Jump to content

Talk:NBN–ZTE deal corruption scandal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is written like a news article. WikiPedia is an encyclopedia, and must have global impact. Verily, upon a cursory perusal of this article, especially its latest additions, I am sure, that this can be a forum thread instead and be deleted or merged with my article. --Florentino floro (talk) 09:43, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And the death of Heath Ledger doesn't have impact on me. But the article and/or event certainly has global impact as it would affect the country's economic image/status to our foreign investors †Bloodpack† 10:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm really dumbfounded on how you can find the Timeline: 2008 Calls for Resignation of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo‎ a better article than this one. --Howard the Duck 14:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Read the writing on the wall and wake up, do not wallow in the mud, its dangerous to get an avian flu: "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can." This article is just a petty, minor and impertinent article that must be merged into my created article which you desire to vandalize by deleting. You have the numbers due to "Cuyog" crab mentality, but the readers will laugh at this article since the tag said so. Do you think we lawyers and justices would cite this article in our pleadings? It's suicidal. Read Wiki's 5 Pillars. You edit and tried to improve and article that is proper for WikiNews. The content of this article in passing and not encyclopedic. Oh common. Re-direct this to my created article. Period. --Florentino floro (talk) 08:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for additional articles

[edit]

We meet again Howard the Duck after you advocated some AfDs. I noticed that you written a lot here. I suggest additional articles/information like its twin controversy: North Rail and South Rail (Jun Lozada mentioned it a lot of times). Plus Seperate articles of Jun Lozada and Joey De Venecia. Re-write the history properly :) Kamuixtv (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 11:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline from The Philippine Star

[edit]

See this for a possible outline. --seav (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


.............. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.208.46 (talk) 00:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also this timeline, to support the other facts: *newsbreak.com.ph, TIMELINE: Exposing the ZTE Overprice, 07 February 2008--Florentino floro (talk) 08:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

S.C. Final Decision

[edit]

I added this - The Supreme Court on May 26, 2008, in a 9-6 decision penned by Teresita Leonardo-de Castro ruled that “The subject Order dated January 30, 2008, citing petitioner Romulo L. Neri in contempt of the Senate Committees and directing his arrest and detention, is hereby nullified.” The court specifically found that “the conversations (in the Philippine National Broadband Network controversy) between President Arroyo and former Socioeconomic Planning Secretary Romulo Neri are classified informations; it tilted the balance of power in favor of Congress, favoring secrecy over public disclosure in the Neri petition.”supremecourt.gov.ph, ROMULO L. NERI vs. SENATE COMMITTEE, G.R. No. 180643, March 25, 2008supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence, Summary of Voting--Florentino floro (talk) 08:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 September 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Philippine National Broadband Network controversy → NBN–ZTE deal corruption scandal – WP:Commonname and WP:Concise. This is the name used most commonly in Philippine local media. This is the one most commonly recognized by ordinary people.(The Standard), (CNN), (Rappler) Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 20:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on NBN–ZTE deal corruption scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NBN–ZTE_deal_corruption_scandal&oldid=1203490697"