This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artemis Fowl, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Artemis FowlWikipedia:WikiProject Artemis FowlTemplate:WikiProject Artemis FowlArtemis Fowl
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
Artemis Fowl was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support But I don't think the disambiguation page should even exist. It would be rather non-controversial for the admin to delete it and just move the page to the main namespace.ZXCVBNM (TALK)10:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are still three topics with standalone articles that could be referred to as "Artemis Fowl" alone—the series, the first book, and the protagonist. I don't think deletion would serve any good. --BDD (talk) 16:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The series page would encompass and link to the other two, perhaps with a hatnote if necessary. Therefore the disambiguation page is pointless as they are not wholly unrelated topics. The only reason Harry Potter has one is because of the journalist of the same name.ZXCVBNM (TALK)21:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.