Talk:Ching Hammill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • article was sufficiently expanded in the last week, it is long enough, and the article is well-written. The hook is an appropriate length and meets all requirements. QPQ was completed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Sic]?[edit]

The article includes the following statements:

  • A 1922 article in The Bridgeport Telegram said his "greatest feat on the gridiron this season [sic] was his 53 yard run back of a punt which he scored a touchdown."
  • "Details of the accident are meagre but from the scattered accounts pieced together by E. L. Fletcher, structural engineer of the American Tube and Stamping company, Hammill with another workman was on the roof of one of the buildings shortly before 9 o'clock this morning[sic]."

What's with the sics? There is nothing to indicate (a) that the 53-yard run back didn't take place during the season that the article was published, or (b) that the accident didn't take place in the morning of the day as to which the article's dateline, November 24, 1925, was applied. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remove them. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ching Hammill/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (No original research): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Notes[edit]

  • "After playing college football for Connecticut he played four seasons" fix grammar or add comma
    • Comma added.
  • if you look at ref 1, its probably worth saying should his legs were amputated
    • Added.
  • "received more playing time u" he was already on the varsity eleven so not sure how he could have gotten more playing time if he was already starting? The source says he switched from end to backfield in 1918.
    • Changed.
  • add he was an end in 1917
    • Added.
  • do you know if his all new england was first or second team? Add to infobox
    • Uncertain of whether he was first or second team, but added to infobox.

That's all I think. Nice work. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All points have been addressed. Passing the article. Nice work! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]