Talk:Clambake (film)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Citation needed

The comment in the intro that this film marked the introduction of drug taking "that would eventually kill him" is awfully POV as it stands. A citation is needed, otherwise the comment needs to be removed. 23skidoo 03:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ElvisClambake.JPG

Image:ElvisClambake.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for image updated. --Northmeister 16:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clambake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070823091731/http://www.digitallyobsessed.com/index.php3 to http://www.digitallyobsessed.com/index.php3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When is a source not a source?

We now have this source: Rachael Seravalli (February 23, 2005). "A UNL researcher reacts to science in the movies". Lincoln Journal Star. Retrieved 23 March 2012. But it still came as a surprise to Mark Griep to learn The King played a chemist in 1967's "Clambake" a discovery made all the more abrupt because this detail oddly was missing from the movie-box description.

I have no idea what in the article is drawn from it, though. Mysha (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 June 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 02:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clambake → Clambake (film) – Clambake: A History and Celebration of an American Tradition by Kathy Neustadt and dozens of other books. Redirect Clambake to Clam bake or Clambake (disambiguation) as appropriate. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is clam-baking in general more or less noteworthy than this film? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Apparently it was notable enough for them to make a movie about it. bd2412 T 13:36, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course. "Clambake" capitalized is still 'clambake' (all the same for the poor clams, who were just going about their lives). Randy Kryn (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support move and redirect "Clambake" to Clam bake. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly support - "clambake" should either be retargeted to Clam bake or Clambake (disambiguation). Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - not primary and to make room for the related move at Talk:New England clam bake#Requested move 24 June 2018. Clambake (disambiguation) should not be moved. -- Netoholic @ 04:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support and redirect Clambake to New England clam bake. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Closing comment: Although this close is technically just a few hours early, consensus is clear and this impacts another RM. Andrewa (talk) 02:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.