Jump to content

Talk:Fernand Sanz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 24 September 2014

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page/target occupied, per the discussion below. Not moved to parenthetical because this would conflict with WP:NATURAL, and not moved to Fernando Sanz because the target is already occupied by an article. If a move is still desired, I would suggest making a multimove request in order to determine the primary topic for the target title. Further, it does not appear to be the case that this is simply a spelling error. Dekimasuよ! 23:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Dekimasuよ! 23:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Fernand SanzFernando Sanz – It's time correct a five-year-old spelling mistake. – Surtsicna (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've been trying to, but few of them turn up. Perhaps I am looking in the wrong places. Nothing but Wikipedia mirrors seem to use "Fernand". Surtsicna (talk) 07:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Surtsicna Okay, I've found three: L'Opinion 1932 p.188 ", un demi-frère d'Alphonse XIII, Fernand Sanz (lequel, après avoir vainement revendiqué un titre et l'octroi de quelques pesetas a la Cour d'Espagne, finit coureur cycliste), .." José María Zavala: Bastardos y Borbones: Los hijos desconocidos de la dinastía, Elena y el Rey: La historia del amor prohibido. Maybe you would add all 3 of these to the article. On the strength of them now support the move to Fernando' as the bio is more notable as a Spanish natural son of the king than as a French cyclist. In fact as a minor noble, per WP nobility naming conventions the full name Fernando Sanz y Martínez de Arizala might be more appropriate than simple citizen "Fernando Sanz". In ictu oculi (talk) 14:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Though if Fernando Sanz y Martínez de Arizala is preferred per WP:Natural User:EdJohnston's comment about moving the footballer to Fernando Sanz (footballer) still stands, but the baseline could still redirect Special:WhatLinksHere/Fernando_Sanz even with (footballer) as he is no mere stub but was also president of Malaga FC. Unless someone wants to volunteer to fix those 20 links and make a TWODAB. Not me. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Where do the naming conventions say that full name is preferred? I was under impression that parenthetical disambiguation is preferred to full names. Surtsicna (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I said "if", I'm not familiar with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Other royals In ictu oculi (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fernand Sanz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]