Talk:Great Wall Motor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fair use rationale for Image:Gwm-logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Gwm-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gwm-logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Gwm-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename article to Great Wall Motor (without "s")[edit]

This company and most media are calling "Great Wall Motor" (without the last "s"). --Love Krittaya (talk) 09:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With this asking to rename, I wait for answers about 1 months. Now I rename this article to Great Wall Motor. --Love Krittaya (talk) 09:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This should be reverted. It is either "Great Wall Motor Company Limited" or "Great Wall Motors". As per their website. --Hm2k (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of GWM[edit]

According to GWM's website and its new cars, its logo was changed. --Love Krittaya (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New logo uploaded --Love Krittaya (talk) 18:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?[edit]

What happened to this page??? It looks like info has been removed (e.g. a list of models). --Pineapple Fez 05:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

removal of "copying claims" section[edit]

I don't believe the "copying claims" section enriches the article or better informs the reader and have removed that section. Fleetham (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We all understand that in your country, China, copyright infringement is not a huge deal. The world is very familiar with this fact. But in the rest of the world, it is very important. As such, allegations of copyright infringement are hugely important to this article. Skiendog (talk) 03:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations without any citation or reference do not belong in Wiki. The fact that one product looks similar to another does not mean that it has been copied. Even if it seems so, you need to provide citation. Your assumptions or generalizations about someone's elses country is no reason for unsubstanciated claims. The claim that vehicles may have been copied has had no reference sourses since 2010. If the statement "may have benn copied" is not backed up by a reference, it will be removed. 106.68.188.100 (talk) 12:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Export/History[edit]

The information about GWM experience in Europe and the participation to Dakar race are correct but quite vague. In fact for both these strategic projects GWM has received a very important support from my person and my staff, as technical and commercial advisor from 2003 to 2007. I can say that without my cooperation, GWM would have been able to enter EU market but after two decades!!

Unfortunately they didn't report and recognise anywhere and anyhow such cooperation due to "priorities" related to commercial partnership in Italy. Anyway, I have evidence of my contribution as professional and expert of Auto Market, I think it should be fair to make it public (also to explain why ONLY this project is the one succeeding in Europe, and explain the asiatic approach to "developed markets" as well...).

In all fairness, I do hope Wikipedia will grant such opening to the truth.

Thanks for your attention.

Marco De Bonis General Manager D.O.G.E. Consulting Ltd marco.debonis@china-bedics.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.77.149.213 (talk) 01:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Great Wall Motors. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Great Wall Motors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Electric new energy[edit]

What is an "electric new energy vehicle"?125.236.202.112 (talk) 22:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Great Wall Motors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Great Wall Motors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of sources[edit]

A blanket argument against state-owned sources would also prohibit use of CBC, BBC, NPR and Al Jazeera as sources. All of these are owned by states and are subject to various levels of direct or indirect editorial interference. (For instance, in the case of the CBC, they tend to provide more sympathetic coverage to parties that don't threaten to cut their operating budget.) If you want to make that argument WP:RS/N is the place to go. But threats to get the article fully protected for a year are somewhat laughable, and I'd suggest that most of this boils down to one user disliking the PRC. Simonm223 (talk) 15:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article contains bizarre marketing material[edit]

The section on the WEY brand reads like a very poor translation of marketing copy. It contains lyrical prose with no information content. Eduard Grebe (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Wall_Motor&oldid=1207415222"