People's history

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"History from below" redirects here. For the Delta Spirit album, see History from Below (album).
Main article: Social history

A people's history, history from below,[1] or folk history is a type of historical narrative which attempts to account for historical events from the perspective of common people rather than political and other leaders.

"History from below"[edit]

Lucien Febvre first used the phrase "histoire vue d'en bas et non d'en haut" (history seen from below and not from above) in 1932 when praising Albert Mathiez for seeking to tell the "histoire des masses et non de vedettes" (history of the masses and not of starlets).[2] However it was E. P. Thompson's essay History from Below in The Times Literary Supplement (1966) which brought the phrase and "people's history" to the forefront of historiography from the 1970s.[3]


A people's history (otherwise known as social history) is the history of the world that is the story of mass movements and of the outsiders. Individuals not included in the past in other type of writing about history are part of history-from-below theory's primary focus, which includes the disenfranchised, the oppressed, the poor, the nonconformists, the subaltern and the otherwise forgotten people. This theory also usually focuses on events occurring in the fullness of time, or when an overwhelming wave of smaller events cause certain developments to occur.

This revisionist approach to writing history is in direct opposition to methods which tend to emphasize single great figures in history, referred to as the Great Man theory; it argues that the driving factor of history is the daily life of ordinary people, their social status and profession. These are the factors that "push and pull" on opinions and allow for trends to develop, as opposed to great people introducing ideas or initiating events.

In his book A People's History of the United States, Howard Zinn wrote: "The history of any country, presented as the history of a family, conceals fierce conflicts of interest (sometimes exploding, most often repressed) between conquerors and conquered, masters and slaves, capitalists and workers, dominators and dominated in race and sex. And in such a world of conflict, a world of victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people, as Albert Camus suggested, not to be on the side of the executioners."[4]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ E. P. Thompson, “History from Below,” Times Literary Supplement, 7 April 1966, 279-80.
  2. ^ When the State Trembled 1442660228 Reinhold Kramer, Tom Mitchell - 2010 "It was Lucien Febvre who first used the phrase 'history from below' when in 1932 he observed that Albert Mathiez, a founding member of the Annales tradition, had sought 'histoire des masses et non de vedettes; histoire vue d'en bas en non ..."
  3. ^ Black and MacRaild Studying History 2007 Page 113 "E. P. Thompson's essay, 'History from below', in the Times Literary Supplement (1966), was the real starting point, not only of the term, but of attempts to define it, to intellectualise about it, and to give it a coherent agenda...."
  4. ^ chapter: Columbus, The Indians, and Human Progress

Further reading[edit]

External articles[edit]