|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edward Bulwer-Lytton article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This is not a forum for general discussion about Edward Bulwer-Lytton. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Edward Bulwer-Lytton at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.|
- 1 2003
- 2 2005
- 3 To the Sentence
- 4 A fine Victorian stylist?
- 5 fwiw paul clifford
- 6 The Great Unwashed
- 7 It was a dark and stormy night
- 8 strange
- 9 "Great Unwashed"
- 10 Not one of the first SF novels
- 11 Bias in favour of the Almighty Contest
- 12 Circumstances of Death
- 13 Not a forum
- 14 Radio Times quote (Claire Webb)
- 15 Pronunciation
- 16 Falkland (1827) and Falkland (1834)
- 17 Bad News: "The Pen Is Mighter Than The Sword," which he coined...
- 18 Are you for serious
- 19 The pen is
- 20 I can't find "the great unwashed" text in Paul Clifford.
- 21 Literary works
- 22 Requested move
What about adding the 1911 encyclopedia article? --Keichwa 17:30 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)
- done --Keichwa 20:41, 7 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Removed from Edward George Bulwer-Lytton:
- Edward George Bulwer-Lytton was also a terrific artist. For example, his painting THE LAST DAYS OF POMPEII is quite famous.
Bulwer-Lytton as a painter isn't known to me. Where can I see this picture? --Keichwa 19:41, 7 Sep 2003 (UTC)
To the Sentence
Personaly, I don't find that sentence so horrible, quite normal actualy. New Babylon
- Do you mean the famous "It was a dark and stormy night..." sentence? Are not all stormy nights dark?
- Well yes,but the level of the darknes is different-when there's no cloud's and there's a full moon it's generaly more lighted then when there's either a storm,or an eclipse,so the emphasizing on the word "dark" could also be interpreted as extremely dark,aka. having even less light then usual.New Babylon
A fine Victorian stylist?
On what basis do we call him this? I've not read more than a few pages of Bulwer-Lytton, but comparing what I've read to other Victorian writers - even to one so mediocre as Wilkie Collins, leaves Bulwer-Lytton rather short. Do critics actually consider him a good stylist? john k 18:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I claim that he IS a fine and wery,WERY good writter and all this is disacreting,I mean you just stamp him negativly and then people will get psychicly blocked from even Trying to read something (and they'd find out it's pretty good).Yours Truly (New Babylon)
Bulwer-Lytton was not a great stylist (although his writing improved with time and experience) but he was adequate and could be colorful on occasion. Like Wilkie Collins (mentioned above) he could even be inspired on occasion when given a good idea or character to develop.
You could sign.Anyway I liked his works pretty much actualy,his short story about a haunted house inspired me quite a bit.Also "The Last Days of the Pompeii" were Masterfully written. New Babylon 15:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
fwiw paul clifford
frankly, I think BL was parodying novels of his time in general in this work.
The Great Unwashed
Hi, I was redirected to this page when looking for "The Great Unwashed" - it is quite interesting, but it does not answer my original question! (Being: What the heck does "The Great Unwashed" *mean*?)“
Those who aren't of the elite, as spoken of by the elite. The hoi polloi, the lumpenproletariat, the lowest common denominator; Tom, Dick, and Harry; the man in the street/man on the Clapham omnibus, etc. Scutigera (talk) 05:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
It was a dark and stormy night
I said it once and Ill say it again-this sentence has nothing so "bad! about it.A simple example-if there is a night where clouds obstruct the moon,then it is a DARK knight and when those clouds are rain clouds and it rains,its a STORMY night.A dark night does NOT necesarily HAVE to be STORMY.If it would go "stormy and dark" THEN it would have been "bad" ,however I have often seen nights witch are DARK and are NOT stormy.Therefore I believe this (plus the contest of bad literature,given Edward Bulwer-Lytton's name) an unfair disgrace of the writer.
New Babylon 2 12:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Have you read the rest of the opening sentence? 'Dark and stormy night' is just a dull, undescriptive cliché, but the rest of the sentence is truly terrible, and entirely deserves its infamy. Terraxos (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Why or how is it dull? It reflects the Romantic interest in the sublime. As the previous writer noted, it is imformative. Is it a cliche? Now, yes. But had it ever been used before B-L? If so, why is he given (dis)credit? If not, then it WAS hardly a cliche. Shall we like-wise call WS the most cliche-ridden writer since the Bible?
- The sentence in full really isn't bad at all. I can easily picture a dark street, the rain showers, the blasts of wind. Modern literature tries to hook the reader with a catchy opening in the first few sentences, but Victorian literature often begins with evocative description. Compare the opening to Bleak House: "London. Michaelmas term lately over, and the Lord Chancellor sitting in Lincoln's Inn Hall. Implacable November weather. As much mud in the streets as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth, and it would not be wonderful to meet a Megalosaurus, forty feet long or so, waddling like an elephantine lizard up Holborn Hill. Smoke lowering down from chimney-pots, making a soft black drizzle, with flakes of soot in it as big as full-grown snowflakes—gone into mourning, one might imagine, for the death of the sun. Dogs, undistinguishable in mire. Horses, scarcely better; splashed to their very blinkers..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afalbrig (talk • contribs) 09:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- It may be a cliché now but it wasn't a cliché when he wrote it.
how is it possible that the book zanoni is influenced by Bulwer Lyttons membership of the english Rosicrucian Society which was founded in 1867, while the book was published in 1842? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
A quick Google Books search reveals the phrase "the great unwashed" in the 1835 book The Unfortunate Man by Frederic Chamier (New York: Harper & Bros., p. 164):
|“||Police. — Mansion-house. — Yesterday John Snob was brought before the lord-mayor, charged with having endeavoured to purloin the portmanteau, great-coat, and umbrella of one Benjamin Banana, Esq., a gentleman who has resided some time in the East Indies, and who, from his spruce appearance and extraordinary manner, excited the attention of a crowd of the great unwashed.||”|
Here is a Google Books link.
I found the phrase in Thackeray's "Pendennis" (1850):
Colleges, schools, and inns of courts still have some respect for antiquity, and maintain a great number of the customs and institutions of our ancestors.... The poorest mechanic in Spitalfields has a cistern and an unbounded suppy of water at his command; but the gentlemen of the inns of court [have only water fetched in jugs].... Gentlemen, there can be but little doubt that your ancestors were the Great Unwashed. [www.gutenberg.org]
The context seems to imply that Thackery was making a pun on a well-known phrase. Chamier wouldn't be the first literary one-hit wonder to be outlived by his work. Scutigera (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
"The Great Unwashed": Historical and socio-political context
Like many others, I have long known of the phrase "the great unwashed", which has entered the lexicon and is typically used unattributed, with most people probably unaware of its origin or context, unless they seek out the source, or learn it along the way.
I am one of the latter. I didn't set out to learn the source. I learned along the way, courtesy of Wikipedia and the contributions of editors such as above. And given the time-period, I can also see the context, again courtesy of Wikipedia, and the reading around I have been doing in my own contributions. Sanitation and hygiene were particularly salient issues of that era, to the extent that it impacted mortality in the population at large, and in hospitals. And then along come the overlapping hydropathy and sanitation movements of the 1840s onwards, followed by a series of parliamentary acts to facilitate the construction of baths and washhouses for the general public. So "the great unwashed" is not just a quote, the origins of which are oft forgotten or unawares, it is a quote with context.Wotnow (talk) 01:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Wotnow.
- The phrase originates before the widespread introduction of indoor plumbing. At the time only the rich had bathrooms and washing facilities. Everyone else had to have a wash or bath in a tin bath in front of the fire, or wash using a tin bucket filled from a well - if they washed at all. Hence the phrase.
Not one of the first SF novels
'Unquestionably, its story of a subterranean race of men waiting to reclaim the surface is one of the first science fiction novels." - I guess it depends on what one understands by "one of" ( one of three, one of thirty, one of three hundred?), but - especially with the first word fo the sentence - I can't see how this can be claimed. Consider Tyssot de Patot's hollow-earth novel La Vie, Shelley's two novels, Loudon's Mummy, and Verne's earlier novels for starters. Kdammers (talk) 11:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Bias in favour of the Almighty Contest
Why does this page clearly serve for the sole purpose of bashing on Lytton?I mean,aside from claims that his "name is a byword for bad writing",to which the sole reference is the existence of the contest,which is also shown not in an exactely neutral point of view-but I must also complain about the links-the "Dickens of Lytton" page outright calls Lytton "the worst author in the history of leters" ,once again basing its asumptions solely on the EXISTENCE of the contest.
Methinks, this "bad" writing was a style, and B-L was a pioneer of this movement. Think of this. Back then, "novels" were serialized on newspapers and magazines, and read to the (illiterate) factory workers aloud. So if you want to be a writer who survives on this kind of audience, you need to do two things.
(1) Write the novel as if it were rhetoric ... i.e., more florid languages, plenty of nested clauses, to describe things and the prior clauses.
(2) Introduce as many fillers and plot twists as possible, so that the story will take longer to tell (and therefore more money). For those who only listen a section of it a day, while there are other distractions, some of these elements would seem very exciting (probably because you don't give a damn after listening to it).
Some of these renowned writers in the Victorian era, like Dickens, Hardy, and B-L, all adopted this style of writing for the above mentioned audience. Their novels, came originally in serialized form, will certainly contain the above elements. Aside from being a source of colorful vocabulary, I personally find reading these works more frustrating than watching soap operas.
Take on the other hand, authors like Wells, Stoker, and Wilde do not serialize their novels the way the above authors did. The style of their novels are more in line with what we see in novels today: somewhat direct in their description, and much more focused in their themes and storyline.
So, I don't think it is really good or bad writing. It's just a style of writing that was catered to a niche audience (a pretty big niche, back in those days), and how quickly it ran in and out of vogue.
Circumstances of Death
There's very little about the circumstances surrounding his death: if some good soul might contribute a little of the wheres and whens and whys, it would be good. Otterswimshome (talk) 05:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Otterswimshome you may be interested in the last couple of para's that are now in the EBL 'Life' section. CPES (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Not a forum
The Wikipedia rules clearly state that the talk page is not a forum for general discussion. What you think of him, his books or his style is not what talk pages are for. They are stricly to discuss what should or should not be inserted in the article. If you can find critiques of his work by famous writers (either positive or negative), you may place that in the article if you wish, but having chat sessions about who likes him and who doesn't is AGAINST THE RULES. Mike Hayes (talk) 01:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Radio Times quote (Claire Webb)
Here is the email reply granting permission to place all or part of the above quote in the Wikipedia Bulwer-Lytton article:
Thank you for your email,
We can now grant you permission and we would have no objection to this provided that a credit for Radio Times is put on “by kind permission of Radio Times” which will indicate no payment has taken place.
Radio Times Reader Service (email@example.com)
- The quotation has the man's name in brackets with a wrong spelling. Can't this be corrected with-out creating a problem? Kdammers (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- I've pronounced it Litton for decades but I don't recall why.
- Varlaam (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- It's pronounced bull-yer-lit-ton. "Lytton" is a variation of Litton.
Falkland (1827) and Falkland (1834)
Bad News: "The Pen Is Mighter Than The Sword," which he coined...
...was a phrase also used by an English playwright, who wrote a few plays in the late 1500's and early 1600's. Actually they're quite good, and some people still read them today. You might have heard of him. It's very possible that Edward Bulwer-Lytton had read him, too. 220.127.116.11 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:52, 12 November 2010 (UTC).
Would you mind providing a citation for this? A computer search of Shakespeare's complete works (http://shakespeare.mit.edu/) turns up no such phrase. I suspect that, as occurs with many well known phrases, this line has been misattributed to the Bard, and the misattribution has then been passed around uncritically. Anlala (talk) 16:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Are you for serious
How many hundreds of references do you want me to produce that prove the infamy of the "it was a dark and stormy night" line? I mean, calling it 'famous' is virtually akin to saying that it is good. The consensus points in the other direction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vulpesinculta51 (talk • contribs) 13:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The pen is
I'm wondering how to reference something that I know personally to be true, but for which I don't have a written source. A friend of mine showed me a first edition he had bought of the book in which Bulwer-Lytton's play Richelieu first appeared in print. The way the famous quote appears is quite illuminating. "The pen is" appears at the end of a line, and the space between 'pen' and 'is' very noticeably narrower than all the other spaces on the page (presumably the typesetter used an n-space instead of an m-space). The implication is that B-L was suggesting "the penis--mightier than the sword" as well as its explicit meaning. I saw this with my own eyes, and know that it is a fact, but I don't want to include it in the article without some kind of independent citation. Am I right in thinking this is the proper Wikipedia procedure? Anlala (talk) 17:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
I can't find "the great unwashed" text in Paul Clifford.
Can anybody identify precisely where it is (page, chapter etc.)? I'm reading the original text and have searched multiple different sources and web based texts and it truly does not seem to be in this novel. --18.104.22.168 (talk) 04:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Follow up: OK I get it. The "unwashed" phrase and "lived cleanly" do not actually appear in the text of Paul Clifford. They appear in a footnote within the 'Dedicatory Epistle' that seems to have only appeared in early printings of the book. It seems to have been dropped from later printings and reprints, including the many so-called complete texts that can be downloaded. See reference #21 in the Article section of this entry. Suggest the original author rephrase the Article to explain more clearly where the phrase appears. Certainly most modern readers of the book will never see the Epistle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 00:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I was going to write here. Could anybody answer? There's no 'lived cleanly' in the various online texts either, probably the citation comes from another book. Glatisant (talk) 13:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
The last sentence I changed as it seemed fairly subjective regarding the "superior" earlier draft - I have tried to change it to reflect a more npov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)