan, in Le Devoir, condemned it as did René Lévesque, leader of the Parti Québécois. Polls taken shortly afterwards, showed that there was as much as 92% approval for the action taken by the Federal government.
  21. ^ "Chronology of the October Crisis, 1970, and its Aftermath – Quebec History". Retrieved April 13, 2008. In a series of polls conducted over the next few weeks, public support for the course of action undertaken by the Government of Canada continued to be overwhelming (72 to 84% approval rate). In a poll conducted on December 19 by the Canadian Institute of Public Opinion, Canadians indicated that their opinion of Trudeau, Bourassa, Caouette and Robarts, who had all expressed strong support for the War Measures Act, was more favourable than before, while their view of Stanfield and Douglas, who had expressed reservations for the Act, was less favourable than previously.
  22. ^ "Operation Ginger and Operation Essay". Retrieved January 16, 2018 – via Archeion – MemoryBC – Aberta on Record.
  23. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Desmond., Morton (1999). A military history of Canada (4th ed.). Toronto: McClelland & Stewart. ISBN 9780771065149. OCLC 44844868.
  24. ^ "Socialist History Project – Socialists and the October Crisis, Part 2". Retrieved April 13, 2008.
  25. ^ Belanger, Claude. "Chronology of the October Crisis, 1970, and its Aftermath – Quebec History". History Prof. Marianopolis College. Retrieved January 26, 2014.
  26. ^ Tetley, William. "The Importance of the Quebec "October Crisis, 1970" to the "Quiet Revolution" in the Province of Quebec (and the rest of Canada (ROC) as well)". McGill University. Archived from the original on March 3, 2014. Retrieved January 24, 2014.
  27. ^ Clement, Dominique (2008). "The October Crisis of 1970: Human Rights Abuses Under the War Measures Act" (PDF). The Journal of Canadian Studies. 42 (2): 160–186. doi:10.3138/jcs.42.2.160. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
  28. ^ "Quebec terrorists FLQ kidnapped 2 & began the Oct crisis". Archived from the original on January 31, 2008. Retrieved April 13, 2008. Public opinion polls showed that nearly nine in 10 citizens – both Anglo and French-speaking – supported Trudeau's hardline tactics against the FLQ.
  29. ^ "Top Ten Greatest Canadians – Tommy Douglas". Archived from the original on April 25, 2008. Retrieved April 13, 2008. The decision to vote against the motion (which passed with a majority vote) was not viewed favourably; the NDP's approval rating dropped to seven percent in public opinion polls. Still, Douglas maintained that Trudeau was going too far: "The government, I submit, is using a sledgehammer to crack a peanut."
  30. ^ "Remembering Robert Stanfield: A Good-Humoured and Gallant Man" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 14, 2008. Retrieved April 13, 2008. That particular backing [of the War Measures Act] was Stanfield's only regret in a long political life. He later admitted that he wished he had joined his lone dissenting colleague, David MacDonald, who voted against the Public Order Temporary Measures Act when it came before the House that November.
  31. ^ Marcel Rioux (1971). Quebec in Question. Lorimer. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-88862-191-7.
  32. ^ Spry, Robin (1973). "Action: The October Crisis of 1970". Documentary film. National Film Board of Canada. Retrieved October 5, 2009.
  33. ^ "Les ordres". Canadian Film Encyclopedia. Film Reference Library. Archived from the original on December 15, 2006. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  34. ^ Landry, Gabriel (March 1974). "Pierre Falardeau tourne Octobre" (PDF). Érudit (in French). No. 71. pp. 4–8. ISSN 0707-9389.
  35. ^ "Nô" (PDF). New Yorker Films. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2006. Retrieved March 7, 2008.
  36. ^ "Black October – DVD". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on October 5, 2007. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  37. ^ Collard, Nathalie (October 11, 2000). "Médias : La Belle Province". Voir (in French). Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  38. ^ "La crise d'Octobre (I): l'engrenage". Tout le monde en parlait (in Canadian French). Radio Canada. September 23, 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  39. ^ "Crise d'octobre (II): le dénouement". Tout le monde en parlait (in Canadian French). Radio Canada. September 24, 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  40. ^ Armstrong, Jane (February 18, 2006). "FLQ on CBC". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  41. ^ Duhatschek, Paula (August 31, 2015). "Fringe 2015: Just Watch Me: A Trudeau Musical". The Ubyssey. Retrieved October 3, 2018.

Further reading