Talk:Everest base camps

Climbing Mid‑importance

	Climbing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tibet Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Confusing

According to User:Yao Ziyuan

"This article may fail to make a clear distinction between North Base Camp and South Base Camp."

Rich Farmbrough, 08:26 8 October 2007 (GMT).

How High?

"South Base Camp is at 10 ft (3.1 m)"

I'm sure this is incorrect, but not knowing the correct number I'm not qualified to change it. McGehee (talk) 05:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everest Base Camp → Mount Everest Base Camp — To tally with all the pages about Mount Everest. We don't want people camping outside the double-glazing company, however cosy it might be. Ericoides (talk) 07:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Everest Base Camp is the common name and there's no need to disambiguate from the double glazing company in the United Kingdom, nor will there be until there's some sign of them being known in a base camp context. Jamesday (talk) 10:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry, that was a little joke. It was so weak, I assumed that much would be obvious. OK, let's call Mount Everest just Everest (as it's commonly called); the 1996 Mount Everest disaster just the 1996 Everest disaster (as it's commonly known), etc., etc. This is an encyclopedia and my feeling is that 1. consistency is important across a topic, and 2. informality in naming should be avoided. Ericoides (talk) 20:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We don't go for consistency of naming, we go with common English usage. That's Everest base camp, not Mount Everest base camp. I don't see any sign of a discussion of how the 1996 Mount Everest Disaster article should be named; it might end up being moved after consideration. Or not. In any case, it won't matter to how this article is named. I agree that Everest is the most common English usage. Maybe someone will choose to start a move discussion at Mount Everest, or just move it to follow naming policy. Jamesday (talk) 10:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. – ukexpat (talk) 18:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

After closure

Alas, I'm a bit too late to the discussion. While I understand the point the nominator was making (naming consistency), whenever I hear anyone talking about it, they usually refer to it as Everest Base Camp and do not include the Mount as when said in context, Mount is certainly implied and is understood as referring to the mountain. I myself don't include the Mount when I am referrng to it. I think common English usage indeed trumps in this scenario at this point in time. RedWolf (talk) 02:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, I think that all the above is correct reasoning and my naming consistency mania was, in this instance, misplaced. Ericoides (talk) 08:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split

Shouldn't this article be split into North and South versions? --Voidvector (talk) 04:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Everest base camps. Consensus favors the move, but without capitalization of "base camps". Note: article content needs to be reviewed/update to reflect this change. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 22:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Everest Base Camp → Everest Base Camps – @General Ization: The Nepali camp and the Tibetan camp are independent entities operating on their own terms. The current title lacks specificity as Rich_Farmbrough and Voidvector pointed out. The new title follows Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals) as this article is on groups or classes of specific things. LUMINR (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If it's changed to plural because it is about a group, then the capitalization should also be changed to Everest base camps because it is not a proper noun. Rreagan007 (talk) 08:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support but Everest base camps because it is not a proper noun. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Everest base camps. Rreagan007 (talk) 01:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Change Rombuk to Rongbuk for consistency.

There is only one instance of Rombuk in this article, while Rongbuk is mentioned at least 5x. For consistency shouldn’t it be changed? echo7tango (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]