Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The more I think about it, the more I think this article should fully be in UK English to reflect where the game was created. It's important that it should use one or the other and this seems a fair way to decide. --John (talk) 21:09, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
This game is NOT available to get on PS3/PS Store
unfortunately at this time of writing, the game isn't available to get on the playstation store (try searching for it on the site if you want). the HD version is available on xbox though. can someone please remove ps3/playstation store from the platforms list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whisperer1982 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Is it confirmed that Capcom published Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas is Japan?
If so, could someone point me out a few sources that claim that on either here or my talk page. Thank you. Tanner Ghosen (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Video game cruft, largely unsourced article is not the subject of independent commentary. The few sources that I could find on the soundtrack/box set are enough to cover it adequately within its section of the game's article. And it can always expand out summary style. – czar 16:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC) – czar 16:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose the two articles being merged here, but support the two soundtrack articles being merged. I think that the soundtrack stuff would take up too significant a part of this article to merge in, it's a suitable use of a fork. However I don't see a reason the box set needs its own article. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't actually think any of the content needs to be merged (only stuff sourced to an actual source should be merged). Those articles don't have enough sources to stand as their own articles, though. – czar 17:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Trim them and see what's left. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I already did? It's all unsourced and there's zero to merge. (And if anyone really wants the track listings, they can pull them from the article history.) I redirected them here and it was contested, hence this rigmarole. It's common sense to redirect unsourced articles. If anyone wants to expand them summary style, they can start with the sections in the game article. – czar 18:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I'd say the track listings are quite important given we're discussing albums, and telling people to "pull them up from the article history" is deliberately hiding pertinent information you don't like. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
The Official Soundtrack's 23 tracks would be fine to list, as normal, but the track listing for the dozens of radio tracks should only be invoked as used by the sources (e.g., if they highlight a track, mention it, but don't just indiscriminately list dozens of tracks because it was once listed on IGN). czar 03:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose - Notable subject covered by multiple reliable sources.. No way you could fit the tracklisting in here. - hahnchen 23:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Why wouldn't everything that needs to be said about the soundtrack not fit in this article? And why would we list every track from the radio stations in this one or its own article? It's overkill. This is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. czar 03:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose - Just because not everything is sourced (which is not the case here, as you do not need to look far to find sources for this), does not mean it does not exist. Listing the radio stations and their playlists is not "overkill" because they make up a large part of the game itself.
P.S. Why did you not instigate this discussion before you created the redirects for the GTA IV and V soundtracks? 18.104.22.168 (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Answered this question wherever you first asked it czar 15:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose - I would say merge the two articles listed into their own. Definitely too big to merge into the GTA SA article proper. Definite fork as mentioned. I'll gladly take the time to investigate and add sources. I know a fair bit on my own due to extensive playing of the video game series. I just went to the GTA3 article looking for music information (I don't have it memorised), and it seems to be already lost (radio/music listings). Although GTA3 isn't as extensive as GTA:SA, even it deserves a forked article. Yes, other sources exist, but many people (myself included) come here first. Please leave and add any appropriate 'citation needed', and I'll work on it. Thanks! Baseballfan (talk) 03:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
They need to be expanded more than tagged citation needed, but anything unsourced obviously needs a source. I can appreciate that you've come to WP for this stuff in the past, but people also come for all kinds of minutiae outside the scope of Wikipedia. If these soundtrack articles warrant a separate page (and the full 70+ track listing), it should be easy enough to find reliable sources and write an article worthy of the extra space. czar 15:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll try and put some effort into it, and indeed, it will be easy to find sourced articles, as music in the GTA games plays quite a big role! Cheers! Baseballfan (talk) 03:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Oppose - +1 to mattbuck's suggestion to merge those two articles, just not here. Sethyre (talk) 19:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose - Notable subject with multiple reliable sources. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠(Talk) 10:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose - Some people may be looking for information found in the articles. ConCass (talk) 15:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Consensus is clear enough that I think y'all can move ahead with merging the two soundtracks. Count me as unconvinced, though. We'll see what another three years of decay will do for these pages. czar 04:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)