Talk:Double Dare (Nickelodeon game show)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Double Dare (1986 game show))
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Double Dare (Nickelodeon game show) has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
June 13, 2017 Good article nominee Listed
August 16, 2017 Featured article candidate Not promoted
October 5, 2017 Featured article candidate Not promoted
Current status: Good article


WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A version of this article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on July 4, 2017. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.
 


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Double Dare (Nickelodeon game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Double Dare (Nickelodeon game show)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 00:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


I'll look this one over and review it later. Sagecandor (talk) 00:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 13, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: This article is of a good quality. My only complaint is with the one sentence long paragraph as the first paragraph of the intro, I suggest merging it, or expanding it. Writing quality is good, it is "clear and concise" per WP:WIAGA. Article has good structural organization and layout. Readability has good flow throughout for the reader between transitions.
2. Verifiable?: Article is very very very well cited throughout.
3. Broad in coverage?: Article is thorough, covering major aspects including Introduction, Gameplay, Main game, Physical challenges, Obstacle course, Personnel, Hosts and personalities, Production staff, Broadcast and production history, 1986–1989, 1990–2011, 2012–present, Reception and achievements, Ratings and impact, Critical reception, Other media, Portrayals and parodies, Merchandise and promotions. Production history is broad and expansive. You can clearly tell a significant amount of research and effort went into this. Well done !
4. Neutral point of view?: Article is presented in a neutral tone. Writing style is matter of fact wording. All assertions of fact backed up to appropriate sources. Appears to be NPOV article.
5. Stable? No ongoing edit wars. No major talk page conflicts.
6. Images?: Four free use images. These have good licensing. Two fair use images. Suggest removing and deleting one, and only having one fair use image. Suggestion for future improvement only.

Good job ! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 23:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review this article! I appreciate the comments! — Chad1m Email Talk Cont. 03:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)