Talk:Mary Wilson (singer)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mary Wilson (singer) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).

Michigan: Detroit Mid‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music High‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

The Supremes High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Supremes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Supremes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SupremesWikipedia:WikiProject The SupremesTemplate:WikiProject The SupremesThe Supremes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Propaganda

This was NOT written by the singer herself, but by a fan. Wikipedia needs to make sure to watch the person that keeps changing the bio. This person spews hatred and untrue facts about the legendary singer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.212.92.148 (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you brought up is rampart within Wikipedia...particularly, where The Supremes are mentioned, individually or collectively. Spenser - The Unknown (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Birth Date

Please check the birth date. I believe the correct date is March 6 Epicidiot 05:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, as does numerous websites. Main article date changed to 6 March 1944 accordingly.

Derek R Bullamore 11:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mwilson.jpg

Image:Mwilson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange

Yes, I agree with the one who thinks that the bio seems written by Mary Wilson. By the way, why the comment was removed? Censorship is not a good thing. Anyway, a fan is neither the best qualified to write about a celebrity. Where are the reliable facts? the references? This hagiographic page does no good to Mary Wilson and seems just like an extension of her autobiography (by the way that's a book that "spews hatred and untrue facts"). 90.46.28.17 (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah if your a ross fan.Saimaroimaru 2008 (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crack Addition

Is this mentioned in the artcle. Proof is in her book where she uses it during the 70's and don't forget to mention her affair with Tom Jones.Saimaroimaru 2008 (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. I read a portion of the book and she also talks about Tom Jones in the book, and talks about her experience with crack during her time in California in the 1970s, and the article doesn’t mention it 16 years later. TheGreatestLuvofAll ( chat with me ) 02:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Completely Biased

I'm a huge Supremes fan and this article is absolutely the most unscholarly thing I've read on a Motown act. It reads like it was written by a "fan" and not folks actually interested in providing a concise and balanced article. The discography is proof - did every "Ooh" and "Aah" need to be noted? Miss Wilson deserves better and there is absolutely NO personal information other than about her childhood. What about her marriages? Children? Aforementioned drug abuse? If her band and label mates are subject to the same discussion points, she should be as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missthingeastcoast (talk • contribs) 00:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you mentioned is, unfortunately, the reality of Wilson's Legacy. Regardless of personal facts, whatever she accomplished was always overshadowed by her two books about the Original Supremes and the Post Diana-Supremes.

It is these fans who come out of the woodwork to atone for what Wilson never did to establish herself as a truly, creditable soloist, actress or personality. What she did was ride the dress of Ross and milk it for all it was worth. It was her two books, particularly, the first book, which dragged the Name Of The Supremes into muck and mud and insighted the ribald Supreme fans into the "Ballard," "Wilson" and "Ross" camps. In-the-end, Wilson is six feet under and Ross still stands on Stage. Remember, the second and third biggest Supremes' hits were "Someday, We'll Be Together" & "Love Child" are devoid of Ballard, Wilson and Birdsong. Hence, what does this purport" It was always Ross. Even "In And Out Of Love" had The Andantes layered over the background vocals of Ballard and Wilson. Did anyone even notice? Spenser - The Unknown (talk) 18:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cause of death?

This edit request by an editor with a partial block was declined. There is no consensus on WP:TMZ. The cause of death should cite a reliable source.

Is this a reliable source?

https://www.tmz.com/2021/02/09/mary-wilson-supremes-dead-dies/

She died from hypertensive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, according to the Clark County Coroner. In other words, she died from high blood pressure brought on by artery blockages. MikaelaArsenault (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

MaryWilsonWalkOfFame1994.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]