Jump to content

Talk:Fragments of Him

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lead image

[edit]

Given that we have a number of free images of the game, I question the value of the current lead image (which is non-free). Perhaps it could be replaced by one of the free images? Josh Milburn (talk) 02:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Josh Milburn: I've tried to contact the developers already, I never got a reply. I think we're stuck with using the current image for the logo. There's one copy in the presskit but it's white and doesn't come through when on white. Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So we have not only freely-licensed screenshots but a freely-licensed version of the logo and you're still choosing to go with non-free content? I'd be inclined to say that the lead image fails non-free content criterion 1. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@J Milburn: I'll take a look at WP:GL to see if someone can make the free versions readable on white. As for the current image, it might even be free because on the Press-kit page, the .mp4 which contains the current image is there. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@J Milburn: Scratch that, I've found a free logo that isn't white. Feel free to delete File:Fragments of Him - Steam logo.jpg now. (as rationale just put author requested). Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great- glad this has been resolved. Best of luck with the nomination. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Fragments of Him/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 01:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article soon. GamerPro64 01:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • I can't find any evidence that this game is an RPG. Sure RPGFan reviewed the game but they don't have it labeled as an RPG in their review. It's Steam page has it as a walking simulator but doesn't have it as an RPG.
Removed. I can't remember adding that as it's not in the infobox.
Gameplay
  • "with the player triggering snippets of narration by clicking on highlighted objects, after which the object disappears." The source didn't say anything about objects disappearing after you click on it. Watched a video of the game and the disappearing thing doesn't seem to be a thing in the game.
I must've read the sources wrong. It turns out clicking on people can make them disappear and reappear, not random objects.
  • "The narrative is in the first-person." This sentence should be part of the beginning of the first paragraph.
Done.
Development and release
  • "The game was released on the web gaming portal Kongregate in 2013." Maybe more that Giant Bomb link down to this sentence.
Sorry, what do you mean by this?
I meant move instead of more. You're good on this end. GamerPro64 13:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "during the 2016 Game Developers Conference (GDC 2016)" Any reason for the parenthesis?
Typically the Game Developers Conference is abbreviated to GDC. Although because it's not mentioned anywhere else in the article, I've removed it.
  • There's something about reading the second section that bothers me as you mention Nathan Grayson writing for Kotaku but the Rock, Paper, Shotgun article was also written by Grayson. Don't know what else to say about that really.
Don't really know how to fix this.
Not really something to fix. Just something I noticed. GamerPro64 13:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think have the development information should be before the information of the games release in this section.
Rearranged.
Reception
  • I don't think the Eurogamer link calls the game boring. Might be wrong though.
Copyedited.
  • Any chance there's information on its sales?
Nope. I've checked all the given references, the official site, the Steam page and tried a few google searches and they all came up with nothing.

Very well written all things considered. I think once the comments are addressed this can pass. GamerPro64 01:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GamerPro64: Thanks for the review. I think I've covered everything you've mentioned, except a couple. -- Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I think we're all good now. Promoting this article to GA status. GamerPro64 13:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fragments of Him. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fragments_of_Him&oldid=1207284415"