Jump to content

Talk:Joe Danger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJoe Danger has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
November 4, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
November 7, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 18, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 24, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that PlayStation Network game Joe Danger was made entirely by a team of just four people?
Current status: Good article

Image

[edit]

After having seen the disappointing PSN Store icon for Joe Danger. I'm in favour of keeping the artwork that we already have. It does the job of representing the game style, character and logo in a bettr way than the actual store icon does. Opinions? - X201 (talk) 11:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joe Danger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hibana (talk · contribs) 15:21, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    There are a few links that need some disambiguation:
    Lead: Daredevil should dab to Stunt performer, Sony should pinpoint to Sony Computer Entertainment
     Done — Joseph Fox 16:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Gameplay: Sonic the Hedgehog, I'm guessing, should dab to Sonic the Hedgehog (video game)
     Done — Joseph Fox 03:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Development: Black should dab to Black (video game)
     Done — Joseph Fox 03:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    There is some inconsistent styling among publications in the body and references. Several instances of sites like 1UP.com, Gamasutra, and Eurogamer don't need to be italicized.
     Done - What happened there is that the citeweb template automatically italicises the work= parameter for some reason, which ruined the coding. Now fixed. — Joseph Fox 03:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    In ref 39, GameRankings should be under the publisher parameter of the cite web template instead of work parameter. The duplicate work parameter for Metacritic in ref 40 is not needed.
     Done — Joseph Fox 03:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Refs 35 and 50: per Wikipedia:Red link, only use red links if you intend to create said article or if it's likely someone else will. Otherwise, delink them.
     Done — Joseph Fox 03:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    What makes Blue's News (of ref 24) a reliable source?
    It is listed over at WP:VG/RS, with the reasoning that it belongs to UGO Networks who are owned by IGN Entertainment. — Joseph Fox 14:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Calculating the generated revenue is original research, as the sources only list the number of units sold. Simply stating that the game sold at least 109,169 units in both the lead and the reception section should be sufficient anyway.
    See WP:CALC for that. Should be fine. — Joseph Fox 14:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Good work. ~ Hibana (talk) 16:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the critique and for the review, very helpful :) — Joseph Fox 16:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE request

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Joe Danger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ouya version

[edit]

Hi,

I think the Ouya port is missing in the article ([1]) FR (talk) 08:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Game relaunch

[edit]

I was just randomly reading news online, and this might be interesting. It's fairly recent, so we might need to update the article with this.

https://www.theguardian.com/games/2022/jan/28/broke-our-hearts-boy-with-autism-inspires-relaunch-of-popular-game

. A diehard editor Editing Wikipedia too much rn, talk to me here, bruh. 08:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Thanks for the link. - X201 (talk) 10:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Joe_Danger&oldid=1244176658"