Talk:Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health

A fact from Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health (pictured) is one of the most frequented religious sites in India, drawing nearly 2 million pilgrims annually?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

Wikipedia

Catholicism Low‑importance

Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Christianity: India Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as High-importance).

India: Tamil Nadu Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in September 2016.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Text and/or other creative content from Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health was copied or moved into Christianity in Tamil Nadu with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Better merge with this with Velankanni article

CLOSED

The merge nomination is 10 years old. There is no discussion on this particular merge nomination. Closed as per WP:Consensus. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Administrative closure

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There is no development of this article as the article Velankanni is getting lot of inputs and has lot of required information. It is time to merge this article with Velankanni article as both are to speak the same contents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrownyCat (talk • contribs) 00:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree I strongly appose this move. This is about an important church building and is rated as Rated B-class, Mid-importance by WikiProject Christianity in India. This church is one of the most famous in India and the most famous catholic church in south India. This article should stay. The reason that there is no improvement is not a valid one. Let it stay as a stub, if it has to. But please do not merge it with an article about a governmental jurisdiction. --Jayarathina (talk) 13:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@BrownyCat: I also feel the same but in the opposite way.

@Jayarathina: Why not merge Our Lady of Good Health into this B class article to avoid WP:duplicate content? Both have pretty much the same content. We can move whatever little extra matter sections and pictures were found, from the Lady of Good Health article to here. Yochikapika (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Existing content is quite good. Article could stand for some content regarding the structure of the building, such as construction materials, design, layout of the building, etc, as such content tends to be required on any articles relative to buildings. John Carter 14:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Nice work! John Carter 14:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]