Jump to content

Talk:Harry Bliss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Is there a reason that this page does not mention Bliss' single-panel comic, "Bliss"? DWorley (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reference to the single-panel comic. I suspect it is the same as the previously described "self-titled cartoon collection", except that the title of that collection is explicitly given as "Death by Laughter". Some editing is needed here! 65.96.67.63 (talk) 01:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Bliss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rockwell tribute in Controversies?

[edit]

Put in the citation for the quote in the section about Norman Rockwell, but should this be in Controversies at all? The original text describes Bliss's use of Rockwell's Pollock as part of the joke, not as anything controversial. Mwphil (talk) 13:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]