This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of the Philately WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of philately and stamp collecting. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or check out the Philately Portal.
I seem to recall reading that these so called bullet holes are actually weathering of the stone over the years. Can anyone confirm or deny this as it seems like an urban myth? I was involved in photographing the Bank or Ireland building in College Green during its restoration in the 1970s and 1980s and some of the stone deterioration looked quite similar to that alleged to be bullet holes on the GPO. Remember that both buildings are of similar age. Comments appreciated. ww2censor 15:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the holes in the Bank of Ireland in College Green are bullet holes too, as well as deterioration due to age. However, I have never heard any seriously challenge the notion that the holes in the GPO are bullet holes. It's not like it wasn't under heavy fire. Lexo 12:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I see RashersTierney's new citation from Frommer's Ireland. I'd really like to see something better source than a travel guide, perhaps an authoritative related architectural publication or a scholarly paper. ww2censor (talk) 02:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
There don't seem to have been any developments in the Irish government's plans to turn the GPO into a 1916 monument. It's still a very busy working post office and I suspect that any attempt to turn it into something else would be massively unpopular. Michael McDowell, the politician who announced the plan, lost his seat in the last election and retired from politics, and the 1916 commemorations came and went last year with no changes to the GPO. I suggest that this sentence be removed. Lexo 12:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC) h —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 08:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Rewritten to update new 2008 proposals that do not suggest moving out the post office. ww2censor (talk) 13:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The Irish spelling of GPO is given as "Ard-Oifig an Phoist" in the lead (which is also what the Irish Wikipedia says), but the image (and caption) says "Árd-Oifig an Phuist". Why the difference in spelling? Is it due to an orthographic reform? If so, this might deserve some mention in the article. Gabbe (talk) 10:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
The short answer is: yes. The sign pre-dates standardisation to the Caighdeán Oifigiúil (official standard) for spelling/etc in the early/mid 20th Century. Guliolopez (talk) 11:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Under the second image, the caption reads, "The Greek hexastyle portico of the General Post Office, completed in 1818. The Royal Coat of Arms, similar to those at King's Inns and the Irish Houses of Parliament, was removed after independence." It's not very clear whether this should mean that the coat of arms was similar to those at King's Inn and the Houses of Parliament, or if it was similarly removed. Perhaps someone who knows more about it could clarify? Ta Johnhousefriday (talk) 13:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
File:General Post Office Dublin.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:General Post Office Dublin.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. The subject of this article is a building, not a geographic place or a settlement. Per WP:NCDAB, comma-separated disambiguation is primarily only used for geographic names. But again, the General Post Office is an office building, not a topic that would generally fall under WP:PLACE (I would also support moving most of the buildings listed on General Post Office (disambiguation) from the comma convention to the parenthesis convention as well). Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Support. Seems to me the way we've been doing this (at least for Dublin) is with a comma - see Trinity College, Dublin and Mansion House, Dublin as examples. If the current consensus is to change, then a broader discussion with wider notification needs to take place. RashersTierney (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Support. This would be an absurd request for a post office in the USA, since parentheses are virtually always used this way for American buildings, but the comma format is definitely dominant for buildings in the British Isles. Nyttend (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Really? I thought it would be the other way around! Although (if I were a particularly stupid America) I might assume General Post Office, Pennsylvania (for instance) to be a city and not a building... interesting. Per your presumably more informed !vote, I'll support. RedSlash 17:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.