Talk:List of neighborhoods in San Francisco

Grrnal Heights

What is this and why is it here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ch2cch3 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Ch2cch3 (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I think it's supposed to be BERNAL Heights, but someone has decided to crap it up. Ch2cch3 (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Chamber of Commerce list

The San Francisco chamber of commerce lists the following neighborhoods: Alamo Square, Anza Vista, Ashbury Heights, Bernal Heights, Bayview/Hunters Point, Buena Vista Hill, Castro, Cow Hollow, Crocker Amazon, Downtown/Financial District, Duboce Triangle, Eureka Valley, Excelsior, Forest Hill, Glen Park, Golden Gate Heights, Haight Ashbury, Hayes Valley, Ingleside, Jordan Park's, Lake, Lakeshore, Laurel Heights, Marina, Mission, Mission Bay (also known as Mission Rock, Mission Creek and China Basin), Mt. Davidson Manor, Nob Hill, Noe Valley, North Beach, Pacific Heights, Parkside, Portola Heights, Potrero Hill, Presidio Heights, Richmond, Russian Hill, Sea Cliff, Sherwood Forest, South Beach, South of Market (Soma), St. Francis Wood, Sunset, Telegraph Hill, Twin Peaks, Western Addition, West Portal and Yerba Buena.

Many of these are not listed.

A much more comprehensive list can be derived from the districts that the Real Estate agents use.

Except that real estate agencies just make stuff up at random, to suit their own interests, and they also borrow names from zoning bodies, which are not in actual use (e.g., property I own in Albuquerque is zoned as being in an apparently undefined area that the county calls "The Estates at Tanoan North" but this phrase doesn't mean anything anyone; even "Tanoan North" is gibberish; the actual neighborhood is "Tanoan", and nearby is "Tanoan East", but there is no "Tanoan North"). — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 05:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Missing summaries

Many of the sections are just links to main articles. Summaries should be provided for them. -Pwnage8 20:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Maps?

This list of neighbourhoods in san francisco is only good if you know them. How about a map showing where each one is in relation to each other? 195.157.84.178 14:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I had been looking for a suburban map which is free to use but couldnt find one. this doesnt have enough detail. Would any of the maps at the library of congress be of any use? --Astrokey44 11:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Maps

Still definitely needs it, if only a blocky sketch map. SUrely a resident could draw one? Midgley (talk) 05:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, this article is nearly useless without maps. The maps produced by the city government are public domain (automatically, because they were created by the govt.; the US doesn't have the equivalent of UK's Crown copyright nonsense). — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 04:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

I think public domain copyright applies to maps produced by the US Federal Government, but that does not automatically apply to other Goverments within the United States (state, county, or municipal - they are allowed to assert copyright and limited licensing). I do note that a NASA supplied satellite photo has been outfitted with district boundary lines and is in use on the German language and Dutch versions of this article. The image is File:Districts San Fransisco.png and could be used in this English article. 2001:558:6045:A0:1947:F371:FD3B:B1F8 (talk) 15:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Those appear to be electoral districts for the Board of Supervisors; they have little if any relevance to this article. —Tamfang (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Merge articles on smaller neighborhoods into articles for bigger ones?

There are nearly 70 articles in the neighborhoods in San Francisco template and on the list, many of which are stubs and/or are for very small areas (And I'm guilty of being the one to create many of them). Some of them are about areas that aren't associated with neighborhoods, like Golden Gate Park, Ocean Beach and Yerba Buena Island. I already merged the Inner Sunset article with the main Sunset article, and some others could be combined, like Cow Hollow and Marina, Laguna Honda and Forest Hill, South Beach and Mission Bay and Theater District and Union Square.

I don't know what to do with the south-western part of the city, though. There are (short) articles on the Ingleside and Park Merced and Merced Manor is on the list and template, but there is no Oceanview or Lakeside article. All of those areas are pretty small anyway, and there isn't much to put in an article about them individually. I don't know if there should be one or two big articles on all of them combined or what.

I would make those changes myself, but there are enough of them that I wont do it without there being some discussion on it. Octoferret 10:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea. We have many articles which are compendiums of that type, such as Santa Monica neighborhoods and High Schools of San Diego. As material develops about individual areas they can split off into new articles. Meanwhile, the clutter of one-sentence articles is reduced. I say "Go for it!" Will Beback 10:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I created a test page like those two and have it at User:Octoferret/Neighborhoods in San Francisco for now. The organization and neighborhoods listed on it need some work, but if they are, the Neighborhoods in San Francisco could be like that. Octoferret 14:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I finished the page I was working on and copied it here. It would have been too big if I included descriptions for neighborhoods that have articles, so I just have the link there. User:Octoferret/Neighborhoods in San Francisco still has some of those with the descriptions. The way the neighborhoods are organized probably could be improved, but there isn't an easy way to divide them up into north/south/east/west or anything. Also, I might merge some of the really short neighborhood articles, like the Ingleside and Sunnyside, into this article and they could stay here until someone exapnds the information on them Octoferret 14:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not kill the neighborhood stubs. There was no reason to nuke the cole valley article and incorporate it into the topic. I would encourage you to add content and not delete content with whatever notion you have of cleaning this up. You should only remove content you know to be inaccurate. Assume otherwise it is there for a good reason. Thanks! It would be nice if you could restore the other neighborhood pages you destroyed.Paul E. Ester 14:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Good job. -Will Beback 19:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

A number of the small "neighborhoods" in the Southwest basically don't really exist. There is often little to no acknowledgement by the residents that they live in such a specified neighborhood. For example Merced Heights... not really, it's more just a chunk of Oceanview. Part of the reason why the Oceanview Muni line runs through it and the Oceanview library branch is located there. My segment (South of Brotherhood Way) has actually been subdivided into not existing within any neighborhood. 69.181.55.239 (talk) 03:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I see no harm in listing small neighborhoods, even if they are just redirects to the superneighborhood that contains them. It might be worthwhile to add an asterisk designating neighborhoods that are particularly large, important, or otherwise "canonical." I'm going to give it a try; if it turns out to be hugely divisive I have no problem reverting it. Inhumandecency (talk) 01:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

SFgov.org's list

There is a list of neighborhoods on SFGOV.org, along with maps. I didn't see any defined boundaries, at least from what I saw. Please note that SFGOV, a.k.a. the "Official San Francisco City and County Web Site", is copyrighted, even though of course it's public information. I'd especially be concerned about the use of their GIS data. --Geopgeop 11:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

There are official boundaries through GIS mapping if you turn on the "neighborhoods" layer. GIS does disclaim the accuracy of their data but there's no problem in quoting the graphical boundaries in prose, and the maps can be used as the basis for a unique self-made drawing. – Zedla (talk) 06:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Where is downtown

I think there should be a listing for whatever is considered "downtown" with mention of it in the intro. -- SEWilco (talk) 22:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The city alternately considers Downtown to be synonymous only with the Tenderloin (property records, see [1]) or to center around Union Square (separate from the Tenderloin, [2]) – Zedla (talk) 07:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Upper Market

The current definition of upper market in this article is not correct. What's the source? See here http://www.sfgov.org/site/planning_index.asp?id=66778 for "Upper Market" defined as Market St. between Octavia St. and Castro St. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.195.209.115 (talk) 00:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Repetition ad nauseam

Am I the first person to notice that there are in excess of 110 uses of the word "neighborhood" in this article? Can't we do something about this? --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 05:08, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

WoTP

I hadn't heard of "Midtown Terrace" before. Is it a synonym of "West of Twin Peaks" (which is mentioned but not listed)? —Tamfang (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Frederick Knob (deleted)

I've lived in this area (at Frederick and Delmar) for 18 years, and this is the first I've ever heard of this neighborhood. My suspicion is that this is an invention for real estate listings on these two blocks on Frederick street. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marschv (talk • contribs) 03:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Why I removed this neighborhood:

• There's no citation indicating its recognition by anyone. It should not be re-added until someone can provide a citation
• Ashbury Heights is a well recognized neighborhood covering the same territory

Jmattthew (talk) 01:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

NOPA

Am I missing this somewhere? North of the Panhandle is definitely a San Francisco neighborhood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.93.162.250 (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

NOPA, although it is the city's popular neighborhood, it's not officially recognized in the city's data. I totally agree with you, NOPA locals do proudly represent their neighborhood. Wfrmsf (talk) 08:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Actually NOPA is not a neighborhood. The name originates from the neighborhood group NOPNA, which was picked up by realtors. And then there was restaurant of the same name. It's always been part of the Western Addition, and realtors and land speculators prefer to avoid that legitimate name, because it has often been associated with low income projects, so-called "blight", and the destruction of vibrant African-American Fillmore through urban renewal, not to mention outright racism. [3][4]

I wrote this in 2017 ago, and I have no doubt it is as true today as it was when I wrote it:

Realtors in San Francisco were continually renaming neighborhoods to make them sound classy and elitist. South of Market became SOMA. Polk Gulch was to be renamed “Polk Village.” (article-link now dead) My neighborhood was "renamed" from the Western Addition to North of the Panhandle to NOPA.[5] Realtors even tried to rename it again to "Park North," suggesting New York City exclusivity--much to the consternation of NOPNA members. ([6]). Now I see they are trying to call it "North Park".[7] All the names changes were to increase property values. (Here are two articles on the subject: SF neighborhoods change names to map out new identity, Colonizing the Urban Frontier)

--David Tornheim (talk) 05:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Needs an index map!

The context: Coppa’s Restaurant, circa 1935. Click on Flickr link for the backstory)

Badly!

I'm wondering what the 'hood at Spring St & California is called . Help? --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Resource, SFGate

Just dropping this reliable source resource here for use

http://www.sfgate.com/neighborhoods/

1fish2 (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Heh, "Deco Ghetto". Thanks for this. Doesn't seem to have an index map, either. Too bad I've never learned how to make wiki-maps.... ;-[ --Pete Tillman (talk) 18:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

North Point is not listed ...

I lived in San Francisco from 1969 to 2001. During my early years in San Francisco, I was a taxi-cab driver and a taxi-cab radio dispatcher for the old Yellow Cab Company at 8th & Townsend. As we sat at the radio and telephone exchange, there were large maps on the desks of all the districts and neighbourhoods of San Francisco. We quickly memorised all the districts of the city. North Point was one of these locales. (I am not referring to North Beach ... but to the area in the far north-east end of the peninsula). I do not see it in your Wikipedia article. Amsterdave (talk) 09:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Lakeview, Where are You?

I searched to find the description of my old neighborhood, Lakeview. It took some searching to find that it is now called "Merced Heights" so I have added that quib to the Merced Heights description. I find it pretty interesting that it's name changed but the other bordering neighborhoods' names did not change. What is really interesting is how Oceanview, which is east of Lakeview, has no view to the ocean and growing up I recall on really clear days... which were far and few between in that area... we could see both Lake Merced and the Pacific Ocean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariacantrell (talk • contribs) 23:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Neighborhood Boundaries

Each section should describe the neighborhood's boundaries even if it merely links to an article. Also, see :

Adjacent neighborhoods

Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk)

What are you talking about?

There are three terms used in this page without real definition: neighborhood, sub-neighborhood and district.

Which is the official one used by San Francisco? Where do the other two come from?

Is there a hierarchy? (If so, then it should be sorted according to that with "sub-neighborhoods" put and marked as such in the description of the "parent" neighborhood, instead of blowing up the list unnecessary...)

Also the header mentions 40 "commonly used" neighborhoods, then in the next sentence switches to 36... which seems to be a problem, one of these numbers has to be wrong, but which one? And if that is really the consensus of what should be major neighborhoods, then why is the list over 100 names long? If it isn't a consensus, then why is the sentence included in the header-section?

And there still is no map... wasn't there a workshop for making things like that on wikipedia? Someone knowing where what should be shoul really draw something on an existing map and ask for getting it redrawn by one of the masterminds in the workshop... --5.146.47.75 (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

The official one used by the city is an unpopular way to map out the neighborhoods. SF locals and even articles here about the areas in SF have long drifted away from it. Just simply put it like this. First you got District, which means the 11 Supervisorial Districts that takes care of a group of neighborhoods which each has their own elected board, supervisor, and such. Then the neighborhoods themselves. "Sub-neighborhood" is basically a segment within a neighborhood that is commonly used in larger neighborhoods. Some neighborhoods may have District in their names but this term is unrelated to the one in supervisorial district. Wfrmsf (talk) 08:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of neighborhoods in San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216090314/http://marilyndriscoll.com/cayuga_terrace.htm to http://www.marilyndriscoll.com/cayuga_terrace.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Balboa Park is not a neighborhood

See Talk:Balboa_Park,_San_Francisco

Bartash (talk) 19:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Cayuga Terrace/Outer Mission

It would seem to me that someone (real estate brokers?) is trying to rename the "Outer Mission" neighborhood to "Cayuga Terrace". Perhaps in hopes that we'll get a "Cayuga Park" in-fill station on BART. Maybe it's some flunky on Ahsha Safai's staff. Who knows. Regardless, it seems we should merge these two sections, shouldn't we? -- RobLa (talk) 04:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Distinguishing the word "District" from neighborhoods with "District" in their names

The word "District" have different meanings in the city of San Francisco. First there are the 11 Supervisorial Districts each having their own board, supervisor, and such that contain a group of neighborhoods. However, there are a handful of neighborhoods, specially larger ones like the Castro, Marina, Richmond, Sunset, Mission, and Bay View that has the word District in their names. Those two different meaning of "District" are not related to each other and there's clarification need to be added onto the main page. Wfrmsf (talk) 08:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

"Nopa" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Nopa has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Nopa until a consensus is reached. --David Tornheim (talk) 20:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC)