Jump to content

Talk:Affordable Care Act

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:PPACA)
Former good articleAffordable Care Act was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 20, 2013Good article nomineeListed
February 5, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
April 9, 2018Good article reassessmentDelisted
In the news News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 22, 2010, and June 28, 2012.
Current status: Delisted good article


California v. Texas

[edit]

"This raised questions about whether the ACA was still constitutional.[16][17][18] In June 2021, the Supreme Court upheld the ACA for the third time in California v. Texas.[19]" is the final piece of the top page of the article. I find this to be somewhat misleading, as the ruling of California v. Texas was a result of the opinion that Texas lacked standing, as their claim to injury was denied by the majority and the Court decided they could not rule on the question at hand. The way these sentences coincide —— without proper context —— implies that the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the ACA, which was not true of the majority opinion. The district and circuit court rulings were also contradictory, the first ruled that the mandate was unconstitutional and therefore so was the rest of the act, while the latter opined that the mandate may be severable, remanding it back to the district. However, SCOTUS granted certiorari prior to the district reopening the case.[1][2][3]

Basically, this case never played out to the point of any effective rulings on the constitutionality of the act as a whole, only affirming this in the portion of the individual mandate. As such, this should be reworded, provided with substantial context, or removed altogether.

JackSitilides (talk) 00:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

non-disabled adults

[edit]

Hi. This term is not in common vernacular in US. I don't think its the best language to use in ACA article and I would not foresee it coming into common use.Scranton (talk) 13:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SNL terminology

[edit]

It's a minor thing, but in the In Popular Culture section, SNL segments are properly called "sketches" rather than "skits." Wikipedia's own entry on Sketch comedy delineates the distinction. 97.99.47.11 (talk) 21:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Capstone Course in American Politics

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2022 and 13 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tinasaad (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jmjohnson43 (talk) 20:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dependents

[edit]

If the parents use Medicare as their health insurance, it does not provide coverage for dependents. Dependents must be individually eligible in order to have Medicare coverage. This provision, therefore, does not apply to Medicare. https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/Files/adult_child_faq 144.92.135.75 (talk) 18:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"landmark"?

[edit]

Calling this a "landmark" statute obviously reflects bias. That word should be removed. WikiAlto (talk) 22:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would at least agree that it reflects bad writing in the context of an encyclopedia. Avoid figurative language, euphemisms, and the sort. GMGtalk 00:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have to disagree with you here. The term "landmark" is used consistently in reference to Court rulings or acts of Congress that present a significant change to the status quo, even in scholarly writing. There is not necessarily any positive or negative connotation to the word as used in this instance. As said at the top of the article, the ACA "represents the U.S. healthcare system's most significant regulatory overhaul and expansion of coverage since the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965." This in and of itself is grounds for the use of the adjective.


Footnotes

[edit]