This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
According to modern author Elliot Horowitz, medieval Jews would often dress up Haman as a look-alike to Jesus, which provoked controversy with the Christian Church. This seems like an interesting footnote for the article, given the documented tendency in Jewish tradition to use symbolism in describing non-Jews or enemies of Judaism, for instance in cases where Amalekites are compared to Palestinians. The analogies also tend to apply with the figures of Esau and Rome. ADM (talk) 10:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Just one point - Jesus was not a non-Jew! 220.127.116.11 (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Was Haman supposedly going to hang just Mordecai on a gallows, and not everyone else? I suppose his idea of "killing everybody" had been to use swords and knives, like the Crusaders later did and also the Hutus and Tutsis. — Rickyrab | Talk 12:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment "The others seem rather obscure by comparison" is not a very strong argument. How about some google and page view stats? Perhaps a summary of the historical significance of the others? Instead of making every participant do this basic homework, why not do it for everyone once, summarize, and provide pertinent links? --В²C☎ 18:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Because sometimes a judgement about primary topic can be based on long-term cultural or historical significance, sometimes established just by reading the articles. Page view and google stats do not necessarily have the importance some people attach to them. PatGallacher (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Agree Definitely predominant use is the biblical figure. Born2cycle, why don't you do the searches, instead of putting down a good-willing editor with a good proposal? Debresser (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Support I agree that the predominant article is the one about the biblical figure. Lepricavark (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Support per the above. StAnselm (talk) 23:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Support per nom; clear primary topic. bd2412T 03:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.